Forum: Sex Topic: To Marry or Not to Marry, that is the question started by: Chrissy Posted by Sithiee on Oct. 18 2000,08:27
this may be the jew in me speaking, but if youre gonna just live with em, its a better idea to get married, cause of the tax breaks an shit...
Posted by Greasemonk on Oct. 18 2000,11:25
Hmmm unfortunately Im not going to be part of the current trend so I will get married if I fall in love with someone. I will not get married 2+ months after getting someone pregnant, I want to get married then have kids, not the other way around. At least in my general area this is the "cultural norm". Oh and you have to be about 17 and pregenant then get married. If you want to be commited to someone and have a lasting relationship that means something then get married.(Im talking about a big wedding, not JOTP and a honeymoon at KFC or McDs.) If you dont want to get married and date thats cool too, just please if you have kids raise them decent and dont go on welfare, I want to at least keep some of my paycheck to pay for my bills. ![]() Posted by Wolfguard on Oct. 18 2000,11:31
tax breaks! BAH!I have been married twice (im blond and did not learn the first time). This time is not as bad as the first. Thing is about being married is this. sooner or later your going to wake up and look at the person next to you and think, "why am i still here?". Once you reach that point its over. Get out. I have not reached that point yet in this marrage. The first one took about 2 months. Then again, i was thinking at the alter "i wish i was back in Panama where people were shooting at me." Main reason i got married this time is I just dont want to be with anyone else. This marrage is going much better than the first. ------------------ Posted by PersonGuy on Oct. 18 2000,14:23
A marriage IS just a peice of paper in it's simplest physical form. However, it can have a HUGE sybolic mean, and it SHOULD! The doesn't mean it has to be religious, just a monumentous even that separates old times from new.The problem with just living together is that you can pretty much jet out an any time. And the women try to have a kid ASAP to hold the guy down. And that's not an attack on women, or on married life partners, it's just what I'VE seen from my experiences. Anyway, if you want to raise a fam, don't have a kid and then get your shit together... get a better job... get a nicer place... find a school... etc. You need to get you shit together FIRST. Get established. Have a LIVE. THEN after everything is set up, have a kid into that set up evironment. Whew, so I'm just rambling, but I think you got my basic oppinion... ------------------ Posted by PersonGuy on Oct. 18 2000,14:26
Oh wait! I remember what my point was! ![]() My point was, that a peice of paper holding people together is better than a kid holding people together, cause you can't hurt paper if there's a break up, but you CAN hurt a kid. Oh, and I'm not saying that people should be HELD together, I'm just saying that marriage should = a commitment, and people should try as hard as they can to keep that promise. ------------------ Posted by fatbitch on Oct. 18 2000,15:24
i have no intention to get married to anyone, becuase i belive that marriage should be for life. no exeptions. i dont care if i am dating someone for 5 years until i realise i want to spend the rest of my life with them. if you dont think you can hold it for life, then dont take the plunge.right now i dont belive i could make that sort of commitment, but i am young yet i'm ont being romantic or any soppy shit, and i am not religeous, but whats the point of being married if you dont have any intention of it to be for life? i will probably end up with some chick living with her in a de-facto marriage for 10 years or something, but so what, as long as we are together, and we love each other BUT i also think that if you find yourself in a marriege that you are not satisfied with, try and work it out (especially if u have kids), and if you cant, then GET OUT because there is no point going through all the hurt if its not gonna work out but imo this all could be avoided if you followed step 1 i dunno, maybe i am just a naive kid, but it all makes sense to me now. ------------------ Metal/Electronic/Ambient etc.. Posted by whtdrgn on Oct. 18 2000,15:45
I happen to be married, and let me tell you, it is NOT easy. You have to realize that everything you do and say now directly effect another person. Men have to grow up, and women have to realize than men will never grow up.It used to be that whenever two people wanted to get married, "all they needed was love". That has now turned into: "all they need is a prenuptual agreement and good lawyers". This is what makes marriage dificult these days. I can recall many times when I have said to myself, "It would be so easy to just leave". I am glad that I never did. I am now a very happy man, and I have a wonderful wife, and two kids to show for it. So I recomend marriage for anyone who is ready to grow up and face the responsibility of the commitment, and if you are not that is OK, just DON'T get married :-) NOTE: For any newlyweds, or people about to get married. Don't worry the first two years are the worst. After that "its all good". Posted by Chrissy on Oct. 18 2000,17:37
I'm not a 100\% sure if this is the right place to put this but I had a question. What is everyones view on getting hitched? I was talking to some girl friends of mine and it still seems pretty much the cultural norm for the girl to want to get married and have kids. Would a guy mind a girl that did not want to marry even if they were together for many many years? Or would it be on the minds of the guys too?I guess Im just looking to see if Im odd or something because I dont believe in marriage at all. I think a person could love another person and not have a piece of paper that atested to that fact. Let me know your opinions on this I'm kind of interested. ------------------ Posted by kuru on Oct. 18 2000,23:10
i don't see myself getting married. maybe not ever, but at least not for a very long time. i like my freedom, i like having my own home with no one else in it, being able to get away from everyone when i need it. i don't think i'm suited for marriage. i don't want kids, i like it that i can move anywhere my career'll take me... but mostly, i can't live with people. 8 - 10 hours a day is the most human contact i can take, and beyond that, anyone even being in the same room with me is exhausting. if i ever do get married, it won't be a 'wedding,' because the last thing on earth i want is to wear a dress and pretend i give a crap about invitation fonts. i have no female friends, so that eliminates bridesmaids no matter what i do.... and i'm too cynical to believe that it's possible to make any decision that's going to work for me for fifty years. so um.. not all chicks think about getting married, i never did. maybe i'm just weird, but if i'm the only chick in the world who never had a pretend wedding as a little kid.. well, i'm glad to know there's one more unique thing about me to make me glad i'm not like everyone else ------------------ Posted by dido on Oct. 19 2000,00:51
I never had a pretend wedding as a kid either and I never thought of getting married before. However I am married now! Contradiciton? I think not! I never imagined myself spending the rest of my life with someone until I met my hubby. It wasn't 2 months and then marriage either. We were together for 6 years (broke up in that time too) and lived together before we got hitched. The main point was/is that we couldn't imagine spending the rest of our lives without each other...we tried it and it didn't work. So to deepen our commitment to each other we did the legal thing. The piece of paper means nothing, its the symbolic gesture that was/is important.As for a big wedding, no thanks! It was small (18 people) and done very inexpensively. Plus I don't have any female friends either so I forwent the bridesmaids and had my best friend (male) be my bachelor of honour. We aren't ones for tradition. ------------------ Posted by Chrissy on Oct. 19 2000,04:52
I think when I was a kid getting married meant less to me then it means now. So playing at being married or "house" was sort of different. These days when I think about getting married I just realise that one of many things is going to happen1. I'll never find the "right" person because there is no "right" person for me. (And I hold no judgements about people and 9 times out of 10 I'll take a date with a guy who asks me out- Its not like I have high standards...so stop thinking Im a snobby bitch) ------------------ Posted by directhex on Oct. 19 2000,05:44
breakups harm the kiddies. don't marry unless you mean it.i'm only 16, and no matter how committed i am to my girlfriend, neither of us even THINK about that kind of shit. or want to until we're at least 25. marriage should be a commitment. 'till death do us part and all that stuff. --directhex ------------------ Posted by Greasemonk on Oct. 19 2000,12:08
Another thing that amazes me is this. You got all these couples who get preganant then they get married because "its the right thing to do", then they get a divorce later on. Whats up with that?
Posted by Rhydant on Oct. 19 2000,12:45
hrm... i could see kuru getting hitched at the LIttle White Chapel in Las Vegas (hey, michael jordan AND the king, elvis, got hitched there)but...uhm...i think im too damned young to think about this now. although it would prolly be nice to settle down some day or something. kids are a maybe, but no more than.... like 1 (i dont want screaming little bastards running around buggine me all day... hehheheh) ------------------ Posted by askheaves on Oct. 19 2000,14:37
quote: That's how my parents got together. My dad knocked up my mom during college, and they got married about a month before I was born (even though I was about 5 weeks late). My parents managed to inadvertantly create my younger brother, then got divorced while I was in 6th grade. Both of my parents have married wonderful people since. I seem to be pretty well adjusted. Marriage: It is one of the absolutes. EVERY society in the world has a marriage practice in one form or another. Not every society (in fact, it's pretty rare) couple because of a love and devotion reason. That would be the reason I would marry, but that's a ways off. Posted by DuSTman on Oct. 19 2000,15:07
For some reason i really don't like the idea of marraige at all. You're making a commitment to someone, but it's a commitment that can be easily (and is routinely) broken. You are making your relationship "official" to the law, but it is generally accepted that the government has no rights to interfere in our interpersonal relationships, so what are we doing? I can understand the desire to make a commitment, but really, all you are doing when you get married is making it so that it would be more difficult to break up. You want a relationship you can depend on? Don't go for unreliable people - if you don't trust the person you are with, will having a piece of paper help any? Gonna make them less likely to cheat, etc? No... Marraige is also a religious thing, but most people that go in for conventional religious ideas believe that god is omniscient. If this is the case then why go through a special service to declare to god a relationship that it already knows about anyway? By marrying in a church, it isn't a blessing, it wasn't god deciding it was a good relationship, it was the vicar. We live in an age of freedom, and the thought of being tied to a relationship in such a way is something i really hate. I intend to avoid marraige at all costs. Posted by Greasemonk on Oct. 19 2000,16:32
Sorry about that askheaves, I was talking about these days. It seems to have caught on recently.
Posted by Michael on Oct. 19 2000,16:36
quote: Yes, I agree that if you are unable or unwilling to pursue any sort of long-lasting relationship or deep commitment to someone else, you definately should not get married. You say that we live in an age of freedom, but what you're really saying is that we live in an age where people are all too willing to give up on something the moment things get tough or some real effort is required. This whole mentality has people thinking "Oh no, we had an argument, now our relationship is ruined" when the fact is that no relationship is perfect, but that if you aren't willing to put in the effort to try to make things right, you will just find yourself quitting whenever things don't turn out to be quite like a storybook romance. The problem with our society is that it does not cultivate responsibility; rather, it teaches people that there's always someone else to blame and always an easy way out. As a result, we have a growing population of perpetual adolescents, unwilling to commit to anything, wandering from place to place and relationship to relationship. You are not truly a mature adult until you have learned to work things out and to accept responsibility for what happens rather than always blaming someone else. Posted by Michael on Oct. 19 2000,17:07
Marriage is the very basis of our society, and has been since the beginning of history. People have tried other ways of raising children, but only families actually work. They provide children with both a male and a female role model, and allowing that child to grow up in relative security and certainty. Can you even imagine what society would be like if there was no such thing as "parents" except in the biological sense?I'm not saying that everyone should get married, but my point is that Marriage isn't "old-fashioned" or outdated; it is an absolutely necessary and vital part of our society. That doesn't mean that those who remain unmarried are not equally vital, but they play a different sort of role. To make a rather wide generalization, the lives of married people are centered around their family, while the lives of unmarried people are centered more on their work. Posted by Chrissy on Oct. 20 2000,10:56
You know I tend to agree...with one last remark. I think my parents generation the baby boombers are really responsible for this lack of accountablity. I mean think about how many of us are in our teens and early 20's whose parents are divorced with no hope of ever working it out. Also how many times mom came to school and told your teacher that he/she was wrong and that you (her child) was right. This inablity to take responsiblity has festered into every aspect of our social world... Getting back to the topic- I think marriage is a sexually oppressive institution for women almost or equally as bad as prostitution. ------------------ This message has been edited by Chrissy on October 20, 2000 at 05:57 AM Posted by whtdrgn on Oct. 20 2000,13:08
Some of the things I learned in college"Marrige is societies aproval of two peoples mating habbits. Marrige's sole purpose is the explotation of women. Finaly, If you are in a relationship were you are sexually exploited, than yes that is what marrige will mean to you. If a woman takes what she wants from sex, and enjoys herself (not just having sex becasue her husband wants to), then it will tend to be better. The one thing my wife told me is that she has sex with me for her not me. I don't really care as long as I am getting sex. Marrige is what you make of it. Just as anything else is. The more you worry about being exploited the more you will be. That is why alot of women have problems having an orgasm. Men figured this one out a long time ago (sex is fun, enjoy it). Good luck to you! Posted by Michael on Oct. 20 2000,16:11
quote: Perhaps historically, marriage has led to the exploitation of women. But in our current society, with much more equal rights, this does not happen as often. After all, if a women has to consent to marry you and can get a divorce if she is being abused, there is not as much of an issue of women being trapped or opressed by marriage. I'm not denying that such marriages exist, but then again there are also marriages where men are being oppressed, exploited, and abused. Posted by Sithiee on Oct. 21 2000,01:04
we had an interesting discussion today in government about gay marriage. and theres this conservative bitch in our class who is a major hypocrite. first he goes off on how gay marriages are immoral, and how they shouldnt be allowed. and then he changes it to companies should be allowed to recognize them if they want to give benefits(we were discussing marriage benefits, i.e. family health care coverage) and then he changed it to the states should be able to vote on it for themselves. he later went on to say that jesus christ started christianity in worship of himself...but anyway, i still think its all about the benefits, but i honestly dont know....
Posted by askheaves on Oct. 21 2000,02:49
quote: Gay marriage is OK with me. My personal belief is that anybody should be allowed to make that committment and be recognized by the government. I understand that most societies (all?) in the world recognize marriage as a union between 1 man and 1 woman. Some societies recognize that beyond marriage, homosexuality outside of a marriage is allowed (ie. men are off to war). Many of these homosexual-friendly societies still recognize marriage in the traditional sense... but I still think we can pathfind on this one. *mmmm... drinkin'* ------------------ Posted by floyd on Oct. 21 2000,03:04
ActuallyMany other countries and society consider the U.S. quite primitive in their generally anti-gay ways. Sure, many other countries don't go out and say 'Everybody bang your buddy,' but at least they don't even have to debate over gay rights. Hell, even in Classical Rome (and of course Renaissance Italy) pretty much every man was Bi, if not full on homosexual, though if they weren't, nobody had a problem with each other. Yeah, gay marriage is cool, considering marriage should be about love and commitment in the first place. Damnit. Posted by whtdrgn on Oct. 21 2000,05:44
Sounds framilure
|