|
Post Number: 1
|
StanVanDam
FNG
Group: Members
Posts: 130
Joined: Jul. 2000
|
|
Posted on: Oct. 06 2001,15:00 |
|
|
It's on CNN right now!
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 2
|
chmod
Jedi Knight
Group: Members
Posts: 373
Joined: Jul. 2001
|
|
Posted on: Oct. 06 2001,15:05 |
|
|
eat it, taliban!
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 3
|
askheaves
Ack!!!
Group: Members
Posts: 1955
Joined: Sep. 2000
|
|
Posted on: Oct. 06 2001,15:28 |
|
|
Anybody else concerned about the ramifications of dropping humanitarian aid there right now? I mean, if I'm the broken down Taliban army, and my supplies are running low, and I know villages are getting food and supplies... I think that's a tasty target for a raid... you know, the ones that get civilians executed. Not a pleasant thought.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 4
|
|
Post Number: 5
|
C_Puppy
Like sum o' DEES NUTZ
Group: Members
Posts: 39
Joined: Sep. 2001
|
|
Posted on: Oct. 06 2001,16:15 |
|
|
Also we need local support in the area, so we need to feed the local groups that are non taliban, like Bush seinor should have done with the Kurds in Iraq, I mean if you promise a bunch of oppresed people aid you for their help you should definatly follow up on your end of the deal-- as long as it is done wisely
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 6
|
|
Post Number: 7
|
|
Post Number: 8
|
|
Post Number: 9
|
sHuoReNviOLiN
deactivated
Group: Members
Posts: 146
Joined: Sep. 2001
|
|
Posted on: Oct. 06 2001,18:59 |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by StanVanDam: I think the US is in trouble now that they started bombing. I hope no American lives are lost. I really think the US gov't could and should have done something else. Violence doesn't solve anything (in this situation) because they can do terrorist shit back to the US which will hurt Americans much more than the "terrorists".
With what? The WTC attack took a year in planning, and a huge amounts of resources, as well as depending on our rather lax security. Not that we're completely invulnerable now, but still... So violence isn't the answer...what is then? Got an alternative? quote:
Plus civilian casualties are definitely gonna happen in Afghanistan. All the US technology and laser sights and GPS won't stop missiles and bombs from hitting civilian homes and hospitals. Such as Iraq, a "stray" cruise missile nailed a hospital.
Amazing as it may seem, technology -has- actually improved since 10 years ago. See askheaves's post. quote:
I dunno if this technology exists back in 'Nam, which I really doubt it did, meaning these B-52s bombed the hospital on purpose. My dad watched it happen. That's such a cheapshot (besides a violation of the rules of war I think...aren't u not allowed to bomb civilians and hospitals and indiscriminately carpet bomb everything?)
::tries to figure out whether that -interesting- little passage was talking about Vietnam, or Iraq, or both:: So, basically, the tech for precision targeting did not exist back during Vietnam, which somehow leads to the conclusion that the US purposely bombed a hospital in Iraq for no reason? Huh?
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 10
|
|
|
|