Forum: Rants Topic: Why do people still start smoking? started by: demonk Posted by demonk on Oct. 04 2000,16:30
I have been trying to figure out why people are still smoking or start smoking in the face of all the evidence of what it does to your body. Anyone here have a good idea because I can't find a good one.
Posted by jim on Oct. 04 2000,16:33
Good question.I smoke and I have no idea why? I remember starting for the buzz... Then you get addicted. What a jip! ------------------ Posted by Wolfguard on Oct. 04 2000,16:33
there is no good reason to start smoking...unless your on fire.Im a smoker, i know. ------------------ Posted by Greasemonk on Oct. 04 2000,18:08
I quit back before cigarettes went over i think it was 1.80 a pack. I started having chest pains and i always had a sore throut. I quit and i felt much more alert, then i started working out and running and now im glad i quit. Smoking is waaay to expensive these days. Another thing ive noticed, it seems in my area Newports are the official ghetto wannabe cigarette.
Posted by demonk on Oct. 04 2000,18:10
So, have you guys tried to quite smoking?
Posted by jim on Oct. 04 2000,18:15
I have 'quit' quite a few times. Once for 3 months while in Marine Corps Boot Camp. I always start back up though. I really do enjoy sitting down with either a cup of coffee, or an ice cold beer and smoking a good ole Marlboro... Also the post eating, post sex cig is a joy as well...But, I wish I never started. I think my addiction is more mental than physical. Since I have got through the nic fits, and cold sweats quite a few times, and then started smoking again at a party or while drinking one night. Then I remember how much I love to smoke and just start up again. ------------------ Posted by six03e on Oct. 04 2000,19:31
Unfortunately, i think the peer pressure and the "I'll do it because it's cool" crowds are still rampant.
Posted by six03e on Oct. 04 2000,19:31
Unfortunately, i think the peer pressure and the "I'll do it because it's cool" crowds are still rampant.
Posted by hyperponic on Oct. 04 2000,19:54
I 'started' smoking because every now and then because it just feels good to relax to one. And now, after 3 years, i'm up to the rate of 4 (give or take) per month. Dunno if that's a good thing or not - i still get cravings now and then and might be addicted if i wasn't paranoid as heck about it. Now, if it got up to buying a pack every couple of weeks i'd start getting really scared. ------------------ Posted by Sithiee on Oct. 04 2000,20:12
i never really understood why people smoked, i mean, i watched my friends take it up, and it looked like they were enjoying it, but i never had any inclination to do it. but one thing is for sure, DARE is a joke, i have never once had anyone come up to me and say "come on, smoke it, itll be cool" they offer, but thats more out of kindness...i mean geez, i offer people gum, but i dont want them to accept. DARE had me brainwashed into thinking anyone who smoked was going to force me to do it, and then kill me or somethin, im glad i realized that wasnt true...
Posted by hyperponic on Oct. 04 2000,20:32
...DARE to keep your kids on drugs...
This message has been edited by hyperponic on October 04, 2000 at 03:33 PM Posted by Rhydant on Oct. 04 2000,20:54
DARE: Drugs Are Really Expensive ------------------ Posted by Rol3x on Oct. 05 2000,01:46
personally, im not addicted, and i barely smoke at all. only at parties where im either high or drunk, which hasnt been much at all lately. but if i dont go ape shit and kill my parents before december, and they do go off to florida like i want them to, ill have madd parties here, and probably be finding bottles, bottle caps, cigs and other things all over my room for weeks after the party. just the other day i found a bottle cap from a beer from a party fromt he end of last school year. maybe its because my room is big.fuck i hate my parents. and no i do not need to hear about how people who have differant parents think i take advantage of my parents, if your not in my family, dont fucking tell me how to live with my family. in my eyes, you dont know shit about them. sorry, im in a real bad mood right now. Posted by j0eSmith on Oct. 05 2000,01:54
The only thing I'll consider smoking are mini-cigars. You know, those little plastic tipped cigars. I HATE cigarrettes. They're smoke smells absolutly rank and gives me a headache. ------------------ Posted by Observer on Oct. 05 2000,02:07
My only real problem with smokers is the damn trash that is left over. People come over to our house on a regular basis and just ash in anything that is convenient, usually regular cups/glasses. Walk outside any building on campus and see the ground just littered with cigarette butts. I wish people would fucking throw their shit out!------------------ Posted by Wolfguard on Oct. 05 2000,10:59
quote: Its not safe for those around me for me to quit. If i give up smokes i have to give up coffee and drinking. Nothing worse than seeing a person that is hung-over, smoking and drinking coffee and thinking... "If i kill him and drink his blood it would take the edge off of this nic fit" not good ------------------ Posted by pengu1nn on Oct. 05 2000,13:07
i smoke, but i don't suggest trying it. i quit for 4 months, then decided i liked to have my morning cig, the after sex cig (haven't had one of those in awhile), the food cig, etc... but if you don't smoke then don't start. those commericals for truth.com are stupid and are ment to misinform you. they say that no tobacco company has ever recalled cigs, which is untrue, marlboro had a recall in the last coupla years, not to mention that truth.com blames cig ads for teen smoking. BULLSHIT, camel joe didn't tell me to smoke, the marlboro man didn't put the cig in my mouth. ahh well, it's time for a cig break Posted by Sithiee on Oct. 05 2000,18:03
the ones where they point out how many people die each day from smoking are good though. i think thats effective. if you knew microsoft products kille 1500 people each day, thatd be a very good reason to go linux...granted, not a great analogy, but it works...
Posted by demonk on Oct. 05 2000,18:32
You didn't know the MS products kill 1500 people every day? What rock have you been living under?
Posted by Wolfguard on Oct. 06 2000,14:14
yea, they die in computer crashes!------------------ Posted by Alarion on Oct. 06 2000,15:17
quote: Yup, I think that's everywhere. I smoked them for 6 years.. Needless to say, I can no longer sing due to excessive throat damage. Newports are about the absolute worst cigs one can smoke, and yet they are the most popular... *shrugs* ------------------ Posted by Althornin on Oct. 07 2000,05:15
Gotta say, i started for...i dunno.i have had periods of months without them, <summer> but whenever school starts i start smoking more and more. They are a great stress relief. and those adds. puh-lease. I started smoking cause i saw people still smoking despite all the bad shit it would do to you. so i tried on and hated it. then i tried on later and liked it a lot. Its the little cigs that count..just like everyone else, the after dinner cig, and the morning drive to wokr cig to wake up are awesome. But dont start, cause it has made me lazier and less active. I used to be a good trumpet player but now that i smoke..hahah i would suck if i tried. Never tried to quit, never had a good reason to. People are like: Well, so does living. seriously, alcohol is bad to, but lately the press has focused on "big tabacco"- why dont you ask why people still drink?
the end. ------------------ Posted by askheaves on Oct. 20 2000,19:17
To revive a dying thread, and corrupt the youth for another day:I started smoking my Sophomore year of college. I started on Cigars, loved them, then started smoking just a few cigs at parties. Then, girl troubles, suddenly I buy my first pack and smoke most of it that night. I smoked for about a year and a half, then I quit because of a girl. I didn't quit so much as I didn't smoke, except maybe a couple every couple of months (or, blow through a pack in a night with a friend, or one after a test or at 3AM when doing lab work, etc). I don't recommend starting to anyone. It is a tough thing to control, and without experience, it can spiral into an expensive habit. I started when smokes were about 1.80 a pack, and they're up to about 4 bucks. That is the most fascist bullshit ever. Double in price in less than 2 years? Come the fuck on! I think about 2.50 of that is taxes now. That's my real rant. Posted by Vigilante on Oct. 20 2000,20:10
Well, if it's too expensive, you could just quit.
Posted by askheaves on Oct. 20 2000,21:18
quote: Eh, it's not a significant part of the budget. Hell, I'm blowing 躔 for a PS2 and accessories. Ŭ a week isn't a huge deal... just pisses me off that this is allowed. Reason that Newports are ghetto cigs: They cost about ũ.50 a pack, and you can usually get a buy 2 get 1 free sale. Not worth it, man... nasty mofos. Posted by CatKnight on Oct. 27 2000,22:23
packs are under ū here. maybe cuz its a college campus hehe. anyway i started because of the crappy cliques here. its either sorostitutes, 13th graders, or smokers.
Posted by demonk on Oct. 28 2000,03:22
I don't really care about what people do to themselves, I mean, its your body, do what you will with it. But smoking doesn't just affect the smoker. I know, I know, there are those of you who already think that walking by or having to stand next to a smoker isn't going to kill me. But if you add up all the people I have to walk by, all the smokers who smoke in big groups and put out smoke like chimmnies, then there is a very reall threat. Second hand smoke is actually worse than what the smokers inhale. I could really care less if you want to slowly kill yourself, that's your choice. But when your choice effects me directly, and endangers my life, that is when I get mad.Sorry about he rant, just wanted to get that out of my system. Flame away! Posted by Althornin on Oct. 28 2000,23:40
you ever think that cars put out more harmfull pollutants than smokers? go be pissed at everyone who drives.You dont have to walk past me when i smoking, just like if you want to stand up and preach outside, i dont have to listen. Go upwind of me. But if you want to make a big deal about people spewing out pollutants, go after those people who drive. they are responsible for far more than what my meager habit does to your body. ------------------ Posted by Sithiee on Oct. 29 2000,01:51
car exhaust stays mainly in the streets, people who smoke and walk on the sidewalks leave it in the air on the sidewalk. thereforce smokers do about as much as cars. do you think cars smoke inside buildings? do you notice how cigarette smoke kinda floats at head level? cigarette smoke starts, and hangs around where peoples faces are, exhaust doesnt. thats why secondhand smoke is so dangerous. and trust me, it isnt as easy to avoid as you may think, because i do try to avoid it.
Posted by askheaves on Oct. 29 2000,01:20
You are very wrong. Fundamentally, all smoke (or other pollutants) will dissipate at the same rate. If it leaves from car exhaust quicker, it's because of the increase in air velocity around it creating turbluance. However, this fact is more than compensated by the sheer number of cars on the road. Besides, the majority of harmful things from car exhaust are not things you can see or smell (CO, CO2, dozens of Hydrocarbon species, NO, NO2, N2O, aromatics) plus particulate matter, unburnt fuel, and burnt oil stuck to the particulates.There is a smog that lingers around most major cities due to car exhaust, not the morning cigarette. There's a reason I have a job working on car exhaust, not trying to figure out who's smoking too much. As for indoor smoking, I agree that it's pretty unnecessary in most cases. The only place i'll smoke indoors is a bar, which usually has excellant ventillation, since it's a building code. I never understood why fast food restuarants allowed smoking when theer would be a high kid population, but thankfully that has changed. Kids shouldn't be forced to take that stuff in since most of the time they have no choice in the matter, and it is infinitely more harmful. For an adult, screw you... figure your own way out of the path of the smoke. ------------------ Posted by Happyfish on Oct. 30 2000,03:38
quote: Based on what?
Posted by Sithiee on Oct. 30 2000,08:31
no, but common sense should tell you that the smoker is more likely to breath in smoke through their filter than without...
Posted by fatbitch on Oct. 30 2000,08:52
but second hand smoke is also filtered... cause its already been through the filter in the first place------------------ Metal/Electronic/Ambient etc.. Posted by Althornin on Oct. 30 2000,11:51
that filter does exactly jack shit.Secondhand smoke is worse because after you breathe out the smoke <thats what secondhand smoke is, smoke you've smoked and then exhaled > it has all the bad shit from your lungs in it also. cigarette smoke doesnt "linger about at head level". what a crock. And if you think car pollution remains only on roads, you're a moron. look into a thing called "smog". Its really bad for you. Do you think, in mexico city, those "smog days" they have where you're not supposed to go outside are cause by smokers? nope. And guess what? Most smokers dont hold with smoking in buildings either. It makes everything smell like cigarette smoke, which is nasty smelling. I only smoke outside. Dont go to places where they let people smoke inside. Just like some smokers i know dont go places that wont let them smoke inside. ------------------ Posted by kuru on Oct. 30 2000,15:38
around here, they actually decreased the amount of particulate in the air that was necessary for it to be a 'smog day' because not enough smog days were being declared to justify paying some suit in an office to declare them.as for what cars put out versus what cigarettes do, there are several thousand chemicals in a cigarette. there are two in gasoline. 2-2-4 tri-methyl pentane and octane. they're hydrocarbons. when they burn, they put out carbon dioxide and water. at least, that's what they're supposed to put out. but they're not entirely efficient, so they also put out carbon monoxide. if carbon dioxide is pollution, then you might as well fuckin kill every last one of us. because every breath we exhale is pollution. there's also a difference between the chemicals put out by cars and those of cigarettes in that the ones from cigarettes often have cumulative effect. once the carbon particles that are in cigarette smoke, the tar stuff, gets into the lungs, it never comes out. carbon monoxide is dangerous if it's prolonged exposure to high levels of it, but going outside and getting enough oxygen can completely negate those effects. cars are not enough like cigarettes to make an accurate analogy. we never see anyone listing statistics for how many people die a year because of car exhaust. so, if you really want to make that comparison... the number of reported deaths due to second hand car exhaust last year was .. there weren't any. and that's with millions and millions of cars on the road. but you can find data for how many people died because second hand smoke causes cancer. ------------------ Posted by Althornin on Oct. 30 2000,16:40
i gaurantee you that cars put off more pollutants than just CO.Read up on yer facts- cars cause hella pollution. Note: CO is an ordorless gas. If cars only put off CO as pollution, then why the hell does their exhaust smell so bad? Oh wait. you might have noticed i wasnt comparing them as them being alike, which is what an analogy is. I said, simply, that cars pollute lots. Cars are one of the top ten causes of air pollution. cigarettes are not. and many many people die from air pollution each year, except that its usually listed as asthma because the govmnt doesnt want you to know how bad the air you breathe is for you. ever wonder why "asthma" is on the rise...its called air pollution, and it kills. and cars make it as bad as it is. ------------------ Posted by askheaves on Oct. 30 2000,18:32
I'll agree with whiskey and Althornin on their points. Whiskey@throttle: If you're sitting in a bar alone doing nothing, you look like a stalker and nobody will talk to you because you frighten them. If you're smoking and drinking beer, usually they won't be as frightened, and you might get people sitting near you or asking to bumb a smoke (an easy icebreaker with no committment to the concept of picking them up in case of rejection). I work in car exhaust. My job is writing software to facillitate the measurement of car exhaust. Car exhaust is a huge problem mostly because of the few cars that aren't in good repair. The worst part is that most of these people can get their car tweaked for about 50 bucks, pass an emissions test, then have it tweaked back to nasty soot mode. I can reiterate all of the things that I posted earlier, but I won't because it'll just be a repeat. The point is, volume wise, more crappy stuff comes out of cars that aren't in good repair. While the ideal chemical conversions would show a breakdown of certain hydrocarbons into CO and water, it is a very delicate mix that can end up creating extra CO if the car is running lean, and extra NOx gases if it's running rich. Besides that, unburnt fuel is shot through and other fun HCs are created, including a lot of aromatics, which have a nice tendancy to stick in your body as well. These are just the most common things coming out of car exhaust. The number of individual chemicals numbers in the hundreds. Ever seen one semi accelerate one time out of a stop light? The amount of particulates coming up more than equals what I could smoke in a week or two. ------------------ Posted by whiskey@throttle on Oct. 31 2000,05:19
Ya know, back in high school, I tried to like smoking. I just couldn't. The burnt ash taste, the dizziness, the hacking cough, the excess phlegm, the smelly clothes, and above all, the price, just didn't go over too well.Nevertheless, I'm still curious. For all of you walking chimneys: how long have you been smoking? When did you start? Think you'll quit? Sidenote: one good thing I've got to credit smoking with is that it gives you something to do in an otherwise abnormal situation. For example, you can be hanging out solo, tapping your thumbs like a dork, or you can actually be doing something that is tragically hip...it's also an icebreaker, I've noticed, quite like weed amongst stoners Posted by demonk on Oct. 31 2000,06:33
I love all the information that has been posted. This is how a discussion should go.Ok, here are my points. Yes, cars to put out more pollutents each year than all the smokers do. And yes, those pollutents are very bad and some do have cumulative effects just like pollutents coming from smokers. But there is one thing different. While cars are being given tighter and tighter restrictions on emission levels, and alternative and cleaner engins are constantly being researched and developed, there is no work towards making emissions from smokers less harmful to bistanders and the environment. I think this one point shows our attitudes towards smoking as a society. Another point: we aren't talking about cars here, we are talking about smoking. If we were talking about how there should be tougher laws against rapists, and someone said that murders are much worse and therefore we should focuse more on them and leave the rapists alone, there would be a big outcry against that. And no, I'm not comparing smokers to rapists. I just wanted to use an analogy to the current situation. We need to keep the subject of smokers and cars seperate. When it comes down to it, both create unneccessary pollution and negative effects on people and the enviroment and need to be curtailed. Posted by pengu1nn on Oct. 31 2000,16:30
quote: started to flame but then i read it again. there are laws that limit where and when you can smoke, not excatly better emissions but it does help keep smoke away from non-smokers. by far the best thing you can do when someone fires up a cig is leave, i know sometimes that isn't possible, but if it is then do it. if you can't leave try asking nicely if they would not smoke. tell them you have allergies (a little white lie never hurt anyone), or you have to use oxygen, or just tell them the truth (which i doubt someone is gonna put out their cig cause you don't like it (althought i prolly would if you asked nicely)) Posted by Althornin on Oct. 31 2000,19:06
I ahve been asked by people to stop smoking near them. If they ask nicely, i will move away from them or stop smoking. If htey are rude, i blow a stream of smoke in their direction and say, "why dont you move" <btw: i am really tall and huge, my friends call me "ogre" as a joke sometimes>. Basically, if yer nice, i'll stop, otherwise, blow me.damn i just realized, im to lazy to go back and correct the letter switches in my post. I think i'll go smoke instead. ------------------ Posted by kuru on Oct. 31 2000,22:19
so this one doesn't really relate to smoking, but here's some background info on cars... because i noticed that someone posted that the main outputs of burning a hydrocarbon are C0 and H20, which doesn't conincide with the chemistry that i learned.the burning of hydrocarbons, (fossil fuels, gasoline, butane, methane, etc) is supposed to result in the production of 2 things. C02 and H20. this is because (i'll use ethane as my example because i remember the chemical formula for it - after being reminded that this one is actually ethane) the structure of methane looks like: (hopefully this comes out right with the line wraps and ubb formating) *** H * H try to ignore the *, they were a lame attempt to get the thing to space right. and oxygen is O = O so it's 2C2H6 + 702 -> 4C02 + 6H20 (equation is balanced, thanks to a little outside help) but the thing is, the methane doesn't burn totally efficiently and other things screw it up, so you get other results out. i can't remember the formula exactly for 2-2-4 tri-methyl pentane (the main ingredient in gasoline), except to say that it's 5 carbons in a chain with a 2 methyl molecules on the 2nd carbon in the chain, and 1 attached to the fourth. octane follows the same pattern as methane, but with 8 carbons. C8H18. there are other impurities in the gasoline itself, which also burn. the gasoline also doesn't burn totally efficiently, which is why we get all those nasty little pollutants. also, as an interesting little note, the internal combustion engine is horribly inefficient. in the *best* case, 23\% of the gasoline burned actually produces movement of the car. as far as smoking goes, i don't really complain when people do it around me. i don't allow it in any room i'm going to have to sleep in, and right now because i have a pretty serious problem with my lungs, i'd prefer if people didn't smoke around me, but i'm not gonna be rude about it. hope someone finds that info above to be intersting. thanks for correcting my mistakes This message has been edited by kuru on October 31, 2000 at 07:53 PM Posted by Bozeman on Oct. 31 2000,22:57
2(C2H6) + 7(02) -> 4(C02) + 6(H20)
Posted by askheaves on Nov. 01 2000,00:24
Yeah, that was my bad... I typoed the CO deal. In reality, the CO content of car exhaust is roughly 0.5\% of the output. By the way, you have drawn Ethane (2 Carbons), whereas Methane is a single carbon Atom.I find all of this chemistry fascinating. It's nice to see also that each year emission control measures are getting better on automobiles. From all of the data sitting around, it seems to be helping. What isn't helping is all of the reformulated varieties of fuels, not to mention some of the alternative fuels. Compressed natural gas is not a good fuel source. Why? Because you don't get much power in a standard mix, so most people richen the mixture. At that point, there's just as much, or more pollution coming out of the car (or bus!). That pisses me off, sorry. Each year we see reactions to cigarettes as well. They become more expensive (exponentially), more places don't allow smoking, more disturbing ads come on tv, and more people shun it as socially irresponsible. Not that it's necessarily a good thing, but at least I don't look as cool as I did a year ago. Posted by kuru on Nov. 01 2000,00:48
damn. yer right. i always get those 2 confused.the others i have no problem with usually except that i can't seme to remember what a 7 carbon chain is. haven't been in a chemistry class in four years, and an organic chemistry class in six, so i'm a little bit shaky. thanks for the correction. ------------------ Posted by CatKnight on Nov. 03 2000,03:25
2-2-4 tri-methyl pentane:(8 carbons, longest chain 5, methyl group on 2, 2, and 4) code: /me is a l33t ch3m357. This message has been edited by CatKnight on November 06, 2000 at 08:40 AM Posted by askheaves on Nov. 03 2000,15:39
quote: I'm cheating, but how about: ***CH3 edit: Closing my quotes This message has been edited by askheaves on November 03, 2000 at 10:40 AM Posted by Michael on Nov. 03 2000,16:13
quote: I think that should be ***CH3 Edits: "& n b s p ;" works for spaces, but this isn't a monotype font so the spaces don't line up. This message has been edited by Michael on November 03, 2000 at 11:19 AM Posted by askheaves on Nov. 03 2000,23:04
Damnit, I suck...
Posted by Observer on Nov. 05 2000,05:12
I think the [code] tag in UBB works for spacing things into a monospaced font.------------------ Posted by Michael on Nov. 05 2000,05:47
Oh yeah...Let's try that. It should work the same as a pre tag... code:CH3 H Oh well... guess that didn't quite work. The pre tags are there in the source, and spaces are being preserved, but not in a monospace font. Hmmm... I vaguely remember something about pre tags not working when contained in another element; neither Netscape nor IE seems to support this. This message has been edited by Michael on November 04, 2000 at 01:13 PM Posted by masher on Nov. 15 2000,07:50
7 carbon chain hydrocarbon is heptane.1 methane Then you get into the double (-ene) and triple (-yne) bond varieties... ------------------ Remember, its all your fault. |