Forum: The Classroom
Topic: Reflex - Best Score?
started by: Neophyre
Posted by Neophyre on Oct. 28 2000,20:18
Mines currently 0.05 seconds 
< http://www.happyhub.com/network/reflex/ >
------------------
If a mute swears, does his mother wash his hands?
Posted by DuSTman on Oct. 28 2000,20:20
I don't seem to be able to break 0.3bad, eh?
Posted by Neophyre on Oct. 28 2000,20:25
second attempt : 0.17------------------
If a mute swears, does his mother wash his hands?
Posted by j0eSmith on Oct. 28 2000,20:54
.22 is my best.. .28 my worst-edit just got 0.17! ------------------
When my flying days are over, and my death has come to pass
I hope they bury me upside down, so the whole damn world can kiss my ass This message has been edited by j0eSmith on October 28, 2000 at 04:14 PM
Posted by hair on Oct. 28 2000,21:26
quote:
Originally posted by Neophyre:
Mines currently 0.05 seconds
i bet someone gets cheater messages half the time... anyway mine is 0.11. edit: seems i average around 0.21 though. This message has been edited by hair on October 28, 2000 at 04:27 PM
Posted by askheaves on Oct. 28 2000,21:50
Isn't there some sort of rule of thumb that human reflex time from senses to motory action is somewhere around .11 seconds (I don't remember the exact time)? In the olympics, they'll call false start if a runner is sensed as leaving the starting blocks before that reflex time is up. So, I dispute your .05 seconds! You're a bad man!!!1
Posted by deity on Oct. 28 2000,22:15
.02here's the proof (because I know know one will believe me)
< http://www.olypen.com/advent/Smiley/reflex.jpg >
Posted by Wh4ck3r on Oct. 29 2000,02:22
are you a migit? do te impulses travel faster in you arm then most? my best is .09
Posted by Neophyre on Oct. 29 2000,03:15
I've got super human abilities.
don't question my reflexes > ------------------
If a mute swears, does his mother wash his hands?
Posted by spinfusi0n on Oct. 29 2000,03:17
0.00 Heres the < proof > This message has been edited by spinfusi0n on October 28, 2000 at 11:20 PM
Posted by deity on Oct. 29 2000,03:55
hey spinfusi0n, where's the little thing that tells you how spiffy you are? like "you have the reflexes of a snake"?*chuckle*
Posted by Kolben on Oct. 29 2000,05:43
I believe everything below 10ms, has nothing to do with reflexes. It's pure timing and luck. And if you look at the proof on that 0.0 ms you'll see that it haven't even changed colors yet. And how the hell can someones reflexes be so predictive?
Posted by pleb on Oct. 29 2000,08:50
< zero :/ > Kolben, the background changes back to black after you hit stop. Try taking a screenshot of a 1.5 second score. And yes, it is pure luck :D This message has been edited by pleb on October 29, 2000 at 04:54 AM
Posted by Blain on Oct. 29 2000,17:00
0.88, it asked me if i have been drinking...------------------
Presented in double vision when drunk.
Posted by reman on Oct. 30 2000,01:43
funnily enough almost all implementations of sleep() never have a greater resolution than 30ms.regards, reman ------------------
People ask me to fix their computer. I do in 5 seconds.
They say "You think your good don't you".
I say "I know I'm good". People always ask stupid questions.
Posted by askheaves on Oct. 30 2000,05:05
Not to mention, the whole thing depends on how the thing is programmed. NT has been known to see latencies on the order of 55ms, and that's just running native code (assuming this app is java). 95/98/Me is not better than that, I guarantee. If you do a Sleep(1) in C++, expect to see your code come back around 50ms later.
So, the order of the color change, the button redraw, the random number timer going off, the timer starting, the mouse click event being handled, the timer stop, etc. all contributes to this 'magic number' that is your reflexes. I put no stock into this, as the theoretical best score you could get without anticipation clicking is around .05 seconds.
|