....this hadn't occured to me... think about this? Can you think of any better spring point for Osama Bin Laden's plans of the West Vs. United Islam? That is besides the obvious problem we SHOULD have with starving 7.5 million people...

------------------
~Anztac [ Pertinaciously disconsolate ]

This message has been edited by DeadAnztac on November 07, 2001 at 09:02 PM

This message has been edited by Vigilante on November 07, 2001 at 09:08 PM

In the end, we're doing a hell of a lot more good.

OUR SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAQ ARE NOT KILLING ANYONE. IT IS SUDDAM HOUSSAIN, WHO GASSES THE KURDS AND STARVES HIS PEOPLE FOR MILITARY PURPOSES.

jeez dude, get in touch with reality.

as for the article:

WE ARE CURRENTLY AT WAR WITH AFGHANISTAN. WE DIDN'T SEND FOOD TO THE FUCKING NAZI'S, DID WE?

you should all just dismiss this article entirely.

This message has been edited by CatKnight on November 07, 2001 at 09:58 PM

There's a big difference between a German war machine and a broken country in the midst of socio-political turmoil.

Pull you fucking head out of your ass.

Seriously, it's not like we've been looking for new targets to test out our technology. The opportunity sort of arose as a bunch of fucknuggets hurt us, then a bunch of other fucknuggets decided to help that first bunch hide. It's not like Raytheon designs hospital seeking bombs here. We're doing more humanitarian aid than ever has been done for this desert before. We're not taking the policy, though much desired around the land, of making the whole place into a sheet of glass.

Although, I find the 15,000 lb bombs somewhat entertaining.

The starving people in Afghanistan are starving because the Taliban decided that Osama was more important to them than their people.

Just because we're(the U.S.) bombing the Taliban doesn't make it our fault that the Taliban is a bunch of fucknuggets.

quote:

---

Originally posted by CatKnight:
*sigh*

OUR SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAQ ARE NOT KILLING ANYONE. IT IS SUDDAM HOUSSAIN, WHO GASSES THE KURDS AND STARVES HIS PEOPLE FOR MILITARY PURPOSES.

jeez dude, get in touch with reality.

---

Um...This I realize. If you had the attention span to read more than the first sentence of my post, you might even have figured that out for yourself.

Btw for future reference that's "Saddam Hussein"

This message has been edited by sHuoReNviOLiN on November 07, 2001 at 11:58 PM

quote:

---

Originally posted by veistran:
saddam sells more than enough oil to feed his people, because he chooses to not do it does not make the reason people are starving in Iraq the sanctions. It means that Saddam is a stupid fuck that doesn't care about his people.

The starving people in Afghanistan are starving because the Taliban decided that Osama was more important to them than their people.

Just because we're(the U.S.) bombing the Taliban doesn't make it our fault that the Taliban is a bunch of fucknuggets.

---

I LOVE your reasoning here. Because the people in power are really bad people and we don't like them or the company they keep(which I think 99\% of the world will agree with), we should punish the 90\% of the country who are NOT members of the government, who didn't elect them, who have no power to fight them (they are starving after all, and malnurished, unarmed desert people don't exactly make a good fighting force) buy not allowing the internasional groups to bring in food to them. Ya, this will really make them love us when the war is all over.

Why should they love us after the war is over? Will it be because we brought them a democratic government? Nope, because if we do what we have historically done (ie, what daddy Bush and Uncle Reagan did), we will replace the Taliban with whatever group(s) helped us out during the war. Guess who is helping us out? Groups that make the Taliban look like warm, fuzzy kindergarden teachers. I shit you not. So, we will probably leave them with a government that is even worst than they currently have, but it will be more friendly towards us, for a while anyway. Ya, that'll really be a good reason to love us (you dumbass).

There are plenty of good reasons a significant percentage of the world truely hates us. Guess what? A lot of the reasons are true. It's because of our shortsighted, ego-centric, bottome-line-is-the-only-important-thing views, and the fact that we "forget" about a lot of the dumb shit we do to other countries/cultures/ethnic groups and then wonder wtf they don't like us and act all inocent. Just proves my views that most politicians need to be shot. Bush needs to be shot twice. Same with Daddy Bush and Reagan. Use a buck shot on Clinton, let him go slowly. Mini gun for the rest.

Ok, I'm done being pissed out our forieng policies for tonight.

------------------
10 PRINT "HOME"
20 PRINT "SWEET"
30 GOTO 10