Forum: The Classroom Topic: They blew up the Twin towers!!!!!!! started by: StreetRaver Posted by StreetRaver on Sep. 10 2001,12:41
Someone has just blew up the twin towers in new york and they blew up part of the pentagon!!!!!!!!!!!------------------ Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,12:47
both towers are down now.. i watched the second tower fall on live tv.
Posted by ASCIIMan on Sep. 10 2001,12:52
Apparently there's a second plane heading for the pentagon. The national mall is on fire. A car bomb exploded at the state dept. The white house and captitol have been evacuated. Oh my god.To quote my roommate: "I'll go to class when shit stops blowing up." edit - There was no car bomb. CNN was wrong about that part. This message has been edited by ASCIIMan on September 11, 2001 at 09:01 AM Posted by JLb_8 on Sep. 10 2001,12:57
FUCK FUCK FUCK! i thought this was just some bullshit joke or something then i turned on the tv and its like on every channel! is this something to do with israel thing?
Posted by SLATE on Sep. 10 2001,13:06
From what i've heard, its all terrorist acts. many are suspecting the bin laden guy of it. Many terrorist organizations have claimed these acts. I'd estimate over 50,000 people have died. May everyone pray to whatever higher being you believe in.... If you don't, then just hope these people felt no pain.Any of you who have lost someone, I'm greatly saddened by your loss. Posted by JLb_8 on Sep. 10 2001,13:10
i think the most important thing to do right now for anyone who lives near or around where thi shappened is to not let even something like this let paranoia set in because if you do ur letting whatever extremist bastards did this to win cos paranoia is exactly what this kind of thing is set up for
Posted by t|nt|n on Sep. 10 2001,13:10
Looks like the pentagon got hit againdamn this Posted by JLb_8 on Sep. 10 2001,13:13
theres another ufo plane on an unkoiwn course plus the one that crashed in pensylvania may have been shot down in desperation (i must stress that thats just my opinion and i havent heard anything to confirm that) as there would be simply nothing else you could do.
Posted by kai on Sep. 10 2001,13:16
abc news just said that they believe the car bombing didn't happen. it was only an ap report.
Posted by ic0n0 on Sep. 10 2001,13:16
This is so bad...oh my god....afganistan is going to cease to excist. This is going to spark something i do not want to be here for.------------------ Posted by kai on Sep. 10 2001,13:18
this reminds me of what we've been talking about in government. our teacher keeps talking about the nostradomas(sp?) guy and his predictions. maybe this is going to be what starts it.
Posted by ASCIIMan on Sep. 10 2001,13:20
The Taliban are having a newconferance/statement in a few minutes on CNN...edit - maybe not This message has been edited by ASCIIMan on September 11, 2001 at 08:46 AM Posted by t|nt|n on Sep. 10 2001,13:22
Posted by JLb_8 on Sep. 10 2001,13:24
mabye someone is trying to show the US the hard way about some shit thats going on around the world. fucking hell theres like people in palestine celebrating this FFS!
Posted by chmod on Sep. 10 2001,13:25
one of those planes was supposedly an American Airlines 767.... freaky
Posted by t|nt|n on Sep. 10 2001,13:26
did they make the statement yet ??I can't get near a TV Posted by ASCIIMan on Sep. 10 2001,13:28
A United Airlines jet crashed near Pittsburgh (80 miles south). They don't know if it's related.
Posted by ic0n0 on Sep. 10 2001,13:29
Osama bin fuckhead is going to be exicuted, we need to invade afganistan and rape that county.
Posted by JLb_8 on Sep. 10 2001,13:30
uk prime minister has just called for global cooperationpresident of USA has declared the US as being under attack the web has pretty much ground to a halt COBRA meeting starting at 5.30 GMT which is in about an hour prime minister is gonna make another statement in a few minutes Posted by JLb_8 on Sep. 10 2001,13:33
0207 008 0000 for anyone in the uk who are worried about anyone in america or on those flights.fuck if ever theres a good enough reason to get rid of these countries with human rights abuse this is it. Posted by ic0n0 on Sep. 10 2001,13:36
The U.S and U.K should destroy afganistan Iran and Iraq and palistine.------------------ Posted by JLb_8 on Sep. 10 2001,13:39
to be realistic an assault of that scale has the risk of going horribly wrong very easily and i think the last thing we need is to end up with our guys getting slaughtered in an act of vengance. though something should be done
Posted by SLATE on Sep. 10 2001,13:41
quote: Stop blaming unknown partys... "The attacks are a consiquence of teh US policies in the Middle EAst." Just heard that.. Rumored to be said by an Islamic Gehad senior officer... GODSPEED..... Posted by JLb_8 on Sep. 10 2001,13:45
American airlines have stated that two of their planes have been lost with a total of 156 people on boardedit: the london stock exchange has been evacuated too This message has been edited by JLb_8 on September 11, 2001 at 08:46 AM Posted by WillyPete on Sep. 10 2001,13:51
My sympathies for the loss, but Icono you're full of shit.So you want go throw nukes around 3 sovereign nations when this has been accomplished by several dedicated individuals for their own purposes? There's good and innocent people in those countries. A terrorist attack is not an act of war by a nation state. You only attack other nations when war has been declared. Posted by ASCIIMan on Sep. 10 2001,13:54
Airplane crashing into the second tower (before either tower collapsed):
After the collapse:
The pentagon:
edit - A second United Airlines plane just crashed. This message has been edited by ASCIIMan on September 11, 2001 at 08:59 AM Posted by JLb_8 on Sep. 10 2001,13:57
"Israel is evacuating all their diplomats from the US fearing they may be targets"this doesnt mean they are targets though Posted by Greasemonk on Sep. 10 2001,13:59
quote: Ummm they took responsibility for it after the 2cd crash. Abu Dhabi television reported it had received a call from the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine claiming responsibility for crashing two planes into the twin WTC towers overlooking New York harbour.
------------------ Posted by L33T_h4x0r_d00d on Sep. 10 2001,14:00
quote: There was no car bomb at state department. My dad works there and just said that nothing has happened. Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 10 2001,14:01
my mom works in d.c...she's at home now. all federal buildings have been closed.there is also another boeing 757 liner going from boston to LA that the FAA has said are "deeply deeply concerned about". the national guard has been mobilized in pennsylvania. all the ROTC students are headed out... NOW DO YOU GUYS BELIEVE ME? THEY DO THIS SHIT TO ISRAEL EVERY WEEK. NOW THEY ATTACK THE UNITED STATES. IT IS TOTAL BULLSHIT. I imagine we will be deploying troops within 2 days to the middle east. Posted by PersonGuy on Sep. 10 2001,14:01
KURU!? CRISSY!? SLATE!? Yall ok???------------------ Posted by JLb_8 on Sep. 10 2001,14:02
over 50 terrorists have claimed responsibilty so to say its anyone of them is just stupid. Edit: CK get a grip ok the US isnt adjacent to a hostile country. but i do feel that it will bring the truth about israel home to a lot of people in america and the rest of the world. This message has been edited by JLb_8 on September 11, 2001 at 09:05 AM Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 10 2001,14:04
my room mate captured the whole thing as it happened live on his puter. i'll post mpegs later today.TOTAL BULLSHIT. Posted by ASCIIMan on Sep. 10 2001,14:06
quote: My roommate's friend just IM'd him ~ 1 hour ago. Her boyfriend (who's a marine stationed in Okinawa) had just IM'd her and said he was leaving. Now. Because all the marines there are being ordered back to the US to take care of stuff... This message has been edited by ASCIIMan on September 11, 2001 at 09:07 AM Posted by chmod on Sep. 10 2001,14:06
in the middle of class i saw US air force helicopters flying towards nyc... very loud
Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 10 2001,14:06
nevermind the 757 headed for LA was just reported to have crashed. if it was hi-jacked, god bless the pilots, crew, and passengers, for defying their hijackers. same goes with the one that crashed outside of pittsburgh.
Posted by Beldurin on Sep. 10 2001,14:13
Can you say Tet 2001? This was too well organized, and if I had to guess, I would say that more were planned. The plane that crashed near Pittsburgh was headed for an intermediate at DC's Reagan airport. There were probably more flights scheduled for this attack. As bad as the loss of life is, the psychological damage is worse. This group has brought the U.S. to a halt. Also, there is widespread celebration by many Palestinians on the middle east. That's just inhuman. God be with us... ------------------ quote: Never argue with and idiot...he may be doing the same thing Posted by ASCIIMan on Sep. 10 2001,14:15
Trinity University just cancelled all classes for the rest of the day. Weird.This message has been edited by ASCIIMan on September 11, 2001 at 09:16 AM Posted by JLb_8 on Sep. 10 2001,14:21
christ knows what might happen next i doubt that if they've gone to all this trouble that it wont stop with just this
Posted by ASCIIMan on Sep. 10 2001,14:25
Statement from the Taliban on CNN just now:"We want to tell the american children that the afganistan feel your pain and the american courts do justice." This message has been edited by ASCIIMan on September 11, 2001 at 09:27 AM Posted by JLb_8 on Sep. 10 2001,14:26
that doesnt mean that they didnt do it.
Posted by ae86trueno on Sep. 10 2001,14:33
i'm in school right now... all news sites are down, this is so annoying.. i dunno what to say, this is madness....pray.
Posted by chmod on Sep. 10 2001,14:40
wow... this topic went to 2 pages in about 2 hours. that's gotta be some kind of new record or something
Posted by ASCIIMan on Sep. 10 2001,14:49
Pictures...< http://www.jelerial.com/1011/ > Posted by whiskey@throttle on Sep. 10 2001,14:58
Holy christ...I just got online to a picture of the world trade center. I can't believe this...Can't get in touch with family in DC either. What the fuck is going on?! Posted by Wolfguard on Sep. 10 2001,15:03
First i just want to say that thank The Maker i flew home from Chicago yesterday and not today as planed.Also i want to point out the yesterday there were flight delays to all east coast locations due to "flight control problems". Now, to let the Wolf out. Anyone that claims responsibility for these acts we should turn the keys on and just Nuke them. When we find the fuck that did this ill bring the hammer and nails. Someone bring the cross. I think its time we just take all these little fuckers, kick there balls between their teeth then shoot them in the back of the neck. the US could roll through the middle east in 28 days. I think its time to kick these sand squaters in the ass. Take their land and their oil and reduce their cities to rubble. They have been fighting in their house and now they have knocked on our door. its time to answer the door with everything we have. ------------------ Posted by JLb_8 on Sep. 10 2001,15:40
i wouldnt worry too much whiskey it's virtually impossible to even get a phone call through to NYC at the moment so i'm Guessing DC is the same.and wolfguard get a hold of urself man killing everyone suspected of doing this will just create more trouble. i aint no peace lovin hippy though. when they do have good intel on who did this THEN they should raise their military to the ground but we dont want a bloodbath of innocent people on our hands. these people are already celebrating this crisis over there we dont need to give them even more hatred of us. i know ur probably just acting out of sheer anger but if we were to actually nuke the middle east we would nuke a large majortiy of oil feilds in the process and then we'd be in even more shit. my best bet? tactical air strikes on mass and i do mean ON MASS plus specialist ground force invasion to compromise communication and transport routes. block all shipping routes and let the fuckers panic as we take their sand from under their feet jesus i only just realised that thew whole south tower had collapsed i just thought it was the tops of the two Posted by Vigilante on Sep. 10 2001,16:07
Both towers are gone, man. Nothin but smoke and rubble.
Posted by LiNeY on Sep. 10 2001,16:13
This is just incredible. Whoever the terrorists are, I hope they will be found and punished, and in this case I tend to approve Wolfguard's violent methods of punishment.This is an attack on Western Civilisation. It is shaking the roots of our world, and I think now it has become clear that the radical muslims (countries or individuals) are much more of a danger than we ever thought. Hopefully, something like this act of terrorism will not happen again, but peace may be reestablished on earth. Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 10 2001,16:14
there's another building next to the towers that is burning...they are worried it might collapse too.Tuesday, 9/11/2001, a day that will live...in infamy. Time to break out the B-52 carpet bombers Posted by L33T_h4x0r_d00d on Sep. 10 2001,16:27
quote: IM me with your familys Phone #(darktmplr3). The local lines are pretty clear, but I cant call out of state. Wolf, I have no pity for what the engineers behind this disaster get but we cannot just lay waste to all of the middle east. That would lower us to thier level. There are alot of innocent people that are just trying to live their life. The governments that harbor or finance these terrorists should find the same fate as the attackers. Anyone having anything to do with something so barbaric has lost their right to inhabit this planet. Might I suggest the chinese death of 10,000 cuts. Posted by DeadAnztac on Sep. 10 2001,16:40
I found out 10 minutes aget it happened... I the proceeded, 10 minutes later to go out into the hall and beat the shit out of the wall.... I think my teacher was concerned... I decided to go home. The police are out here in Columbus in force. I believe there will be riots on campus. I'm increadably pissed all around... but I can't absorb it all yet... I don't think I want to.. when I realized the surface of what had happened I went balistic.. I wouldn't want to know what I'de do if it all registered...------------------ Posted by aletros on Sep. 10 2001,16:47
Fairly decent live feed is < http://www.sky.com/skynews/home > Is British though. Posted by whiskey@throttle on Sep. 10 2001,16:49
Well, I still haven't heard anything, but I'm pretty positive they're all right. Thanks for the offer, though. Supposedly the only thing hit in DC was the Pentagon and perhaps the State Dept. (though I hear the car bomb there was just a rumor). My aunt/uncle/cousin live on Embassy Row/Mass Ave, and work at the Dept of Energy and a shop in Adams Morgan, respectively. Seems to be pretty out of the way.One thing I'd like to mention, however: no matter how repulsive and shocking this attack is, jumping to conclusions about who did this and why will get us absolutely nowhere. I fully support reciprocity, but there are many precautions to take in advance. You can't just go nuking an entire country because there are terrorists harbored inside. Hell, promoting the idea of "nuking" anyone is frankly fucking retarded, as it not only a threat to the stability of world peace, but a threat to the physical safety of the entire planet (fallout, radiation, etc). What needs to happen, after the designers of this attack are positively identified, is a thorough and harsh eradication of all connected parties around the globe, via incarceration or assassination. Of course, the problem is based in how such a process will take place; my guess is that we'll never know all the players involved. At least, not for certain. Furthermore, are we willing to make martyrs of these people? Ugh. What a terrible day...what a shitty mess. I wonder what happens next. Posted by whiskey@throttle on Sep. 10 2001,16:56
quote: You're entitled to your opinion, but I've been listening to a conversation on the radio that brought up some very logical points that many seem to be ignoring. Just because terrorists live/are known to live in a certain country does not make the government of that country liable or connected to their actions. Please remember that Timothy McVeigh and his associates not only lived in this country, but were native citizens as well. Look at the Michigan Militia and the KKK. Look at the National Socialist Party (antebellum Nazi movement). These are all anti-national, terrorist organizations, by strict definition. Are you going to imply that the US condones their actions? The point is that bad people - the scum of the fucking Earth - live everywhere, and come in all shapes, sizes, and colors. We can't necessarily blame a government just because terrorists live inside their borders. Posted by Nikita on Sep. 10 2001,16:59
I wonder what will happen next. Kinda makes us realize that we are still vulnerable. What do the terrorists want to achieve with all this? Is it some disillusioned crackhead working from within the US? What if it's someone from the US?I am a bit worried about one of my housemates. She is from the middle east (Bethlehem) and is always talking to her family on the computer/phone. I think they're very close. I'm going home after writing this to see if she's okay. The racist bastards here better not do anything stupid. Not saying that Penn State is bad, but there has been quite a bit of racist shit around here lately. Though my faith in a God seems to be decreasing with each passing day, my thoughts and prayers go out to the victims and their families. Posted by SLATE on Sep. 10 2001,18:00
I'm willing to donate my time, blood, whatever.. Only a few problems... I'm having vision problems at the moment. I'm 17, can't donate blood. Its nearly impossible to get into NY and out of it...
Posted by JLb_8 on Sep. 10 2001,18:01
quote: mate, its because people in america are so confident in their safety that shit like this happens. its not a surprise that people are calling this the second pearl harbour
Posted by jrh1406 on Sep. 10 2001,18:22
I've heard reports of a bomb going off in the capitol building too, havn't seen anything on any of the news sites, just FOAF reports.
Posted by spOon on Sep. 10 2001,18:27
quote: We are confident for a reason. We are the most powerful society in the world. Of course it's a Second Pearl. "All we have done is wake a sleeping gaint and fill him with resolve." Admiral Yamamato. Right after the pearl harbor attack. He was right too. The US doesn't take kindly to people who mess with us. There are few incidents like this. But most of the time we are confident because we are respected. Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,18:36
m8 i dont think this is a time to start this but people dont respect your power they resent it. which is why you're a prime target. and the bigger you are the easier it is to sneak small thing past you. and i REALLY dont mean any offense by this but if you are so great how could this thing happen?everyone has vunerabilities.
EDIT: HERE'S JOHNY! I'M BACK ! just wish it was under better circumstances This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on September 11, 2001 at 01:37 PM Posted by Greasemonk on Sep. 10 2001,18:43
You never know. Theres is just as much hatred for the USA coming from within the country itself as well as from other countrys. Our first instinct is to think its another country doing the shit. The terrorists might be US citizens who are trying to get back at the government like McVeigh.------------------ Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,18:45
my brother's fiance's sister works for american airline's in NYC and they haven';t passed me word yet on her, and i pray she's fine..as for this middle eastern shit, there's like people dancing in the streets that someone did this to us. i'm not prejudice or anything, but i say burn those fuckers... Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,18:45
live CNN reports of building 7 about to colapse...
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,18:47
if it was within america it couldnt be just a few citizens it took a whole middle east terrorist group to attempt to crash a plane into a building a few years back and that failed
Posted by Hellraiser on Sep. 10 2001,18:48
quote: If you want to get back at the government, you go after the government. The trade centers were not government targets, unlike the federal building which happened to house a daycare center. Also, you do it using a minimum of lives lost, rather than using a loaded airplane as your weapon. Anything else is just terrorism, done for the pure shock. Americans don't think that way, but terrorist groups from the mid east do, just look at any typical paper in palistine for confirmation, and you'll see reports of people killing themselves for a cause. Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,18:51
No official or credible claims to the incedent, and Osama Ben Ladin's group is denying the incident.
Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,18:55
i don't think the plan was that in depth to particulary hit the WTC, only in the fact that other buyilding's in NY could have been more profitable by such groups to hit... now either the WTC was just the easiest target, or perhaps if those fuckers were smart enough to understand certain economic functions they might target it, but i haven't heard anything on the news lately of special negotiations going on in the WTC save all the oil shit. Death Toll climbing at horrific rates. Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,18:58
quote: they've been done in by so much propoganda that they think that we go to work and spend our lunch breaks designing plans on how to murder everyone of them.
Posted by chmod on Sep. 10 2001,18:58
I wonder what the black boxes from those planes will have.... Imagine being on a plane and then finding out that it's being hijacked, and then flying another 2 hours knowing that your life is about to end.My dad was in the city today... hes fine but it's gonna take him a damn long time to get home. Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,19:03
hopefully they will be able to retrieve those boxes.. but even more than the piulots.. imagine being the guy in tower 1 on that floor standing at the water founting going, "oh shit, there's a plane headed at me." remember their families in prayers or what-have-you...
Posted by t|nt|n on Sep. 10 2001,19:04
what is the flight number of the unaccounted for plane ?????
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,19:07
quote: underestimating the enemys intelligence is a dangerous thing to do complacency is not always good This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on September 11, 2001 at 05:45 PM Posted by Hellraiser on Sep. 10 2001,19:09
What a miserable time to not have a deity or higher power to blame/pray to/take comfort in if you're one of the bereaved in this tragic incident. I'm glad I believe in God, because otherwise how could anyone make any sense of this kind of thing. I'll be remembering those who died today and those who lived through it in my prayers. They're saying right now the death toll could be over 10,000 people and rising. Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,19:11
Prime Minister of Isreal Ariel Sharon is giving his statement.. but what i want to know is.. the passenger lists from those foiur flights.. find teh abu dahbi fucker on there.. you know they alredy know who did this shit...
Posted by SLATE on Sep. 10 2001,19:12
quote: Fake ID's perhaps? And I'm 100\% positive they already looked at the flight lists. A lot of shit is going on that we don't know about... Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,19:13
quote: i mean how can people just sit there knowing they will die and instead of everyone just rushing the terroists just sit there in some denial about their doom. This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on September 11, 2001 at 05:46 PM Posted by Hellraiser on Sep. 10 2001,19:15
And probably a lot of stuff is going on that no one will ever know about except those few who are doing it. We're left relying on the guesses of the media based on what little has been afforded them from the people who are mobilizing to deal with the situation.
Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,19:15
i'm actually a fan of terrorism reviews, and other sick shit.. i'm one of those fellows who takes the hollocaust and says Hitler was a fucking genius to convince millions of people to kill millions of people.. it's pure madness and this takes the cake on america's side.. whomever did this wasn't just some lackey, this was a well thought out, planned attack on high precedent areas of american importance... now, i don't feel that the WTC was that important to america's gov't as in democracy is concerned, i'm merely questioning the purpose of targeting the WTC.. i want to know why... why today, why WTC, why pentagon... it might have been a complex plan, but i still don't understand the goal.also, the notice they just gave about all 24,000 pentagon employees have been evacuated.. you know there's still people down in them bunkers workin hard.. Posted by Hellraiser on Sep. 10 2001,19:17
quote: What makes you think they were just sitting there? If they weren't already killed in the takeover, the probably had no idea of the destination, and were probably too scared to move. I know I would probably be to scared to do anything, particularly if the terrorists had shot a few people as demonstrations of their resolve. Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,19:18
i think the passengers, if they hijackers had guns were already executed, purely for the fact they wouldn't sit there and let themselves die... maybe even poisoness gas to knowck them out, seeming as how it's next to impossible to put a gun on an airplane now.... just a theory though. but you know an american pilot wouldn't put a plane into the side of those buildings.. he would have dumpoed in the harbor in a last ditch effort.my belief has to be that.. i don't like un-american fuckers. Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,19:21
Tom Clancy on CNN, stating it might not have been Islam's due to suicide against islamic religion, like going straight to hell... Building number 7 has just collapsed...
Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 10 2001,19:23
trade center building 7 just collapsed...
Posted by shifter on Sep. 10 2001,19:24
< http://www.drudgereport.com/ > < http://www.drudgereport.com/ > go go go palestinians are claiming credit and the gas is 5 bucks a gallon Posted by Hellraiser on Sep. 10 2001,19:25
quote: Yeah well, tell that to the palestinian suicide bombers. In Islamic Jahad, holy war, I think they figure Allah will overlook a suicide that is done to further their cause.
Posted by ic0n0 on Sep. 10 2001,19:26
I do no know who is responsible for this act but I would imagine it is one of two Possible types. Anti-government Domestic types or Arab (Islamic or not P.L.A maybe) terrorists. Why do I draw these conclusions? Because those are the only two types who have attacked America with terrorism. Until I know otherwise I am going to say there is a 65\% chance of Arab terrorists and a 35\% domestic.------------------ This message has been edited by ic0n0 on September 11, 2001 at 02:27 PM Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 10 2001,19:26
hey evil genious, tom clancy was commenting on the fact that the muslims who do suicide terrorist attacks are actually just idiots because according to islam suicide is bad. that doesn't mean they didn't do it. they have been sending suicide bombers to israel almost every other week.
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,19:26
i doubt they got weapons aboard as they would need a hell of a lot to kill everyone on board and hey would risk de pressurising the plane. we might never know. it took years to figure out what happened on the lockaby disaster but i guess not everyone is willing to risk their lives, they might not have known what was happening to them until the last minute though now that i think about it. they might just think it was a bog standard hijackingThis message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on September 11, 2001 at 05:47 PM Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,19:27
heh, i don't doubt it was sandniggers that did it (absolutely no offense to any arab persons on this board, i'm mean, but not silly-stupid)... i was just stating what TC said... anyone else catch his crack on the stupidity of the media?
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,19:29
thats a fucking scary shot! ------------------ Posted by ic0n0 on Sep. 10 2001,19:29
As for missile defense I doubt they would knock out commercial planes. I do not think all or most Arabs are bad just the ones that harbor terrorists.------------------ Posted by aventari on Sep. 10 2001,19:30
quote: you mean you don't? ..freak
then i realized it was real, all i could think of was joining the FBI or CIA just to stop shit like this. It feels like living in a Tom Clancy novel ------------------ Posted by SLATE on Sep. 10 2001,19:31
quote: YOU can shut the fuck up.
Posted by ic0n0 on Sep. 10 2001,19:33
Evilgenus as far as I can figure you are an evil bigoted bastard.------------------ Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 10 2001,19:33
quote: what about the millions of muslims in the middle east who are cheering about the deaths of ~1000 american civilians? Posted by damien_s_lucifer on Sep. 10 2001,19:35
I keep hearing that "all Federal and State buildings are closed..."...but the Berkeley Lab - part of the DOE - is still open? This is bullshit. I don't want to be here. They gave us the option of "taking a sick or vacation day." Er, excuse me? THE FUCKING WTC AND PENTAGON WERE JUST BLOWN UP BY FUCKING TERRORISTS!!! HAS IT NOT OCCURRED TO MANAGEMENT THAT ALL ANYONE WANTS TO DO RIGHT NOW IS HIDE UNDER THEIR FUCKING BED?????????? AND THAT TELLING US TO TAKE A "SICK DAY" IF WE WANT IS THE MOST MEAN-SPIRITED THING WE'VE EVER HEARD? There's only about 1/3 of the people who are normally here. Those who remain are not working - they're watching TV or talking on the phone to their friends and families - very little eye contact as people walk dazed thru the halls - conversations, when they occur, are in hushed tones - me? I keep sitting at my desk - staring at the monitor - then hopping up to smoke yet another cigarette - my mom has cancer, my family's falling apart, and anyway they're on vacation out of reach of the phone - all my friends are huddled together with their significant others - which I don't have - my roommate has gone to be with his family - horrible agony in the land of the doomed. Posted by ic0n0 on Sep. 10 2001,19:35
Did they kill those Americans no? And you are stereotyping way out of line.------------------ This message has been edited by ic0n0 on September 11, 2001 at 02:35 PM Posted by ic0n0 on Sep. 10 2001,19:37
Not every single Arab in the Middle East is out to kill you many are not the majority.------------------ Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,19:39
quote: when i saw this thread this morning i though it was cos of some comedy show that had mabye said something about twin towers and that everyone had latched onto it then i turned on the tva dn fuck me... first time i saw the plane crash into the building i really thought it was a joke then my reality-o-meter kikced in and i thought why would the news fake that? ------------------ This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on September 11, 2001 at 05:49 PM Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,19:39
box cutters and knives?! what the fuck.. i'da ripped those terrorists a new asshole come at me with a knife... and i only say that because i've actually been in a knife fight before. come on people, get some fucking balls and stand up to those dumbshits... i'm sorry folks, i just know that if i was there i would have givin my life to change the course of that plane... whether vain or not.. i'm not one to lay down and die.
Posted by ic0n0 on Sep. 10 2001,19:41
I’m watching some news feeds from Italy and Germany and they are covering this also. I have never heard something like this described in so many languages.------------------ Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,19:43
ladies and gentlemen let me not get discarded by an earlier comment, i'm not a racist/bigot or whatever you wish to say, i don't care if it was full-blooded american bastards that did this, i want them to pay.. anger fuels the tongue.
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,19:44
fuck i just seen a clip of the plane crashin from a different angle it like punches right through thte whole fucking building! and if they only had knives on them i would be fucking pissed that they managed to get away with this whole thing. knives are easier to deal with than a simple punch! and they've finally announced the pittsbourgh thing noone survived that ------------------ This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on September 11, 2001 at 05:53 PM Posted by ic0n0 on Sep. 10 2001,19:45
I want them to pay also, but referring to people like they doesn't really help to solve this it only perpetuates stereotypes.------------------ Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,19:50
London's now locked up tighter than a knat's twat. pretty much everythings on maximum security. diubtful that anything will happen here anywayz but better to be safe than blown to fuck ------------------ This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on September 11, 2001 at 05:54 PM Posted by whiskey@throttle on Sep. 10 2001,19:54
An Akamai head was on one of the planes that hit the WTC:< http://us.news2.yimg.com/f/42/31/7m/dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010911/bs/crash_akamai_dc_1.html >
Posted by ic0n0 on Sep. 10 2001,19:54
I just saw the new angles, that is so sick, the building absorbed the jet.------------------ Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,19:55
hands up who thinks that bush's plans to re-implement the star wars program are pretty much fucked after todays events. a worst case scenario is not always the most sought after. you dont need nukes to bring civilisation to a halt------------------ Posted by ic0n0 on Sep. 10 2001,19:56
I don't know what to think anymore, I doubt nuclear missiles are going to be the object thrown at us anymore.------------------ Posted by whiskey@throttle on Sep. 10 2001,19:58
Another freaky shot:
Posted by darksol on Sep. 10 2001,20:00
who here thinks it was backed by a country? if it was i think it would either be indonesia or the middle east, thoughts?
Posted by chmod on Sep. 10 2001,20:00
quote: It's not possible to predict how you would react in a situation like that. You might think that you could be the hero, but fear makes your brain play tricks on itself. There is just as much chance that you would have pissed your pants and accepted your fate. Posted by ic0n0 on Sep. 10 2001,20:02
Something is going on in Afgahnistan------------------ Posted by Der_Teufel on Sep. 10 2001,20:03
Watching CNN right now. They have a live feed of Kabul, Afghanistan of missiles, rockets, etc. going off. You can hear and see the explosions. My dad is the commander of one of the camps in Okinawa and he said that they were put on ThreatCon Delta (highest almost 'virtual war' so to speak) not long after the pPntagon was hit.This message has been edited by Der_Teufel on September 11, 2001 at 03:04 PM Posted by chmod on Sep. 10 2001,20:03
quote:
Posted by kornalldaway on Sep. 10 2001,20:03
CNN is showing videos from Afganistan reporting sounds of gunfire and antiaircraft missles, as well as sounds of airplane missiles exploding all over. Supposedly US just lunched a first airstrike against Afganistan. But then again, those are just guesses, however the explosions and gunfire are real and CNN is showing it right now.
Posted by ic0n0 on Sep. 10 2001,20:05
a little early to determine if afgahnistan is the source.------------------ Posted by ic0n0 on Sep. 10 2001,20:06
I think it is the teliban VS. Northern tribes.------------------ Posted by Der_Teufel on Sep. 10 2001,20:06
This is a REALLY disturbing picture.This message has been edited by Der_Teufel on September 11, 2001 at 03:07 PM Posted by kornalldaway on Sep. 10 2001,20:06
we do not know anything at all, compared to the information US government officials know. Almost everything behind this case is being covered up right now and kept sekret.
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,20:07
might be just to try to convinve the civilians there that the americans are "killing" all the innocent civilians.whatever is going on i doubt its been planned beforehand ------------------ This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on September 11, 2001 at 05:39 PM Posted by whiskey@throttle on Sep. 10 2001,20:07
Something is going on in Afganistan...shots fired, explosions...some sort of a missle attack. Greenspan is probably having a heart attack right now. Bill Gross had a call with MSDW head today and it's BAD.. despite the 20 cars per pump and ŭ gas prices fiasco, the euro market is now going to cripple the american market (though am. market is not even in session). Equities are going to PLUNGE and a "relaxed" recession is going to turn into a full blown recession. The fed HAS TO create a price blockade...for the first time in 70 years we'll have to price-fix. You know...everyone hates the us: europeans, china, cuba, obviously the mideast...with no one taking blame and the pit that this throws the us into...not to mention the global advantage gained after today re international markets...it puts a big dent in the "Invincible US". VERY scary shit I hear the market will be closed for a week. UNPRECEDENTED. Gross was saying he can't imagine anything worse than this for the market and the economy... Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 10 2001,20:07
it's possible u.s. or israeli forces happen to know where bin laden is and are trying to take him out before he flees. even if it turns out he wasn't responsible for this, he has been responsible for countless other acts of terrorism.
Posted by ic0n0 on Sep. 10 2001,20:09
quote: So we think he may just be a scapegoat. ------------------ Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,20:10
just a lot of shit decided to occur today.. why today? it's the end of the world... w00t! Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,20:10
i find more disturbing that the news was showing people on the north tower hangin gout of windows with white flags and shit and minutes later 15 storeys of concrete was falling down on top of these people.and remember when we launched a counterattack on sadam last year in iraq. we didnt start a war then so it might just be there to test their response ------------------ This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on September 11, 2001 at 05:40 PM Posted by ic0n0 on Sep. 10 2001,20:11
Ironically it's 9/11 today.------------------ Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,20:14
anyone know whereabouts these strikes are? blowing up the civilians isnt such a hot idea ya know. quote: time to fuck as many chix as possible must keep the human race alive ------------------ This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on September 11, 2001 at 05:41 PM Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,20:16
the missiles are supposedly hitting outside of the town.. i think the northern side in the mountains or something like that...
Posted by kornalldaway on Sep. 10 2001,20:17
explosions are in KAbul, where supposedly all government of Afganistan is located
Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 10 2001,20:19
Holy fucking shit...Right now, I've heard reports from CBC and CNN. CBC has been saying that it looks like the missile strikes & artillery in Afghanistan looks as though they are coming from high flying airplanes. CNN Reports that an ammunitions dump has been attack and it currently burning. The shots of that plane sickened me to my stomach. ------------------ Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,20:19
they keep showing that fire off in the distance, and saying that it might be the airport or something liek that.. anyone else catch word of what's burning?
Posted by Nikita on Sep. 10 2001,20:20
quote: I was wondering about that ... My housemate got an email from the International student office that pretty much implied that all international students should watch their backs just in case. And I quote: "the tragic events of today may provoke intense emotion in many Americans. Although we have no indication that you should feel concerned for your safety, we feel it is important to advise all international students to be cautious." A friend's mom was IN the gdmf Pentagon - and she works on the side that was hit. She was okay though - was more towards the center of the building. Hm, at least I don't see anyone picketing outside with "The End is Near" signs ... Posted by Tattered on Sep. 10 2001,20:20
quote: Not only that but death during a holy war was supposed to be a way into heaven..
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,20:23
whats 11/9 (converted for proper calendar) got to do with all this? in fact what has todays date got to do with anything?------------------ This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on September 11, 2001 at 05:42 PM Posted by DRUFER on Sep. 10 2001,20:23
this is getting out of hand....i doubt that the US would just go ahead and bomb another contry so soon like that...ah forget it I dont know what the hell is going on anymore.
Posted by L33T_h4x0r_d00d on Sep. 10 2001,20:25
quote: 911 is a standard emergency number in america. If your being mugged, stabbed, burned, flooded, heart attacked, or struck by lightening you can call 911 and get the proper officials to the scene. Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,20:26
i beleive the date is just the planned time for all of these planes to be hijacked... whether or not this is some special day for terrorists around the world before.. it is now.
Posted by kornalldaway on Sep. 10 2001,20:26
it could very well be israel bombing afganistan
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,20:27
< time to send in the boys >------------------ This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on September 11, 2001 at 05:44 PM Posted by ic0n0 on Sep. 10 2001,20:28
This thread has filled fast------------------ Posted by JLb_8 on Sep. 10 2001,20:30
and has anyone wondered why the airlines havent made any form of statement. like as to the fact when they realised the planes were being hijacked whether they have identified any suspected passenegers what?!?!!
Posted by SLATE on Sep. 10 2001,20:31
quote: I'm sure he knows that, but they foreign countries see it as 11/9, which has no significance (or does it.) I think thats what his point was Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 10 2001,20:32
CNN just reported that the US offically has said that these strikes ARE NOT coming from the US and ARE NOT retalitory strikes.------------------ Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,20:33
CNN just said that america does not claim the bombings upon afghanistan... they claim it's just the continuing civil war...
Posted by DRUFER on Sep. 10 2001,20:33
Ok....According to CNN this afganastan stuff has to do with a civil war going on within Afganastan.....it was not retaliation for the terrorist attack.
Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 10 2001,20:34
quote: I'm sure the FBI is probably on that, but dont want to compromise thier search ------------------ Posted by L33T_h4x0r_d00d on Sep. 10 2001,20:40
Why the fuck must CNN cover half the screen with the tv boiler plate. Its not breaking news anymore. Everybody knows. Get that shit off the screen.
Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,20:43
*laugh* i'm waiting for small infomercials to pop up down there...
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,20:48
good point i'm betting a hell of a lot of the WRONG people want to know how much the US knows right now ------------------ simultaneity is not absolute. So just because you think i'm wrong, from my frame of reference i'm right! This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on September 11, 2001 at 05:33 PM Posted by StanVanDam on Sep. 10 2001,20:50
The US has been asking for this for a long time. There is somethin funny with the Bush administration. First was the Persian War, now this. Ever since Bush became president, there have been many conflicts. Yemeni bombing, EP-325 spy plane, Japan fishing boat, giving/selling weapons to Israel, and I'm sure u guys could think of some more.Every war the US fought, there were many civilian casualties. Many civilians NOT working in civilian buildings in Vietnam were killed, in Iraq, at least one hospital i know for sure was hit by a stray cruise missile. How can terrorists take down the "Invincible US" with just knives and cardboard cutters? The US can't retaliate against any particular group, since there are over 50 groups that would do something like this. All of you should know that MANY countries dislike or even HATE the US. The attacks in Kabul I bet are done by American terrorists. Maybe not by the US government, but most likely American. Who else would attack a poor small country like Afghanistan? If the US hits the wrong group, it will make the US look especially bad, and will spark a major conflict. Maybe if the US didn't impose sanctions on poor enough countries, or invade their space, they would be less hated. I think there may be American people working on the inside, because this attack happened to go over well. A lot of average people don't understand what the US does to other countries. In total, all in all, the atrocities the US have done are far worse than what has ever been done to them. Posted by spOon on Sep. 10 2001,20:55
So it's 90\% confirmed that this was the work of Oslama Bin Laben. Correct my spelling. I think that not only this is sad but the attitude of the Arabs is even more sad. They think that when they do this in the name of Allah that they will die and for to Allah Paradise Inn I suppose. How sad to be killed my your own beliefs. Bush is on his way back to DC to address us. He better have something good... Posted by Der_Teufel on Sep. 10 2001,20:56
The Camp David Accords were signed around this time in 1978. They screwed with the Arab-Israel conflict.
Posted by spOon on Sep. 10 2001,20:59
Der TeutelThis is totally off the subject but are you really from VT? If so... The HOKIES ROCK! Ok I'm over it..i'm cool... This message has been edited by spOon on September 11, 2001 at 04:01 PM Posted by Der_Teufel on Sep. 10 2001,21:03
Yes I am and yes they do. I'm a freshman here. The Northern Alliance has claimed responsibility for the Afghanistan bombings.
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,21:04
christ even more new shots of the second plane. the WTC looks like its made out of matchsticks. that thing just takes a massive chunk outta the building ------------------ This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on September 11, 2001 at 05:34 PM Posted by Nikita on Sep. 10 2001,21:08
Yea ... like a hot knife through a big butter stick ... I don't really know what to think anymore ... prof just emailed us postponing deadlines and homeworks ... Posted by aventari on Sep. 10 2001,21:18
my school shut down today, in fact all Cal State schools were. but i'm at work now and everything is pretty much business as usual------------------ Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,21:19
fucking knives! they were armed with just fucking knives i cant belive they did all this with just knives. dammit u have no idea how helpless u feel when u know that u could have helped these people! ------------------ This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on September 11, 2001 at 05:35 PM Posted by Der_Teufel on Sep. 10 2001,21:19
The first time I saw the video footage at about 0930 this morning I didn't realize how much of the plane came through the other side of the WTC before it blew up. I've e-mailed my dad asking some questions, but I'm sure he won't tell me anythign cause most of stuff is probably classified or he doesn't know. In my opinion I would consider the pilot of the plane that crashed in PA to be somewhat of a hero. It's possible that, if he ditched the plane, he saved thousands of lives by doing this.My roommate was asking what needs to happen for the draft to be enacted. HAHA Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 10 2001,21:19
It was hit by a 767 at full power. What did you expect to happen?------------------ Posted by StanVanDam on Sep. 10 2001,21:22
Dude I don't think the pilot did anything. Really though. Think about it.
Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 10 2001,21:23
quote: I'm willing to bet that it was shot down. ------------------ Posted by kornalldaway on Sep. 10 2001,21:24
yeah, me tooplus i think they had their own pilots doing the flying Posted by PersonGuy on Sep. 10 2001,21:25
quote: ROFL Verison Head of Marketing: "Dammit! Get CNN on the phone! I need them to show more video clips that include our logo!" ------------------ Posted by Der_Teufel on Sep. 10 2001,21:29
quote: At the time I saw it this morning the video they had was so bad it looked like a Leer jet (think that's the company). Assuming that that's what it was I thought that if a bigger plane hit it the whole upper part of the building would be gone. Posted by StanVanDam on Sep. 10 2001,21:29
For you CS players...< http://kotisivu.raketti.net/wadez/ter.jpg > Posted by PersonGuy on Sep. 10 2001,21:29
Oh, and in the spirit of Det Net------------------ This message has been edited by PersonGuy on September 11, 2001 at 04:32 PM Posted by SLATE on Sep. 10 2001,21:33
quote: Honestly, I wouldnt recommend posting anything your dad says.. You never know who could be reading this... SLATE Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,21:33
quote: LOL i know i shouldnt laugh but i cant help it
This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on September 11, 2001 at 05:36 PM Posted by SLATE on Sep. 10 2001,21:34
Why are you fucking people joking about this shit?< http://masterslate.org/ > Read my commentary. This isn't a joking matter. Posted by kornalldaway on Sep. 10 2001,21:37
totally unconfirmed reports from a few friends of mine in russai where they say a total of 11 planes were hijackedone of which landed in whitehourse, yukon. it was later proven that the plain wasn't hijacked, it just had to do an imergency landing because it was low on fuel. so taking all the into account, according to russia (very much unconfirmed), a total of 10 planes were hijacked. now if 4 of those went down, there must be 6 more that had been shot down or had landed somewhere Posted by L33T_h4x0r_d00d on Sep. 10 2001,21:38
quote: Is this funny to you? Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,21:49
i'm interested on the retaliation that US is going to take... it should be fucking hardcore on whomever we deem responsible.. and if it's the wrong perons on the first try, fuck it.. go to the next one on the list... and i still cna't beleive people are blaming this shit on W.. come on people, this was in place long before W ever thought of being president...
Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 10 2001,21:53
The US is most likely going to (and they had damned well better) declare War on all countries housing Terrorists.------------------ Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 10 2001,21:58
"In the City of God there will be a great thunder, two brothers torn apart by chaos, while the fortress endures, the great leader will succumb.", "The third big war will begin when the big city is burning." - Nostradamus
Posted by SLATE on Sep. 10 2001,22:00
quote: The only thing I agree with you on. Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,22:03
quote: why is everyone quoting this shit! its moere ambiguous than a fucking horoscope. need i remind u that nostradamus predicted the world to end pretty much every fucking 3 years or somethign ridiculous
This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on September 11, 2001 at 05:38 PM Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,22:09
my "world gone to shit" cam ghetto style< http://www.yafs.08002go.com/webcam/webcamremote.html > its on news 24 so should be on all night ------------------ Posted by L33T_h4x0r_d00d on Sep. 10 2001,22:11
quote: That would make us as bad as them. We need to get retribution, but we cannot result to terrorist acts to do so. This message has been edited by L33T_h4x0r_d00d on September 11, 2001 at 05:13 PM Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,22:17
purely because i'm a wierd fella, i'd love to hear of an american terrorist team fuckin their worlds up.. maybe even to the swordfish level, but i doubt it... retribution, yes.. i agree whole-heartedly, and i just want them to pay. and pay hard... it's easy for someone like me iwth a lack of conscience to say he doens't mind the amoutn of innocent lost in finding the people whom are responsible... but again, i'm also smart enough to know that that's not what will take place, nor what needs too... let's just hope the actions that W takes are the right ones... and if not totally correct, the best to human possiblility, and american possibility. Posted by L33T_h4x0r_d00d on Sep. 10 2001,22:18
What makes me even sicker than the actual crashes is that camara whore, Paula Zahn, on CNN. She was actually smiling when she said that there were 200 missing firefighters and 78 police.
Posted by [liquid] meta on Sep. 10 2001,22:24
< my views on this >Nostradamus. Posted by Der_Teufel on Sep. 10 2001,22:27
quote: No shit, that's pretty obvious. I wasn't saying that I was gonna post what I'd heard from him. Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,22:35
no distinguishing between those responsible and those harboring them... W is out to kick some ass... W mentions Psalm 23 as well.. interesting.. thoughts? Posted by StanVanDam on Sep. 10 2001,22:52
"Those responsible and those harboring them"That gives them leeway to bomb the entire country and say that the country was helping the terrorist(s). Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,22:56
i dont think i'll ever play red alert 2 in the same way ever again (you'd have to have played it to get that) ------------------ This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on September 11, 2001 at 05:58 PM Posted by StanVanDam on Sep. 10 2001,23:08
I played it like 3-4 years ago...I forget...plz explain.
Posted by veilside on Sep. 10 2001,23:14
quote:that.....is FUCKED up.
Posted by StanVanDam on Sep. 10 2001,23:16
Yeah man its all fuct. Osama bin Laden was spelled all wrong.
Posted by veilside on Sep. 10 2001,23:20
quote:it's not even, that, i don't appreciate the fact that someone even took the time to make shit like this... pretty damn immature Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 10 2001,23:21
you know the mission where you have to stop the psychic transmitter being set up and just for fun you can blow the fuck out of the WTC with your tanks ------------------ Posted by aventari on Sep. 10 2001,23:23
< Weird stuff >interesting even if not real ------------------ Posted by L33T_h4x0r_d00d on Sep. 10 2001,23:26
quote: WTF? Close to 50,000 people could be dead and your making fucking jokes. What the hell is your problem? Hey j0esmith. Ill pay for your plane if you drop by Nova Scotia and crash it into StanVanDam's house. Just make sure you jump out then we can make fucking cartoons about him and his dead fucking family splattered and burned to death. This message has been edited by L33T_h4x0r_d00d on September 11, 2001 at 06:28 PM Posted by aventari on Sep. 10 2001,23:29
how do they know the planes were hijacked w/ knives? Posted by veilside on Sep. 10 2001,23:32
quote:there was a woman who called out of a hijacked plane and described their weapons, "knife-like objects" i believe..
Posted by veilside on Sep. 10 2001,23:33
quote:werd... this isn't a time for jokes... Posted by chmod on Sep. 10 2001,23:33
quote: supposedly some people on the plane used their cell phones and called their families or something. i didn't think that could be done on a plane, but... that's what i heard. Posted by kuru on Sep. 10 2001,23:34
Because a CNN correspondent was on the plane crashed into the Pentagon when it was hijacked. She made a cell phone call to her husband and said that the hijackers had 'knives and knife like objects' and used them to subdue passengers and crew and force them to the back of the plane. We know it only becase Barbara Olson was there. Rest in peace, Ms. Olson. ------------------ Posted by StanVanDam on Sep. 10 2001,23:36
Hey. I have no affiliation with the government. I don't try to fuck with other countries. I don't expect to be hit in a terrorist attack.So fuck you. American government is one thing, but the American people is something else. I have NOTHING at all against random American people. Project Echelon, Carnivore, Vietnam, the spy plane incident, Japanese fishing boat full of university students, Korea. These are some events where the US has clearly done some wrong. Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 10 2001,23:40
quote: She dies, Zahn lives. Fuck. ------------------ Posted by SLATE on Sep. 10 2001,23:40
quote: reportedly 3 of the 4 flights had contact with someone on board, mostly via cellphone. They told about the shit that was going down. Also, some high ranking US official's wife was on board 1 plane and she called and told about it too. (http://news.excite.com/news/ap/010911/20/news-attacks-investigation) Posted by aventari on Sep. 10 2001,23:41
wow. thats amazing that they could do that with just knives. i'm sickened
Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 10 2001,23:45
Mrs Oslon was supposed to leave on a flight the previous day. She stayed for her husbands birthday, so she could spend the night with him.------------------ Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,23:49
people are using their cell phones from under the rubble to direct the rescue people to their locations... i honestly wish i was there to help.. although i don't have my EMT lisence... i'd still help.
Posted by aventari on Sep. 10 2001,23:49
My friends girlfriend is in NY right now on vacation, she visited the World Trade Center _yesterday_ and was gonna fly back here to California today but didn't. veeery lucky Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 10 2001,23:52
also, one of the people fleeing the building by jumping out of the 50th floor.. landed on a rescue member, firefighter i think they said, and killed him... definately not cool.
Posted by StanVanDam on Sep. 11 2001,00:00
ALSO, i have a pic from the internet of someone falling out of the building. The pathetic thing is that it is fake. You can see the crop marks in the pic if u zoom in a little bit.
Posted by L33T_h4x0r_d00d on Sep. 11 2001,00:08
quote: And how many of the people in the WTC made decisions that affected any of those events? How many of the people in the WTC had anything to do with what happens in the middle east? I can understand the pentagon but not the WTC. Posted by StanVanDam on Sep. 11 2001,00:17
Yeah, I do feel bad about the WTC. Coming from the terrorist point of view, it would cripple the US economy (and others I think), which is what they want to happen. Still I can't think of any ways to justify hitting the WTC. I try to see things from both ways.
Posted by L33T_h4x0r_d00d on Sep. 11 2001,00:24
quote:
Posted by Hellraiser on Sep. 11 2001,00:24
You know what else the US has done wrong? Probably everything the US has done if it didn't go as planned or affected anyone in any way. That's still not reason to blow up a federal building, let alone two trade buildings with 50000 workers in them and four planes complete with passengers. No grievance with a country calls for acts of terrorism on its people. The mere implication that any consideration of what the US may or may not have done right in the past has any bearing on this situation is offensive to the extreme. I am really starting to dislike this StanVanDam character.------------------ Posted by StanVanDam on Sep. 11 2001,00:26
Sheikh Yassin, leader of the Islamic militant group Hamas, said "no doubt this is a result of injustice the U.S practices against the weak in the world."You can't totally deny this. There is partial truth in what this guy is saying. Posted by miNus on Sep. 11 2001,00:28
quote: Echelon, Carnivore: Online surveillence. How can you compare ANY of these incidents to what happened today or ANY terrorist attack!? So shut the fuck up until you pull your head out of your ass, StanVanDam, or we can all do it for you. Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 11 2001,00:29
Oh would you shut the fuck up.If you want to think like that, move to the middle east so we can proceed to drop bombs on your fucking skull. edit: Directed at Stan, obviously. ------------------ This message has been edited by j0eSmith on September 11, 2001 at 07:31 PM Posted by miNus on Sep. 11 2001,00:35
quote: It did not, nor will it cripple the American economy. Whoever planned this for sure had flawed thinking.
quote: What the fuck? What "injustice against the weak"? Come on, tell me. The USA is a country that offers strong protection of it's citizens, yet also gives us FREEDOM. Where else in the fucking world do you get that? Not many places. We stick our nose in business it does not belong in, but that's because of our heritage. No body is of American descent. We are all from someplace else, which means we all have ties to our homelands. If some civil war were to happen in Italy, I would want the US to get involved to try to solve the problem. That's what we are. Peace keepers. And some fucked up people get pissed off when thier terms aren't the ones that are settled on. Fuck them. And fuck you. So fuck off. Posted by chmod on Sep. 11 2001,00:39
quote: The United States has done more to help the weak than most other countries all over the world. And even if our country has done some wrong, it is nowhere nearly enough to begin to justify what happened today.
Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 11 2001,00:56
Fuck..Asian markets just opened, and are allready down to their lowest point in 17 years. Gas prices are up to ŭ/gal in some place in the states (same as Ū/litre Cdn) ------------------ Posted by whiskey@throttle on Sep. 11 2001,01:01
The point I found most disconcerting was addressed by Schwarzkophf tonight: that in, for example, the Gulf War, US troops took as many steps possible to avoid harming civilians and civilian targets. Now, to say they succeeded in this effort 100\% would be plain ignorant, but as far as I know the US (being a superpower in the spotlight of the globe) did go to extra lengths to keep Iraqi civilians out of harm's way. Sometimes, even putting our own troops at extra risk.The sad thing is that whoever did this (and I'm not implying it's the same person) had absolutely no concern for civilian life. That's what still gets me. If you have beef with a government...attack government installations. Ugh. I don't know. I still haven't heard from my cousin in NYC. Another cousin left just yesterday, thank God. What a strange day it's been. Still, I have to be somewhat objective about this. What could have pissed these people off so much that they would do something like this? What is the US really doing abroad? It's absolutely no excuse for this disgusting fucking day, and I really want to see these motherfuckers pay for this, but I don't know if it will stop there. Seems like there could be a bigger problem. And it really scares me what that problem is...and how we're going to deal with it. Posted by L33T_h4x0r_d00d on Sep. 11 2001,01:04
Well, the toll is up to 265 firefighters including the firecheif and assistant firecheif, and 85 police officers.
Posted by Hellraiser on Sep. 11 2001,01:17
Whoever did this should die a horrible death. No cause is worth this kind of careless disregard for human life. I can think of only one thing in the past that even comes close to the kind of evil witnessed today, and that is Hitler's crusade against the Jews. Pearl harbor is not a good comparison because it was a legit target considering the fact that it was a military installation. The World Trade Center was (I hate using the past tense here) a non-government, non-military installation manned pretty much entirely by civilian class citizens.
Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 11 2001,01:29
2-3 people arrested tonite on the NJ Turnpike, near the GW Bridge. Found with a van filled with Explosives------------------ Posted by SLATE on Sep. 11 2001,01:29
quote: I also heard that the official count for the Pentagon was over 800 people. Posted by SLATE on Sep. 11 2001,01:31
quote:
Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 11 2001,01:33
Update: No explosives were in the van. Just confirmed by NY Police Commisioner.
Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 11 2001,01:35
the van didn't have any explosives in it.. the 2+ men are beign held for questioning...
Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 11 2001,01:36
quote: actually it was 100-800. 800 max. that's fiddlesticks compared to the x-thousands killed at the wtc... Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 11 2001,01:49
Up to 300+ firefighters now.These men and women deserve the highest honour possible. Posted by kuru on Sep. 11 2001,01:57
There's speculation here that the plane that went down in Somerset County PA was downed because the pilot refused to crash into Washington D.C.Rumors are all over the place that the pilot intentionally crashed into the field rather than a D.C. building. ------------------ Posted by SLATE on Sep. 11 2001,02:01
quote: That was my suspection... That man had courage. Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 11 2001,02:01
quote: Given the chance, I would've. ------------------ Posted by SLATE on Sep. 11 2001,02:11
What I'm wondering is why NOONE on board these planes fought against a bunch of assholes wielding knives... Sure, you might get stabbed, but come on... Its worth risking it rather then crashing and guarenteed death. Plus, a plane of lets say 50 people.... even if 10 of them were terrorists, there are still 40 passengers, 2 pilots and about 3-7 crew.. Figure only half are men... you still have 20 guys vs 20 knifewleding terrorists... Odds seem in there favor... Why they didn't fight back, who knows. Maybe there's something we don't know. It just kinda ticks me off....
Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 11 2001,02:20
im sure if they knew what was planned they would've.
Posted by Rhydant on Sep. 11 2001,02:22
slate, we dont know what the fuck happened up there on the planes. for all we know, the terrorist could of killed off a couple of passengers taht might have put up an uprising.there was a guy on the one that crashed in PA that lockede himself in the lavitory. he called 911 on the cell phone and was on the line for about 1 minute, tben the line went dead. teh terroist prolly killed him, or the plane crashed. shit ive been watching this crap since this morning in school. its so god damned depressing. all because these fuckin Palesitinians want Israel back, and they cant have it. so they send some kamakazis to hi-jack planes and run them into the WTC/pentagon. Shit. if cluless george doesnt get off his ass and fire some damn tomahawks and smartbombs at Afganhistan (where Ben Laden is hiding) and Palestine, alot of people are gonna get pissy. ------------------ Posted by SLATE on Sep. 11 2001,02:29
rhydant, don't place blame when its not 100\% certain...
Posted by Rhydant on Sep. 11 2001,02:30
pffft....bomb first, then again, and ask questions later. ------------------ Posted by solid on Sep. 11 2001,02:31
Rhydrant I hope you realize that's rather ignorant...
Posted by Rhydant on Sep. 11 2001,02:32
....errr, forgot something.anyone actually live in New York? or does anyone know anyone in new york? ive got 2 friends up there. talked to one today, says he saw one of the towers colapse from his apartment, but hes ok. Havent hear from the other one.... ------------------ Posted by Rhydant on Sep. 11 2001,02:33
quote: no shit? Posted by SLATE on Sep. 11 2001,02:40
I live in very close proximity to there. About 10 miles...
Posted by Vigilante on Sep. 11 2001,02:43
As for fighting back against the terrorists...It's easy for us on the ground to say that. However, until we dig up the flight recorders (and maybe not even then), we won't know exactly what happened on any of those planes. It's rather unlikely the T's told everyone they were on a kamikaze flight. They couldn't see out the front of the plane; they had no way of knowing they were about to ram headfirst into the twin towers or the pentagon. What if the T's grabbed women or children hostages? Not knowing that you were in fact dead either way, would you risk the life of a woman with a knife to her throat without any idea what would happen? Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 11 2001,02:43
Doesn't Chrissy live in the NY area?
Posted by SLATE on Sep. 11 2001,02:43
I'm gunna try to donate blood tomorrow... Godspeed
Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 11 2001,02:45
Also, one offical reports that there was a Keyed Mic on one of the flights that gave investigators "some very good leads".
Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 11 2001,02:52
the man that mrs. olson said was in that certain seat was from Broward county... and now the FBI is gonna go find the people who will lead to who's really behind all of it.. then i say take those people and do horrible things to them... once again, it's just what i'd like to see done. i don't know how to completely convey it, but when someone does something horrible to america, we should retlaiate twice if not 100 times worse to them and anyone associated with them.. proving that if you fuck with america, be prepared.. we're the most powerful nation of pissed off fuckers in the world.. :-P
Posted by Rhydant on Sep. 11 2001,02:56
quote: i hear they only want type O. the sad thing is, there arent going to be a lot of survivors to give the blood to. most of the people that went to the hospitol were for dust inhailation. ------------------ Posted by SLATE on Sep. 11 2001,03:06
quote: i hear they only want type O. [/B][/QUOTE] O+ or o-? and its worth a shot.. I'm pretty sure I'm type O. Posted by SLATE on Sep. 11 2001,03:16
quote: what is a keyed mic? Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 11 2001,03:19
O- is the universal donor blood. (i think)Any type of donation will do. A keyed mic means a mic that'd been activated. Like the one in the cockpit was active so the ATC could hear things the mike was picking up Posted by SLATE on Sep. 11 2001,03:23
Ahh makes sense.Personally, I don't feel as though I have much time left on this earth, so, just in case the worst happens.. Fairwell to all of you. If I'm wrong, which I hope I am, then good. But I just feel really uneasy in my stomach and I honestly think its gunna get worse. SLATE Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 11 2001,03:26
both o+ and o- are universal donors, sorry.
Posted by Frosty on Sep. 11 2001,04:28
I think there are three major points that need to be gotten across here. I'll start with the one that will piss most of you off, but really, bear with me.Everyone needs to just calm the fuck down, take a step back/deep breath, and try to take a dispassionate look at this. I told someone today that it was a very successful attack on the part of the terrorists, and that person got pissed off at me. I'm not being insensitive, it is tragic and horrible but all these people died. But that's no excuse to lose all sense of reason.
quote: Prime example. L33t, he was looking at a completely different aspect. Talk all you want, that's not going to matter on tiny ass little bit about the great loss that these people suffered. No one is denying they suffered a great loss. But people suffer great losses all the time, and if you just get hung up on the fact that this was a bunch of people dying and forget that it happened because some people WILLED IT to happen then you're totally missing the point. Justification for hitting the WTC is important. In our eyes it's very very bad and horrible because a lot of civilians were killed. If you look at it from their point of view (which is IMPORTANT) you get a much different twist on things where the benefits outweighed the costs. Also consider the fact that we're not dealing with a military body, but a terrorist faction. Terrorism has nothing to do with civilian/military targets, it doesn't distinguish. That's why it's called terrorism. Scary, isn't it? For all the people who are so bewildered about how these people could do this with knives, ask yourself...would you endanger your life by attempting to attack these people if it wasn't in immediate danger? I highly doubt you would. So what these terrorists could easily have done is told everyone that the plane was being hijacked, and they would be landing somewhere to negotiate for their lives. Don't cause trouble and you won't die; your freedom will be bought by your government. That way everyone just sits in the back of the plane and awaits arrival at whatever destination. It's a lot different if you know what's actually happening compared to what's happened in your little world up to that point. My third point is actually more of a question. That is, how is it that everyone says this event was extremely well planned? All of these flight times are available on the internet and without smuggling any weapons or anything else suspicious into the airport to get you arrested, you should be fine. The hardest part of the trip would be once the plane is hijacked, finding your way to wherever you need to run into. The way I see it, this could've been planned in a couple of hours. It was well organized, but not THAT complex. Part of it failed anyway. I hope at least some of you can actually detach from your hysterical selves and give some sensical replies to this instead of just deciding i'm a cold asshole (which is not the case). Any thoughts? Posted by L33T_h4x0r_d00d on Sep. 11 2001,05:01
quote:
Posted by whiskey@throttle on Sep. 11 2001,05:07
Yeah, I hear you on that and definitely agree. Sorry for the misunderstanding.I just saw this on another board. Not sure how true it is though:
quote: To think we had to shoot down our own planes...holy shit. That's heavy. Posted by Nikita on Sep. 11 2001,05:10
If that's true then I'm going to feel like i'm in the middle of a goddamn whackamole contest involving fallen planes ... go PA...
Posted by DRUFER on Sep. 11 2001,05:22
Im in shock here....i was in my CISCO class today (3 and 1/2 hrs) and we got a message to turn the news....school was kinda shut down...they didnt send us home but we didnt do much for the afternoon but watch this. They replayed the videos of the WTC buildings collapsing over and over and over again...EDIT:I live on the NJ coast near sandy hook....my father who was home at the time said he HEARD the explosion. This message has been edited by DRUFER on September 11, 2001 at 12:24 PM Posted by L33T_h4x0r_d00d on Sep. 11 2001,05:24
quote: Imagine the last thing you see is your own millitary plane firing a hellfire or sidewinder missle at you. Also no one else has mentioned the car bombing on the FAA building in Leesburg Va. From the roof of our building in Tysons corner we could see the fire and smoke of the pentagon to the east and the smoke of the FAA building to the west. Also my father works at the state dept. in DC. I just talked to him and he said there was no car bomb, or that it was very small. The building didnt shake so he is skeptical. Posted by MattimeoZ80 on Sep. 11 2001,05:25
got some images... working on movies.< http://terror.joshstorz.com/ > Posted by JLb_8 on Sep. 11 2001,05:33
k i havent heard anything on the live news about that f-16 thing.what i have been hearing is everyones agreement that americas lax security measures did contribute in a heavy way to allowing this to happen. i think that the US not being so used to terrorist attacks made them a prime target for such a massive scheme. so it might be that it was targetted because of that and that the general target was the whole democratic world. fucking ben ladin and the bastard taloban who cares if it wasnt them good enuff reason as any to put more effort into getting rid of 'em. President hasn't moved to the white house but to central air command. this is most likely just for security and communication purposes but if he feels like throwing a few cruise missiles (NOY NUKES FFS!) at sadam and the boys then i wont complain too much Posted by SLATE on Sep. 11 2001,05:33
(what i'm about to say should not be taken as fact..)The reasons of shooting down the planes is that we had the option of either taking them down or letting them crash into more buildings, killing more people. Yes, its extremely unfortunate, but it wouldn't have been done unless it was deemed necessary. Godspeed. Posted by spOon on Sep. 11 2001,05:38
Shit SHit SHITTTT! I get dumped by my stupid horse, come home to see the WTC is missing and the Pentagon has been blown?!? What the fuck?! Anyways...Anyone is insane to attack the US. We got enough military, weapons, and nuclear nukes to knock out the world population 86 times. We spend 200 biliion each year for defense alone. Attacking the US is like asking someone to write your suicide note. Anyways they didnt suceed in PA, but man... they ruined my sunshine day. Bush is in Omaha, Nebraska. He is gonna hold a confrence with DC via telephone and video. Brokaw fell asleep and is drooling on his desk. BTW, thanks to Britian Posted by Hellraiser on Sep. 11 2001,05:49
They closed the college early today, so I got to skip my last class, but thats a small matter in light of such a tragedy. "Anyone else feel like chicken little," as my friend commented to me earlier today. First heard about it this morning right before math class, it was all over the campus in like 30 minutes after the second crash was reported. Total fucking madness now. Oh well, life goes on, and may all those who have passed on rest in peace, I know we're not gonna have peace from this matter for a while yet. This thing is even more tragic than Columbine or Oklahoma on a matter of scale alone. It makes me sad to be part of the human race to think that anyone could be so malicious as to plan an attack like this, but it makes me proud at the same time to know that there are those who will give up days and days of their time to help their fellow man through this crisis. Posted by veilside on Sep. 11 2001,05:59
quote:i go to school like 6 miles from nyc, in bergen county... litteraly, a short drive down the highway... i didn't hear anything cause i was in class.. interesting how they keep us in there with no tv, when we're missing history taking place..
Posted by YouGunnaStopMe? on Sep. 11 2001,07:35
All your trade centre are belong to us!
Posted by DeadAnztac on Sep. 11 2001,08:51
Ok. I hate to be the conspirator here, but what in the hell would a terrorist group have to gain from doing this? America has demonstrated it's prowess in hunting down terrorists in the past, doing this is like putting a "Please nuke me" sign on their back. It just doesn't make sense. In short, no matter how bad it is for us I can only imagine it being worse for whoever did it.Now, who does profit from this? Us. Despite of the loss of human lives think what this does for us: Bush finally has a solid basis to attack the middle east, and possibly even try to take it over if he feels like it. People had been talking of continuing peace talks in the Middle East; now the same people will be screaming, "BLOOD!" Also, note how well organized and well researched the action was. Almost to a point where it seemed like a well executed military action, no? Finally, can you think of any better way to hike our economy then war? Bush realizes that America is it's strongest when it's at war. His father realized the same thing. Don't shoot the messenger, just take this warning to heart and think about it. Think about it logically. Believe me, I would love to be wrong. I would love there to be a single specific group that did this that we could bring to justice. Alas I doubt it's that simple, and we all should realize that at least. *NOTE* I have, most likely, just been blacklisted. ------------------ This message has been edited by DeadAnztac on September 12, 2001 at 04:05 AM Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 11 2001,09:32
neither bush started a fake war to stimulate the economy. any such conjecture is just pure bullshit.
Posted by YouGunnaStopMe? on Sep. 11 2001,10:27
< http://clan_e_c.tripod.com/america.jpg > Posted by Nikita on Sep. 11 2001,11:30
Blood: any of the + ones has the Rh factor in it I believe.Make-a-War: Too much X-Files? Though at this point, anything is possible... Palestinians celebrating: ... *sigh* Students from the middle east: ... smart enough to not do something foolish like celebrate in public. Though I feel sorry for them ... there's a job fair here this week ... Posted by spOon on Sep. 11 2001,11:38
Ok so it's said that it's possible around 800 people died in the Pentagon crash. Most of my relatives are in NY.. so far so good. I live a tic away from DC. Man the traffic. It's awful. This REALLY PISSED ME OFF! They are showing people jumping from the twins... those people are about to meet their fucking deaths! And their showing it on National TV! Don't they have any respect? MG.... I'm gonna go email NBC, and ABC. Posted by Wolfguard on Sep. 11 2001,11:59
Its a day later.Not only should they hunt down the bastard that did this and nuke him out of existance and the goverment that protected him back to the stone age, they should find every terrorist and their camps and bomb them into dust too. I dont care if you have to bomb entire countries into the stone age. I dont care if there people had anything to do with it. If the people of the country are cheering our deaths in the streets then they too are supporting the terrorists. We have been taking it on the chin from these maggots for years and just wagging a finger at them. We as a people have had enough. Its time we put a stop to all these little fucknuggets once and for all. I dont care if we have to kill every single person in the middle east to make this stop. and you little, sniviling, whining, fucks that thinks this is a bad thing because we are more civilized than that. Fuck you. These bastards are not civilized and they need to be delt with. The carrot has not worked in the past. Fine, bring out the big stick. ------------------ Posted by WillyPete on Sep. 11 2001,12:06
First off: My sympathies guys.DA: you ask why? Just a few points to mull over. *Anyone noticed how well the attacks were carried out. I mean, the towers were hit form opposite directions even though they originated from the same airport. The gash in the first tower show the aircraft hit at a banked angle. The video of the second shows the same. *Someone on tv commented they looked like they were swerving. Not so. They hit to cause maximum damage structurally. A diagonal impact would cover more floors of the building vs horizontal impact whaich would have been easier to achieve. The resulting damage also took out the supporting corner nearest the other tower. The planes were just from takeoff - fully fueled: lots of guaranteed fire, of which momentum would carry to the far side of the structure before igniting. *The planes hit at different heights, almost similar to the opposing cuts a feller makes on a tree to weaken it if you treat the towers as one unit. *Time of the attack. Shows some military/spec ops training by the planners. Used to create maximum disruption. Rush hour, both street and airport, would have made their job easier and resulted in more collateral damage with people at work (not lunch) and emergency services being delayed. Law enforcement/military reactions delayed due those in authority just arriving at work, adding to paralysis of reaction through surprise. Disruption of related industries/organisations such as stock exchange. An evening attack would have not affected gold/oil prices the way they would. Bush could have frozen the markets overnight to prevent it. Shows good analysis and appreciation of US economic reaction. These factors pretty much guaranteed structural failure. Any falling of the building would be guaranteed to hit the foundation of the neighbouring tower. Next:
*Synchronised attack. You just need to ensure that your people are all airborne on their scheduled flights. You could even use cell phones for that. They work in the air, the victims are proof of that. *The big issue here was security. Very few people involved and the fact that no-one knew about it. Would suggest the top level decision from any organisation and absolute secrecy between those involved. You'd only want those doing the job involved in this. This shows you don't really need that many people to do the job. *Training: MS flight sim? Some suggest no skill and some say they were trained pilots. I say basic piloting skills. With Flight sims, I can fly a plane into any of the targeted buildings easily countless times and from different angles prior to the event. They're all big, easily reached, easily identified from other buildings and close to all major flight paths. *Why American Airlines? Security. Some companies follow more stringent rules than others. With a knife, you'd want to get into the cockpit of an already airborne craft and kill the crew. I've been on South West flight where I could lean ove and see the runway through the open door of the cockpit whilst landing. Very lax standards. *As pointed out, most people would rush knife weilding hijackers. The crew were dead I say. I also say that because a good pilot would realise what would happen hitting the WTC and would have gone for the river. We'll prolly discover they were dead before impact. Conclusion. This was probably done by a very small, VERY trusted part or break-off from an existing organisation. I won't suggest an action by a foreign nation, but won't dismiss it. I do have some questions. Anyone else notice the Bush statement? (EG did i think) Odd to quote a christian reference by the leader of a country that bans school prayer? Psalm 23. Written by the king of Isreal, a king which had ordered or participated in conquering the lands now in dispute. Bush is going too get tough on international terrorism. Does this mean we are going to see a stop to the US dollars financing groups like they did for the IRA? The US is not innocent of these types of actions. Sorry if I offended anyone or sound insensitive, but I have to think like a surgeon here whilst analysing it. You have to block out the injured body while trying to see what's wrong with it. This message has been edited by WillyPete on September 12, 2001 at 07:10 AM Posted by WillyPete on Sep. 11 2001,12:44
quote: And there's absolutely NO innocent people in those countries right? You didn't cheer when people died in Iraq? No-one in America said 'Damn right!' when the ANC/PAC used to bomb the living shit out of us in So. Africa. (regardless of their options, I won't get into that argument. it's not their reason here, it's their actions I'm not condoning.) Not as long as we in Europe have had it. America has ONLY JUST seen what it's like to be terrorised. You guys had no problem watching US dollars buy bombs for the IRA. Look up the Omagh bombing. You know you could probably translate this in arabic and change 'middle east' into 'America' and I guarantee some guy over there has said those words. By dropping nukes you nullify ANY nuclear treaties America has EVER entered into. You make a laughing stock of any future attempts by the US to stop nuke proliferation in other countries. You invite the whole islamic religion to attack westerners EVERYWHERE. They wouldn't stand for blind retaliatory strikes by the US/NATO. You would unite ALL of arab nations against Israel and the west. Bye bye cheap gas and the US way of life. You turn the US into an International war criminal unmatched even by Hitler, Hussein or Milosevich. I'm not pointing the finger at you guys and saying you're wrong to feel this way or that your loss is nothing, but this attitude is wrong. This message has been edited by WillyPete on September 12, 2001 at 08:03 AM Posted by L33T_h4x0r_d00d on Sep. 11 2001,12:51
quote: Very true. But please have a little respect for the dead. I am one of the first people to crack a joke about something but that CS picture was in VERY poor taste. Posted by spOon on Sep. 11 2001,12:58
I wouldn't do anything to the cheering people. The kids were brought into it by the adults. I think we should send a steam roller over Afgahnastan, and anyone else who helped in the action. But the cheering is harmless. Let them cheer. They will just put more guilt on their pathetic souls. Besides, the ones that were cheering were arrested. And there was only a few groups.Anyone hear anything about the black boxes? Oh this is chilling. They are getting cell phone calls from people trapped in the rubble, begging for help. They found a car at Dulles that is most likely driven by the terrorists. It had Arabiac flying manuals, and copies of the Toran. It had a VA lisence plate. They towed it and is under investigation. Posted by WillyPete on Sep. 11 2001,12:59
L33t, although distasteful, it's a good indicator as to how we've become very desensitised to violence as a whole. I'm actually a bit ashamed that the joke didn't appall me as much as I know it should have. This message has been edited by WillyPete on September 12, 2001 at 08:00 AM Posted by Nikita on Sep. 11 2001,13:34
The HUB is packed with people watching the news on the widescreens. They just delivered 2nd or 3rd batches of major newspapers to campus. The first batches were gone by 9am I think. All my classes were cancelled. At least 50 companies have cancelled attendance to the job fair this week. I was at a candelight vigil last night. There were people there who have lost relatives and family. I have not been able to reach my relatives in the NY area. Nor have I been able to reach a good friend who lives there. There were a few things said that the mostly christian vigil that made me want to stuff the guitar down the speaker's throat. Let us grieve for once, don't say "God is awesome" "God has taken a bad thing and made it good" I know they want to turn negatives into positives ... but now is not the time. Now what? WW3? I certainly hope not. Sorry, I'm just a bit caught up with everything right now. I'm just rambling. --------------------- Posted by The_Stomper on Sep. 11 2001,14:12
"These were not merely acts of terror. These were acts of war." - Bush in a speech this morning.Fuck. This is not good. I'd love to see justice meted out on those responsible but I don't want a war. I have a really bad feeling about this. Last time I felt this bad, JFK Jr. died in a plane crash the next morning. I'm frightened. Honestly. I am. Posted by Hellraiser on Sep. 11 2001,14:12
I know what you mean Nikita, I don't feel like anyone should try to turn this into a positive, nothing positive can come out of this. All we can do is support each other and hope that this brings about a sense of national unity that has not been felt for some time now.I don't think a hasty reaction by the US would be a good idea, we need to find out exactly who was behind this and who helped them, and wipe their memory from the face of the earth. But we don't want to start WW3, at least I don't. We've already declared war on those who did this, lets find out who they are and take care of them. I wonder what will be done at the site of the WTC buildings. I kind of hope that it doesn't get leveled and turned into a park or something, we should build trade centers there again to show those who did this that they cannot topple American pride by toppling the symbols of capitalism. I do think however that no one will feel the same about America, and we might loose some of the freedom to travel that we have enjoyed to this point. I certainly hope that airports around the country and around the world learn from this and tighten their security so you cant even take a pin onboard an airplane. Posted by Wolfguard on Sep. 11 2001,14:46
quote: There chanting it in the streets right now im sure.
quote: What ever it takes. Im more for a conventional war but if it takes a nuke to make these fucknuggets realise that enough is enough then im all for dropping one. though a FAE(Fuel Air Explosive) would work just as well in this case
quote: Yeah, like thats working for us. im wondering when an old russian nuke will show up in NY harbor in a binladen bought yaht.
quote: Hello...been happining already
quote: So, we take their land and their oil and make it cheeper yet for everyone. No more of this opec shit of cutting production so they make more money.
quote:
quote: we have lead by example long enough. Its time to make examples of some people. ------------------ Posted by t|nt|n on Sep. 11 2001,16:05
I just want to extend my sympathys to all of you in the US and to say that we in Ireland are having a National Day of Mourning on Friday to remember those of all nations that dies in the attacks.May they rest in peace Posted by Nikita on Sep. 11 2001,16:12
quote: Hahah I was just telling a friend about that yesterday! Though all this really did make me think ... the US can be quite a bully at times ... (think Native Americans) ...
Posted by Observer on Sep. 11 2001,16:38
Finally getting around to posting here. Chrissy lives in upstate New York and is fine. She just doesn't post here much.------------------ Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 11 2001,16:40
btw to all of those who think that we shouldn't retaliate, because that will just make them more angry, is full of shit. that is the kind of thinking that got 6 million jews killed in germany and poland because europe and the united states didn't want to make the nazi's angry. playing mr. please-don't-hurt-me-we-can-all-get-along pacifist is rediculous and NEVER works. did it work in elementary school when the bully tried to kick your ass? no, he just came back for more the next day, knowing that he was free to do so. retaliation is our ONLY possible recourse. the only question is, towards whom.
Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 11 2001,16:48
WillyPete, it's very nice to meet a calibur thinker... i did catch the Bush statement. I don't know who's responsible, although i know we'll eventually find out. The best point made here is that the US can be hurt by nothing but knives and a small fligth plan. This ought not to be. As much of badasses we know we are, we still have to deal with the fact that if someone is willing to give their life for something, they're going to carry it out. What i wouldn't give to make America invulnerable. I also have some personal views on it from the other perspective. I am a small guy. I like fighting the big guy. I like defeating the big guy. I'm all about the underdog... but not like this. These terrorist or whomever tried to prove a point, which i beleive, if we're right, they did to their own people. This is a time for the big guy to win. Crush those little fucks, and put it into their heads that they can't harm the US no matter how much they are willing to give their lives.Another quick question i'd like to ask, is about all this immediate information that we're finding. We have this car, we had that van, we've got people from Boston, some house that might have been a hijackers house... There's two points i can arise from a conspiracy theory... Is everything we've found a decoy? Are we supposed to beleive that we're going to find them this quickly? I would like to think so, but i doubt it. If this was a small part of a faction, i'm sure they wouldn't have cared to leave all their shit behind, because hey.. they're dying anyway. Now in all the crimes i've ever committed (which if you've paid attention to some of my other posts you might be able to guess... ) it's not about the crime committed, it's about how to not get caught. I kinda think that all this information that's being flooded by this small group is really set on purpose to throw off the idea of whom it really could have been... it's a longshot, but i do have confidence in our investigative bodies to take deep breaths and come to the proper conclusions. I also want to know why the Taliban is begging America not to bomb Afghanistan... this confuses me, because the whole time the Taliban is anti-america, and wants to show their supremacy over America, why would they cower now? Didn't they realize that any attack that could have been remotely placed on them would require a massive retaliation? I honestly think their fucked, because I know their not begging us to spare them as if they had nothing to do with this. Also, if they are begging us to not bomb afghanistan, they're either trying to hide something inside that country, or it's a pleaded cry to direct the US somewhere else... where, i don't know... but they'd better start tellin, cause i'm sure they're just buying time to move this Bin Laden fella out of there... Ok enough rambling, i've got homework to do... on a wuick last note to Willy, the funny thing is, i haven't completed Tom Clancy's "Debt of Honor" but i've been reading it now for a while... and as much of America my first reaction was, "shit, this is just like a clancy novel." i didn't know it was like the one i was reading.. thanks for giving it away. :-P
Posted by Dark-Angel99 on Sep. 11 2001,16:55
quote: Thank you... Posted by justcozz on Sep. 11 2001,17:25
FUCK!Stupid computer... GAHHH Frosty: Not cold. Slightly chilled. Calm the fuck down, every one. Not that MUCH we can do bout it. As in... It already happend. Help where you can. Do what you can. You can't change the past, just learn from it. Surgical strike good. Mass bombing bad. This wasn't a thing you and your buddies decide to do on a weekend. 40ish people, at least 4 with piloting/navigation skills. From one continent to another (most likley). Then I'm thinking that they were a bit nervous. getting all those nervous people on one plane. Kinda hard. I can't go through life serious about EVERYTHING. I like to be happy/cheerefull. If somthing isn't like I like it I change it. If I cant change it, I do what I can and get over it. Planes crashed buildings collapsed people died. That is unchangable. Do what you can to help. Don't get hysterical. It doesn't help. ---Insert flames here--- This message has been edited by justcozz on September 12, 2001 at 12:37 AM Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 11 2001,18:10
heh, this probably has nothing to do with anything, but this article was published on September the 11, 1997 about the oklahoma city bombing and an Islamic man's destress caused by hatred.< http://www.iio.org/terrorism/terrorism.htm > i'm sorry ladies and gent's... i haven't read teh UBB code for links or picture or anything yet... i'll do it later..
Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 11 2001,18:13
oh wait, *chuckle* in my lam0r style, i didn't know if you just typed in the url it automatically made it a link.. sorry peoples.
Posted by Rhydant on Sep. 11 2001,18:27
why would he put his email on the site he just hacked? doesnt seem too logical... hrm.... RyDen sounds too much like Rhydant.... im scared. er, not really ------------------ Posted by toes on Sep. 11 2001,18:38
All i can say is "fuck me". Whoever does this deserves punishment and IMO death is too leniant. I'm just a British guy offering his sympathy because my Auntie was visiting the WTC *that day* but, she was luckily still in bed when this atrocity happened. My entire family was worried when we got home and we couldn't believe that someone could even contemplate this. In my opinion contingency plans of this scale where never even contemplated. To me its more of a scene from a bad action film than anything else, and the astronomical death toll will be remembered for a single act. I'm not pointing a finger, i'm not saying "nuke the assholes" i'm just saying find who did it and bring them to justice. If anyone in the UK saw the ITN news tonight (12th), they would have seen the other side of Palestine, and how horrified some of them where. The initial joyous pictures (and i dont know if America has seen them) made me sick to my stomach thinking that this kind of thing would bring them pleasure. All i can say is that i hope whoever did this is hiding, very very very well because he WILL have hell to pay. If W takes his word, and targets the coutry as well as the terrorist, the death toll is going to be higher because they will bomb the citys, they will kill lots more innocent people. Personally, i would rather see this sick S-O-B rot in jail for the rest of his miserable life, having to live with however many people he killed, than have someone walk up and shoot him in the back of the head. I would like to see whatever country is harbouring him/know who it is bring them to justice and show the world they've got the balls to do it. K - Rant over. Insert flames blah blah blah... -toes Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 11 2001,19:30
quote:well i would guess that they were flying low enough to get a signal trhough also i think slate is on the berge of a nervous breakdown cos he has seriously flipped out over this. SLATE it ISNT the end of the world london got 100 times more fucked than this in WW2 by V1 and V2 missiles and they were acts of terror. its just u not used to liveing in a country thats free of terrorism and suddenly shit like this happens on you back door. anyone who lives near or in london has become almost accustomed to terrorist activities its just cos ur not used to it that you panic. also no-one has thought of the fact that this might have been done not by terrorists but by people trying to get the message through to the free world that shit is getting out of hand in the middle east and that they want retaliation by framing well known groups. anbd i'm fucking sick of all of congress going on about "oh i'm sorry for the loss" then startin up bullshit about how america will not be beaten we have come out of this thing with heads held high these terrorists have failed in their attempts to frighten us...erm where the fuck have these people been the last 48 hours just fucking admit that america isnt as safe and happy as u make it out to be. people should realise things like this can happen everywhere and after a time they will come to look out for such things happening again. and i am REALLY pissed off that they did all this with knives. people can go on all they want about "oh you dont know how you'd act" "they might ve killed people already" these people had just fucking knives..not machettis! if this ends up being 100\% confirmed that thats all they had i am fucking ashamed that people didnt do something. whats the point of all this if we're too afraid to do anything in the face of death. is this what the human race is made up of people who're too scared to stand up for themselves? ------------------ Posted by Vigilante on Sep. 11 2001,19:38
Think it through, dkb. Risking your own life for a just cause is one thing, and I think many of the people on those planes would have done so had it just been their own life. But if there are two snarling, scruffy arabs shouting at you in a language you don't understand while holding screaming women and children to their chest and knives to their throats... would you really charge them bare-handed?This message has been edited by Vigilante on September 12, 2001 at 03:13 PM Posted by Observer on Sep. 11 2001,19:43
About that site, it's Taliban; that misspelling in the domain name removes a lot of its credibility.------------------ Posted by Michael on Sep. 11 2001,19:50
quote: Here's what worries me: if I were a terrorist, and if I really wanted to attack the US, I wouldn't just launch one attack. I'd use something like this to knock the country off balance, and then hit them with something completely different from a completely different direction. Like, say, a biological attack on LA or some other west coast city. Sort of a one-two punch kind of deal. I think the government anticipated something like that, which is why they called out the CDC. But an equally credible hypothesis would be that the worst second blow to the US that could be struck would be to get them to attack an innocent country, to make us look bad in the eyes of the rest of the world. And if these terrorists knew anything about the US they would know that we like to solve things with our military (especially under a Republican leadership) and that when we do so it can easily become a huge fiasco (ie Vietnam). Right now we have the backing of the world community but I worry that we may do something to lose that support by over-reacting or mis-reacting. Posted by whiskey@throttle on Sep. 11 2001,20:02
quote:
#2 - The cell phone callers said the hijackers spoke in English. This message has been edited by whiskey@throttle on September 12, 2001 at 03:06 PM Posted by Vigilante on Sep. 11 2001,20:12
hmm. I saw your name somewhere. sorry.
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 11 2001,20:25
plus they herded the people to the back of the plane i didnt hear anything about children being abused. and a knife is a hell of a lot easier to deal with than a simply punch. half the danger of a knife is being afraid of it.EDIT: someone might want to start a new thread for this soon so it doesnt get fucked up like the "post ur pic" thread did This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on September 12, 2001 at 03:43 PM Posted by Beldurin on Sep. 11 2001,20:47
DKB - perhaps the people didn't know what the hijackers intended?It would make much more sense to herd all the people to the back of the plane, the reassure them that all you wanted was money and that noone would be hurt. Throughout the flight, tell the passengers that negotiations were going well. That way, you have a scared but probably docile group of passengers right up until the last minute. Calling these people cowards for not doing something when you don't know what the fuck you're talking about is not only arrogant, but ignorant. STFU (pardon my French and shit) Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 11 2001,20:57
hell if it happened that way then yeah. but i did say if that was 100\% how it happened. i'm just pissed off if no-one tried anything whatsoever------------------ Posted by whiskey@throttle on Sep. 11 2001,21:03
DKB, I highly doubt a planeful of people would have just accepted their deaths if they knew the hijacker's plans. Don't be a dumbass. The vast majority of hijack situations end peacefully...I don't doubt that the passengers were reassured it would be all over if "no one tries anything funny," or some other terrorist cliche like that. Would you cause a stir if you were told that? No, you'd shut your ass up and wait it out.
Posted by Beldurin on Sep. 11 2001,21:04
quote: And you don't know that either, do you?
Posted by spOon on Sep. 11 2001,21:28
Bullets were flying already at Houston, TX at a muslim worshiping place. Threatening emails to Arabs and Muslims as well. Is that really neccesarry? Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 11 2001,21:29
fine i've cleared my head and vented some anger ...observe:< http://web.onetel.net.uk/~dark_knight_bob/smackdown.jpeg > ------------------ Posted by whiskey@throttle on Sep. 11 2001,21:33
Just got this in email. Thought I'd share.
quote: Posted by WillyPete on Sep. 11 2001,22:11
Mainy to WolfGuard:Dude, chill, I'm not the bad guy. We still don't know who the bad guy is for certain. Yet. I'm not attacking you or saying a desire for retaliation is wrong. I want retaliation and I want to see terrorism go away. You know as well as I do that the best way to combat it is to cut their supply lines. Turn off the money tap. Regardless though, the US has NO claim on anyone's oil but that in America. You can't take it from sovereign states. Most of the oil comes from our only allies in the middles east. That's just rage talking. I want retaliation and results, but I want to see it the proper way and the right way. Don't drop to their level. Any anger vented toward islamic people or nations, regardless of past sins, is just what the terrorists want. You think they just expected the damage to end when the fires got put out? No, they want to hurt you in the most personal way possible. If you let them they'll take your humanity, your mercy, your desire to protect the basic rights you and others enjoy as Americans and to throw them away on a wave of hate and passion. You become no more than the same vicious dictators killing women in Afghanistan for the simple act of revealing the wrong piece of skin. They want people to act on rage and kill other Americans in their places of worship or homes just because they pray to a different direction. Causing those people to experience what they (the terrs) may have experienced and take their own retribution, in turn, against the Americans that persecuted them because they thought it might be a moslem that did this. Seeing their (the terrs') enemy kill one another in their own camp would please them immensely. I've heard you speak before. I know you're speaking out of frustration of inaction. One turncoat found in these organisations is more sought after than any amount of ordnance fired on a 'suspected' village hiding place of such groups. Let them be bought. It's 'hearts and minds' all over again. That's the only policy that works against such people. NATO waits. We've cast our lot with you and will lay it all at America's door to help. Posted by StanVanDam on Sep. 11 2001,22:18
Excellent post, WillyPete.Violence is NEVER the answer. Both sides have to agree upon peace, or the fighting will just continue. I'm sure you can think of many cases. One story I think of is that a real long time ago in Vietnam, these 2 villages fought with each other for generations. Killing each other back and forth and shifting the blame back in forth just doesn't work. These 2 villages eventually became peaceful with each other, and when both sides agree on peace and maintain it properly, then the conflict is mostly resolved. The US is definitely NOT getting anywhere by saying that they will hunt down who did this and punish them. They will just fight back, and the cycle continues. There has to be a way to agree on a certain peace. Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 11 2001,22:19
at least THIS is what N.A.T.O is trained for, not smoe overseea of people skirmishing but actually kicking some ass. if bush has got any sense though (unlikely as it seems) he'll find some way of getting back at the terrorists in a non "drastic" way. last thing we need is another gulf war. ------------------ Posted by StanVanDam on Sep. 11 2001,22:31
Hummm maybe I missed some threads, but where's Cro at? I wanna hear what he has to say about this.
Posted by kuru on Sep. 11 2001,23:37
This is just a post out of my own bewilderment. I've got one friend still unaccounted for, who worked in the WTC.At this point, I can't even feel anything until I know if he's dead or alive. Whatever happens, we've got to make it clear to every terrorist in the world that they are an endangered species and will soon be extinct. Since they all communicate, and all share information, I consider them all guilty. The strange thing is, I can't even feel pissed off. I just have this logical knowledge that they did this act of war, and that we must declare war on them. It's time that terrorists learned that we are the United States of America. Don't tread on us. ------------------ Posted by Rhydant on Sep. 11 2001,23:45
quote: the FBI's identified the terrorist in the PA crash. they had links with bin Laden. im no rocket scientist, but it seems that Osama is behind it all... ------------------ Posted by miNus on Sep. 11 2001,23:46
Something has to be done, or else attacks like these will keep escalating. If nothing happens they think, oh, they can't do anything if they can't find us, because they won't risk killing innocents. They will use that to our advantage.Something must be done. Quickly and efficiently. Just a question, how many of you 18 and up would be willing to go into the service, though there probably wouldn't be a draft, if we went to war with a country or two? Posted by aventari on Sep. 12 2001,00:01
I was thinking about joining up the minute i heard about this shit. The probably is that there probably will not be a "war" as such. these are small groups, not nations ------------------ Posted by Rhydant on Sep. 12 2001,00:05
oh no, this is gonna be a war. not WW3, more like desert storm x 2. we'll use missles instead of men. thats just how it works.------------------ Posted by whiskey@throttle on Sep. 12 2001,00:05
If anyone is interested, < here's footage of the first plane crash. >edit: very disturbing This message has been edited by whiskey@throttle on September 12, 2001 at 07:06 PM Posted by Rhydant on Sep. 12 2001,00:07
HOly shit!
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 12 2001,00:07
i'll just stay home and screw hot chicks. i'll join the home guard and we can do jolly things like in dads army.------------------ Posted by SLATE on Sep. 12 2001,00:18
quote: Holy fucking shit! What I wanna know is why I can't see the plane at all.. the way the audio sounds makes it seem like it was right overhead.. Also, is there another video of the first plane, perhaps from some type of roof camera monitor thing? Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 12 2001,00:20
to whomever said "violence is not the answer", "we can't go down to their level", etc etc, you're fucking wrong. in order to stop terrorism from happening we have to do retaliate on such a level that these countries will be terrified. we have to make them piss their pants when they hear "U.S.A.". we can carpet bomb them, use tactical nukes, whatever. small surgical strikes will do NOTHING. bin laden's followers will just take his place, and this will continue.
Posted by veilside on Sep. 12 2001,00:46
i saw footage of the first crash on tv, and seeing it for the first time it was devastating.. the second one they've shown on like, constant loop, even in the background when they're talking... jeez..btw, this has nothing to do with anything, but it's probably because i've been watching so much news the past day and a half.... that girl whitney casey on cbs is cute. ::runs for cover:: Posted by solid on Sep. 12 2001,02:25
What happened.. what was it.. oh yea- the Taliban attacked diplomats or something in Iran, killed 19 of them or something, refused to apologize (I may be wrong/inaccurate) and then a few days later Iran prepared air strikes on the border and then sent soldiers to eliminate a Taliban village (population of 100-200). I felt great hearing the news that day, knowing my country won't take that shit..So what's the rush? The retaliation will come soon.. Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 12 2001,03:41
i'm 18, and i'd enlist in the marines and beg to be put on the front line.. that's more a psycho-lack of care before hatred... nevertheless, wars are won on the ground presence.. not by missiles... the Gulf War was won with a 100 hour ground war... now, bombing afghanistan will definately get a reaction from whomever it was... in two ways.. if we don't kill innocents, then we are cowardly not to respond effectively... if we do kill innocents, we may be called terrorists, and killers and at their level.. which may be what these fuckers want.. and wht i'd like to sya is, who says we're better than them, eh? lord, i've said it before, and i'll say it again, i'm sick enough to go as far as burning their children in front of their face... i don't care.. but the rest of america isn't as flagrant as i am towards militant operations.. now, i'm no sick-fuck, and i don't know what i'd relaly do if i had Osama bin Laden sitting here in my dorm room.. but i do know i'd make him, or whomever is reponsible pay... the only thing we as a country can do now is wait, our investigative teams, and intelligence are the best in the world, and now we need to rely on them to make proper and accurate decisions about who's responsible.. once we've got the information, all of it, then we can decide on how to act... i await the information as much as the next man.. and now that we've got NATO in on it.. we should be able to squelch a lot of the main terrorist factions around the world... lord have mercy on them, for we won't. Posted by whiskey@throttle on Sep. 12 2001,05:01
Ah, ignorance and scapegoating. I thought you'd never arrive:
Exemplary diction there, fella. Scholarly words and sound advice.
Posted by StanVanDam on Sep. 12 2001,05:18
The Taliban is begging not to be bombed because of the Tomahawk Cruise Missile strikes back in 98(?) due to evidence that bin Laden bombed the 2 US Embassies in Africa. So this time they have evidence that bin Laden did this, so the Taliban fear another strike against Afghanistan. Also, in the Oklahoma City Bombing, Middle Eastern people were immediately blamed. A little bit more time should be given to be certain of the perpetrators, and THEN catch those who are responsible, without any "collateral damage", meaning no mass bombings of the general Middle East or the likes. Those who are responsible for this WILL be found. Just a matter of time. These guys pissed off a helluva lot of people/countries Tuesday, so there will be even more effort to find those who did this.
Posted by Beldurin on Sep. 12 2001,05:19
Something that I thought about when the plane went down near Pittsburg:The other 3 hijackings and attacks were very well coordinated time-wise. Within 30 min. each. The forth plane was on its way to DC (Reagan), but crashed near Pittsburgh, way out of time phase. If they were so coordinated on the others, why didn't this one arrive sooner? I have 2 comments about this. 1.) It didn't arrive b/c the pilot crashed it on purpose. The other 3 pilots had to have been dead before impact, but I would bet that they were kept alive until they were near the city. Why? You have a group of 5 to handle the plane. You kill the pilot and now you only have 4 to handle the plane and one to fly. Why not leave the pilot alive until the near the end. 2.) I believe that the 4th plane was deliberately late. Why? After the first three, what would the military have to do to another rogue airliner heading towards DC? Exactly, shoot it down. Therefore, if you're the terrorist group, you've achieved 3 things. To stop a nation, where do you hit it? It's government center (DC) and it's financial center (WTC). The third thing they would have accomplished is forcing the American military to act against its own populous. Truly terrifying, ne? I don't think that this is over, and God help us all if I'm right. For the last 2 centuries Americans has been the guardians of democracy, but who will guard the guardians...? Posted by whiskey@throttle on Sep. 12 2001,05:33
< http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/57/21620.html > Heheh...nice one. This message has been edited by whiskey@throttle on September 12, 2001 at 12:34 PM Posted by Rhydant on Sep. 12 2001,05:43
i was watching the news this morning... they said theyve identified some of the terrorist in the PA crash, and they have ties with Bin laden. well, mystery solved.the problem is, getting the Taliban to hand over bin laden. but they wont do this, mainly because if they do, all the palestinians and arabs will be out raged, start and uprising, and the Taliban will be no more. so i guess the next thing would be to find Laden himself, and bomb his encampment. problem there is, we dont know where in afgahnistan to look. i guess my 'bomb first, then bomb again' plan might not be a good idea after all. oh, and who said that 800 people died in the pentagon crash? i thought it was ~350. ------------------ Posted by veilside on Sep. 12 2001,05:48
quote:w00tah!
Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 12 2001,13:33
woops.. i'm over 18..
Posted by TheTaxMan on Sep. 12 2001,14:57
I've been staying with a friend for a few days, hence I haven't been lurking around. However, I haven't been out of touch with the news. I went to class with her Tuesday morning at eight, and when we arrived at her second class, the Professer said something like, "I know we all want to talk about the events that have happened, but I've got to do the lecture." Wtf? What happened? "In case some of you don't know, several planes have crashed into the World Trade Center." Hm... I really had no idea what to think about this at the time, it was just sort of some sort of odd event, like when you hear about earthquake in California. I just didn't know what to think of it. SO we went to a building with a television and see collapsed buildings in New York. Even now, looking at the collapse of these things makes me sick to my stomache. Not because I know someone who lives in NYC. Not because I have been to NYC. But, more because someone had the [u]gaul[/u] to actually attack the United States of America. The missing persons toll in New York is around 4600 now, with 94 confirmed deaths. Even if no one was killed, even if this terrorist attack was a total and complete failure, and even if the only thing we ever heard about this was some intercepted phone call by the NSA, it dumbfounds me how someone would even dare to think that they can actually destroy American lives for some stupid fuck religious extremism makes me so incredibaly angry. If I ever saw Osama Bin Laden (but we're only 90\% sure he did this...yeah I don't really care) I would rip his throat out, and urinate on the dead, bloating corpse. What is most amazing to me, are some of the world-wide statements that have been made, most notable to me between NATO and Russia. I could rant and vent for pages and pages, but I'll spare you all my loathing for certain peoples in the world. BTW, CK, I completely agree with you about Palestines condoning (don't try and tell me Arafat doesn't, he has made hardly an effort to stop these extremists) the terrorists in that part of the world. I'm done.
------------------ quote: Posted by WillyPete on Sep. 12 2001,15:01
Guys, the threat of warfare by a superpower is always greater in effect than the actual committment.Any country acted against unifies and stengthens their resolve against such attacks. This means we are with you one hundred percent. Everyone thinks of glory and rushing off to kill these guys, but who you gonna shoot? Bin Laden has been on the FBI front page for years. Don't you think the US wants him? The best support you could EVER give your country is to stand behind any decided action patriotically. This is no political issue here like some of the Balkan states. It's going to get dirtier before it gets better. Some of you screaaming for heads that were not directly affected by loss from the WTC attacks may lose some dear friends and relatives in the forces when this happens. Do not mock their sacrifice by making judgements regarding those that send them into action. All the armed services are going to need to know that the folks back home are behind them whatever they are asked to do. Do not go against the leaders a few months from now when servicemen and women working close to the potential targets become targets of reprisal too. Remember your willingness to throw American might at the shadows when you count the cost. That's all these guys are. Shadows. They represent no-one but themselves or their ideals. You can't put a skin colour on them, you can't stick a religion on them. You can't stick a nationality on them and bomb a dot on the map and hope they'll go away. Think of where terrorists get their motivation to kill innocent people. They get it from hate. They hate to see people hurt them and their own when they are powerless to stop them. How did most of USA feel on the evening of 11/9/01? Something like that? You can see that acting upon hate like that and hurting other people without thinking would make you a terrorist as well if you view it like that, yet everything about us tells us in our hearts that we're not like them. Why not? What makes us more special than those extremists. We believe in freedom. They believe in something else. Doesn't our belief in freedom allow for them to believe that? Anyone sanctioning violence against another purely for beliefs or revenge is a terrorist. Got to take away their reason to hate. It's hard to hate the person who feeds you, or heals your sick, or relieves you of injustice. That's our target. That's what we need to achieve.
< Some people fought the hijackers > My respect to them and their families. Brave men and women indeed. And a london reporter expresses how a lot of us feel < here >: Posted by Dysorderia on Sep. 12 2001,16:17
quote:CK, listen to your own post. You sound exactly like a terrorist yourself. Bombing the heck out of a country won't help at this point. If Bush did bomb afgahnistan now, it would be 10x worse than what happened in NY. ------------------ Posted by StanVanDam on Sep. 12 2001,16:59
Damn right Dysorderia.Catknight's plan doesn't make sense. Bombing Afghanistan is stupid, it will show the world how the US can't handle situations properly. They are poor enough as it is over there, it isn't worth it to bomb them. I guarantee if the US bombs Afghanistan, no one will be greatly satisfied. The consequences just won't be worth it for the US. Posted by Jynx on Sep. 12 2001,18:14
quote: Willy Pete has hit it on the head here. I am inflamed. I am speechless from the pure turmoil of my emotion over this...this atrocity. However, The US can NOT strike out blindly. The US has some of the premier detective and forensic resources available in the world. Despite the necessary political ties that the FBI has, I am confidant that it will ultimately find the Truth of what happened, who did it, and make that truth available to everyone. (By the way, I don't prescribe to a bit of that conspiracy nonsense e-mail that Whisky posted--if anyone even CARES, I'll post why) When we know the Truth, and ONLY when we know the Truth, should we strike. We should strike with the laser-like precision that the US has perfected, and more importantly, we should televise the strike. We should say, "We have proved that Joe-Bob Nutcase committed this act, along with this specific Nutcase Group #27, and here is the proof. Here is where they are located right now, and here is Joe-Bob's hideout. Watch this, Joe-Bob--express package delivery from the U.S. of A!" On a totally different note, I would like to bring to light something that I have not yet read on this thread: I am bursting with pride over the American people's immediate response to this crisis! Think about it--we, as individuals, are giving our money, our time, even our own blood to help out total strangers. Politics, for the past two days, have almost ceased to exist. Democrats, Republicans, and Independants are united in a common goal and a common purpose. Despite our faults, our generosity makes our country great. ------------------ I used to be a kleptomanicac, but I took something for it. Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 12 2001,18:24
The ONLY way to prevent terrorism is with terrorism. We have to kill their women, their children, their families. We have to bomb their cities, their factories, their hospitals. We have to retaliate in such a way that the world says "Oh my GOD!". A small surgical air strike against a few terrorist encampments will do JACK SHIT. These terrorists are already WILLING TO DIE. They WON'T MIND being killed. We have to make them PAY A PRICE that they are NOT WILLING TO PAY. That is the ONLY way to stop future attacks. Increasing security on aeroplanes will do NOTHING. This was an ingenious, never before done act of terrorism. They will do something equally unexpected next time. The Israeli's have been following a similar policy, although not to the same extent.
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 12 2001,18:33
quote: your intelligence should not rely on itself to solve this as it isnt exactly the best out there quote: hmm like you did when trying to shoot down scuds in the gulf war. despite the president saying that some 90\% were shot down it was barely 10\% and cruise missiles are not as accurate as you might want to think. several civilian areas were bombed by accident plus even our own troops came close to being shot by freindly fire edit: the world should not back the US in ANYTHING that the decide to do as to give in to emotion and not to follow using a clear head is a path to disaster. just because america was affected the most shouldnt mean that they should decide what the best solution is. bush says about leading the strike against these people. he should be the LAST person leading this thing. america is NOT the only one affected a significant majority of people in the WTC were britons as new york and london are virually twin citys in financial terms. they frequently have personael from each country moving between them. terrorism is a global problem and should be a global solution
This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on September 13, 2001 at 01:38 PM Posted by DuSTman on Sep. 12 2001,18:37
There is a tightrope that the US has to walk with dealing with this.On the one hand, doing little will be an invitation to terrorists and the enemies of the USA to do more of this kind of stuff in the future and the US and europe I know are yearning for some ass kicking to be done to those responsible. On the other hand there is the repercussions that seriously need to be considered. I'm sure we've all seen the videos of the palestinian people partying in the street. These are not the people responsible, but it is an indication of the society that bred the people responsible. There is a large anti-western feeling in those parts of the world, and caution must be exercised to ensure that in eliminating the current threat to the security of the west a fresh generation of extremists are not bred. The space between these two constraints, if such a space exists, is where the response must lie. This message has been edited by DuSTman on September 13, 2001 at 01:39 PM Posted by SLATE on Sep. 12 2001,18:50
quote: Many of these terrorists are after the US just for that reason.. Cause we killed their women, their children, their families. Posted by DeadAnztac on Sep. 12 2001,18:57
I'm sorry.. I just don't follow your logic Cat, if we kill their woman and children now won't they feel MORE justified in doing it again? America the great Satan rears it's ugly head? Despite what America says to US, THEY do it anyways... Well terrorism is ok, even America resorted to it! ..just a thought... if we do this justly, but decisively we will be Ok I think. Countries will see what we've done and we can set an example so the world doesn't plunge into chaos...
This message has been edited by DeadAnztac on September 13, 2001 at 01:58 PM Posted by DeadAnztac on Sep. 12 2001,19:04
Actually, the more I look at it the more I see that most people think of Arabs as these low life dogs that need to be beaten to understand... it's not the truth I don't think. If we preach peace, then are hit hard and still strive for peace and justice then maybe then people will see our true face..Or if we go and carpet bomb woman and children they'll hate us forever, never trust us again, the worlds peace making nation will no longer be trusted, and perhaps we will show what the terrorists expected all along, and what might be the ACTUAL sad face of America today... Food for thought. ------------------ Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 12 2001,19:32
you guys are missing the point. these people HATE US. we aren't going to make them hate us more by striking back. we have to make them shit themselves at the thought of one of their people attacking the u.s. we have to fuck them into oblivion, so that the afgans themselves go after laden.
Posted by cr0bar on Sep. 12 2001,19:52
You've forgotten how to perceive correctly. Let me help you.Go read the interview with Osama Bin Laden himself (linked on first news post). The terrorists hate us for a reason. We have been meddling in their disputes for years, selling arms to both sides, among other things. If you think that they hate us for no good reason, please remove your head from your rectum and think again. It's easy to look at their methods and label them as crazy, but they're not. They're not stupid either. I support putting pressure on nations and governments harboring known terrorists. I do not support more needless killing and destruction. The sad fact is that Bin Laden may have a point. Historically, Americans refuse to open their eyes until they are hit very hard in the face. quote: Posted by WillyPete on Sep. 12 2001,20:19
I'm gonna twist your words a bit here CatKnight and I hope you calm down enough to see what I'm trying to point out.quote: Connect-the-dot Disclaimer: I am not say Bin Laden or his tactics are good. I'm pointing out that others may have already felt the way you do on the other side of the fence regarding your own country's actions. The UK is not blameless either, and I'm not offering to throw any stones first. How many more orphans do you intend to create to become future vessels of retribution and terrorism? Posted by StanVanDam on Sep. 12 2001,20:50
I knew Cr0bar would be on the right side and see things straight. Catknight man, I thought you were smart or something. Your ideas are rather stupid. The Americans bombed the shit out of North Vietnam and killed PLENTY of civilians. That not only didn't scare the shit out of Vietnamese, but also lost the war for the US. Violence begets violence. You really should find more about what the US have been doing to other countries for years. The CIA frikken trained bin Laden for fuck sakes.
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 12 2001,21:31
the guy who invented fraiser and cheers was on one of the planes ------------------ Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 12 2001,21:45
I'll give you a fucking easy solution to all of this, don't leave anyone over there to swear revenege.
Posted by Rhydant on Sep. 12 2001,21:48
*cough* executive producer. i loved that show.yikes... congress wants ฤ billion for reliefe efforts and what not.... holy shit. another buildings gonna come down... shit. this is depressing. ------------------ Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 12 2001,21:53
the WTC was pretty big and so were the surounding buildings. i'm getting a scary thought about some kind of domino effect regarding all these buildings------------------ Posted by Rhydant on Sep. 12 2001,21:55
thats what i was thinking. imagine. if they had crashed both planes at the same time into the base of one of the towers, it could of fallen INTO the other one. then the other tower could take out others.... shit.------------------ Posted by chmod on Sep. 12 2001,23:39
quote: that's what i was thinking too... on the news they said the American Express building was in danger of collapse. And that is a big building. Posted by N30 on Sep. 12 2001,23:53
All I know is bin Laden is goin down.------------------ Posted by Vigilante on Sep. 13 2001,01:38
The twin towers, being so massive, were engineered to collapse on themselves in the event of a catastrophic earthquake/fire/explosion that weakened its structure. If they hadn't been, we would have seen an even worse domino effect.
Posted by TheTaxMan on Sep. 13 2001,01:55
I haven't read all this and I don't plan on it.Violence is the answer. If We sit back and take a complacent attitude towards this, it will only happen again. Benjamin Netanyahu compared this to the Battle at Midway. Osama Bin Laden is only a squadron leader, and in order to stop these extremists we have to sink the carriers. Palestine. Afghanistan. Iraq. The list is quite large and we -all- know that it will continue if the threat is not eliminated. 'We' is not only the United States. It is not only NATO. It is every country in the world that wishes to stop terrorism at the source. Russia and NATO have agreed upon each other to actually work together to stop this. Russia and NATO. Fourty years ago, the creation of NATO was to stop the spread of communism. Now, the same people NATO has fought for decades are joining together. Terrorism has seen complacencey for years and years. Palestine has Trainging camps for small children to teach them to be suicide bombers. The Taliban protects the same people that destroy Not only Destroyers and Embassies, but national landmarks. A line has to be drawn, and asking nicely has failed. It is time for action to stop the spread of these extremist ideals. Treaties and Peace Talks do not work against people who never show. No one like war. No one likes death. No one enjoys doing what has to be done, and that is extinguish the source of these attacks on the free world. ------------------ quote: Posted by SLATE on Sep. 13 2001,02:14
quote:
You see how we hate them? Thats how they feel about us. CAUSE WE CAUSED THEM HARM. You are acting like an extremist/terrorist by sanctioning the attack of 3 countries, because you don't like them and think they are all terrorists. (YOU doesn't mean anyone in specific.) SLATE Posted by TheTaxMan on Sep. 13 2001,03:11
I never said kill every afghani. The point is the Teliban houses these people and approves of it. Palestine has people running in the streets pronouncing their hatred for the US. It doesn't do any good to just kill one person. Does anyone know what it took to stop WWII?BTW, I'm not condoning the use of nuclear weapons. I am against using them in just about every way. It's my opinion that if you people want to just live on like nothing happened, and make a 1/2 assed effort to stop this, then go live in Canada where it isn't likely to happen (again). Also, Slate makes it sound very much like it's us or them. Well fine, don't pick a side. I for one am not going to sit idle while everything this country is founded on is ripped to shreds by terrorism. I've never killed anyone. I don't like punching people, but when it comes to the defense of the American way of life, yes I put it above other countries. That's the entire point. We live in the land of the free, and home of the brave. These groups are trying to take that away from us and we don't have to stand for it. One more thing: quote: Fuck that. If any American agrees with that shit I'll personally ride you out on a rail. You want to live in fear? You want to allow these people to "fuck us into oblivion?" If that's the case, well fuck you right in the ass, and get the hell out of the country. He's dead wrong. I hate is extremist organization more than I ever have hated anything in my life. Continuing on that line of thought, CK's post makes sense. This has done nothing but fuel the US. quote: This message has been edited by TheTaxMan on September 13, 2001 at 10:58 PM Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 13 2001,04:28
i agree with CK and TheTaxMan's notice of the fact that this is going to fuel america's ambnitions for whatever it is to be done very, very high... i've been one to joke about terrorist activity in other countries... but now they've fucked up and gone and done something to my motherland... now, this may mean that i'm on their level.. i don't give a shit as to being on their level.. i'm american, and i'm rather damn proud of it.. hell, to you few fellas from UK, fuckin rock on... love the Brit's.. and Auzzie's, and everyone else really... my good friend whom i've been hanging out with today isfrom Pakistan, and lived in Saudi... and he knows first hand what real terrorism is... evne on my campus, Middle Eastern nationality students aren't really being harrassed, but they are, you know? anyway, i'm also not condoning the killing of innocents in these countries, but if they are, oh well, it's just casulties of war... Now people of these smaller countries call us the oppressors of them because we support their enemies... we only support what is what we beleive to in the best interests of freedom.. and that Israeli v. Palastine shit's been going on for thousands of years... and incase they havn't realized it yet.. we're hlping the winning side.. cause the Israeli's and Jews or whomever deserve their land and if anyone remembers that thing called the Bible, fuckin with God's people just ain't cool... so they can get pissed at us all they want.. they can deal with it... America is the greatest superpower on this planet... that gives us the right to do whatever the fuck we want, when we want to do it... we don't step on everybodies toes, because we're not a big bully.. but we are a self appointed big brother.. whether they like it or not.. we're there, and we're going to stay, why?, because we said so. Posted by damien_s_lucifer on Sep. 13 2001,04:30
George Bernard Shaw pointed out that the vast majority of criminal acts are committed by poor people. Thus, if you want to take a bite out of crime, a sensible starting point would be to take a bite out of poverty.Which has EVERYTHING to do with this situation. Look what we have in America - free education, lots of cars, lots of nice roads to drive them on, TVs, computers, stereos, beautiful women... and quite often our biggest worry is how we look. Meanwhile, in the Middle East, a lot of people aren't real sure if they'll be able to eat tonight. And in every village, there's a TV showing reruns of Baywatch. Now do you understand why there are some very angry people over there? 'Cause I sure as hell do. This doesn't make terrorism right, but it gives us a pretty good reason why it's happening, and a pretty obvious way to relieve it. Hopefully the majority in this country will finally pull their asses, and go "hmm... gee... maybe it's not about WE'RE RIGHT AND GOOD AND THEY ARE WRONG AND EVIL... maybe we should tell our lust for blood to fuck off, and focus on fixing the goddamn problem... ain't that what they call Yankee Ingenuity?" Posted by TheTaxMan on Sep. 13 2001,04:33
Whatever. Just because I'm hungry doesn't mean I can kill people. It's the same way in Africa (a lot worse, actually) and they don't go do this sort of thing (yes there is violence in africa, however, it's based around the diamond trade for the most part).------------------ quote: Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 13 2001,04:51
people of those nations hate capitolism because they may beleive it oppressors the poor even more.. which they'd be absolutely correct.. everyone has their God given right to poverty, Lord knows i feel i'm livin in my own.. it might not be as bad as theirs... but even still they want everything to be equal, no matter what status it may make them.. more rich than not... they want socialism... which is totally impossible due to natural human desire.. but i'd also like to say that isn't the case here... the people in those middle eastern nations hate america interfering with their problems and having us tell them that one side is wrong, and the other side is right... beacuse in everyone's eyes they are correct... just as they feel they're right to commit terrorist activities here on my homeland.. and i feel correct in calling them incorrect and killing their entire fucking half of the world... it's all about business.. they hate america getting in theirs, and causing them to fail at what it is they deem correct.
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 13 2001,05:38
if bush is stupid enough to send troops into the middle east i sure hope other countries DON'T blindly agree and send their troops in with them. the US and everyone else needs to seriously look at foreign policy. some muslim idiot was on news today saying that an attack against any muslim is an attack against all muslims. has anyone actually bothered to seriously consider what the consequences would be if the US just took their typical attitude of "me strong me kill". just cos u've got sheer numbers going for u doesnt mean its the best course of action.edit: grammar mistake made me contradict myself This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on September 13, 2001 at 12:39 PM Posted by damien_s_lucifer on Sep. 13 2001,17:46
EvilGenius, you'd better change your name to EvilAlmostGenius, 'cause you missed one very important point :Most of those people can't even read. They're peasants, for fuck's sake! Do you really think they even know what capitalism and socialism ARE? All they know is we have a lot of cool shit, and they don't, and they don't see any chance of HAVING that cool shit. It's easy enough to whip 'em up into a frenzy and tell them that if they can't have cool shit, at least they're holier, and to prove it they will try and kick our asses back to the Stone Age. Give a hungry man a choice between cash and faith, and he's gonna pick what he KNOWS will put food on the table and a TV in his living room. Survival is a much older instinct than faith. Or to put it more cynically, Greed pretty much wins over everything else. Mr. TaxMan, my question for you is - do you want to create MORE pissed off motherfuckers, or do you want to get RID of them? We can't just go bomb an entire culture just because a few of them pissed us off. If nothing else, I like Persian rugs, couscous, and hashish. I know this is hard to believe, but Those People are just like us. We're just more educated. It wasn't that long ago that some crazy Europeans decided they'd like to take over the world. We kicked their asses, and then we educated them. Now they make awesome cars and AMD Athlons and drink a lot of beer. I just KNOW cr0bar is going to come along and bag on me for reinvoking the White Man's Burden... but you know, I liked living in a world where I didn't have to worry that some shithead is going to blow up my building. Plus it's no longer the White Man's burden - all cultures are involved in this problem. As for Africa - that's an even tougher problem than the Middle East. Dunno what to do about that one, but it sucks... I'm having an 80's flashback - We are the World, We are the Children, We are the ones to make a brighter day, so let's start givin... there's a choice we're making, we're savin' our own lives, it's true we'll make a better day just you and me... This message has been edited by damien_s_lucifer on September 14, 2001 at 12:49 AM Posted by StanVanDam on Sep. 13 2001,18:08
What we call "terrorists" may be called "heroes" or "martyrs" in their homeland. America has invaded their land, putting their nose into everything, imposing their lifestyle upon them, its no wonder Americans are hated. These people don't want American influence on their country. In case you don't know, the CIA trains terrorists in other countries. If the US wants to stop terrorism, first stop their own use of terrorism. Iraqis can't even fly in their own damn land. Pretend you're an Iraqi. Wouldn't it piss you off that foreigners control your land, tell you what u can and can't do? That would make me really mad. The US needs a new way of handling things. Also, an attack against US is NOT an attack on NATO. The terrorists' main intentions are to terrorize America, because they're the ones that pissed them off, not Canada, maybe UK, but not all the other NATO countries. US is just saying that to rally support from other NATO members. I have to say Bush was too quick on promising revenge.
Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 13 2001,18:19
like the blind man and the elephant...it's easy to point out the consequences without the actions, and then blame the united states for bullying these countries. iraqi's can't fly planes over their own air space and we impose sanctions on them. ohh no we're so evil! help those poor defenseless iraqi's! WRONG. They invaded a foreign nation, raped and pillaged their people, so we fought back for them. THEY ARE PAYING THE PRICE OF THEIR OWN ACTIONS. The same goes for afghanistan. Either bomb them into oblivion or blockade them till they starve. Posted by pengu1nn on Sep. 13 2001,19:14
quote: he goes against himself there, the whole western government and the western people. if it is the government then why kill thousands of workers? it is not a government or military place. bin laden may have a point, but he is a hoypocrite (and a dead man/coward) Iraq has a dirty evil leader who kills his own people, we stopped him from gaining more people to kill and more land. and fuck him, he can't be good then he can't fly his goddamn planes end of story. American Government has fucked up, in many ways, and thats all any other country looks at. well fuck you, we've helped a hell of a lot more than we have hurt. our missles hit some civilian house, sorry bout that we didn't mean to do that. but still you rub it in, the us blah blah, the us blah blah.. i do believe NATO was with us on that one? So STFU, we didn't bomb civilians on purpose, and that arguement should never have been brought up, fucking assholes (ya you, the ones that think it is a good example of how bad the us is)
one more thing, you people need to watch your mouth with the raceist comments, we have someone here that is from that region and i don't think he deserves to hear shit like that (i only saw 2 posts like that so i don't think it is a problem)
Posted by TheTaxMan on Sep. 13 2001,19:29
quote: This is a crock. Germany and Holland have both arrested people in their countries that are members of the same terrorist organization. I don't give a fuck if they're martyrs in Afghanistan and Iraq. The point is they killed thousands of Americans on Tuesday and whatever fucked up religious belief these extremists have should not be allowed to taint the world. ------------------ quote: This message has been edited by TheTaxMan on September 14, 2001 at 02:30 PM Posted by Hellraiser on Sep. 13 2001,20:01
When was the last time you heard of the United States hijacking an Iraqi or Afganistan plane full of passengers and flying it into a skyscraper in one of their cities and killing close to 5000 people in the process? Never! Any time that the US has done any kind of military action in the Middle east, it has been in retaliation for something done to US, such as the embassy bombings. Sure we may have missed a target and hit civilians, but never intentionally has the US hit civilians, rather we go out of our way to limit civilian casualties in our military actions.I'll be the first one to say that US foreign policy isn't necessarily the greatest, but that still does not justify terrorism. That question should not even come into consideration, terrorism is evil and that's that. We all know why it was done: someone had a bone to pick with the US and decided to pick it by attempting to strike fear into the hearts of the American people. That out of the way, lets nail the fucker who did this already, and be done with it. All you pro-terrorists can go fuck yourselves. When I get my gun and uniform, don't express any devil's advocate feelings around me about these cowardly acts (to use the presidential term) if you value your safety. ------------------ Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 13 2001,20:29
oh thats mature of you calling anyone who doesnt want to kill innocent civilains pro-terrorists. and you keep proclaiming that we've always had the best intentions. well how do we know that our intentions for the middle east have been the right ones?quote:well the government has barely started its investigation into all this let alone finished it so unless you've got some amazing source that your hiding from us all how the fuck do you know why this really happened. i think we should try to realise that mabye this thing may have been avoided. yes the terrorist are evil for carrying this out but are we any less evil for be short sighted into the reasons why they did it? mabye if we'd done this differently this never would have happened and thats what we should be looking at so we can stop it from happening again not by going off throwing missiles left and right ------------------ Posted by Hellraiser on Sep. 13 2001,21:19
quote: Excuse me? Methinks DKB is on crack. As for the second half of your second statement, sure, this could have probably been avoided had the US blown the shit out of some place and actually gotten Bin Laden in its last attempt. But we're not terrorists, so we cut it short after a few missle strikes struck out. I'm all for trying to save the lives of civilians, which is why I'm so enraged by these acts of terrorism. I am also all for wiping whoever is behind this off the face of the earth along with anyone who helped them in any way, and I'm all for finding a way to do it so as to limit the number of deaths of innocent bystanders in the Middle East. I think we will to. I was not referring to people who want to limit civilian casualties in general as pro-terrorists, merely criticizing those who insist on trying to take up the viewpoint of the terrorists, and saying in effect that the US has committed acts of terrorism on them, so they were justified in blowing up the WTC's. Those people in my opinion need to stop smoking crack and join the real world, where people who have virtually nothing to do with political struggles in the middle east die when you blow up a couple of 110 story office buildings. To draw an analogy: thats like saying that McVeigh was justified in blowing up the federal building and daycare center, and killing all those people because he disagreed with our government. No fucking way! There is a specific format for voicing disagreements with our government or its policies, and its called contacting your congress, raising support amongst the people, and in general making it known that you have issues without resorting to acts of violence. My country may be far from perfect, but until last tuesday, it was one of the safest and most free places in the world to live, one of the few countries taking an active role in attempting to keep peace in other parts of the world, one of the few countries that was always willing to lend a hand to other countries in need without being repaid, and one of the many countries which is composed of and run by fallible human beings who are not omniscient about how foreign policy and the potential effects of certain actions, but one of the few countries that for the most part did its best to lead by example, and one of the countries where very high value is placed on human life. That's something to stand up for, and something to take an active role in defending against attack by fear or terrorism. Edit: I wasn't 100\% sure how many people McVeigh killed, so I wrote "All Those" instead This message has been edited by Hellraiser on September 14, 2001 at 04:22 PM Posted by SLATE on Sep. 13 2001,22:12
quote: If I'm included in the "those who insist on trying to take up the viewpoint of the terrorists", I am NOT saying they were justified, and I'm sure the others would agree. We never said they were justified. NO, it shouldn't have been done. But they had a reason. It wasn't done for NO REASON. That would just be super fucked up, more fucked up than it is now. Posted by damien_s_lucifer on Sep. 13 2001,23:05
quote: May I point out that the game of Devil's Advocate is fundamental to the process of Reason? If you want a reasonable, effective solution to this problem, someone has to argue the terrorist's POV. Ignoring them and telling them to STFU isn't going to help any. Poking holes in THEIR arguments will.
quote: Ah, and there's the hole in the terrorist's argument... we don't start wars with countries just because they think or live differently than us. We only use violence when someone is using violence to harm our friends and interests - and although it may seem paradoxical, sometimes the only thing that's going to stop the violence is MORE violence, properly applied. Your first grade teacher always said "it doesn't matter who hit first," but that's a crock of shit and we all knew it even then. Run away from a bully, and you'll live to have him hit you another day. Punch him in the goddamn face and he'll leave you alone from then on. I feel a new thread coming on... Posted by Hellraiser on Sep. 13 2001,23:19
quote: I actually agree with most of that. I just don't like the fact that people are posting things as if in support of the terrorist viewpoint. If you're gonna play devil's advocate, at least make it clear you aren't supporting the devil's viewpoint, else you go on my hitlist. Posted by myersrj40 on Sep. 14 2001,00:21
Hello, I just wanted to put my two cents in. I am in the Air Force, and I have read pretty much every post in this thread and I must say alot of them have made me sick. It seems alot of people are just posting nonsense information with out even knowing what is actually going on. Saying things such as killing the women and children is wrong. I may not like the people, but it seems like you all want to go after the wrong people. The goal is to go after the terrorist them selves and any one linked to them such as who is financing them, their leaders, and the government if they are condoning these people and their actions. Were not going to go in their and purposely kill women and children, if some do die then it happens that is a part of war that can not be helped. If they hide in civilian buildings then there is going to be civilians that are killed that is the way it has to be. This is not a war against the inocent, this is a war againist global terrorism, not just in Afghanistan but world wide. We are not going to just stop once we have Bin Laden or Taliban government, this is just a sector of terrorist groups. This is going to be a long war and yes the casualty rate may be high but the US and the rest of the world has to do what is ever possible to eliminate acts like this happening not just in the US but worldwide. I for one am willing to die for the cause and help protect my family and friends and you guys also, so we can continue to live the life we all want to live. Negotiations are not going to work, paper work is not going to work. You have to go for it all, go for the root of the problem. I have to say though that launching nukes is not the way to go about it though, that would be very irrational. What ever happens we have to back the president, I beleive he has the best interest of the US citizens in his mind. Maybe being in the military has given me a different perspective on the situation then some other people here may have, but I just see a lack of thought in a lot of these posts. That is all I got, have a good day.A1C Raymond Myers Posted by StreetRaver on Sep. 14 2001,00:33
I'm making a Data cd on the whole World trade center and the pentagon getting attack by the planes. What im putting on the cd is this thread with everyones comments, Pictures and Video clips. i may have to use two cds to fit everything on attacks and so forth. I'm surprised to see everyones replys on the situation because 359 replys in less than a week, thats got to be a record or something. Anyways if you have any pictured that are not in this post please post the pictures or send them to my E-mail (NecronStudy@aol.com ), I'll take any short Video on what people shot with there Cams or something, Any pics that have to do with the attacks are welcome to be put in the cd. Thanks for your time everyone and please if you can help out anyone that was touched by the attacks please do.------------------ Posted by StanVanDam on Sep. 14 2001,02:15
Yo Hellraiser, do some deep research into McVeigh. He was in the damn US army, he was one of the best there. THEN he realized what they were actually doing, and the kind of BS it was. Strong love and pride for the American government turned into VERY bitter hate. He just didn't flip out overnight. He found good reasons to hate the US, and instead of bombing a large shopping center and killing lots of civilians, he bombed a GOVERNMENT building, and like he said, the civilians hurt were "collateral damage". He felt the need to strike back at the government for what they did/are doing. He wasn't just a random psychopath. How can he not resort to an act of violence when the US always threatens others by being the "superpower" or "invincible US"? Just because the US is stronger doesn't mean they have to interfere with almost EVERYTHING.
Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 14 2001,02:26
Stan, would you SHUT THE FUCK UP. I CANNOT fucking BELIVE your defending McVeigh now. You ugly mother fucking peice of shit. Your SYMPATHISING WITH THE GODDAMNED ENEMY. YOU _ARE_ THE ENEMY. I don't want to hear another fucking word out of your goddamned mouth. I hope you get to fry in that special place in hell I just know is waiting for you. ------------------ Posted by StreetRaver on Sep. 14 2001,02:37
LOL someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning. What how old are you? i mean you cant be an adult and say what you said or you just havent matured enough yet and is still going through his voice changes and is discideing weather or not he likes girls or not. oh i bet that hurt. anyways im tired of all the bull shit that poeple are doing lately, like for instance the morron that typed in all the swear words and shit ( as much as that just sounded panzi) that person would equal to what i typed in in the beggining. *thinks* god I hate stupid people!------------------ Posted by whiskey@throttle on Sep. 14 2001,02:41
Joe, chill.
Posted by StreetRaver on Sep. 14 2001,02:43
damn, that had to be the shortest thing i ever read that got straight to the point.------------------ Posted by j0eSmith on Sep. 14 2001,02:51
Fuck. You.< http://www.wikipedia.com/wiki/September_11,_2001_Terrorist_Attack/Casualties > Read that, then listen to people try to defend the terrorists. Pay special attention to the Firefighters. They're the ones running into places everyone else runs away from. More firefighters died than all the people on the planes. Confirmed dead By hospital Missing and presumed dead I've got a fairly close friend who lives in NY. I still haven't heard from him. Does anyone know if any publishers operated out of the World Trade Center? ------------------ Posted by SLATE on Sep. 14 2001,03:11
For those of you who want to know what companies were tenants, here is a list, with floor numbers included.< http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/tenants1.html > Posted by Hellraiser on Sep. 14 2001,03:55
quote: I don't give a fuck where the hatred came from, the point is, it is inexcusable to resort to an act of terrorism to make a point. Now get the point before I resort to an act of terrorism on your person. /me gets out the flamethrower and eyes StanVanDam with an evil glint in his eyes. While I'm on the topic, it doesn't matter if it is a government building or not, a government building is staffed by citizens who usually do little more than file paperwork. I guess I should blow up the accounting department in the microsoft building because I have a DEEP hatred left from all the pain Windows users have been forced to deal with over the years. Because human beings are rational, I'm sure there is some thought that goes into every decision made by every person throughout history. But there is such a thing as going too far. And there are certain decisions and actions that cannot be justified no matter how the decision was arrived at. The only possible point to figuring out what prompted the decision would be to prevent anyone from making such a decision again. And sometimes its best to just get rid of whoever would make decisions like that rather than back down on principles. The united states is dependent on oil from the middle east, and has protected this interest in the past whenever possible. This has agreed resulted in some interesting and probably meddlesome foreign policy issues, though the one pointed out about the Iraq/Iran issue, The only reason Iraq/US relationships are the way they are is because Iraq decided (or rather its dictator) to invade a virtually defensless smaller country. The US created some careful coalitions and went to war to protect Kuwait and its oil interests, but stopped short of obliterating Iraq in an attempt to prevent all out war from breaking out in the middle east. In desert storm, every effort was made to keep civilian casualties to a minimum, while also limiting American and Ally losses. The history of unrest in the middle east goes much deeper than American foreign policy in the area. If you understand this, you can also understand that the US has been on very shaky footing in protecting its interests, and it is actually remarkable that there haven't been more problems. There are plenty of decisions that have been made that were not the best. In hindsight, all the flaws of every administration in every era can be seen which may not have been readily visible. However, these actions are not wholy responsible for anti-US sentiment in the middle-east, the United States has done a lot to help certain nation/states, as well as made decisions that may not have helped. In third party situations like that, a lot of times the third party (US) takes more of the blame because it is seen as not belonging. Despite the fact that there is a lot of negative feelings towards the US, the vast majority of people in the middle east would not support the type of terrorist acts that occured on Tuesday. I never at any point said the US did not have a flawed history in foreign policy. I did state, and I will repeat this, that the US has as a rule attempted to do the best it can in dealings with foreign countries. There have been numerous more times that the US has helped out another country than caused harm by intervening. Because the US is arguably the wealthiest and strongest country in the world, or at least was through most of the second half of the past century, many other nations have looked to the united states as a superpower. That was never a title we pursued. We didn't go out of our way to become the strongest. But often it has fallen to us to intervene in the interests of preventing problems and keeping peace. In NATO for instance, the united states has provided most of the bruntwork in peacekeeping missions, thus has often been villified when things didn't go as planned. Again I will stress that the US is not without flaws in its dealings with other countries. But we have helped more than hurt, even in the middle-east. Terrorism is something that I know is not new to the world, nor is it new to the United States. But events of this past Tuesday were worse than any terrorist acts that have been committed in the past. In placing responsibility for human behavior, there is a tendency these days to shy away from the fact that humans are responsible for their actions, and try to find some element in their background on which to place the blame. For instance, saying the US provoked these attacks by policy decisions that left Arabic peoples feeling resentment towards the US. The reality is that responsibility for these attacks rests solely on the shoulders of those who planned it, and carried it out, and those who helped those who planned and carried it out. The whole world has been under terrorist attacks for too long now, it is time to take a stand and say that terrorism is not going to sway us, or drive us away in fear, it is not going to further your cause, it is merely going to sign your death certificate. I want to see any actions that are taken in counter-terrorism over the next few months/years/decades/centuries to be in a sense world-wide, as in supported by countries around the world, and done in a manner so as to limit civilian casualties in the process. People harboring terrorists, and governments supporting them, as well as the terrorists themselves should not be considered as civilians, because these type of people are lending support to actions that no civilized person would. I also want to see everyone around the world not stereotype arabic peoples in terms of "us" and "them" since as a group they are much like any other group: asian, african, european, native american. That is to say they are a part of the variety of humanity that exists on the face of this earth today. Only those specifically involved in, and supporting terrorism, as well as terrorist organizations and supporters in any other ethnic group should be targets in the wave of anti-terrorist purism that should ensue. Indeed, it should be a war on terrorism, not on people. Thats all I have to say on this right now, and I think it covers most of the topics broached so far in this thread. I do have my sources, but its too late tonight to go through and list them all, some of my better sources for US foreign policy include the excellent book "Called to Serve" by James Gritez (sp?) which I read last year, as well as what I have gleaned through 6 years of reading various news on world affairs, as well as research I did for highschool and college papers on Israel, the Peoples of the Arabian Sub-continent, Religions of the world and their origins, and Desert Storm. I also have aquaintences in the various branches of the US military who have actually had frontline experience on US missions in the middle-east and other areas of the world, as well as several friends who are Israeli/US dual citizens, and an Arab immigrant, who was not at all supportive of terrorism, I'll be the first to tell the FBI. ------------------ Posted by TheTaxMan on Sep. 14 2001,04:27
quote: Sure we did. Oh, say can you see...
------------------ quote: Posted by Hellraiser on Sep. 14 2001,04:43
quote: Perhaps you should take advice from the quote in your signature Its good to know that the spirits of individualism and good humor have not left us in the wake of the AOA. ------------------ Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 14 2001,05:27
i didn't say anything about reading. what i mentioned is what the underlying tone of their truths are.. you're absolutely correct when you say they're greedy and want more for themslves... i'm guilty of the exact same thing, and can not condemn that action, i can only condemn that action made towards me.. which is hypocritical, but i've never claimed to be completely straight forward on my intentions.
Posted by Rhydant on Sep. 14 2001,05:50
terrorist arent bad people?slate's off his fucking rocker. ------------------ Posted by StreetRaver on Sep. 14 2001,13:40
I only got one e-mail for the data cd but I need those e-mails with the pictures and vid clips so please semd those e-mails. one cd is going to be on the terorist attacks and the other is probly going to be on the war we are most likely going to get in so that should be interesting to a point. ------------------ Posted by Dark-Angel99 on Sep. 14 2001,16:03
President Bush declared war, and that Bin Laden is the prime suspect.....This message has been edited by Dark-Angel99 on September 15, 2001 at 11:56 AM Posted by whiskey@throttle on Sep. 14 2001,17:05
bleh.This message has been edited by whiskey@throttle on September 15, 2001 at 12:06 AM Posted by incubus on Sep. 14 2001,19:06
If you carry on thinking that they all deserve to get their country bombed you may want to look at < this >.Now start thinking twice before you blindly believe what the media tells you. ------------------ Posted by incubus on Sep. 14 2001,19:08
quote: CatKnight WTF is up with you. I'm usually the one sticking up for you but since the 11th everything that's come out of your mouth has been a steaming turd. Posted by Hellraiser on Sep. 14 2001,19:29
WTF? Whatever happened to the idea of crime and punishment? Hundreds of murders have been commited in the US, leaving scores of prisoners on Death row or Life imprisonment, we don't punish the families and cities of the people who commited the crimes. Why should we kill the families and cities of those who commited this crime against the free world? That makes no sense. Go after those who did the deed and those who supported and harbored them, no one else. Nazi Germany exterminated millions of Jews, lets go kill all germans. Sure thats fair enough, isn't it?Every story has several sides to it, and usually we only see one side. Sure everyone saw red Tuesday night, but thats not cause to go after every person of the same race as those who commited the crime. What CK suggested would bring us down to the level of the terrorists who commited those crimes. We can't afford to do that. Aside from the fact that it would be morally wrong, it would seriously damage the already shaky perception of the US in the world outside our borders. Posted by incubus on Sep. 14 2001,19:35
Very true. And already Arab-americans are being persecuted now. Because of their ethnic origin. Lets not all be savages here.Another very interesting article by UKs direct-action newsletter SchNEWS: Apparently O.B.L. came about cos of a CIA funded project? This needs looking into ... Posted by Hellraiser on Sep. 14 2001,19:40
< http://www.middleeastwire.com/newswire/stories/20010914_4_meno.shtml > This is exactly the kind of thing that I was afraid would happen tuesday afternoon. Even leaving the campus, I felt a sense of "us" and "them" develope among the students waiting at the bus stop who were americans and those who were muslims even though they were also american. Philadelphia and New York both have a large muslim community, and it irks me to no end that people are holding the actions against the whole ethnic group rather than specifically targeting their rage at those who did the terrible acts.
Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 14 2001,20:38
Well I acknowlegde that I may have been a bit harsh. We don't have to nuke Kabul. However, my ideal is still right in that we have to take more action then just killing a few terrorist leaders. I think the best way is to either bomb many government buildings, or to capture the city and depose the government. After which, we can scantion them similar to Iraq, although more severely.
Posted by whiskey@throttle on Sep. 14 2001,21:24
quote:
Posted by TheTaxMan on Sep. 14 2001,23:19
Look, no one knows what the end result of all of this will be. Ck, you can't say that they will need to be sanctioned severely (although in the past, this has been the case) and whiskey, you can't say they won't need to be. THe question is, what do our governments have planned for the now.------------------ quote: This message has been edited by TheTaxMan on September 15, 2001 at 08:01 PM Posted by whiskey@throttle on Sep. 15 2001,00:02
Sanctions are an alternative. We sanctioned Iraq because Saddam was still alive and in control of the country. It's a way to keep him in check, ensuring that he wont use his GNP to fund things like nuclear research or terrorism. If you depose a government, there's no one left to punish. What, are we going to defeat the Taliban and then starve the displaced refugees? No medical supplies or gasoline for you! Ha ha! Posted by TheTaxMan on Sep. 15 2001,01:00
Whatever you say; and you know what I meant.------------------ quote: Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 15 2001,01:56
on second thought, deposing the government will do pretty much nothing except spawn more terrorism. yeah we really do need to break out those bright, shiny new f-22's...
Posted by Hellraiser on Sep. 15 2001,03:28
I talked to my friend who's in the navy, and he says the military is mobilizing right now, things are in the works for an all out assault on terrorist groups and the nations that support them, all that we're waiting for is support from NATO so that the world does not see this as America fighting back, but the free world fighting against an attack on the free world. The idea is to rather than just take out the leaders of the terrorist groups, make it clear that the US does not just sit by when under attack, but ensures that all those responsible for the attack, indeed all those who use terrorism to further their causes will be wiped from the face of the planet. This is a crusade that will not be over for a while yet. Don't count on just a few dead terrorists, there's gonna be the makings of war. I hope, I sincerely hope that in this action every effort is made to limit civilian casualties, as has been done in the past. We don't want to start world war 3 but we do need to make a statement, and if in the process we can make the world a safer place, thats all the better.As long as the US proceeds with caution and limits civilian casualties, I'm in full support of what my country does. I'm actually glad that Bush made it to the white house rather than Gore, because I don't see Gore as being the type of person who could have handled this situation. He'd probably even be apologizing to the middle east right now, or asking for a recount of bodies to see if there were enough of them to justify the US taking a stance against terrorism. ------------------ Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 15 2001,04:11
the icon says it all
Posted by Rhydant on Sep. 15 2001,04:34
my uncle (who is a fireman, or all things) is going up to NY to volunteer in the reliefe effort.but i think hes just going because itll be the one decent thing he ever does. and thats not even a good reason. i think he thinks hes gonna get paid or something. ah well. ------------------ Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 15 2001,05:26
again I must point out ugly reality. even if you kill bin laden, and all of his assocites, and all of his cells, MORE WILL COME UP. they will be just as angry at the US fro the same reason they were on tuesday. The only way to make this stop is to make it too expensive for them to commit these acts. Lets see now, they are already willing to give up their lives, so what can we take away from them? Their families. Their cities.All of you who are worried about a counter-counter-attack are just full-of-shit pacifists. They have already counter attacked us. It's our time to strike back hard and fast. ------------------ Posted by whiskey@throttle on Sep. 15 2001,05:44
quote: Catknight, there's a threshold for the amount of times I can sit here and watch you advocate the total annihilation and virtual genocide of an entire race. I also find it rather unscrupulous considering your heritage and views on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. If you haven't learned a lesson from the Nazis I suggest you ask your family to reeducate you. If they can't help I'm sure any Armenian or Rwandan will suffice. Joe – I think you’re getting worked up at the wrong guy. I don’t want to put words in anyone’s mouth, but I don’t think he’s condoning what McVeigh did. But, you have to remember to be objective. These people aren’t mindless crazies: they have an agenda, they are rather intelligent, and they are willing to die for a cause. In their point of view, what they did was justified. If we don’t spend time identifying and dissecting what it is that drives people to commit such atrocities, and work on correcting those problems, then we are only sealing our own fates. This goes back to CK, too. The answer is not in total destruction. There are two obvious paths to take: one which involves senseless murder, and the other that involves thought and intelligence. The time has come to once again pick between brains and brawn. Between compassion and hatred. Granted, a certain degree of force is necessary, and in essence unavoidable, but to advocate killing families as this asshole keeps doing is frankly repulsive. Posted by chmod on Sep. 15 2001,11:54
dammit!my sister's friend was working in the world trade center at the time and no one's heard from him since. My aunt, who works about 2 blocks away, got out unscathed but just found out that one of her neighbors lost both of his parents, and he's an only child. Posted by Der_Teufel on Sep. 15 2001,16:53
quote: My cousin's girlfriend's cousin was in class (HS in Northern VA) and the principal came in to tell someone in her class that both of the person's parents were on the flight from Dulles that crashed into the Pentagon. I was talking to my sister (in Okinawa ) via our WebCams the other day and she had the camera pointed towards the window and you could see the Marines partoling in Hummers. They were patroling on foot w/ machine guns and helmets, flak jackets, etc. but now they are patroling in Hummers. Posted by Hellraiser on Sep. 15 2001,17:28
quote: Yes, he was amongst the resistance fighters in afganhistan during soviet occupation from 1979-1989. The CIA trained many of the resistance fighters, including Osama in the art of guerilla warfare, to help drive out the soviet invaders. However, while fighting with the other members of the resistance, he solidified his already extreme religious views. When the soviets were driven back, and America withdrew from the situation, Afganistan spiraled downward into civil war and unrest, until the Teliban strongarmed their way into power, also with the help of Osama. In the middle of this, he somehow identified America, his former ally in fighting the russians, as the enemy, and proclaimed that the only way to deal with the evil of the west was through terrorism and not distinguishing between civilians and military targets. All American citizens were equally deserving of the wrath of Allah. Posted by Rhydant on Sep. 15 2001,18:15
aw..... shit.tahts not right, man. ------------------ Posted by StanVanDam on Sep. 15 2001,22:28
Check this:< http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/09/14/afghanistan/index.html > Posted by DeadAnztac on Sep. 15 2001,23:42
Thank you Stan! Now THAT is intelligent! Really. I HATE listening to you fuckers about plowing down inocents. Scaring them into never doing it again. All you'd be doing is killing inocents, the Taliban wouldn't care, they're doing it already. Read that article! It's what I wanted to say, but didn't have the solid evidence for. Nor the validity. So listen to that man. PLEASE!------------------ Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 15 2001,23:49
I agree with this. Again, I think we should either bomb government structures across the middle east, or invade afghanistan with ground troops and depose the government. or both.
Posted by DogKnight on Sep. 15 2001,23:56
*BARKS AT CATKNIGHT*Hey hey hey! Who's that there changing their opinion without even a hint of an apology for his RETARDED ASS former posts? *GRRRRR* Posted by kornalldaway on Sep. 16 2001,00:21
CK, do you really think it will be that easy to invade afganistan? Russia tried a while ago, and guess what, they lost the war. Now of course US has greater military power then the terrorists there, but it will still be incredibely hard to take over the country. Casualties would be tremendous.
Posted by DeadAnztac on Sep. 16 2001,00:44
If we could clean out the Taliban I think the Afgani people would be grateful. Besides, we should clean up our mess anyways (the CIA did fund the Taliban (and a number of other groups) to fight off the Soviets. Well, they took out the Soviets, but we know who's leaders now.)------------------ Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 16 2001,01:59
hey dog, or DKB, or whoever you are, I really don't think this is the place to start an extremely immature flame war.
Posted by DogKnight on Sep. 16 2001,02:03
True, but you can apoligize for past slips. It's ok. Even "increadably intelligent" people like you can, in fact, be wrong. In your case can be wrong lot's of the time. But, hey, that's besides the point.
Posted by TheTaxMan on Sep. 16 2001,03:33
Ok.Let's assume heavy losses. Is it worth it? I mean seriously, to finally get rid of terrorist groups in the middle east? We've got the support of Pakhistan and probably Egypt as well. Is it worth the deaths of 'x' american troops to make the world a better place for everyone? Granted, I'm not in the military, and do not have the authority or the right to make a decision like this, but we've got the man-power, the mechanised power, and so does NATO and the rest of our allies (so that means losses for all, not just the US, duh). And, anyone who thinks someone should apologise for speaking their mind on this forum is fooling themselves. Find something usefull to complain about. quote: This message has been edited by TheTaxMan on September 16, 2001 at 10:34 PM Posted by whiskey@throttle on Sep. 16 2001,04:04
It's been reported that one of the hijackers may have been Egyptian. You want to bomb and invade Egypt too?
Posted by aventari on Sep. 16 2001,07:17
Pakistan is even telling the Taliban to hand the guy over now. Who knows if it's just an empty guesture or it actually represents Pakistani attitude though. I'm left wondering if we would actually invade Afgahnistan, that would be a little crazy considering they slaughtered the Soviet fucking Union.
------------------ Posted by WillyPete on Sep. 16 2001,10:23
DogKnight, back off CK. If he's changed his mind so be it. All for the better I say.He owes no-one an apology. I'd rather any hotheads change their minds without any word of apology than having people hurt others in anger. Not saying CK would, but there's folks out there looking for a reason to hurt anyone else because of their differences. Like I posted before, the best thing anyone in America can do is to stand behind their leaders when the time comes to make the decisions. Even when some of your loved ones or acquaintences come back dead. This WILL require people going in to do the dirty. It's not going to be a push button war again. I think the really significant part of this whole ordeal is the fact that the Americans fianlly realised HOW MUCH the other parts of the world can hate them. You guys knew they didn't like you for some time, but not to the extent of this tragedy. And the hard part is knowing that your country has been trying to help these people for decades. I read a speech by a Canadian leader the other day that made total sense. America has always been there for the rest of the world but no-one has ever volunteered to help her during her disasters till now. The root of it is, America's foreign policy touches every country. You guys seeks to do well everywhere. Granted sometimes it fails, but usually it's successful. You don't see news headlines showing that N Korea didn't do anything aggressive today. Or that another day has passed without China trying to reclaim Taiwan. Problem is, with such a far-reaching international policy, people tend to associate ANYTHING going wrong in their lives, with the USA. Compare it to IT. Computers crash all the time, but what name do IT people curse each time/ 'That damn Microsoft!' Even though they've done more to standardise computing for the world than anyone, it's mostly talked about for it's faults. It's exactly the same with America. Be proud of the fact that it's for this reason that you guys are hated and now, although sadly it's taken this tragedy to ignite it, America is going to be the pivot in changing world safety regarding terrorism. When the eyes are dried after this, a lot of people are going to sleep a little more soundly and hopefully have a little brighter outlook on their own future. Posted by ic0n0 on Sep. 16 2001,10:40
Everything turns into a flame war around here.------------------ Posted by Hellraiser on Sep. 16 2001,11:24
Well spoken, WillyPete.------------------ Posted by doom farmer on Sep. 16 2001,11:47
Hey, this is just a quick post..Didn't the CIA have a group of people..assassins/mercenaries...to get rid of corrupt international leaders? I think they ended this kind of thing in the 70's when it became publicly known. Anyway, I think this sounds like a godd idea...not that we could assassinate Castro on how many attempts? ------------------ This message has been edited by doom farmer on September 17, 2001 at 06:48 AM Posted by StreetRaver on Sep. 16 2001,12:48
The U.s also had bounty hunters after the terrorist leaders awile back but they did no good. so yeah we did have people over int he east trying to get rid of terrorizm but have failed. In my own oppinion i say nuke the little shits and get this over with but hey here comes WW3.------------------ Posted by TheTaxMan on Sep. 16 2001,17:03
Who ever said that? Bin Laden isn't Afghan so I don't know where this conclusion is coming from...------------------ quote: Posted by EvilGenius on Sep. 16 2001,18:08
damn, i feel like i have to go take some form of history course to keep up with this thread... and i really hope all that palestine bullshit where epople were dancing in the streets is fake... we've already had "incidents" that are race related here on my campus... Posted by SLATE on Sep. 16 2001,18:23
Also... one thing that confuses me about that video... What time did CNN release that footage? Wasn't it late in that area when that video was released? Plus, aren't women, under the Taliban, not allowed to show their face?
Posted by DeadAnztac on Sep. 16 2001,18:29
Palestinians = mostly in IsraelIsrael = Off Mediterranean sea, between Syria, Egypt, and Jordan Pakistan = country off India at war with Afghanistan Afghanistan = former part of the USSR, revolted (with CIA help, arms, training, funding). Now sits in between Persia, Russia, India, and China. Taliban = A faction of the revolting people who were funded by the CIA and, after driving USSR out, took Afghanistan for it's own. Correct me if I'm wrong. I'm just trying to get info straight here people. ------------------ This message has been edited by DeadAnztac on September 17, 2001 at 02:50 PM Posted by WillyPete on Sep. 16 2001,18:46
DoomFarmer, there shouldn't be any CIA assasins set to kill leaders of nation states. It was made illegal by Executive order sometime in the 70's/80's. Done so the US and USSR wouldn't keep trying to top one another's chief of state.'Better the devil you know' and all that stuff. Also to prevent any holocaust should the US mistakenly think the KGB was behind any more events like Dallas/Kennedy. Don't know the exec. order #. Terrorist leaders, however, are pretty much under an open season license. Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 16 2001,19:09
quote: oops, pardon my ignorance. btw SLATE, the taliban is the government of afghanistan, not palestine. Posted by Hellraiser on Sep. 16 2001,23:17
Don't believe everything you see on TV, but at the same time, don't believe everything you read on a forum. Such second and third hand info is often dubious to begin with and should not be taken as fact.Even < www.middleeastwire.com > indicated that the clip aired on CNN was in fact genuine, but indicated that it was only a few, and when people were made aware of the details of the attack, no one was cheering. In fact, services in honor of those who died were held across the middle east. I sincerely doubt that CNN would be foolish enough to dig up old newsclips to broadcast in the wake of a tragedy, because it would seriously damage their credibility. ------------------ Posted by StanVanDam on Sep. 17 2001,05:22
You know why Pakistan is on the US side, even though they just were allies with Afghanistan a few weeks ago?1. To avoid being attacked by the US Posted by StanVanDam on Sep. 17 2001,05:26
It appears that it was footage taken some 10 years ago. Here's a post in it's entirety, from another messageboard. -------------------------------------------------- Don Armstrong -------------------------------------------------- Years ago, he came to visit us. We were a bit concerned because the TV news was reporting widespread rioting right where David lived. When he arrived here, he told us that the news reports were simply wrong. There hadn't been any rioting, let alone the widespread stuff that was being reported. David said that when he'd left Chile only hours before everything was completely normal. People going about their business normally. Businesses open, people having lunch in cafes, and so on. We happened to have the TV news on later. They were reporting that rioting had been going on for days, and were showing footage. David told us that was ridiculous. Earlier that day, he'd been at exactly the place they were showing on TV, and it was completely peaceful, whereas the TV was saying that this was a continuing riot. As the report continued, David jumped up and shouted, "Look at the license plates on those cars!" We couldn't figure out why he was so excited until he explained that the license plates on the cars being shown in the TV news footage hadn't been used in Chile for 10 years or more. And there was no question that the TV news was representing this to be current footage. That's just one example. I've also spoken to many other people whom I trust who have described similar situations. I simply don't trust the TV news to report anything accurately. Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 17 2001,05:34
well even if that short clip was used out of context, there were still many arabs in Michigan and on some Canadian college campus that were cheering. Also, there were two doctors in McKeesport who were cheering IN THE HOSPITAL when the towers collapsed. They got kicked out, but came back the next day.
Posted by Observer on Sep. 17 2001,05:48
CK, listen more closely in the morning before you go on spreading such rumors. UPMC McKeesport categorically denied those allegations. Even Quinn had his doubts as to the validity of the email he received.------------------ Posted by Leb on Nov. 07 2001,07:25
When queried by reporters concerning his views on the assassination of John F. Kennedy in November 1963, Malcolm X famously - and quite charitably, all things considered - replied that it was merely a case of "chickens coming home to roost." On the morning of September 11, 2001, a few more chickens - along with some half-million dead Iraqi children - came home to roost in a very big way at the twin towers of New York's World Trade Center. Well, actually, a few of them seem to have nestled in at the Pentagon as well. The Iraqi youngsters, all of them under 12, died as a predictable - in fact, widely predicted - result of the 1991 US "surgical" bombing of their country's water purification and sewage facilities, as well as other "infrastructural" targets upon which Iraq's civilian population depends for its very survival. If the nature of the bombing were not already bad enough - and it should be noted that this sort of "aerial warfare" constitutes a Class I Crime Against humanity, entailing myriad gross violations of international law, as well as every conceivable standard of "civilized" behavior - the death toll has been steadily ratcheted up by US-imposed sanctions for a full decade now. Enforced all the while by a massive military presence and periodic bombing raids, the embargo has greatly impaired the victims' ability to import the nutrients, medicines and other materials necessary to saving the lives of even their toddlers. All told, Iraq has a population of about 18 million. The 500,000 kids lost to date thus represent something on the order of 25 percent of their age group. Indisputably, the rest have suffered - are still suffering - a combination of physical debilitation and psychological trauma severe enough to prevent their ever fully recovering. In effect, an entire generation has been obliterated. The reason for this holocaust was/is rather simple, and stated quite straightforwardly by President George Bush, the 41st "freedom-loving" father of the freedom-lover currently filling the Oval Office, George the 43rd: "The world must learn that what we say, goes," intoned George the Elder to the enthusiastic applause of freedom-loving Americans everywhere. How Old George conveyed his message was certainly no mystery to the US public. One need only recall the 24-hour-per-day dissemination of bombardment videos on every available TV channel, and the exceedingly high ratings of these telecasts, to gain a sense of how much they knew. In trying to affix a meaning to such things, we would do well to remember the wave of elation that swept America at reports of what was happening along the so-called Highway of Death: perhaps 100,000 "towel-heads" and "camel jockeys" - or was it "sand niggers" that week? - in full retreat, routed and effectively defenseless, many of them conscripted civilian laborers, slaughtered in a single day by jets firing the most hyper-lethal types of ordnance. It was a performance worthy of the nazis during the early months of their drive into Russia. And it should be borne in mind that Good Germans gleefully cheered that butchery, too. Indeed, support for Hitler suffered no serious erosion among Germany's "innocent civilians" until the defeat at Stalingrad in 1943. There may be a real utility to reflecting further, this time upon the fact that it was pious Americans who led the way in assigning the onus of collective guilt to the German people as a whole, not for things they as individuals had done, bur for what they had allowed - nay, empowered - their leaders and their soldiers to do in their name. If the principle was valid then, it remains so now, as applicable to Good Americans as it was the Good Germans. And the price exacted from the Germans for the faultiness of their moral fiber was truly ghastly. Returning now to the children, and to the effects of the post-Gulf War embargo - continued bull force by Bush the Elder's successors in the Clinton administration as a gesture of its "resolve" to finalize what George himself had dubbed the "New World Order" of American military/economic domination - it should be noted that not one but two high United Nations officials attempting to coordinate delivery of humanitarian aid to Iraq resigned in succession as protests against US policy. One of them, former U.N. Assistant Secretary General Denis Halladay, repeatedly denounced what was happening as "a systematic program . . . of deliberate genocide." His statements appeared in the New York Times and other papers during the fall of 1998, so it can hardly be contended that the American public was "unaware" of them. Shortly thereafter, Secretary of State Madeline Albright openly confirmed Halladay's assessment. Asked during the widely-viewed TV program Meet the Press to respond to his "allegations," she calmly announced that she'd decided it was "worth the price" to see that U.S. objectives were achieved. The Politics of a Perpetrator Population As a whole, the American public greeted these revelations with yawns.. There were, after all, far more pressing things than the unrelenting misery/death of a few hundred thousand Iraqi tikes to be concerned with. Getting "Jeremy" and "Ellington" to their weekly soccer game, for instance, or seeing to it that little "Tiffany" an "Ashley" had just the right roll-neck sweaters to go with their new cords. And, to be sure, there was the yuppie holy war against ashtrays - for "our kids," no less - as an all-absorbing point of political focus. In fairness, it must be admitted that there was an infinitesimally small segment of the body politic who expressed opposition to what was/is being done to the children of Iraq. It must also be conceded, however, that those involved by-and-large contented themselves with signing petitions and conducting candle-lit prayer vigils, bearing "moral witness" as vast legions of brown-skinned five-year-olds sat shivering in the dark, wide-eyed in horror, whimpering as they expired in the most agonizing ways imaginable. Be it said as well, and this is really the crux of it, that the "resistance" expended the bulk of its time and energy harnessed to the systemically-useful task of trying to ensure, as "a principle of moral virtue" that nobody went further than waving signs as a means of "challenging" the patently exterminatory pursuit of Pax Americana. So pure of principle were these "dissidents," in fact, that they began literally to supplant the police in protecting corporations profiting by the carnage against suffering such retaliatory "violence" as having their windows broken by persons less "enlightened" - or perhaps more outraged - than the self-anointed "peacekeepers." Property before people, it seems - or at least the equation of property to people - is a value by no means restricted to America's boardrooms. And the sanctimony with which such putrid sentiments are enunciated turns out to be nauseatingly similar, whether mouthed by the CEO of Standard Oil or any of the swarm of comfort zone "pacifists" queuing up to condemn the black block after it ever so slightly disturbed the functioning of business-as-usual in Seattle. Small wonder, all-in-all, that people elsewhere in the world - the Mideast, for instance - began to wonder where, exactly, aside from the streets of the US itself, one was to find the peace America's purportedly oppositional peacekeepers claimed they were keeping. The answer, surely, was plain enough to anyone unblinded by the kind of delusions engendered by sheer vanity and self-absorption. So, too, were the implications in terms of anything changing, out there, in America's free-fire zones. Tellingly, it was at precisely this point - with the genocide in Iraq officially admitted and a public response demonstrating beyond a shadow of a doubt that there were virtually no Americans, including most of those professing otherwise, doing anything tangible to stop it - that the combat teams which eventually commandeered the aircraft used on September 11 began to infiltrate the United States. Meet the "Terrorists" Of the men who came, there are a few things demanding to be said in the face of the unending torrent of disinformational drivel unleashed by George Junior and the corporate "news" media immediately following their successful operation on September 11. They did not, for starters, "initiate" a war with the US, much less commit "the first acts of war of the new millennium."
That they waited so long to do so is, notwithstanding the 1993 action at the WTC, more than anything a testament to their patience and restraint. They did not license themselves to "target innocent civilians." There is simply no argument to be made that the Pentagon personnel killed on September 11 fill that bill. The building and those inside comprised military targets, pure and simple. As to those in the World Trade Center . . . Well, really. Let's get a grip here, shall we? True enough, they were civilians of a sort. But innocent? Gimme a break. They formed a technocratic corps at the very heart of America's global financial empire - the "mighty engine of profit" to which the military dimension of U.S. policy has always been enslaved - and they did so both willingly and knowingly. Recourse to "ignorance" - a derivative, after all, of the word "ignore" - counts as less than an excuse among this relatively well-educated elite. To the extent that any of them were unaware of the costs and consequences to others of what they were involved in - and in many cases excelling at - it was because of their absolute refusal to see. More likely, it was because they were too busy braying, incessantly and self-importantly, into their cell phones, arranging power lunches and stock transactions, each of which translated, conveniently out of sight, mind and smelling distance, into the starved and rotting flesh of infants. If there was a better, more effective, or in fact any other way of visiting some penalty befitting their participation upon the little Eichmanns inhabiting the sterile sanctuary of the twin towers, I'd really be interested in hearing about it. The men who flew the missions against the WTC and Pentagon were not "cowards." That distinction properly belongs to the "firm-jawed lads" who delighted in flying stealth aircraft through the undefended airspace of Baghdad, dropping payload after payload of bombs on anyone unfortunate enough to be below - including tens of thousands of genuinely innocent civilians - while themselves incurring all the risk one might expect during a visit to the local video arcade. Still more, the word describes all those "fighting men and women" who sat at computer consoles aboard ships in the Persian Gulf, enjoying air-conditioned comfort while launching cruise missiles into neighborhoods filled with random human beings. Whatever else can be said of them, the men who struck on September 11 manifested the courage of their convictions, willingly expending their own lives in attaining their objectives. Nor were they "fanatics" devoted to "Islamic fundamentalism." One might rightly describe their actions as "desperate." Feelings of desperation, however, are a perfectly reasonable - one is tempted to say "normal" - emotional response among persons confronted by the mass murder of their children, particularly when it appears that nobody else really gives a damn (ask a Jewish survivor about this one, or, even more poignantly, for all the attention paid them, a Gypsy). That desperate circumstances generate desperate responses is no mysterious or irrational principle, of the sort motivating fanatics. Less is it one peculiar to Islam. Indeed, even the FBI's investigative reports on the combat teams' activities during the months leading up to September 11 make it clear that the members were not fundamentalist Muslims. Rather, it's pretty obvious at this point that they were secular activists - soldiers, really - who, while undoubtedly enjoying cordial relations with the clerics of their countries, were motivated far more by the grisly realities of the U.S. war against them than by a set of religious beliefs. And still less were they/their acts "insane." Insanity is a condition readily associable with the very American idea that one - or one's country - holds what amounts to a "divine right" to commit genocide, and thus to forever do so with impunity. The term might also be reasonably applied to anyone suffering genocide without attempting in some material way to bring the process to a halt. Sanity itself, in this frame of reference, might be defined by a willingness to try and destroy the perpetrators and/or the sources of their ability to commit their crimes. (Shall we now discuss the US "strategic bombing campaign" against Germany during World War II, and the mental health of those involved in it?) Which takes us to official characterizations of the combat teams as an embodiment of "evil." Evil - for those inclined to embrace the banality of such a concept - was perfectly incarnated in that malignant toad known as Madeline Albright, squatting in her studio chair like Jaba the Hutt, blandly spewing the news that she'd imposed a collective death sentence upon the unoffending youth of Iraq. Evil was to be heard in that great American hero "Stormin' Norman" Schwartzkopf's utterly dehumanizing dismissal of their systematic torture and annihilation as mere "collateral damage." Evil, moreover, is a term appropriate to describing the mentality of a public that finds such perspectives and the policies attending them acceptable, or even momentarily tolerable. Had it not been for these evils, the counterattacks of September 11 would never have occurred. And unless "the world is rid of such evil," to lift a line from George Junior, September 11 may well end up looking like a lark. There is no reason, after all, to believe that the teams deployed in the assaults on the WTC and the Pentagon were the only such, that the others are composed of "Arabic-looking individuals" - America's indiscriminately lethal arrogance and psychotic sense of self-entitlement have long since given the great majority of the world's peoples ample cause to be at war with it - or that they are in any way dependent upon the seizure of civilian airliners to complete their missions. To the contrary, there is every reason to expect that there are many other teams in place, tasked to employ altogether different tactics in executing operational plans at least as well-crafted as those evident on September 11, and very well equipped for their jobs. This is to say that, since the assaults on the WTC and Pentagon were act of war - not "terrorist incidents" - they must be understood as components in a much broader strategy designed to achieve specific results. From this, it can only be adduced that there are plenty of other components ready to go, and that they will be used, should this become necessary in the eyes of the strategists. It also seems a safe bet that each component is calibrated to inflict damage at a level incrementally higher than the one before (during the 1960s, the Johnson administration employed a similar policy against Vietnam, referred to as "escalation"). Since implementation of the overall plan began with the WTC/Pentagon assaults, it takes no rocket scientist to decipher what is likely to happen next, should the U.S. attempt a response of the inexcusable variety to which it has long entitled itself. About Those Boys (and Girls) in the Bureau There's another matter begging for comment at this point. The idea that the FBI's "counterterrorism task forces" can do a thing to prevent what will happen is yet another dimension of America's delusional pathology.. The fact is that, for all its publicly-financed "image-building" exercises, the Bureau has never shown the least aptitude for anything of the sort. Oh, yeah, FBI counterintelligence personnel have proven quite adept at framing anarchists, communists and Black Panthers, sometimes murdering them in their beds or the electric chair. The Bureau's SWAT units have displayed their ability to combat child abuse in Waco by burning babies alive, and its vaunted Crime Lab has been shown to pad its "crime-fighting' statistics by fabricating evidence against many an alleged car thief. But actual "heavy-duty bad guys" of the sort at issue now? This isn't a Bruce Willis/Chuck Norris/Sly Stallone movie, after all.. And J. Edgar Hoover doesn't get to approve either the script or the casting. The number of spies, saboteurs and bona fide terrorists apprehended, or even detected by the FBI in the course of its long and slimy history could be counted on one's fingers and toes. On occasion, its agents have even turned out to be the spies, and, in many instances, the terrorists as well. To be fair once again, if the Bureau functions as at best a carnival of clowns where its "domestic security responsibilities" are concerned, this is because - regardless of official hype - it has none. It is now, as it's always been, the national political police force, and instrument created and perfected to ensure that all Americans, not just the consenting mass, are "free" to do exactly as they're told. The FBI and "cooperating agencies" can be thus relied upon to set about "protecting freedom" by destroying whatever rights and liberties were left to U.S. citizens before September 11 (in fact, they've already received authorization to begin). Sheeplike, the great majority of Americans can also be counted upon to bleat their approval, at least in the short run, believing as they always do that the nasty implications of what they're doing will pertain only to others. Oh Yeah, and "The Company," Too A possibly even sicker joke is the notion, suddenly in vogue, that the CIA will be able to pinpoint "terrorist threats," "rooting out their infrastructure" where it exists and/or "terminating" it before it can materialize, if only it's allowed to beef up its "human intelligence gathering capacity" in an unrestrained manner (including full-bore operations inside the US, of course). Yeah. Right. Since America has a collective attention-span of about 15 minutes, a little refresher seems in order: "The Company" had something like a quarter-million people serving as "intelligence assets" by feeding it information in Vietnam in 1968, and it couldn't even predict the Tet Offensive. God knows how many spies it was fielding against the USSR at the height of Ronald Reagan's version of the Cold War, and it was still caught flatfooted by the collapse of the Soviet Union. As to destroying "terrorist infrastructures," one would do well to remember Operation Phoenix, another product of its open season in Vietnam. In that one, the CIA enlisted elite US units like the Navy Seals and Army Special Forces, as well as those of friendly countries - the south Vietnamese Rangers, for example, and Australian SAS - to run around "neutralizing" folks targeted by The Company's legion of snitches as "guerrillas" (as those now known as "terrorists" were then called). Sound familiar? Upwards of 40,000 people - mostly bystanders, as it turns out - were murdered by Phoenix hit teams before the guerrillas, stronger than ever, ran the US and its collaborators out of their country altogether. And these are the guys who are gonna save the day, if unleashed to do their thing in North America? The net impact of all this "counterterrorism" activity upon the combat teams' ability to do what they came to do, of course, will be nil. Instead, it's likely to make it easier for them to operate (it's worked that way in places like Northern Ireland). And, since denying Americans the luxury of reaping the benefits of genocide in comfort was self-evidently a key objective of the WTC/Pentagon assaults, it can be stated unequivocally that a more overt display of the police state mentality already pervading this country simply confirms the magnitude of their victory. On Matters of Proportion and Intent As things stand, including the 1993 detonation at the WTC, "Arab terrorists" have responded to the massive and sustained American terror bombing of Iraq with a total of four assaults by explosives inside the US. That's about 1\% of the 50,000 bombs the Pentagon announced were rained on Baghdad alone during the Gulf War (add in Oklahoma City and you'll get something nearer an actual 1\%).
In terms undoubtedly more meaningful to the property/profit-minded American mainstream, they've knocked down a half-dozen buildings - albeit some very well-chosen ones - as opposed to the "strategic devastation" visited upon the whole of Iraq, and punched a 贄 billion hole in the earnings outlook of major corporate shareholders, as opposed to the U.S. obliteration of Iraq's entire economy. With that, they've given Americans a tiny dose of their own medicine.. This might be seen as merely a matter of "vengeance" or "retribution," and, unquestionably, America has earned it, even if it were to add up only to something so ultimately petty. The problem is that vengeance is usually framed in terms of "getting even," a concept which is plainly inapplicable in this instance. As the above data indicate, it would require another 49,996 detonations killing 495,000 more Americans, for the "terrorists" to "break even" for the bombing of Baghdad/extermination of Iraqi children alone. And that's to achieve "real number" parity. To attain an actual proportional parity of damage - the US is about 15 times as large as Iraq in terms of population, even more in terms of territory - they would, at a minimum, have to blow up about 300,000 more buildings and kill something on the order of 7.5 million people. Were this the intent of those who've entered the US to wage war against it, it would remain no less true that America and Americans were only receiving the bill for what they'd already done. Payback, as they say, can be a real mother****er (ask the Germans). There is, however, no reason to believe that retributive parity is necessarily an item on the agenda of those who planned the WTC/Pentagon operation. If it were, given the virtual certainty that they possessed the capacity to have inflicted far more damage than they did, there would be a lot more American bodies lying about right now. Hence, it can be concluded that ravings carried by the "news" media since September 11 have contained at least one grain of truth: The peoples of the Mideast "aren't like" Americans, not least because they don't "value life' in the same way. By this, it should be understood that Middle-Easterners, unlike Americans, have no history of exterminating others purely for profit, or on the basis of racial animus. Thus, we can appreciate the fact that they value life - all lives, not just their own - far more highly than do their U.S. counterparts. The Makings of a Humanitarian Strategy In sum one can discern a certain optimism - it might even be call humanitarianism - imbedded in the thinking of those who presided over the very limited actions conducted on September 11. Their logic seems to have devolved upon the notion that the American people have condoned what has been/is being done in their name - indeed, are to a significant extent actively complicit in it - mainly because they have no idea what it feels like to be on the receiving end. Now they do. That was the "medicinal" aspect of the attacks. To all appearances, the idea is now to give the tonic a little time to take effect, jolting Americans into the realization that the sort of pain they're now experiencing first-hand is no different from - or the least bit more excruciating than - that which they've been so cavalier in causing others, and thus to respond appropriately. More bluntly, the hope was - and maybe still is - that Americans, stripped of their presumed immunity from incurring any real consequences for their behavior, would comprehend and act upon a formulation as uncomplicated as "stop killing our kids, if you want your own to be safe." Either way, it's a kind of "reality therapy" approach, designed to afford the American people a chance to finally "do the right thing" on their own, without further coaxing. Were the opportunity acted upon in some reasonably good faith fashion - a sufficiently large number of Americans rising up and doing whatever is necessary to force an immediate lifting of the sanctions on Iraq, for instance, or maybe hanging a few of America's abundant supply of major war criminals (Henry Kissinger comes quickly to mind, as do Madeline Albright, Colin Powell, Bill Clinton and George the Elder) - there is every reason to expect that military operations against the US on its domestic front would be immediately suspended. Whether they would remain so would of course be contingent upon follow-up. By that, it may be assumed that American acceptance of onsite inspections by international observers to verify destruction of its weapons of mass destruction (as well as dismantlement of all facilities in which more might be manufactured), Nuremberg-style trials in which a few thousand US military/corporate personnel could be properly adjudicated and punished for their Crimes Against humanity, and payment of reparations to the array of nations/peoples whose assets the US has plundered over the years, would suffice. Since they've shown no sign of being unreasonable or vindictive, it may even be anticipated that, after a suitable period of adjustment and reeducation (mainly to allow them to acquire the skills necessary to living within their means), those restored to control over their own destinies by the gallant sacrifices of the combat teams the WTC and Pentagon will eventually (re)admit Americans to the global circle of civilized societies. Stranger things have happened. In the Alternative Unfortunately, noble as they may have been, such humanitarian aspirations were always doomed to remain unfulfilled. For it to have been otherwise, a far higher quality of character and intellect would have to prevail among average Americans than is actually the case. Perhaps the strategists underestimated the impact a couple of generations-worth of media indoctrination can produce in terms of demolishing the capacity of human beings to form coherent thoughts. Maybe they forgot to factor in the mind-numbing effects of the indoctrination passed off as education in the US. Then, again, it's entirely possible they were aware that a decisive majority of American adults have been reduced by this point to a level much closer to the kind of immediate self-gratification entailed in Pavlovian stimulus/response patterns than anything accessible by appeals to higher logic, and still felt morally obliged to offer the dolts an option to quit while they were ahead. What the hell? It was worth a try. But it's becoming increasingly apparent that the dosage of medicine administered was entirely insufficient to accomplish its purpose. Although there are undoubtedly exceptions, Americans for the most part still don't get it. Already, they've desecrated the temporary tomb of those killed in the WTC, staging a veritable pep rally atop the mangled remains of those they profess to honor, treating the whole affair as if it were some bizarre breed of contact sport. And, of course, there are the inevitable pom-poms shaped like American flags, the school colors worn as little red-white-and-blue ribbons affixed to labels, sportscasters in the form of "counterterrorism experts" drooling mindless color commentary during the pregame warm-up. Refusing the realization that the world has suddenly shifted its axis, and that they are therefore no longer "in charge," they have by-and-large reverted instantly to type, working themselves into their usual bloodlust on the now obsolete premise that the bloodletting will "naturally" occur elsewhere and to someone else. "Patriotism," a wise man once observed, "is the last refuge of scoundrels." And the braided, he might of added. Braided Scoundrel-in-Chief, George Junior, lacking even the sense to be careful what he wished for, has teamed up with a gaggle of fundamentalist Christian clerics like Billy Graham to proclaim a "New Crusade" called "Infinite Justice" aimed at "ridding the world of evil." One could easily make light of such rhetoric, remarking upon how unseemly it is for a son to threaten his father in such fashion - or a president to so publicly contemplate the murder/suicide of himself and his cabinet - but the matter is deadly serious. They are preparing once again to sally forth for the purpose of roasting brown-skinned children by the scores of thousands. Already, the B-1 bombers and the aircraft carriers and the missile frigates are en route, the airborne divisions are gearing up to go. To where? Afghanistan? The Sudan? Iraq, again (or still)? How about Grenada (that was fun)? Any of them or all. It doesn't matter. The desire to pummel the helpless runs rabid as ever. Only, this time it's different. The time the helpless aren't, or at least are not so helpless as they were. This time, somewhere, perhaps in an Afghani mountain cave, possibly in a Brooklyn basement, maybe another local altogether - but somewhere, all the same - there's a grim-visaged (wo)man wearing a Cling Eastwood smile. "Go ahead, punks," s/he's saying, "Make my day." And when they do, when they launch these airstrikes abroad - or may a little later; it will be at a time conforming to the "terrorists"' own schedule, and at a place of their choosing - the next more intensive dose of medicine administered here "at home." Of what will it consist this time? Anthrax? Mustard gas? Sarin? A tactical nuclear device? That, too, is their choice to make. Looking back, it will seem to future generations inexplicable why Americans were unable on their own, and in time to save themselves, to accept a rule of nature so basic that it could be mouthed by an actor, Lawrence Fishburn, in a movie, The Cotton Club. "You've got to learn, " the line went, "that when you push people around, some people push back." As they should. As they must. And as they undoubtedly will. There is justice in such symmetry. ADDENDUM The preceding was a "first take" reading, more a stream-of-consciousness interpretive reaction to the September 11 counterattack than a finished piece on the topic. Hence, I'll readily admit that I've been far less than thorough, and quite likely wrong about a number of things. For instance, it may not have been (only) the ghosts of Iraqi children who made their appearance that day. It could as easily have been some or all of their butchered Palestinian cousins. Or maybe it was some or all of the at least 3.2 million Indochinese who perished as a result of America's sustained and genocidal assault on Southeast Asia (1959-1975), not to mention the millions more who've died because of the sanctions imposed thereafter. Perhaps there were a few of the Korean civilians massacred by US troops at places like No Gun Ri during the early `50s, or the hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians ruthlessly incinerated in the ghastly fire raids of World War II (only at Dresden did America bomb Germany in a similar manner). And, of course, it could have been those vaporized in the militarily pointless nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. There are others, as well, a vast and silent queue of faceless victims, stretching from the million-odd Filipinos slaughtered during America's "Indian War" in their islands at the beginning of the twentieth century, through the real Indians, America's own, massacred wholesale at places like Horseshoe Bend and the Bad Axe, Sand Creek and Wounded Knee, the Wa****a, Bear River, and the Marias. Was it those who expired along the Cherokee Trial of Tears of the Long Walk of the Navajo? Those murdered by smallpox at Fort Clark in 1836? Starved to death in the concentration camp at Bosque Redondo during the 1860s? Maybe those native people claimed for scalp bounty in all 48 of the continental US states? Or the Raritans whose severed heads were kicked for sport along the streets of what was then called New Amsterdam, at the very site where the WTC once stood? One hears, too, the whispers of those lost on the Middle Passage, and of those whose very flesh was sold in the slave market outside the human kennel from whence Wall Street takes its name. And of coolie laborers, imported by the gross-dozen to lay the tracks of empire across scorching desert sands, none of them allotted "a Chinaman's chance" of surviving. The list is too long, too awful to go on. No matter what its eventual fate, America will have gotten off very, very cheap. The full measure of its guilt can never be fully balanced or atoned for
Posted by Vigilante on Nov. 07 2001,07:32
You're a funny, funny man.
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Nov. 07 2001,08:15
quote: can anyone scale down that encyclopedia of a post cos the hell if i'm gonna be bothered to read all that ------------------ Posted by whiskey@throttle on Nov. 07 2001,10:30
I enjoyed reading that, and think you have many good points. However, your essay seems to root in the assumption that there exists no other evil in the world besides the US - that all our "enemies" are somehow innocent because they lost battles against us. Granted, I see you think many or all of these conflicts were unjustly instigated by the USA - granted, many were, but there were other threats abound when this country made the military decisions that pepper its history. For example, you mention Nagasaki... Well, did it not end the war? For how long would the ground battle have continued if not for that bomb? American losses aside, how many more Japanese would have died in a bloody, extended ground campaign? The intelligent bet is on "a fuckload." I'm not saying the use of nuclear weapons is okay. It's just that at the time, a hasty decision was made at a bottleneck...not only as the means to scare a desperate (not to mention suicidal) country into surrender, but a way to illustrate to the Nazis that they had lost the race, and were officially fucked. Perhaps some similarity is shared between this example and today's Taliban/state-sponsored terrorism threat. Yeah, I think it does. However, now is the time to learn from past mistakes...to learn from the horrors of war...to not be condemned to repeating the past because of ignorance. On these points, I completely agree with you. Nevertheless, I still think something must be done. Action must be taken in order to snub murder and violence. The US may be just as guilty, but no one said we can't fight to change our country as well. While our soldiers are away, I wish more fat-ass Americans would get off their sofas and start making a fucking country out of this land…instead of staying glued to fucking low-brow, voyeuristic television, sucking down processed food and working miserable 9-5 shifts like robots in factory…instead of rotting in apathy (aka obesity and welfare), making the rest of us hard-working citizens look like morons in front of the international community. Everyone seems to complain about the US...but no one wants to make it better. No one offers positive internal solutions. They just want to justify violence against us. To tell us, "we had it coming." Yeah, people need a wake-up call. Again, that's one of the things I liked about your essay. Still, I think as long as we fight in Afghanistan for the benefit of 1Afghanis and the global good, taking careful measure to keep the innocent fed and safe, I will support this war on terrorism. Of course, whether this is actually happening is open to debate... That's what I think. G'nite.
Posted by kuru on Nov. 07 2001,13:00
After nearly two months I finally have the closest thing I'll ever get to final confirmation on some of my friends.One walked down 89 flights of stairs from Tower 2 just after Tower 1 was hit. One missed his train and arrived at the Holland Tunnel in his car just in time to see that it was closed. One is somewhere in a field in Pennsylvania, no body to bury, a smoking hole is his grave. One never left his desk that Tuesday morning, missing a 9 am meeting that would've taken him out of the building. He was on 91. One made it to the 38th floor after walking down the stairs, telephoned a friend, remarked that the stairs were impassible and he would find another way out. He did not call again. One left his office and telephoned his wife in his attempt to exit the building. He promised to call from the street. His memorial serivce was last week. He never reached the street. Those involved: 6 Nobody can tell me that it was America's fault that 5000+ people died that day. It's not. It's the fault of a bunch of extremist militant Islamists who believe nobody but they are allowed to live on Earth. It's the fault of those who will kill Americans only because Americans are free people. War is horrible, as people on this very board can attest, and the US has done some very dirty things in war. Dirty things that none the less allowed Americans to live the soft, cushy life of people mainly unthreatened by terrorists and war mongers. Dirty things that sent a message for 56 years, 3 weeks and 2 days that you DO NOT EVER attack on United States soil. We have been so evil as to defend freedom worldwide, our sons and daughters have died for it in lands they would otherwise never see and for people who cannot say "Thank you" in English. They have endured being spit upon for doing a job their government called them to do, and they have gone forth knowing that they may not come home. The United States contributes billions of dollars in aid to disadvantaged peoples world wide, takes in the 'tired, meek and poor' of other nations who escape to America, gives tuition breaks and government assistance to these new immigrants so they may study in our universities while American kids pay full price. When there's an earthquake, a flood, or some other natural disaster, Americans put aside their daily lives and rush to help. Americans dig deep into their pockets and donate money to buy food and medicine for impoverished countries in the Middle East, Asia and Africa. We've done it all despite the outright lies being taught to those in foreign lands, lies such as in Egypt's offical newspaper printed by the editor assigned by Egypt's governor that the United States has genetically modified and otherwise poisoned supplies because the US has a sinister plot to exterminate Islam. We continue to give, only to hear that we did not give enough, we gave too soon, we are bullies, we are evil, we are Satan, we murder innocents... We watch people use the very freedom that Americans have fought and died to bring to them as a means to insult us, criticize us, slander us, spread outright lies about us, and abuse us. We know we are not the world's saviour, but we have contributed much and received little in the way of thanks - unless of course being swindled on European streets and insulted in newspapers is 'thanks'. My post is already long, so I'll end it with one final thought: Once before in history a group of people was told to look at themselves to find out why they are hated, as many people today are suggesting Americans do. That time was the 1930s and that group was Jews. ------------------ Posted by Vigilante on Nov. 07 2001,18:27
Glad to see the return of our brain parasite.
Posted by CatKnight on Nov. 07 2001,18:33
nice kuru. altough the jews in 1930 were not in such a position to defend themselves as we are today.
Posted by CatKnight on Nov. 07 2001,18:34
nice kuru. altough the jews in 1930 were not in such a position to defend themselves as we are today.btw interesting article:
quote: Posted by kuru on Nov. 07 2001,18:54
I know they weren't CK, and that is truly regrettable.Not that we are capable, but that they were not. ------------------ Posted by Jynx on Nov. 07 2001,18:55
I would like to present two posts here, and I would like everyone to consider the point that I am trying to make here...On one hand, we have Leb. He (she?) posted an impressive amount of material that spans, at times, over a thousand years of history. As whiskey pointed out, it is quite an essay. On the other hand, we have kuru. Her post was not even a tenth as long as Leb's post, and didn't have an impressive display of research or clever wording. It did, however, have something that Leb's post was totally devoid of: love. I was barely able to read half of what Leb posted. This was not because I am stupid (which I might very well be), but because it contained a non-stop litany of hateful propaganda, speculation, conspiracy-theory, and some outright lies (an Islamic woman planning revenge? Think about that for a minute). I hung on every single word of kuru's post. She made my heart ache with sadness, and soar with pride. Never once did she call anyone names, nor did she attack a country or a religion, despite the fact that she was immediately and deeply scarred by this event. In doing so, she represented to me what we, as a country, are all about, and what we, as a country, really are made of underneath our "roll-neck sweaters" and our "cords". Two people, two posts, two emotions, two representations. I know who I want to be associated with. ------------------ I used to be a kleptomanicac, but I took something for it. Posted by kuru on Nov. 07 2001,19:59
Somebody else, wiser than me, related this story. I think you guys should read it.
quote: Freedom is worth any price. My four friends (three in NYC and one in Pennsylvania) paid that price, unknowingly, but I doubt they'd take it back now if they could.
This message has been edited by kuru on November 08, 2001 at 03:01 PM Posted by incubus on Nov. 07 2001,20:14
quote:
------------------ Posted by afropik on Nov. 07 2001,23:47
My guess is Robert Paulsen.
|