Forum: Rants
Topic: Old Topics
started by: TheTaxMan

Posted by TheTaxMan on Aug. 08 2001,21:04
Damnit, stop bringing topics back from two months ago just becasue you're reading the back logs and decide you have something to add. People stopped posting to it becasue they're fucking done w/ it!

------------------

quote:
Originally posted by RenegadeSnark:
If you have a problem with the average IQ around here, don't do things to lower it.


Posted by Dark-Angel99 on Aug. 08 2001,21:23
If they are still there, why not add a comment? Who cares anyways? If someone has something to say let them say it, thats what this forum is all about right?

------------------
< http://www.geocities.com/Seady1117 > <--- ME


Posted by solid on Aug. 08 2001,21:25
Reviving old threads is sort of a detnet no-no.
Posted by Dark-Angel99 on Aug. 08 2001,21:27
Ok, sorry... I will be sure no to add my comments in old threads! Sorry for the other comments...
So how old is an old thread not to post in?
------------------
< http://www.geocities.com/Seady1117 > <--- ME

This message has been edited by Dark-Angel99 on August 09, 2001 at 04:29 PM


Posted by incubus on Aug. 08 2001,22:21
more importantly, how much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
Posted by TheTaxMan on Aug. 09 2001,00:03
How many boards would the Mongols hoard if the Mongol hordes got bored?

------------------

quote:
Originally posted by RenegadeSnark:
If you have a problem with the average IQ around here, don't do things to lower it.


Posted by Beldurin on Aug. 09 2001,03:16
quote:
Originally posted by TheTaxMan:
How many boards would the Mongols hoard if the Mongol hordes got bored?


Beautiful...also, see my apology < here >

edit - fixed the URL
------------------
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But in practice, there is.

This message has been edited by Beldurin on August 09, 2001 at 10:18 PM


Posted by Greasemonk on Aug. 09 2001,09:32
Hey now, only certain people are allowed to revive dead posts. If you have under 200 posts and revive a dead post be prepared to hear some whining.

------------------
All that I know there was no God for me
Force that shatters all, absence of mortality


Posted by Observer on Aug. 09 2001,11:08
It's not really a board-wide no-no. You just piss off a small faction of people who don't want to re-read their own arguments again. As Jim once said in the < very first > Classroom thread, "If the topic isn't closed, then it's still open for discussion."

------------------
When 1337 hax0rs start impaling each other with swords and typing code with a hook on one hand, then they can modify the term "pirate."


Posted by incubus on Aug. 09 2001,12:47
amen.
Posted by blanalex on Aug. 09 2001,21:09
Oh yeah, bringing back topics to life is a no-no, then you have to make a new topic about the same subject.

Then you will have the other half of detnet falling on you because "there's already been a thread about that, and you should post it there", and Observer will even have the kindness to post a link toward the old thread! thus waking dead threads, and you have this half of detnet crying that you shouldn't have woke a dead thread, etc,etc,etc

Well, with that we get cought in a paradox where we can't post at all, so I suggest that detnet UBB forums to be closed now!</sarcasm>

quote:

Lisa: Oh no! You killed zombie Flanders!

Homer: What? Flanders was a zombie?



------------------
#define QUESTION (2b)| |!(2b)


Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Aug. 09 2001,22:32
if you have something worthwhile post it otherwise leave it to die. dont post shit cos one guy who doesnt even post here anymore says you can. no offense jim but ya cant shoot someone for having an opinion...(disclaimer: if its a worthwhile one)well not in the uk anywayz

------------------

quote:
Violence isn't the problem... it's the solution.

< Where's your self re-cocking-spect >


Powered by Ikonboard 3.1.4 © 2006 Ikonboard