|
Post Number: 1
|
|
Post Number: 2
|
damien_s_lucifer
Emperor of Detnet
Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: Jan. 1970
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 03 2001,06:55 |
|
|
steal it.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 3
|
@$$h0l3
FNG
Group: Members
Posts: 40
Joined: Dec. 2000
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 03 2001,07:01 |
|
|
Ahh, your post reminds me of the simpsons episode where Homer steals cable. "Nothing a month? Yeah, I think I can afford that." Personally, I tend to stick with my OS until it is in desperate need of changing. I just went to W2K about 3 months ago from NT4.0. I like my (Microsoft) OS to go through at least 2 service packs before I consider running it for my main system. The other reason I suggest putting off the upgrade is the, "will all my shit still work" factor. I know a few people with older systems that have had older devices not work in W2K and XP. If you're handy with the installs, it might be worth a shot. If you're going to do a fresh install, which is probably your best bet (I don't even know if there's an "upgrade" path from 98 to XP), remember that you have to go through the fun process of reinstalling all your applications, setting up various accounts, etc. Once again, that's why I wait until it has to be done. Call me lazy. I'd do something about it, but, it's easier not to.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 4
|
|
Post Number: 5
|
|
Post Number: 6
|
|
Post Number: 7
|
|
Post Number: 8
|
askheaves
Ack!!!
Group: Members
Posts: 1955
Joined: Sep. 2000
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 04 2001,13:20 |
|
|
Now that they've released the Rational Suites for 2002 and they work on XP, everything I use is XP except the servers. They way I look at it, a new MS OS is like a big service pack. I like it so far. It's pretty stable with just some weird quirks. I love being able to theme it. It boots quickly, and the multiple concurrent users is pretty sweet. The new media player is nice, even better than the hacked verson of 7->8. I don't know, just generally very nice.Also, I'm going to be putting XP on an old person's computer. It just seems more intuitive for them. Plus, it'll integrate very well with MSN, which is his ISP. He was running WinME before and it was crap. Blah Blah, I like WinXP. And there's already hotfixes going out all the time, so it's constantly being patched.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 9
|
pengu1nn
I am almost one of Us.
Group: Members
Posts: 499
Joined: Sep. 2000
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 04 2001,18:05 |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Greasemonk: Im not going to get it for a while. There is no real need to upgrade to it. I dont like the activation and Windows 2000 is working just fine. XP is just Windows 2000 with a different look and a little more stability.
no, its win2k for the dumb/blind/retarded. i've crashed xp more than 2k (3 weeks with xp, 7+ months win2k) i have also hard locked with xp, something i haven't been able to do in 2k. i do however think xp is better than 95/98/me, if you don't want to do the reg with microsoft thing, go buy ya a copy then dl a pirated one with that shit takin out. that way your still supportin bill gates, but not giving into the bullshit (hi, mircosoft, i need to get reregistared i just chnaged my hdd and my vid card, blah blah blah balh, crap)
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 10
|
|
|
|