Forum: Sex Topic: Andrea Corr started by: fatbitch Posted by fatbitch on Feb. 01 2001,09:26
since this is the sex forum, i would just like to sayi want to SEX Andrea Corr. thank you Posted by CatKnight on Feb. 01 2001,13:28
who?
Posted by Spydir Web on Feb. 01 2001,18:46
she's this model chick... she's not that bad looking, but I could beg to differ...personally, I'd go for heidi klum, amy webber, jennifer love hewwit, denise richards (I used to date a chick who looked a whole freggin' lot like her...), or... your mother ------------------ Posted by CatKnight on Feb. 01 2001,18:58
![]() she's quite pretty Posted by Vigilante on Feb. 01 2001,21:10
Irish singer. Yummy.
Posted by kuru on Feb. 01 2001,21:11
looks kinda stoned.------------------ Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Feb. 01 2001,22:59
i have this flatmate who is just a "lil" obsessed with her. i think a direct quote from him when he sees a pic of her is"fantastic" he is luuuuurv sic for her Posted by askheaves on Feb. 02 2001,01:17
quote: i love british people... while, at the same time fearing them. Funny thing is, they actually have great music (The Corrs, for those who haven't interpolated yet). I enjoy their works... i just wish they'd leave their brother in a hotel somewhere, pick up a hot cousin, and go on tour Sans-Man. Posted by fatbitch on Feb. 02 2001,04:18
haha true dat askheaves, true datto elabroate on my somewhat... erm... drunken post, yes i think Andrea Corr is very hot and sexy indeed. i have liked her for quite a while, but there was a corr's concert on the tv last night... anyway, yeah. just thought i would tell you all Posted by CatKnight on Feb. 02 2001,19:22
righty-o
Posted by kuru on Feb. 03 2001,20:28
they need more dentists in england. or at least, the men there need to start seeing dentists.because take for example, hugh grant. not a bad lookin guy, until he smiles. ------------------ Posted by ic0n0 on Feb. 03 2001,23:58
i have Anglophobia or at lest fear of there teeth, and isn't Andrea Corr irish? The irish don't have such bad teeth much better than people from the rural midwest. ![]() Posted by ic0n0 on Feb. 03 2001,23:58
i have Anglophobia or at lest the fear of english teeth, and isn't Andrea Corr irish? The irish don't have such bad teeth much better than people from the rural midwest. ![]() ------------------ This message has been edited by ic0n0 on February 04, 2001 at 07:00 PM Posted by kai on Feb. 04 2001,01:43
hey, theres nothing wrong with us rural peeps------------------ Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Feb. 04 2001,08:04
wtf is it with americans and their teeth fs."oh no my rear molar is out of alignment by .03 microns!! i need worth or orthodentistry done" we dont all have bad teeth its just that we're not so vain as to think anyone who doesn't 100\% fit perfectly into societies idea of normal is some kind of phreak! i mean if you really wanna insult us about it fine but dont expect me not to mention the fact that most of you are fat yanks and oh... lol vietnam that was a bit of a joke that. sorry just hate people who stereotype. (and yes I use stereotyping just there but i used it as poetic justice or some shit like that to prove my point or summin) ------------------ Posted by Sithiee on Feb. 04 2001,08:29
yes, i admit, most americans are fat, now you admit that most brits have bad teeth.
Posted by kuru on Feb. 04 2001,10:19
it's not just that his teeth are out of alignment, but they look like they're rotting out of his head!------------------ Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Feb. 04 2001,13:29
i wasnt talking about hugh grant!!!! hugh grant is a twat!!------------------ Posted by CatKnight on Feb. 04 2001,13:32
quote: hey he's making fun of our military! lets get him! oh wait...nevermind. we saved your asses in WWII anyways
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Feb. 04 2001,14:43
english people do not = ![]() ------------------ Posted by ic0n0 on Feb. 04 2001,18:14
i think the u.k obesity rating is higher than that of the states i'm kiding the states are soemthing 53\% overweight and the u.k is 60 something. The bad teeth thing is just a joke, and once again i restate that people from the southern states and the rural midwet have werse teeth in General yes that is a stereotype but i live in the rural midwest and i see alot of it and it is not good. Good Lord once you get like 10 miles from the interstate the dental Hygiene is realy bad. I am foutunate to have parents who grew up in a major city.
Posted by askheaves on Feb. 04 2001,18:58
In the rural midwest, people have a hard time with spelling and punctuation as well. I think it has something to do with lactose and the brain. Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Feb. 04 2001,19:39
you joined the war at the fuckin end.....no no i'm not gonna start off a u.k is better than u.s.a thing it'll just end up being as ridiculous as that stupid anti canadian thread :/------------------ Posted by ic0n0 on Feb. 04 2001,21:13
I can't drink milk i'm latose Intolerant, stop bring up my poor Punctuation and spelling becasue your not going to get me to change.(Dyslexia sucks once again) TRANSPORT TYCOON RULEZ that we can all agree on. Back to Andrea Corr she is one of the hotest females right after Jessica Alba (Dark Angel chick) man those two in a three way with myself that would be the greatest thing ever.WAP! WAP! WAP! ![]() ------------------ Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Feb. 04 2001,21:18
transport tycoon rulez da earth literally anyway on with the porn...i mean andrea porn...corr!!!...corr!!!------------------ Posted by CatKnight on Feb. 04 2001,21:58
transport tycoon does kick ass. do you have the deluxe edition?btw, wwII=1939-1945 don't say we didn't join till it was almost over and we were sure we'd already win. we kicked a lot of ass. Posted by ic0n0 on Feb. 04 2001,22:32
ive got TRANSPORT TYCOON DELUXE I LOVE IT!!!!!!! AND IVE GOT A PATCH SO I CAN have STATIONS UP TO 7 tracks wide and they can be all three types of trcks railroad monorail and meglev in one station it is cool.
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Feb. 04 2001,22:46
hmm i think you'll find that battle of britain decided pretty much the fate of the allies. early on. and that was mainly due to polish pilots. they deserve more credit than you or i.
Posted by ic0n0 on Feb. 04 2001,22:53
darkknight how would the battle of brighton(sp) show the outcome? the germans would have kicked everyones ass including the u.s if japan hadn't attacked when they did wich created a war frenzy in the states and a resign to get involved, the war would have stalemated without the u.s entering on the allies side hello d-day!! how many british troops landed on the beach some i know of but no where as close as to the amount of u.s and canadian troops. With out the troops from nothern american the u.k would have been screwed. sorry for the spelling mistakes.------------------ Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Feb. 04 2001,23:02
you havent actually seen many WWII documentaries have you?all that you did really was speed up the process A BIT and help us out financially afterwards. i'm not even gonna go into detail about the embarassment you were over the enigma decoder THE most important turning point in the intelligence side of the war if not more This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on February 05, 2001 at 06:04 PM Posted by Rhydant on Feb. 04 2001,23:18
/me looks at picture/me vomits up his dinner god damn, shes oogly ------------------ Posted by Sithiee on Feb. 04 2001,23:19
shut up. battle of britain was important, but so was our entering the war. and though brits did do decent, we did save their asses, northern africa was an embarrassment to the brits, without US, they woulda been analy raped.
Posted by kuru on Feb. 04 2001,23:49
the brits did decent if you count the fact that the english channel saved their asses from an invasion by the germans.and whoever here has forgotten the lend/lease executive order needs to remember that the usa was funding the war effort long before they actually sent troops. now i won't get into codes and intelligence during the war, well, at least not too much. read up on the navajo code talkers. you'll probably find it interesting, since neither the germans or the japanese were ever able to break the navajo code. ------------------ Posted by PersonGuy on Feb. 05 2001,02:03
quote: YAH! SHE'S SO HOT!!! ... WAP? ------------------ Posted by aginor on Feb. 05 2001,04:15
wap=the sound your dick makes when you smack it against a solid object, i.e. the side of a persons head, or the wall. ![]() ------------------ Posted by kuru on Feb. 05 2001,11:53
why would you be smacking your dick off of a wall?this makes no sense to me. i don't go around and thump things with my tits, so why would guys go around and wap the walls with their dicks? ------------------ Posted by DougalMacD on Feb. 05 2001,15:05
Right. Yank bashing (rubbing hands together). Gentlemen, start your engines...Americans - late twice last century. Great. I thought that it was very good of the Americans to harbour German U-boats in NY harbour (with a "u"!) when they were sinking British shipping. So did the Irish. I have nothing against individual Americans, but as a nation, come on! They are very powerful only because in wars they have 260 million people to expend (more than other people) and they have vast resources. I resent people saying that Americans are the Gods gift to earth. They buy spray cheese in cans! And all from a nation that has no word for "wanker". And as for teeth? Hugh Grant is a pillock. There are plenty with nice teeth, but people who make it onto the big screen over here are succeed not just because of their looks and the desire to fulfil a national "dream"... I hate ranting and being off topic, so sorry. Posted by askheaves on Feb. 05 2001,15:35
The Russians have a hell of a lot more people and natural resources (of different types) than America... yippie. China? Same story. If those places ever went truly democratic (or republic, depending on your spin), America would have a very powerful and overshadowing ally, or a deadly and frightening enemy.Dude, don't knock the Easy Cheeze. I think i'm gonna buy some tonight now. Damn you. We have more words for the concept of Wanker than you could even conceive of. So, what is a wanker exactly? Americans make more fun of our stars because they are mostly just hollow shells of men and women that are looks and self-worth... except that guy who played in Fargo, I think his name was Steve. (name the song!) Finally, welcome to the party, ya freakin' Mic (I've never insulted a scotsman before... was that correct? are you scottish?) Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Feb. 05 2001,18:34
well peronally i dont like to go on at americans unless provoked. just look at the two best WWII films ever made to see how americans and the british worked together for a common goal.The Longest day and last thing just to clear up something even though i'm being a bit hypocritical as to what i just said. D-Day was due to one of the largest british intelligence misinformation operations ever. if it werent for that it'd would have been body count= saving private ryan X 100
This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on February 06, 2001 at 01:36 PM Posted by ic0n0 on Feb. 05 2001,18:38
Most Americans are stupid, but you can't tell me most brits aren’t stupid. Stupidity is universal it knows no nationality in particular but it is everywhere, welcome to humanity! Most Americans have little knowledge of the outside world but it doesn't make them all stupid just the ones who like to look at red buses. In America the ones who can afford to travel aren’t necessarily the most intelligent, don't take those morons as a representation of all Americans. The thing about wwII is that no one can say for sure what would have happened if Americans hadn't got in the war but I am pretty sure that if Germany only had to fight Russia on the eastern front and an island nation that was in no place to invade to the west with no aid from the states (who at the time had less than 250 million citizens) it wouldn't have been a hard battle to win for the Germans given there success early in the war. The British did a hell of allot but they didn't have the resources to fight the war indefinitely and would have most likely fallen given 5 years or so and a successful invasion by Germans. The British underestimate the American’s, the war remember was in the pacific too and we split our forces and had to fight on two fronts (three if you count Africa) You think Americans are arrogant look at what you have been saying, that the war was basily won by the British without American aid and troops! BULL SHIT! I don’t think America’s involvement was the main factor that lead the allies to victory, I do think that honor goes to the Russians but without America the allies would have lost. And Andrea Corr is a hotty. ------------------ This message has been edited by ic0n0 on February 06, 2001 at 01:41 PM Posted by Sithiee on Feb. 05 2001,20:03
quote: and you call us arrogant? lets start with your most major offense. russa isnt and never has been communist. they were socialist. i dont really know for sure what they are supposed to be now, but its not communist. allow me to prove my point. russia never claimed to be communist. they were the USSR, United(?) Soviet Socialist Republic. see that nice fat SOCIALIST? thats not communism. reason why most idiots think it was communism is because of good ol' McCarthyism. Yes, he was an american. I never said all americans were smart. now lets move on to your next offense, few americans think of our system of government as "American Democracy" most either think it is plain old "Democracy" or know better. i dont know what your comment about the magna carta is supposed to mean, cause you all dont have pure democracy either, seeing as how you used to be monarchist and whatnot, and even with your parliament and such, its still not pure demcracy. if your claiming brits invented democracy, well, pardon me while i laugh, HAHAHAHAHAHA. democracy (look at that word, does it sound british? NO) was invented/outlined/created/whatever by the ancient greeks. yes, yes it was. and taht form of democracy, i dont think is currently being implemented anywhere. damn brit. Posted by DougalMacD on Feb. 05 2001,20:16
I'm not rejecting the USA's great effort in WWII or WWI, and as DKB says it is a great example of what can be achieved. The thing that irritates me most abou WWII and the USA is the films and media about the event. I mean look at U-571. What a pile of wank! It did happen, but the Royal Navy did it before the Americans even entered the war. USA did eventually get an Enigma, but only after D-Day, when they were so easy to get you could buy one with a morning croissant ("I'll have a large coffee, a Danish pastry, a Times and what the heck, an Enigma"). Ever heard of Bletchley Park? That's where Alan Turing et al. broke the Enigma with arguably the first computers long before D-day. And Saving Private Ryan? Seems like the Brits never were in it. WWII could never have been won without the Americans (at least, not from the West Europe side and it would be left mostly to the USSR). However, thinking about this, I have come to a conclusion. Never, ever, think about irritating a Brit, as they are pugnacious little bastards. The Welsh will beat anyone up, the English have honed their fine skills by frequenting football matches abroad, and the Northern Irish can scare the bejeezus out of anyone. And as for the Scots!? Anyway, enough is enough. This is off topic, inflammatory and I hate being nasty. Now lets get back to the topic, which was ogling women - a fine blokes' past time. Posted by DougalMacD on Feb. 05 2001,20:26
Just seen the other post.Hands up all those who think the USSR was communist. Ah, I thought so. Socialism is not communism. Socialism is a social system in which the means of producing and distributing goods are owned collectively and political power is exercised by the whole community. Communism is where goods are equally shared by everyone. It is often also charactarised by revolution of the proletariat (Russia, 1905 and 1917) and the following of a Marx-Lenin doctrine. Sod it, can't be arsed any more. blah blah Brits rule blah blah Americans suck blah blah that is what you think I should say. Don't bother replying. There are holes in my argument but I still stand by it. It seems like arrogance and probably is. Back to the ogling of women (Andrea Corr). Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Feb. 05 2001,20:27
not to rub it in even more but i think its a bit fucked up how steven sploodgeberk didnt mind putting the frnch and the american flags up at the beggining of the film and left out the british ones. this isnt a dig at you lot just that twat who's only movie i ever thought was really good was schindlers list. i mean dinosaurs where did they get the time machine from der to put them in the film. didnt anyone mind that the actors got eaten up. i'm sure the union had something to say about that!------------------ Posted by ic0n0 on Feb. 05 2001,22:03
Russia was never truely communist nor Socialist nor a republicunder the U.S.S.R. The name doesn't show what it truely was, a dictatorship by the "communist party" names are worthless here are some examples, The Peoples Republic of China? The Democtratic Republic of the Congo? Names don't show what nations truely are but rather what they would like the rest of the to see them as. And communism is an economic system not a political one. And there is a huge differnce(sp) norway and sweeden(however it's spelled) are semi Socialist and have an elected governments so they are democratic-Socialist nations and many eurpeon nations lean in this direction. So the U.S.S.R was a dictatorship that was Totalitarian but clamied to be for the benifit of the workers and this we know isn't true. I am a leftist and i consider myself to be Democratic-Socialist i have more in common with the labour party in the u.k than i do with the democratic party here in the states.WAP! WAP! WAP! ------------------ Posted by kuru on Feb. 06 2001,02:33
could someone explain to me how the us only entered at the 'tail end' of wwII when by the dates given on this board:start of wwII: 1939 the us fought for 2/3 of the time of the war? last time i checked, if you enter into something six years long when it's in its second year, that's not 'coming in at the end.' ------------------ Posted by fatbitch on Feb. 06 2001,03:07
quote: YAY on topic Posted by j0eSmith on Feb. 06 2001,03:50
quote: Actully that would be the 3rd year and 1/2 of the war. Not that it matters. ------------------ Posted by Sithiee on Feb. 06 2001,05:00
i think you brits should just be happy with the fact that you are, and probably always will be better then those damned canadians.
Posted by DougalMacD on Feb. 06 2001,05:23
True - Russia has more stuff. But it had a little problem called Communism that you may have noticed. On which subject, you might reply, "well thank god for good ol' American democracy we saved their sorry arses". Pity about Magna Carta in 1215 then. I am pretty sure that China will be the next superpower, and that it will displace USA reasonably soon. It is an interesting balance that the Chinese have struck between capitalism and communism. Although oppressive, it seems to work (just). I'm not Scottish - I have roots in East Anglia but I am a Londoner - I live in SW7; i.e. near to the Science Museum and Harrods for all the out of towners. That means that everyday I am amazed by the fact that people I was thinking about this earlier - I can't think of a single thing that America has ever exported except its culture. Most of it is just tolerable, others not. Others bits are great (i.e. Frasier and Simpsons). The reason that I am so bemused by Americans is this: I went to Las Vegas last year. I am 18, so here I can absolutely rat-arsed legally, drive, vote etc. I stayed in the Luxor, and was informed that I mustn't stop to look at the idiots wasting their money in the slot machines. So they put the restaurant (ha - an optomistic name) in the centre, where I have to walk through the slot machines. Duh!? Also, my Mum bought a bottle of wine in a shop in the casino with some other stuff (Coke, crisps etc). Being nice, I took the bag off the counter so that my Mum, who has a bad back, wouldn't have to carry it. I was asked my age, and informed that I couldn't carry a bottle of wine in a plastic bag upstairs because I was under 21. Ooookay. I then walked outside, having to barge throught the large amount of people trying to press hardcore pornography into my hands. What a stupid country. Oh yeah, back to the thread. Andrea Corr? In the words of many people - PHWOOAAR. Posted by Sithiee on Feb. 06 2001,08:38
considering we entered at the very end of 41, it was more like 42, so we were in it for 42,43,44,45, 4 years out of 39,40,41,42,43,44,45, 7 years. a bit over 4/7. as for coming in at the tail end, maybe if your talking about WW1. and thats so true, dont bomb an easily angered country when they are neutral....no one should be bombed when they are neutral, because it just isnt a good idea....its as smart as eating moldy cheese...WHO EATS MOLDY CHEESE????
Posted by CatKnight on Feb. 06 2001,12:44
i dobut anyway, united states=REPUBLIC not democracy soviet union=COMMUNISM (but not marxist communism. ever hear of collective farms??) Posted by ic0n0 on Feb. 06 2001,18:12
the u.s.s.r was not a marxist anything although they claimed to be. So let that be said. The u.s.s.r perverted the cummunist manifesto. I am not a communist but i respect marx and hate it when people call him "Evil" or that he was responsable for the u.s.s.r being an asshole.
Posted by directhex on Feb. 06 2001,18:29
sigh. peace, now, kiddies. america's full of stupid lardasses and england's full of people with bad teeth, bowler hats and umbrellas. that way, everybody's happy!alons enfants de la patrie, le jour de gloire est arrive... --directhex ------------------ Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Feb. 06 2001,18:55
nooooo england= masters of da WURLD!!! well we used to be hey we had our moment you cant say that any other country ever owned that much land. apart from mabye da romans but they had big noses so they dont count! ------------------ Posted by Vigilante on Feb. 06 2001,19:00
When was the first time the sun set on the british empire? That was an interesting factoid I've forgotten...
Posted by Sithiee on Feb. 06 2001,19:28
i know this is kind of random, but i just thought of this, were bowler hats originally worn by bowlers? or were they invented by the same guy? is it just a coincidence?...that is a bit random, sorry...
Posted by CatKnight on Feb. 06 2001,20:11
i think its cuz they are in the shape of a bowl
Posted by Sithiee on Feb. 07 2001,05:31
not COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM.
Posted by CatKnight on Feb. 07 2001,05:50
england & france = SOCIALISMUSSR=COMMUNISM foo |