Forum: The Classroom Topic: PENIS! started by: CatKnight Posted by CatKnight on Aug. 04 2001,02:51
...is actually the acronym for Proton-Enhanced Nuclear Induction Spectroscopy. I find this amusing for some reason. I wonder if the scientists refer to it as penis...
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Aug. 04 2001,16:45
ok seeing as this thread is a pile of bullshit i'll post a decent discussion...if the theory of universal homgenisation (that if you look at the universe on a large enough scale you start to see "symetry" or an equal pattern) is true then isnt this proof that life other than our own exists if not identical to our own? ------------------ < Where's your self re-cocking-spect > Posted by incubus on Aug. 04 2001,18:09
No because it's if you take it on a large enough scale. Sure somewhere else in the galaxy there may be 23743828 carbon atoms per 32432cubic metres of vaccuum but that doesnt necessarily mean theres life there.The keyword here is "large enough scale". Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Aug. 04 2001,18:59
who said anything about this galaxy i was talking cosmological distances here ------------------ < Where's your self re-cocking-spect > Posted by TheTaxMan on Aug. 04 2001,19:59
Well, is the universe confined space, or is it infinite? If choice one, are there more than one of these, to infinite levels? If yes, then there is another place exactly like earth, and you truely aren't a unique and beautiful snowflake. In fact, there are infinitely many of you!------------------ quote: Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Aug. 04 2001,20:03
what a horrible thought------------------ < Where's your self re-cocking-spect > Posted by CatKnight on Aug. 04 2001,21:01
well there is a limited amount of matter/energy in the universe. although space is sort-of infinite (hard to explain the way cosmological distances work), there is not an infinite number of stars/galaxies, etc. If there were infinite numbers of stars, then the sky would look pure white because at any miniscule RA/Dec, you would be pointing at a star at some distance.
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Aug. 04 2001,22:59
wait a minute CK surely you've heard how that that paradox was solved using the speed of light and also the expansion of the universe being faster than light as being finite after a certain point. Its not like you to say something like that CK you feeling alright?! is that really you ?! ------------------ < Where's your self re-cocking-spect > This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on August 05, 2001 at 06:00 PM Posted by hal0 on Aug. 04 2001,23:39
hmm.. thank you for alerting the PERT to this astonishing breakthrough.. this could be useful in the future.PENIS!!!! ------------------ Posted by CatKnight on Aug. 05 2001,02:15
well actually it was solved by the fact that we can only see as far as when the universe became transparent.
Posted by kai on Aug. 05 2001,06:26
i thought this was going to be about the game.
------------------ Posted by CatKnight on Aug. 05 2001,11:26
what game?
Posted by Rhydant on Aug. 05 2001,13:09
i dont think there should be such a thing as 'infinity'sure, its a cool word, but theres no way to know if something goes on forever or not. why? because thered be no way in hell that anyone (or groups of persons) would want to put money and resources into some sort of super computer to count every star (or something) in the universe second though: how would we know when we're done? there could be an incredible number of stars (or whatever) out there, and we could track millions and billions, but we would never know when to stop. mainly becuase we dont know hwere it ends. wow. ------------------ Posted by CatKnight on Aug. 05 2001,13:46
basically, you just said"I don't think there should be such a thing as infinity because I'm too lazy to figure out what it means" have fun with that. Posted by YouGunnaStopMe? on Aug. 05 2001,14:34
I'm so lazy I'm not even going to post!Have fun with THAT! Posted by DeadAnztac on Aug. 05 2001,18:05
this gamepenis. I love that game, I always win. I have no shame ------------------ Posted by Nikita on Aug. 05 2001,18:08
GO GO GADGET PENIS!
Posted by kai on Aug. 05 2001,18:09
quote: basically you go to a public place with some friends and you see who can yell penis louder. it's quite juvinile. it was great ------------------ Posted by hal0 on Aug. 05 2001,18:56
hey now.. yelling Penis! is not a game. It is actually the emergency alert call of the Penis Emergency Reponse Team (PERT). If you need assistance, Dial the operator, yell penis, and hang up and try again.------------------ Posted by solid on Aug. 05 2001,20:00
I love that game too, I get to win all the time and my friends pretend to desert me in public while I crack up and laugh at them.
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Aug. 05 2001,20:13
quote: but thats just the limit of the observable universe not all of it. thats why we look for the density not the mass, not that i mean that the universe is infinite beacuse we dont know all of its mass but because we dont know ALL of the universe. it may not be infinite but it IS bigger than what we will EVER observe because in order to see further we would need to be able to look futher. only problem is as we look further (as you will no doubt know CK) we look back in time and after a while we reach the limit of the begining of time. so saying that we cant look any further doesnt mean thats the edge of the universe ------------------ < Where's your self re-cocking-spect > Posted by CatKnight on Aug. 05 2001,22:51
Premise: The universe cannot be infinite and static because if it were the sky would be white with the light of infinite stars in all directions.Problem with premise: We don't see light from infinite stars in all directions because it takes a finite time for light from distant stars to reach us. Solution: Stars couldn't have existed before the universe was transparent, therefore the universe had a begining, therefore is not infinite nor static. Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Aug. 05 2001,23:00
quote: problem universe didnt come froma single point. it "exploded" everywhere at once. the big bang explanation is confusing in that for the laymen it seems like the universe came from a single point in space. but seein as space didnt exist before this (if you follow the theory that is) space came into being everywhere. this is why we still have a backgorund radiation cos it keeps coming from outside our known universe. the only way to tell currently whether there is a limit is to wait until the end of time and see if the background radiation is there. (this is obviously ignoring something like the universe changing in some way to block the path of radiation or some thing) i just put that thing at the end to stop u nit picking CK ------------------ < Where's your self re-cocking-spect > This message has been edited by Dark Knight Bob on August 06, 2001 at 06:01 PM Posted by DuSTman on Aug. 05 2001,23:05
I find the concept of infinity endlessly entertaining as a logical device.For example: For every second that goes by an infinite number of infinitely small amounts of time has passed. Because we actually observe time to pass it can be assumed that the infinite number of them somehow takes priority over the infinite smallness of the elapsed periods. Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Aug. 05 2001,23:23
this is just a little theory of mine i have knocking about but i reckon that as energy has been proven to be discrete that it will eventualy be proven that virtually everything will turn out to be found in discrete measures, mabye even time.------------------ < Where's your self re-cocking-spect > Posted by CatKnight on Aug. 06 2001,02:17
well no, because the difference is that time is a spatial dimension, like up or backwards. you can splice meters into femtometers, into 10e-100 meters, and so on. time isn't a physical thing like an electron occupying a specific energy level.
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Aug. 06 2001,02:36
its a dimension space is a dimension and even stephen hawking beleives that there is a limit to how small things get but hey like i said its just a theory and seeing as you have no proof thats concrete just current scientific beliefs (thankyou quantum theory) i reckon i'm right...oh did i sound like someone from the faith thread there damn these smilies why do i have to put them for the dum people who cant tell sarcasm from flaming.------------------ < Where's your self re-cocking-spect > Posted by TheTaxMan on Aug. 06 2001,04:31
Lucky I'm too nutty to take offense!Enjoy! Oh, er, wait. I hate...damn, I just don't have the heart to do it anymore, so enjoy once more! ------------------ quote: |