|
Post Number: 1
|
|
Post Number: 2
|
CatKnight
Jedi Republican
Group: Members
Posts: 3807
Joined: Dec. 2000
|
|
Posted on: Sep. 24 2001,15:30 |
|
|
rofl that was my first reaction too. give it about a week, and you'll be crawling back to 2000 just like i was. once you install a few programs it lags and crashes all the fucking time.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 3
|
The_Stomper
300,000 dead kittens and counting!
Group: Members
Posts: 542
Joined: Sep. 2000
|
|
Posted on: Sep. 24 2001,18:07 |
|
|
CK - what version of XP were you running? I'm dualbooting 2K/XP right now myself - I plan to add Linux to the mix soon.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 4
|
kornalldaway
1337 like alan turing
Group: Members
Posts: 297
Joined: Jan. 2001
|
|
Posted on: Sep. 24 2001,20:51 |
|
|
i will never ever go back to 2k. it seems so shallow and empty and slow and unstable comared to XP. everybody has different experiences with xp, but mine have been truly great. it never crashed on me, it only froze twice or so for a short period of time in like that last 5 months of me using it definately beats 2k that in less then 2 months crashed on me so many times i lost count
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 5
|
|
Post Number: 6
|
CatKnight
Jedi Republican
Group: Members
Posts: 3807
Joined: Dec. 2000
|
|
Posted on: Sep. 24 2001,23:27 |
|
|
i was running corporate build 2600. as i said, it may seem fast and stable at first, as it did with me, but after you install a lot of programs it will get all fucked up and you will be like "WHY THE FUCK DID I INSTALL THIS CRAP!!"
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 7
|
|
Post Number: 8
|
|
Post Number: 9
|
|
Post Number: 10
|
|
|
|