Ikonboard » Printable Version of Topic » attention all l33t hax0rs (and syph0n)

Forum: The Classroom
Topic: attention all l33t hax0rs (and syph0n)
started by: CatKnight

Posted by CatKnight on Nov. 05 2001,14:56

do whatever you can to fuck up:

66.71.30.175

except dos attacks which would probably fuck me up just as much because we have shared bandwidth. viruses, trojans, whatever you want.

Posted by Observer on Nov. 05 2001,15:17

------------------
When 1337 hax0rs start impaling each other with swords and typing code with a hook on one hand, then they can modify the term "pirate."

Posted by hal0 on Nov. 05 2001,15:22

if you want something done right, do it yourself.

------------------
"that's even better! hot lesbian witches.. think about it, it's fucking genius!" - charlie sheen

Posted by aventari on Nov. 05 2001,16:05

agreed. You can't expect us to do your dirty work, without so much as a reason.

If you're on the same same network, get a packet sniffer and snoop away

Posted by StreetRaver on Nov. 05 2001,16:25

nah...CK needs everyone to do his dirty work because he cant do 1337! TOO stupid in the head.

------------------
1 sEem t0 ha\/3 |)iEd. 0|-| weLl. 5HIT |-|@pP3|\|5.L1PhE GO35 0|\|, 5o pHOR |\|0W i|\/| 93++I|\|G |-|1G|-|, 8ut 1T d0E$N+ |\/|@+tEr. \/\/|-|y? 83c@U53 1|\/| |)34|)

Posted by Vigilante on Nov. 05 2001,16:28

...

Posted by Spydir on Nov. 05 2001,16:45

CK just doesn't want to admit he has no clue what he's doing. Seriously, read BugTraq for the next week, and you'll find all the little things you could ever want to do to the kid (computer wise). Anyways, doing anything along those lines is stupid, and just proves how ignorant you are CK...

------------------
Net Syndrome - < www.netsyndrome.net >
Catch The Sickness

Posted by veistran on Nov. 05 2001,18:05

quote:
Originally posted by StreetRaver:
nah...CK needs everyone to do his dirty work because he cant do 1337! TOO stupid in the head.

what is that, manglish, singlish? I can't tell, but it sure ain't english.

------------------
Veistran
- Sarcasm is just one more of the free services that we offer.

Posted by CatKnight on Nov. 05 2001,18:44

bah i can't do anything myself because it's too easily traceable back to me and that would be bad.

how about it, syf?

Posted by syf on Nov. 05 2001,18:52

I already got him, actually. I have this wonderful little app that lets me just reboot windows machines. Dealer gave it to me a while back. Anyways, he runs like unprotected Windows 95 or some shit. It's way easy to use. After a few days of what I've been doing, he'll be very frustrated in the least.

Posted by StreetRaver on Nov. 05 2001,19:01

Sorry CK, I was mad a bit ago and needed to take it out on some one and you just looked like a good person to. Once again sorry.

Posted by damien_s_lucifer on Nov. 05 2001,19:20

quote:
Originally posted by CatKnight:
except dos attacks which would probably fuck me up just as much because we have shared bandwidth.

/me prepares a nice pingflood...

Posted by damien_s_lucifer on Nov. 05 2001,19:23

Here's a question for someone who knows more about packet hax0ring than I do...

let's say you use a raw socket to construct a UDP datagram that has the source address and port the same as the destination address and port. Both ports are UDP ping... you then send this packet to the destination addresss.

What happens? Will the machine stupidly continue to ping itself?

Posted by TheTaxMan on Nov. 05 2001,19:27

quote:
Originally posted by StreetRaver:
... TOO stupid in the head.
1 sEem t0 ha\/3 |)iEd. 0|-| weLl. 5HIT |-|@pP3|\|5.L1PhE GO35 0|\|, 5o pHOR |\|0W i|\/| 93++I|\|G |-|1G|-|, 8ut 1T d0E$N+ |\/|@+tEr. \/\/|-|y? 83c@U53 1|\/| |)34|)

Need I say more?

------------------

quote:
Originally posted by RenegadeSnark:
If you have a problem with the average IQ around here, don't do things to lower it.

Posted by veistran on Nov. 05 2001,19:44

yeah, I know, his sig looks like someone was just rolling their face along his keyboard.

Posted by incubus on Nov. 05 2001,22:02

quote:
Originally posted by damien_s_lucifer:
Here's a question for someone who knows more about packet hax0ring than I do...
let's say you use a raw socket to construct a UDP datagram that has the source address and port the same as the destination address and port. Both ports are UDP ping... you then send this packet to the destination addresss.
What happens? Will the machine stupidly continue to ping itself?

The machine should not accept the packet. If it's operating a pack filter, it would log it as a 'martian'.

I would think ... because technically youre targetting the loopback interface and once the machine tried to reply it would realise that it was sending to it's own address.

at a guess.

------------------
"just pressin y0 butt0ns f00" -- miNus

Posted by Dysorderia on Nov. 05 2001,23:28

quote:
Originally dribbled by CatKnight:
do whatever you can to fuck up:
66.71.30.175

CK, I have to ask you a question.

Are you trying to work up to being stupid or were you just born that way?

------------------
Bill Gates's Honeymoon

After Bill Gates's wedding night, his wife finally knew why he called his company Microsoft.

This message has been edited by Dysorderia on November 06, 2001 at 06:29 PM

Posted by syf on Nov. 06 2001,05:31

If you want me to fuck him over, start spelling my goddamned name with an 'f', not a 'ph'. It's annoying.