Topic: Zuh?
started by: Vigilante
Posted by Vigilante on Mar. 30 2002,16:09
< http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2002/20mar_newmatter.htm >I'm no scientist, but I know what I hate... and I don't hate this.
Posted by veistran on Mar. 30 2002,17:55
heh to quote my friend after I sent him the link "neato".
Posted by Spydir on Mar. 30 2002,18:06
sssccchhhhwwweeeetttt
Posted by Bozeman on Mar. 30 2002,18:32
This is one of the coolest things I've seen here in a while. Thanks, Vigilante.
Posted by Vigilante on Mar. 30 2002,18:42
Wow, I delurked Bozeman. Go me. 
Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Mar. 31 2002,00:33
atom lasers are cool i think they've managed to diffract some thing as large as a protein.
Posted by CatKnight on Apr. 02 2002,07:18
i hate to say this but the article is bullshit, AND outdated.
Posted by incubus on Apr. 02 2002,15:01
| Quote (Vigilante @ 30 Mar. 2002,10:42) |
| Wow, I delurked Bozeman. Go me. |
~ROFFLE~
Posted by Wolfguard on Apr. 02 2002,17:30
| Quote (CatKnight @ 02 April 2002,01:18) |
| i hate to say this but the article is bullshit, AND outdated. |
proof!
That was cool, the debunking should be good too.
Posted by CatKnight on Apr. 02 2002,21:01
eh i reread it and near the bottom they clear up the stuff i was having problems with.also physics is totally deterministic, no probability is involved, that part is misleading.
Posted by Wolfguard on Apr. 02 2002,21:05
damm...i was looking for another article not that you did not read far enough... 
Posted by liquid metal on Apr. 02 2002,23:32
quantum physics is all probability. they have assumed what things are like because we can't comprehend it.oh and my response to this article: "holla"
Posted by BlackFlag on Apr. 03 2002,00:41
| Quote |
| physics is totally deterministic |
Amen to that. Long live the mechanical universe!
Posted by Anztac on Apr. 03 2002,01:51
1-->| Quote (CatKnight @ 02 April 2002,151) |
| ... also physics is totally deterministic, no probability is involved, ... |
Tee hee hee, your wrong
Quantum physics as far as it goes is correct, but incomplete. What it's lacking is the observer. Intention builds itself into reality. Quantum fields that exsist only as that and materialize with intent and a certain degree of probability. This is why you get physicist predicting that such and such will happen with a particle, and then it does. Then another says the exact oppisite will happen, and it does. I'm obviously not going to ask anyone to believe me, because you won't. But hey, the new physics should be coming in soon enough. ::Shrug::