Forum: The Classroom Topic: Underwear!!! started by: PersonGuy Posted by PersonGuy on Jun. 05 2000,00:08
How many people wear:Breifs? Boxers? Panties? Other? Nothing? Anyone with special colors or designs (stains don't count)? Has anyone made a recent switch? If so why? And do you like the new style better? Ok, I'll go first... I where NUTZING! Yeah, hurray, okay... ------------------ Posted by Lordbrandon on Jun. 05 2000,16:15
Ima box0r man i have a pair of l33t sun microsystem B0x0rz that are so old theyve got big holes in them
Posted by Lordbrandon on Jun. 05 2000,16:16
i say every one post pictures of their undiesanybody have any underoos? Posted by SLATE on Jun. 05 2000,18:00
panties...but only on weekends..... errr but seriously, boxers.. the only way to go.. otherwise you're all crushed.. not good ------------------ http://www.the-streets.net modellers needed!!! Posted by DuSTman on Jun. 05 2000,18:02
Briefs. Anything else wouldn't support my geek credentials.I'm 100\% geek! Posted by Kayy on Jun. 05 2000,18:36
I wear boxers myself, in fact, for 65\% of the day, its all I wear, the other 35\% is when I'm out of my room or in bed.I would scan them and post them for you, but if I took them off to do it and someone unexpectedly walked into my room, they would wonder what on earth I was doing sitting nude in front of my computer at nearly 1am. ------------------ Posted by DrunkNigel on Jun. 05 2000,20:26
Put on different ones while you scan >=\No one's up at one in the morning at my house... I wear boxers. And; no, I won't scan them... ------------------ Posted by caseman984 on Jun. 05 2000,20:59
Im definately a boxer man! Used to be a breifer, but my friends converted me to boxerism.------------------ Posted by PersonGuy on Jun. 05 2000,21:17
So I'm the only free baller... Free yourselves! Let my people go! (not that your spherical members are my people or anything) I used to wear breifs, but one day I gave it a try. It was weird the first 2 days, but now I'm glad I did it! Take the PersonGuy Free-ball (and for the ladies, replace "ball" with whatever word you see fit) Challenge (parallel to Sosa Pepsi Challenge, haha). Let me know how it goes! ------------------ Posted by jim on Jun. 06 2000,05:44
Boxer Briefs...Chicks dig em. ------------------ Posted by jim on Jun. 06 2000,07:41
No WAY!!! I used to wear briefs cause of the nice secure feeling you get. Then I tried going comando, but you crank can creep down your leg, then sit wrong just one time. Ouch. Then I tried boxers. Same thing can happen. Or he sneaks out the window. Boxer brief gives you best of all worlds!!!------------------ Posted by Wolfguard on Jun. 06 2000,09:14
Im just like that tom petty song.And im freeeeee...freeballing... Falling? i guess that would make more sense but.. ------------------ Posted by Hellraiser on Jun. 06 2000,09:17
I'm a free-baller myself.------------------ Posted by Lordbrandon on Jun. 06 2000,11:19
No need for pictures of that...yeesh
Posted by PersonGuy on Jun. 06 2000,21:29
Hey! You stole that Freeeeeeee-(falling/balling) song joke from my good friend Jesse Ventura (unfortunately I probably spelled his name wrong). He's in the free-ballers of America club.And how can you sit on THAT!!!! It must have been a HOT day! Oks... have any guys ever stole a girl's panties as "proof"? (and for the ladies, the vice-versa) Do you STILL have them!?! *sniff* ... ahhhhhhhhhhh .... more important things have just come up, gotta go... ------------------ Posted by Ansible on Jun. 06 2000,21:39
boX0r bri3fz 0wN j00.
Posted by Cyrino on Jun. 06 2000,22:21
Box0r-breifs all the way!!Your boys need to be free, but have some constrainsts or they'll go flapping around... ------------------ Posted by jrh1406 on Jun. 10 2000,06:51
i wear briefs, i tried boxers, but my boys kept falling between my legs and that just didn't work when i sat down (ouch), that and i tend to walk one foot in front of the other. i need the briefs for support, although i may look into this boxer-briefs business
Posted by PersonGuy on Jun. 11 2000,14:25
Woh! Check this out!< www.boxerbriefs.com > Mabey I'll have to get me some... ------------------ Posted by Octavian on Jun. 12 2000,03:12
gotta go with briefs. i keep my boys in check. tried free, but i sometimes walk one foot in front of the other also, and a guy shouldn't have to think about whether or not sitting/running/walking is going to hurt that much. they also help to conceal your "feelings" when you're wearing khakis.and think about when you get old. don't know if it's the same, but what happens to a chick if she never wears a bra? do you want it to look anything like that? Posted by Nero on Jun. 12 2000,13:42
so you're saying that you want to have perky testicles?
Posted by aventari on Jun. 12 2000,21:53
personguy-- you start the weirdest threads!! ------------------ Posted by Octavian on Jun. 12 2000,23:53
yes, i would rather have nice, perky testicles than limp, saggy nuts.
Posted by PersonGuy on Jun. 13 2000,02:39
Hehe... isn't it great though! Anywaze, I didn't know that I'd get any more replies, but here's what I've noticed... Old guy have NO shaft left at about 70 years old. It's like a little lump stuck on some furry stuff (fine make fun of me for having seen naked old guys...). I think that this resession of a penis back into your belly is partly cause by constricting breif. If you've got gravity on your side (swingy!) then it's not likely to shrink in like that... and what's wrong with perkyness? Ummm... yah... that's all... ------------------ Posted by Chrissy on Jun. 13 2000,02:45
All I can say is...this thread makes me happy NOT to be a guy....I just remember a story and ex told me about how one day he had swimming practice in the morning but his undies dropped on the floor after practice and he couldn't very well wear them wet so he free-balled it all day long and ended up very *hurt* at the end of the day....he never did that again...from that day forward he always had an extra pair.I say...always be prepared...you never know... ------------------ [This message has been edited by Chrissy (edited June 13, 2000).] Posted by rig_hater on Jun. 14 2000,02:31
seeing as how i'm a woman, i've never had a need for "support" in the underwear area - just for the breasts. i guess underwear for men is more comparable to bra's for women - they both cover the areas requiring support and restraint. hence, going without a bra for a girl, would be like freeballing for a guy. imho, once you reach a certain breast size, it's unconfortable to go unsupported, especially while jogging, etc., so i prefer restraint to freeboobing.------------------ [This message has been edited by rig_hater (edited June 13, 2000).] Posted by PersonGuy on Jun. 14 2000,22:38
Hehe, I think that's a very good comparison! However:1) boobs have weight (I don't know as a guy, but I'm gussing more that a pound. Therefore they have momentum and do some bouncing when your jogging... balls don't have that problem cause they're much lighter. 2) boobs are close to eye level. Nobody would be looking at a guys crotch to see if anything is bouncing (I HOPE) 3) boobs are much easier to notice (whether they are supported or not, simply because it's acceptable to show MOST of them. Of course guys can't cut a hole in their pants so part of the balls hang out... I didn't have a concluding point, but I thought I should make those points! ------------------ Posted by rig_hater on Jun. 15 2000,01:34
points noted. though, i do have points too:1) i have seen guys with bigger boobs than some girls (mind you, the girls were tiny, but still, those are some big balls!) 2) what about midgets?! their eye level's different (not meant to offend those who are vertically-challenged - just making a point on perspective). i guess it's just personal choice whether you want to be confronted with a pair of hairy bouncing balls or bouncing breasts. 3) speaking of appendages hanging out of clothing, when people have holes in their pants, imho, they should have the decency to cover whatever appendage has been unleashed. there's this one guy in one of my classes that always has a hole in the butt of his pants and almost always has some part of it's hairy mass showing out the hole - this, gentlemen, is not the way to win a lady. and no, i don't really have a conclusion either...except for the fact that guys are lucky - their underwear doesn't require shoulder-straps! ------------------ Posted by PersonGuy on Jun. 15 2000,02:50
Hehe... alright... good points. I don't think underwear is totally out of the question. If I'm wearing jogging pants, underwear is pretty nessisary!! Just like the hole in your pants thing would apply. I just think that under most circumstances it's extreamly cofortable to free-ball.YIKES! Underwear suspenders (shoulder straps)?? What a world that would be! Besides... it isn't like it's all YOUR problem that you have the straps! Us guys get frustrated when WE have to undo the stupid things!!! (VELCRO I SAY!!) ------------------ [This message has been edited by PersonGuy (edited June 15, 2000).] Posted by zac503 on Jun. 15 2000,14:00
person guy I hope you never wear baggy shorts or lose pants------------------ Posted by rig_hater on Jun. 16 2000,02:56
velcro eh!? did any of you ever seen the seinfeld episode with the mansiere? that was hilarious!------------------ Posted by Nero on Jun. 16 2000,19:35
every guy i know looks at a girl and this goes through his head:and eventually after several full body scans they may or may not wonder what's inside her head, rather than her clothes. I'm saying it's right (or wrong for that matter[avoiding hypocrisey here]), but that's just how it is. ------------------ Posted by PersonGuy on Jun. 17 2000,00:09
Well, actually, the thing that will CATCH my attention and initially attract me is the eyes... that being either that they're pretty, OR that they are looking at ME.Once you get past the eyes, I think overall figure is next (not F A T, but that doesn't mean they have to be bone skinny). Of course breasts play into the overall figure as a major factor. Third is the other physical features (skin tone, hair, clothes). Finally the personality is evaluated, where every guy has is own taists. If someone has a great personality, then the physical features aren't 100\% of the choice. But if your choosing between the ugly bimbo and the sexy bimbo, then you know the answer... Oh, and about breast size. BREASTS are important to men... not the size in particular. Big breasts are just as fun as small breasts... however, the larger ones do have a slight (I stress SLIGHT) advantage. So there you go... now, here's what all you ladies REALLY want to know... What we DON'T care about: Can you guys back me up on this one? ------------------ Posted by The_Hiro on Jun. 17 2000,01:54
With respect to appearances, the attractiveness of the woman's face is primary for me and her figure is secondary. In general, I can't really say whether I like big breasts or small breasts because I take into consideration how everything fits together. Physical features that I like, but which seem to be seldom mentioned are a woman's neck, and I also like calf muscles (I imagine this is one of my idiosyncracies).With respect to personality, contrary to stereotype, I find intelligence appealing. I don't like to see women dumbing themselves down. Stuff I don't care about: [This message has been edited by The_Hiro (edited June 16, 2000).] Posted by SLATE on Jun. 17 2000,01:56
quote: 1) somewhat agree 2) agree 3) agree 4) agree, although they are sometimes cute 5) disagree.. i dont want some girl that wears grandma panties/bra's 6) smooth soft hands is better then 'manly' rougher hands 7) agree 8) agree ------------------ http://www.the-streets.net modellers needed!!! Posted by Hellraiser on Jun. 17 2000,02:37
I like to look, but when it comes to socializing, I would much rather be with someone who is rather plain but has an interesting personality than some blonde bimbo. Actually I prefer brunettes but I would be very happy to get the best of both worlds. I think however that in the long run, personallity is most important.------------------ Posted by PersonGuy on Jun. 17 2000,03:28
Now wait wait wait... you got me all wrong! I didn't say I prefered bimbos! I love personality. In fact, it's the MOST important factor in a commited relationship. All I was saying is that between 2 bimbos, the body is going to be the tie breaker! Oh, and face fits in with the hair and clothes and stuff that I mentioned before. And by hands, I meant that I don't care if she's got hang nails, or a little uneaven nails or any of the things that women seem to obbsess about. The ODVIOUS hand problems would ODVIOUSLY bother me!Heh. Oh, and I definately don't think blonde is the best color of hair... FUN FACT: Guys are blond... Gals are blonde. Ummm ok... so ladyies... what do you look for in guys (OTHER THAN PERSONALITY DAMN-IT). I want the nitty gritty of: facial hair, face, hair style, feet, hands, chest, wank, or whatever your really look for! ------------------ Posted by Chrissy on Jun. 17 2000,05:19
I saw that episode...I think I pissed myself laughing. I don't know too many guys who have bigger breasts then I do.I always get two compliments but they are often together..goes something like "Gee Chrissy you have really nice brea....eyes" makes you wonder what exactly men look for in women. ------------------ Posted by Chrissy on Jun. 17 2000,19:15
OkI know what I like in guys- but this is just because after dating several of them I just noticed a pattern I like a tall guy who is heavier then me (I'm not fat or anything I just hate super skinny guys they give me a complex) I like it when they have tattoos (rebel without a clue) I also like when they are pierced (its gotta be the goody-goody vs bad boy thing I like so much) Overall though I like guys who don't mind a good debate about the ills of capitalism, who likes to see movies and doesn't mind that sometimes he won't be the main focus in my life at all times. I think in this respect I need to find a guy who is secure with himself and doesn't mind doing things on his own. As far as facial hair is concerned - I don't care if it looks good on you- I'll take it- but don't be surprised if I tell you it looks like crap. :P ------------------ Posted by rig_hater on Jun. 19 2000,18:51
here's what i look for in a guy:1) attractive face 2) bigger than me - ie) broad shoulders, taller than me (over 5'10"), strong, not scrawny - basically, the stereotypical football player build i guess. 3) willing to experiment and try new things 4) not a close-minded redneck 5) considerate, positive attitude 6) the ability to participate in an intelligent conversation 7) easy to talk to and confortable to be around 8) preferably short hair/clean shaven, unless he's one of the few guys that look better with facial hair, but still, i like short hair. 9) have a mysterious side - ie) unusual likes/dislikes/piercings/tattoos, etc. 10) respects my need for space and doesn't expect my world to revolve around his 11) someone who returns calls and doesn't stand me up on dates. okay, so, i'm picky i guess, but i've dated too many guys who turned out to be idiots. ------------------ Posted by PersonGuy on Jun. 19 2000,22:33
I'm going to reitterated good ol' Adam when I say:If all the guys you date are idiots, then it's not cause most men are idiots. YOU are the constant in the equation, therefore either YOU are attracted to idiots, or YOU attract them! Thank-you very much... ------------------ Posted by Chrissy on Jun. 20 2000,01:42
Anyone ever hear the saying"You get what you put out there" here's my clean example a therapist once said "If your instrument in life is a hammer you'll only attract nails" basically if you are a fool you'll attract other fools. Well I figure my instrument in life must be a toliet cause I attract shit and assholes. Hey I know my short comings, do you? ------------------ Posted by Hellraiser on Jun. 20 2000,01:50
It's not that short, and it comes a lot, but I know it like the palm of my hand. Oh wait, wrong thread. My biggest shortcoming is my ego, being rather intelligent gets me puffed up sometimes, and it is very hard to admit it when I am wrong. I seem to attract people who are much older than me for some reason: most of my friends are in the 25-40 year range. Needless to say, it's rather hard on my lovelife since most of them are married. ------------------ Posted by PersonGuy on Jun. 20 2000,02:03
Your right, I shouldn't be so critical when I do have enough of my own shortcommings...First of all I'm the opposite of insecure (whatever that's called). I'm constantly telling people exactly what I think. I also do crazy stuff cause I don't care what anyone else thinks. (when people talk to me first) And at the same time, I'm extreamly shy, where I won't say or ask anybody anything unless it's a mater of life or death! I'm extreme, in that I'm either all for or against something, with little inbetweenness... Anyway, I tend to be one of those "rescue" guys, and I'm always giving tons of money to the losery, low self asteem bitches that I'm unfortunately attracted to. THANKS MOM! ------------------ Posted by rig_hater on Jun. 20 2000,03:11
hey, i'm not saying that everyone i date is an idiot - heck, i consider one idiot to be too much. i've dated lots of great guys too. i'm just saying my criteria has changed accordingly to the bad experiences, so as to hopefully eliminate their possibilities of reoccurring, and because of this, my scenario has improved. isn't that why everyone has things they look for in a person - just to rule out the people that wouldn't work?!------------------ Posted by Chrissy on Jun. 20 2000,04:53
Person-yer statement just reminds me of a Woody Allen quote from "Deconstructing Harry" he said "I think you're the opposite of paranoid, I think you're suffering from the dillusion that people actually like you" heh..just reminded me...thats all..not saying that is you Anyway- I also have a thing for guys with long hair but I don't necessarily go for that kind of guy. I don't know I like the ruff and tuff kinda d00d..makes me feel better or something ------------------ Posted by PersonGuy on Jun. 21 2000,00:20
Hehe, actually Deconstruction Harry is my favorite movie! I've thought of that line several times...Most people like me... or at least I think they do. And your right Rig, just change what you look for till you find the right person. I'll have to try that! ------------------ Posted by rig_hater on Jun. 22 2000,01:46
yeah chrissy, the ruff and tuff guy image has always been a weakness of mine too. too bad that so many of them are not capable of partaking in decent relationships!------------------ Posted by Chrissy on Jun. 22 2000,01:53
Oh how true is that. Why doe girls go for guys like anyway- I have no reason to take less ruff guys over more i just tend to...makes you think ------------------ Posted by Willy Pete on Jun. 22 2000,13:34
It's 'cause the 'ruff' guys are in your face all the time and they seem to be able to meet people better. I'm not an ugly guy, (no that's not based on the fact that my 'mommy told me so') I've gone out with some ravishing women and some of them have been basket cases. I find that I'm drawn to them .(Yes, both ravishing and mad)The fact is, what you might consider 'ruff' is just more self confident and more apt to speak to women. I guarantee those qualities you specify are to be found in a lot of men that you don't meet, just the wierdos are the ones that come on to you. Sounding bigheaded is the furthest thing from my mind, but the I feel I fit the attributes you gave earlier, because they are not too specific. I'm not shy but I don't go saying hi to every girl I lthink I'd like to meet. I ride the tube (subway to you yanks) everyday and invariably there is a beautiful single women a few feet from me every trip. If you think about it, it's a great place to meet people. It's like a bar without the alcohol - noisy, full of people and hot. I often see them looking at me or get caught looking at them, a lot of times we both smile at one another, but no-one says hi. Wierd, but that's tube etiquette for you. As for the 'ruff', I play rugby (I have the body size - not fat) and other sports, I wouldn't be embarrassed by my body if made to be naked public, I ride motorcycles, scuba dive, snowboard and have served compulsory time in the South African military. No tattoo yet, waiting till I see 'the' design that would inspire me. I think that qualifies as 'ruff' and I find myself saying 'that's me' when some women describe some of these things as their preferences, but somehow I'm too chickenshit to say hi to a stranger. Some 'ruff' guys just don't act it. I'm not dumb either (most times) I'd even like the label of 'geek'. The point is, don't confuse 'ruff' with loud. Loud guys are wankers of the highest order. Next time you see a 'ruff' guy look in the background for his 'quieter' buddy. That's where I am sometimes. Try 'reliable' instead. You'll probably get 'ruff' as an included option and not as the only option. ------------------ Posted by XaSERaX on Jun. 22 2000,18:07
i wear nothing when im walking town or out to the bars on every day things. but in class i wear boxers, cause you never know when a hardon will pop by to say hello after you see the hot coed in PDsi, ouch, so i thinks safer, but when i get home i strip off the boxers, and back to freeballin------------------ Posted by Client on Jun. 22 2000,22:05
Personally...im a square pants kind of guy.------------------ Ever see a cage of rats starve to death? Posted by PersonGuy on Jun. 23 2000,00:34
That's so crazy how everyone complains about that! (not to brag) but I guess my penis is long enough so that it stays in the leg of my pants (ouch) instead of alerting everyone around me!And Willy... lovin' you! ------------------ Posted by rig_hater on Jun. 23 2000,23:51
going back to willy's post, i think what we mean by "ruff" is just a guy that's not a mamma's boy and who's got balls, a guy that's not pussy whipped, etc. i like a broad-shouldered rugby/football build on a guy. i think it goes back to natural instinct (at least for some of us). we naturally go for guys that are bigger than us, and stronger than us, because back in the day, female apes relied on a strong male to keep them safe and help forage for food. not that i'm saying we're apes, i'm just saying that certain things don't change - like how guys don't necessarily find the waif look attractive, whereas so many girls try to achieve it.back to the subject of the thread, when i picture the ideal guy-in-his-underwear scene, i see a guy with a muscular, well toned body in a sexy pair of boxer-briefs - they're so much sexier than any other men's underwear. ------------------ [This message has been edited by rig_hater (edited June 23, 2000).] Posted by PersonGuy on Jun. 25 2000,01:50
So if I dropped my pants and nothing was there (nothing = no underpants... not NOTHING) you'd be horrified? And don't take this litterlay... not ME.------------------ Posted by rig_hater on Jun. 25 2000,18:17
well, that would be an ideal guy-NOT-in-underwear scene, not a guy-in-underwear scene------------------ Posted by k00gs on Jun. 28 2000,23:41
boxers from day 1! no daipers for me! next question: how many pairs does everyone own =) and how frequently do you all wash / think about washing them!!
Posted by Hellraiser on Jun. 29 2000,01:04
Don't even go there! I bet most of you wear them till they're stiff as a board, then turn them inside out and wear them till they're soft as leather again.------------------ Posted by PersonGuy on Jun. 29 2000,03:08
Actually I have about 20 pairs... ironic that I only use about 3 a year!------------------ |