Forum: The Classroom Topic: Building a Computer started by: whiskey@throttle Posted by whiskey@throttle on Oct. 02 2000,23:21
Well, most of you know a great deal about computers, so I figured this would be the best spot to ask for some advice.I'm thinking about this: What do you guys/gals think? A rip-off? A decent price? I mainly want this cpu for doing multimedia stuff (producing and programming music and editing video) as well as games, of course. Oh, and it would be nice if it lasted about 3 years before becoming completely obsolete. This message has been edited by whiskey@throttle on October 02, 2000 at 06:23 PM Posted by DrunkNigel on Oct. 02 2000,23:23
All I can add to this is; Drop that damned voodoo5 and go for a Geforce2 GTS :P------------------ Posted by Sithiee on Oct. 02 2000,23:24
what burner? what size monitor, what speakers? specifics man, specifics.
Posted by whiskey@throttle on Oct. 02 2000,23:46
Uh, I haven't decided on a burner yet. Perhaps an HP? I don't know. Got any recommendations?As for the monitor, it'll most likely be a flat screen ViewSonic 17". Then I'm just getting an affordable Altec Lansing 3-piece (I primarily use headphones) Posted by Sithiee on Oct. 03 2000,00:51
well for monitors, always go sony. for the burner, you should shell out the extra cash for the fastest available, so as to have most compatability later on...and nigel is right, you should go geforce 2...and you might want to think about a DVD player, if youre doing multimedia, dvd is a great source for shit....
Posted by jim on Oct. 03 2000,00:56
If you get a Plextor Burner AND a Plextor CD Rom drive, you can do bit by bit CD burning and you can copy literally ANY CD!!! Seriously....When pairing Plextor CD-RPOM drives with Plextor CD-RWs, you get the added benefit of bit-by-bit accurate disc duplication. That's right––Plextor's DiscDupe program allows you to make perfect replicas of any disc when using Plextor CD-ROM and CD-RW drives in tandem. This means you can make backups of everything from copy-protected games to Playstation discs, all without the fear of burning a tosser. ------------------ Posted by Cyrino on Oct. 03 2000,01:00
I'll agree with these guys, especially on the voodoo5. Go for a decent card like the GeForce2. Gogs are nice! ------------------ Posted by cr0bar on Oct. 03 2000,01:08
Video editing? May I suggest SCSI disks or at least IDE RAID 0. If you go SCSI (highly recommended), then get a Teac or Plextor CD-R. I don't know much about IDE CD-R's except that they seem to burn a lot of coasters above 6x, and with kits including an Adaptec SCSI card falling in price, it's hard to go wrong.For real video editing, you're not going to want to use any popular gamer's 3D card. Of course, my definition of "real" video editing happens to be working with MiniDV. If yours is turning Grandma's 80th birthday Hi8 tapes into 320x240 MPEGs for sending out over AOL, then by all means grab a 3D accelerator with vidcap thrown on ------------------ Posted by marc c on Oct. 03 2000,01:24
I would go with a Thunderbird instead of Pnetium, that will save you a bunch, and you won't be losing any performance. Also, I would only choose the V5 if you really want the full screen AA, if not then go with a GeForce 2 GTS or Ultra 2.------------------ Posted by whiskey@throttle on Oct. 03 2000,02:12
Cr0- I'm not going to be doing anything major, like substituting my home PC for an editing bay or anything. I want to put together some decent digital video music videos for some local bands, and get some projects up on iFilm, etc. Think I could hang with the gaming 3d card? And here's the part where I prove my sheer ignorance: Will a SCSI hard drive really make much difference? I haven't a clue. < www.hardwarecenter.com > said: In most cases, IDE drive outperforms an equivalent drive in the SCSI format. This, coupled with the lesser costs, makes IDE a better choice...It is only when you get into serious multi-tasking that SCSI is a real benefit. I'm not doubting you, I'm just curious what you think about that. Anyhow, I think the Plextor duo sounds pretty nice. I think I'll take that over a DVD-rom. I had just heard so many people recommending the Kenwood 72x (and it's pretty cheap).
Posted by reman on Oct. 03 2000,03:59
well here are my additionsget a slot-in 16x pioneer DVD, slots rule! umm thats about all i can think of. regards, reman ------------------ Posted by Sithiee on Oct. 03 2000,08:29
yay slots! i only have the 10x, its old. and yes, that was a dumb review. scsi is always much much faster. especially scsi raid arrays...ooooh.....
Posted by Rhydant on Oct. 03 2000,12:42
hrm... what you could do (this just seems like a good idea to me) is drop the PIII and that mother board, and pick ye self up 2, count em, 2 550+mhz Celerons and a Dual celeron board. more powa, less money... right? plus, you could over clock the hell out of them. i have a friend how has a 550, and he clocks it to 666. he has a devil worshipping cpu... mwahahaahaaaa.------------------ Posted by cr0bar on Oct. 03 2000,15:11
Dual 550's probably wouldn't outperform the 800. At most you get 1.5x the power, and that's only in apps that support SMP. Plus, SMP in NT really blows, and I doubt he'll want to run Linux.------------------ Posted by askheaves on Oct. 03 2000,15:49
My recommendation (and what I did)firstly, check out < www.bunta.com > PIII 800
Posted by whiskey@throttle on Oct. 03 2000,20:30
The thunderbird sounds good, but isn't that a game-oriented processor? And aren't there problems with the ones that get overclocked over 1000mhz?
Posted by Hellraiser on Oct. 03 2000,20:53
In terms of hdds, the maxtor 61.4GB drive is one hell of a performer. I get a drive index of 15360, average seek time of 8ms, and it's quiet as a mouse. This thing flys! RAID 30's is another way to go, but about 1.5 times as expensive, and only performs about 15\% better than the 60giger in my experience, while the 60 giger performs between 8-10\% better than the average for UDMA 66.
Posted by cr0bar on Oct. 03 2000,21:02
The only problem with Maxtors is that they suck. I wouldn't trust its data life/integrity to store even crappy mp3s. Working as a repair technician, I've seen three Maxtor drives die in just one afternoon. Go with Western Digital or IBM, you won't be disappointed.
Posted by jim on Oct. 03 2000,22:03
quote: That's hiliarious! My cousin just brought his computer over yesterday saying that he couldn't FDisk his 20 Gig HD... I tried the same, and it made this CaThunk, CaThunk, CaThunk... Noise while trying to verify drive integrity.... Pulled it out. Maxtor. Told my cousin to go get his money back.... ------------------ Posted by Sithiee on Oct. 03 2000,23:49
thats funny, because maxtors do suck, i was trying to use one my dad bought so temporarily store things while i wiped my hd, and my comp wouldnt recognize the disk. i did eveything right, and then i got 2 of my friends to look at it (both of whom know more than i) and they couldnt get it to work with it....its a real shame that maxtors suck so much...
Posted by aventari on Oct. 04 2000,01:08
I'm afraid I too must chime-in here.I've had a few hard drives fail on me, about 5--and guess what? the only one that _wasn't_ a Maxtor was a 6 year old Seagate 30 megger heh heh My vote fer sure goes with the IBM deskstar GXP's. i've read a LOt of reviews(www.storagereview.com is the best HD hardware site.) and I got 2 30 gig IBMs for my KT-7 RAID. ------------------ Posted by cr0bar on Oct. 04 2000,01:14
HAHAHAHAHHAHAWe're going to need a "Maxtor" forum here soon :-) Posted by eng_man on Oct. 04 2000,02:25
I thought it was common knowledge that Maxtor HDs suck big hairy nuts? (I bet Hellraiser feels stupid right about now ;)I personally would never get anything but an IBM. I have them ranging in size from 500mb to 45gb, all of them still work and are quiet too. As for the video card, I'd stick to an nVidia based card. Geforce 2 GTS if you're big into games and have some money to spend. A Geforce 2 MX if you're feeling thrifty. Kenwoods are THE fastests drives you can get, but their DAE (for ripping CDs) isn't the best. So getting a DVD drive in addition to letting you watch DVDs would give you a drive that more than likely has better DAE. For memory I'd try and max out the memory slot(s). If the mobo can support 256mb DIMMS get those. This leaves you the most room for upgrades later on. That'll do for now I guess. ------------------ Posted by hair on Oct. 04 2000,02:54
all the Maxtors I've ever had anything to do with have performed well (hey, someone had to give them a little credit). now, however, I feel ashamed for buying them.
Posted by whiskey@throttle on Oct. 04 2000,04:29
Frickin' Maxtor. I never knew so many hated 'em. But yeah, I'm definitely going with 256mb sdram 2-dimms. So (and here's where I once again show how little I know) what's DAE? How do DVD-roms exceed CD-roms in this respect? Posted by SimplyModest on Oct. 04 2000,05:38
personally, what im on right now is a...800thunderbird i think the whole thing cost me about not only that, but the hard drives in the Raid array will out perform about any single drive you can get (IDE that is) my #1 suggestion is the thunderbird dude, think it over. Posted by cr0bar on Oct. 04 2000,17:03
DAE is Digital Audio Extraction. It allows you to rip CDDA (Compact Disc Digital Audio) a.k.a. Redbook directly to waveform files without resampling. This is done by popular "mp3 ripping" programs such as Audiocatalyst, but usually it's more than just one step (i.e. rip, then encode).I don't know if DVD-ROM drives are better per se for DAE, but in my mind, they would be (and to a greater extent, CD-R drives) since most CD-ROMs are built simply for speed and not much else. Posted by whiskey@throttle on Oct. 04 2000,23:41
Okay, so I'm definitely nixing the VooDoo5, but what about the ATI Radeon? Anyone have any words on that card?There's a nice little benchmark test on pg. 170 of the new PCGamer, for anyone else who gets it. The table shows the ATI Radeon DDR 64 mb consistently outperforming the GTS. Granted, the GeForce2 Ultra is pretty kick ass, I don't think I can afford spending 軸. Perhaps the Radeon is a happy compromise, since it comes with DVD playback nad video capture. But I'm not sure... This message has been edited by whiskey@throttle on October 04, 2000 at 07:09 PM Posted by Hellraiser on Oct. 05 2000,00:44
Radeon is cool, even beats the GF 2 GTS at a few things including price.As for the Maxtor drives sucking, I know a lot of them have problems, but I've never heard of anyone with a Maxtor they bought in the past year having any problems at all. I've had excellent results with mine, and have not had a single data error since I got it. I am running my system at the 112 bus speed instead of 100 so it is slightly overclocked, and I have been almost constantly ripping CD's, copying the files from my C to my D, rearranging, deleting old versions, etc, and have now used up close to half of the 60GB drive. No problems whatsoever. It's a great performer. Go ahead, laugh it up fuzzballs, you most likely haven't tried one. And it is helluva quiet, quieter even than any Western Digital I've seen, and they're very quiet drives. 60GB for 赨 is a bargain any time, and the quality I've experienced with this drive is above what I expected. Thumbs up for Maxtor on this one. DVD drives are better at DAE because they usually don't have any speed problems. Using Audio Catalyst, I have found that CD only drives and CD burners tend to speed up the disk too fast, then have slow downs that cause numerous speed problems. The result is a lot of breaks and weirdness in the MP3's after encoding. Both the 6X DVD in my computer and the 12X DVD at work do not have this problem, the CD spins at a constantly increasing rate (as the laser gets further and further from the center of the disk, each revolution can store more data) and I have not had one speed problem, even while doing tasks that require a little CPU time in the background (such as watching a TV show on my TV tuner, or browsing the net while ripping). Besides, DVD movies rox0r on large screen monitors. One thing that the ATI card has to recommend it is one of the best DVD hardware acceleration solutions available on a graphics card. NVidia still has a ways to go in this department. All my statements and reviews in this and my previous post were based on actual experience with the hardware in question, although I haven't had much chance to play with the Radeon because it's in my friends computer, not mine. My next machine will probably have one in it, unless a revolutionary new card comes out before I upgrade that blows the competition away. For now, i'm pretty happy with my ASUS GF 2 GTS since I can get between 50-80 FPS average at 1600x1200 on it in Q3 and UT. ------------------ Posted by pengu1nn on Oct. 05 2000,16:18
ati is good but the damn drivers are shit!!!,until the product has been out for a few months. other than that they are good cards. Posted by Sithiee on Oct. 05 2000,18:47
cambridge soundworks are awesome speakers too, at least for four+ point surround, and logitech cordless are far superior to any corded mouse. also for sound, naturally go creative soundblaster (yeah Live! Platinum!)
Posted by marc c on Oct. 05 2000,20:23
I'm ordering my new system tonight; I think this will be the first time I've had a top of the line system. I know none of you will listen to me, but I found the MS Explorer mouse (five button optical one) to truely suck. Not only did the mouse (esp. the buttons) feel like it was made out of cheap plastic like a 2$ special, but it didn't fit my hand well and after about a week the wheel started to rub against the side of the mouse. Trust me when I say Logitech all the way... speaking of which, anyone get one of the new logitech optical mice? Looks like all the features of the MS one, with Logitech's feel and quality... I may have to get one with my next paycheck. ------------------ Posted by Sithiee on Oct. 05 2000,22:46
i know someone who has one, and he says he likes it. but he says hes not upgrading till they go cordless. i love my cordless desktop, its so nice, i can type from across the room, or even down the hall. yay
Posted by DuSTman on Oct. 05 2000,22:48
Yeah, i've got one of the new optical logitechs. It rules. Fits my hand well, tracks excellently, well built.It is a bit big for my everglide "large" attack pad tho. IIyamas are some really good monitors. I have the flat faced 17" one and would have its children if such an arrangement were possible. Sonys are good, but they arn't the only really good screens in town. I am planning to get an all in wonder radeon for the TV and DVD facilities. This would also bring a welcome boost in power (better than this voodoo banshee, which used to be not so bad but now sucks majorly). Oh yes. I have a cambridge four point surround 1000. Really good sound (i think, though i'm not much of an expert on this). Only problem is no headphone socket on 'em.
Posted by DuSTman on Oct. 05 2000,22:57
quote: Really just about any processor you can get these days is "fast enough" for anything except games. Pretty much the only reason for going for the current biggest and best is to get excellent game performance. I don't know about "game oriented". Floating point usage is growing in games more than integers, but also other media-driven applications. Thunderbirds have good floating point capability as well as good integer ability.. I believe the thunderbird is quite well-balanced. Posted by damien_s_lucifer on Oct. 05 2000,23:06
quote: I'm with you on everything but the speakers and the monitors... Sony monitors kick ass, but ViewSonic's top of the line monitors are also excellent and usually about 贄 cheaper than the Sony. I've owned 3 ViewSonics over the past 10 years and never had a single one go bad. Altec Lansing make good speakers, but to be truly l33t get a good stereo amp (the thing you'd run a tape deck or record player etc. thru) and some phatty Cambridge Soundworks speakers for it. Then go to Radio Shack and get a 1/8" stereo miniplug to RCA adapter and use it to plug your sound card into your amp. Satellites + subwoofers sound ok, but there is nothing like having REAL speakers for supa phat sound quality... oh yeah. Make sure to keep your REAL speakers a respectable distance from your monitor, otherwise you'll get funky colors. If you have 4 channel output on your s/c (a soundblaster live or something), plug your front channel into your stereo system, and get some reasonable PC speakers for the rear channel... the rear channel doesn't have to thump, just sound good enough so you can tell where everything is. As for the Athlon being a "game oriented" CPU... I own one @ 550MHz, my roommate owns a PIII CuMine 550MHz, we have pretty much the same equipment otherwise (IBM HDs, nVidia Geforce, etc.) and there is virtually no difference in performance on anything. His is a teensy bit faster in Photoshop... like if he runs a filter that takes 15 secs., it will take 15.5 secs on mine... he's mad because we both upgraded around the same time, and I TOLD him to buy Athlon, but he didn't listen and wound up spending about 赨 more than I did, and my system is more stable than his This message has been edited by damien_s_lucifer on October 05, 2000 at 06:12 PM Posted by Lordbrandon on Oct. 06 2000,05:05
in a long time of buying equipment her is my experence on quality:only buy: IBM hard drives if you can afford it get a cpd-G500 sony FD monitor or a gpm-G500 sony FD monitor, and if you cant. use your old monitor until you can afford one. there the best investment you can make. your monitor will be good for 8- 15 years unlike anything else you'll buy for your computer. and as for the quality, it is a joy every time i turn on my monitor, theese are the best normal sized monitors on planet earth, other monitors that compete are the apple 21" monitors (they use the same tubes as the sonys) and the 22" apple cinema display, that thing is total tits, but its 4000, same with the 24" sony Posted by jim on Oct. 06 2000,05:20
I think that is known as zealotry... Actually I agree with you 100\% percent! ------------------ Posted by fatbitch on Oct. 07 2000,14:34
quote: why have you had 3 then? hehe whats the diff froim athlon and thunderbird? cause im gonna get a new athlon cpu and mboard tomorrow, 800mhz cpu, and abit KT7 mboard. can i overcloack the athlon higher than thunderbiutrd? hehe Posted by Sithiee on Oct. 07 2000,16:49
athlons are in slot A form, the AMD version of the slot 1 (like your p2/p3). thunderbird is in socket (370?) form, like your pre-p2 processors. i think its sposed to be faster, but i dont know...
Posted by askheaves on Oct. 07 2000,18:00
That all sounds right. Yeah, so I have an FC-PGA chip... and I love it. It's a huge socket, but the chip is only really about a half inch by half inch... cute, actually. I don't know why the package itself should matter so much, but I think there's something cleaner about FC-PGA. Plus, I have the ability to double vent my chip, thus my clocking it up around 6 Mhz each day until I have stability problems (912 today).Also, I cannot stress how much I recommend the ASUS boards. I will probably never go with anything else for a while. I lot of control, and I trust the company. Also, the 815e chipset (Solano2) rulez. Posted by DuSTman on Oct. 07 2000,18:09
quote:
Also, AMD produce slot A athlons that are thunderbird cores. AMD calls the thunderbirds athlons as well as calling the originals athlons. The main difference is that on the thunderbird the cache will scale clock speed wise, where as the rev 1 athlons cache would not exceed 350MHz(i think). All recently produced athlons are thunderbirds, but if going for a slot a athlon ask the retailer if it is a thunderbird or not.. Thunderbirds are a bit better.(some retailers may have back-stock of the original athlon.)
Posted by damien_s_lucifer on Oct. 07 2000,20:31
quote: First one was 14" Second one was 17" Third one is 19" All three of them still in use
quote: Athlon is AMD's brand name for both the original K7 chip in the Slot A package, and the revised K7 core (codenamed Thunderbird) in the Socket A package. The major differences : Slot A Athlon : available from 550MHz - 1GHz, 512K off-die L2 cache running at 1/2 to 1/3 CPU speed. Socket A Athlon (aka Thunderbird) : Available from 700MHz - 1.2GHz, 256K on-die L2 cache running at full CPU speed. In most applications (including games), the Thunderbird is gonna be about 10\% faster than the older chips because of the faster L2 cache. Also, AMD has dicontinued production of Slot A Athlons... you can still get them, but I'd only recommend it if you ALREADY own a Slot A motherboard. Otherwise, get a Socket A, AMD will make the Thunderbird chips thru at least 1.5GHz. I've heard of the existence of Slot A Athlons using the TBird core, but they're extremelly rare and will only work if your mobo uses the AMD chipset... if you have a Via chipset your fux0red. And take heed of this VERY important fact : Socket 370 : 66/100/133MHz bus, Intel Pentium Pro protocol (so why didn't they use Socket 8? Hmm...) Socket A : 200MHz (DDR) bus, DEC Alpha EV6 protocol 'course my Athlon is a 550MHz Slot A... I want a Thunderbird, dammit!!! But I can't complain, an AMD rep gave me the chip for free when I said "if I'm gonna sell and support this chip, I really ought to have one to play with..." This message has been edited by damien_s_lucifer on October 07, 2000 at 03:46 PM Posted by fatbitch on Oct. 08 2000,03:13
ok i ordered it - Socket A 800mhz athlon, which is thunderbird according to damien. also ABit KT7 mboardhow easy are these baby's to overclock?and how far will it go? i also ordered this cool looking Chrome Orb heatsink/fan combo thingy, it looks like it cools pretty well This message has been edited by fatbitch on October 07, 2000 at 10:16 PM Posted by Blain on Oct. 08 2000,04:23
MAKE SURE YOUR HEATSINK IS FIRMLY TOUCHING YOUR PROCESSOR!!!!!!!!!! you need to get special "athlon approved heatsinks" otherwise they either won't touch the processor or they well break it from too much pressure. I didn't know that when i built my thunderbird system (i got the first kind) and while it looked a lot like the heatsink was touching, it kind of wasn't. the result? a 跌 fuckup. all well, i got to upgrade to a 900 without ever trying out my 700 ------------------ Posted by askheaves on Oct. 08 2000,05:18
My PIII is a FGPGA (or whatever... some kind of socket). I don't think I would ever do a Slot CPU if I could avoid it. Too much space, looks nasty, etc. Mine is really nice because I have a CPU fan attached to the chip, and an exhaust fan and chute 1/2 inch from the chip. I'm overclocking my 800 to a 912 now, and having no stability problems.
Posted by incubus on Oct. 08 2000,05:20
I've had only good experiences and heard only good things about ABIT boards. They really do r0x0rz, honest.As far as I remember slot 1 was a marketing ploy back in the day, cos it looked bigger but took up less space on the board. Plus it was a cheeky way for them to keep the L2 cache off the chip and slow things down, so you could pay extra for the "Xeon" versions that had the L2 cache onchip, even though it was still a slot 1. Or something. :P Mike ------------------ Posted by incubus on Oct. 08 2000,05:24
The new CuMine PIIIs use socket 370, but FC-PGA (Flipchip pin grid array) as opposed to slot 1 (regular vanilla PIII). The Celeron I series use PPGA (plastic pin grid array) but the socket is the same, AFAIK. Celeron II use FC-PGA like the CuMine PIIIs, I think.Athlons use Slot A, their version of Slot 1, and Durons (celeron competitors) use Socket 370 I think. Not sure about Athlon T-Birds though. All just what I think, may not be right, hence the "I think and AFAIK" all the way through it ------------------ Posted by aventari on Oct. 08 2000,08:34
hey fatbitch (I hope you read this soon) , The chrome orb will definately NOT fit on the abit-KT7 motherboard! If you placed the order for it, go back and change it, unless your pretty good with a die grinder or REALLY good with a hacksaw. The chrome orb sticks out over the CPU, and on the KT7, there's a row of tall capacitors near the socket, and the edge of the orb hits them and wont fit. I've got a Golden Orb on my Duron with the KT7-RAID and when i got it, I almost broke the capacitor off the motherboard trying to force it over You should check out the ALPHA PEP66 or a Global Win FOP32 or something if you're planning to overclock a lot. The orb do cool the CPU OK, but not optimally Check this site for AMD(tm) approved HSF's and if you want links to some online stores selling good heatsinks, email me ------------------ Posted by fatbitch on Oct. 08 2000,08:59
aventari: thanks for that advice, i emailed them and told them not to ship the orb, and i will have a look at that site for an appropriate one. thanks again!
Posted by fatbitch on Oct. 08 2000,09:09
hey aventari can u pls do me a favour and look here< http://www.store.yahoo.com/taisol/cpucoolers.html > and tell me which you would reccommend, and any other advice, thanks dude btw, the pictures show the fans on heatsinks, but i have a feeling the prices are just for the fan, if you can clarify this it would also be handy thanks This message has been edited by fatbitch on October 08, 2000 at 04:12 AM Posted by aventari on Oct. 08 2000,18:42
hmm I've never heard of those coolers, but i'm sure any of the duron/thunderbird coolers will be fine, the site say's their AMD approved so thats good. What I dont understand is the Athlon (Thunderbird) CPU Cooler 1.1GHz If you are going to overclock you'll probably want to check out this article here on HardOCP--it's a Heatsink comparison < http://hardocp.com/reviews/cooling/s37arndup/index.html > Also you should use thermal grease on the heatsink instead of the crappy thermal tape that usually comes with them ------------------ Posted by damien_s_lucifer on Oct. 08 2000,20:39
quote: Yep, it is
quote: Hmmm.... I don't know too much about ABit mobos. My store stopped carrying them when about 1/2 of the boards we got were coming back defective... we only stock ASUS boards now. But if the ABit board is anything like the ASUS A7V (i.e. the motherboard supports tweaking the multiplier), overclocking involves grabbing a pencil and using it to connect some traces on the Thunderbird to allow it to respond to the motherboard's clock multiplier settings, then tweaking FSB, multiplier, and core voltage until you find a good combo. I can't remember where I found the instructions to connect the traces, though. If anyone else knows where they are, post the URL, mmkay? Also, be careful of fan/heatsinks that need to be twisted on (like the Chrome and Golden Orbs).. if they are not specifically designed for the Athlon, you'll crack the chip. When I build Athlon systems I use a regular hs/f combo by Cooler Master. Basically an oversized Socket 370 hs/f. It seems to work just fine even with 1.1GHz CPUs. I'll try and get the part number for you. Posted by aventari on Oct. 09 2000,00:39
You'll need to connect the L1 bridges on the top of the chip, with either a pencil, or even better, a rear window defroster repair kit. (available at auto parts stores)heres a link detailing the procedure. < http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.html?i=1296&p=3 > If you're lucky however, the traces will already come connected like mine did from the factory. ------------------ Posted by fatbitch on Oct. 09 2000,01:53
thanks for that, i will look into it more when i actually get the board. i never knew pencils were conductive!
Posted by directhex on Oct. 10 2000,19:18
< http://support.ati.com/infobase/3334.html > any company who calls this a "minor bug" not worth fixing isn't worth your time. however, my 250mb maxtor (circa december 94) still worked last time i needed it. (the western digital i bought to replace it melted on me) --directhex ------------------ Posted by askheaves on Oct. 10 2000,20:15
quote: This bug came about around the beginning of this year. The laptops my school issued freshman had ATI Rage Pro chips in them. When this driver (2560) came out, people's computers started crashing, games stopped working, etc. The site you link says a workaround is to use the older driver... that's very unprofessional, if you ask me. I had the same laptop, but I was running Win2K. I had to wait until April (almost 3 months) until a useful driver came out (ie. ran OpenGL). Between 3dfx not supporting my old Voodoo Graphics card under Win2K, and ATI being total support crappies, i don't even know where to turn anymore. NVidia hasn't pissed me off yet. Posted by cr0bar on Oct. 11 2000,00:02
Actually I've seen that happen on all 3D accelerators (and I've seen quite a few). Besides, why should one care about half-life performance on school laptops?
Posted by askheaves on Oct. 11 2000,14:48
quote: After working my ass off all week, I want to sit down to a nice game of rape your neighbor with a blaster. I had to play QuakeII in software mode, or else move to my P166 with a Voodoo Graphics card and reboot to Win98 so that I can have drivers for it. Even worse, school work. My senior design project was a 3D game FPS using DirectX. While it was supported by the driver, it was buggy as hell and slow. That was my biggest gripe. Posted by aventari on Oct. 11 2000,22:48
As a matter of fact, I was able to run Ultima 9 on with my TNT 1, with no problems except for the frame rate of about 15.. heh I haven't tried it since w/ my duron 900 and Geforce2mx, but i hear Ultima 9 would even bring my new system to it's knees. That would've been such a great game if it was written in openGL and/or DirectX.. ahh well. The only 3D cards i've ever had have been NVIDIA, and i have pretty much Zero complaints. if it aint broke... ------------------ Posted by damien_s_lucifer on Oct. 12 2000,05:47
quote: nvidia rules. They're still updating drivers for the old TNT chips (Detonator 3 supports them ) The only game I've ever had a problem with on my TNT2 card is Ultima IX, and that's because Origin decided to write the game for 3dfx's GLide and added a very crappy DirectX implementation as an afterthought. nvidia also provides optimized XFree86 (for Linux) drivers with full accelerated OpenGL support. From what I've seen it's really rare for a manufacturer to do that. This message has been edited by damien_s_lucifer on October 11, 2000 at 12:50 PM Posted by whiskey@throttle on Oct. 12 2000,15:37
Dude, this sucks. I got this SB Live card, and everything is great, except for one of the software bundles. There are three cds, two of which installed fine. However, the programs I really need are on the third, and that disk only runs on Windows 2000. Lucky me, I have Windows ME. What a bunch of crap. Can I downgrade from ME to 2000 if I got my paws on a win2000 disk? Posted by Happyfish on Oct. 12 2000,15:57
I was going to buy a Abit KT7 raid board then I heard about the new wave of DDR boards that are coming out.. anyone know anything about them? Are they worth the wait?DDR is supposed to be damn fast - better than the current rambus RAM in some cases.. Posted by askheaves on Oct. 12 2000,16:30
quote: FYI: Win2K is an upgrade from WinME. (I assume you know all this) Win2K is based off of NT, WinME is an extension of Win98 (like, Win98 TE). The beauty will come when codename: Whistler comes out. It is the final integration of the NT kernal with all of the useability of Win98. Apparently it's in beta right now and you can find copies out on IRC somewhere (i've never used IRC), but I haven't gotten it in the MSDN subscription at work. Oh well. Side note: does anybody have any idea why WinME crashed on my machine after the powersaver monitor turns off? I move the mouse to bring it back, then I get scrambled screen going to BSOD. Damn frustrating. Posted by Blain on Oct. 12 2000,18:04
Anybody know how to get the optical output on the SB X-Gamer working? i have been trying for some time now but never get any signal to come out.------------------ Posted by aventari on Oct. 12 2000,18:19
ME sucks in my opinion. I'm running it now, i used to run 98SE, and ME is so much less stable it's scary. Plus a lot of my old software wont freaking run on ME at all. It sux0rzI'm going back to win98se and dual booting with 2k and linux for sure ------------------ Posted by askheaves on Oct. 12 2000,18:44
quote: <Algore> Maybe I misunderstood my opponent when he said he was dual booting, but doesn't that add up to three? </Algore> Posted by damien_s_lucifer on Oct. 12 2000,19:04
quote: I like ME for one reason, and that's speed. Of course my ME install ate itself last night after I was stupid and decided to install all the updates to Media Player 7, which fucks up Adaptec EZ-CD Creator... but I followed the directions on Adaptec's web site and uninstalled EZCD, and then reinstalled it, and presto! instant blue screen and WinME wouldn't boot after that. So I deltree'd the Windows directory, reinstalled, got the burner software installed again, and the SAME FUCKING THING HAPPENED. I miss DOS. Posted by pengu1nn on Oct. 12 2000,19:05
quote: <guyspeakingtoalgore>you invented the internet, you should know </guyspeakingtoalgore> Posted by askheaves on Oct. 12 2000,19:48
I'm trying to figure out what happened with ME. The interface is pretty (indistinquisahble from Win2K), and the new solitare game is kick ass (i copied it onto every machine I own). I can't figure out why it's so unstable though. My god, like I wrote before, I can't let my computer sit while on ME side for more than 30 minutes. My monitor turns off, and the system is dead. How friggin' lame!!! I could just forgo the power saving options, but the evil blue glow would keep me up at night.If anybody finds a copy of Whistler out there, let me know. I think it may be a best of both worlds situation finally. Poor suckers that payed Best Buy 98 bucks to upgrade :P Posted by dido on Oct. 12 2000,20:00
I can't believe you people like winME. God that OS sucks ass! Problems like what askheaves has been talking about are just the beginning. Not only does a lot of software not work in ME but hardware too!!! My V3 wouldn't install properly at all...no 3d graphics with winME. Not to mention the 4 sound cards I went thru just to have no sound cause ME didn't support any of them. Then you get into the old crashing and blue screen of death problem...you sneeze in your computers general direction and the damn thing crashes HARD. So I trashed winME (backed over it with my car several hundred times) and went with win2K. NOw that OS is sweet! All my hardware installed the first time no problems. I had no crazy conflicts, I got maximum 3d graphics for all my quaking goodness and crystal clear sound. NOt to mention that I have left my computer running for a week solid and it didn't crash, slow down or lock once..ONCE i tell ya! So I can't use all my proggies in it..who cares microsoft is coming out with compatibility updates all the time. What may not work today will be in the next update so I just sit back and wait a few weeks. win2K works best with high end systems with lots of toys and power, so it's possible that if you are having problems with it your computer just may not be new enough to handle it. But hey we all can't have new computers! I wouldn't go back to anything under win2K again, I am perfectly content with my computer for the very first time. ------------------ Posted by askheaves on Oct. 12 2000,20:31
Win2K question: I can't get AGP acceleration to work. I have an ASUS CUSL2 board (the shit) and an ASUS 7700 card (GeForce2). Maybe I don't have the correct Win2K board driver updates or something, or maybe it has something to do with clocking my motherboard up to 152Mhz FSB. Who knows. Wondering if anybody else has had AGP problems under Win2K.BTW: With Win2K, I've had uptimes of a couple of months on a P166 at school. The only reason it went down is because I wanted to play Quake (earlier rant about 3Dfx suxorz), so I rebooted to Win98SE. I swear by Win2K, except that the server edition won't recognize my network card (SMC Ultra 9000 ISA 10Mbit). Problem was solved by going to Computer Renaissance and buying a ผ 100Mbit card. Posted by Sithiee on Oct. 12 2000,21:04
winME is better than 98 by far. its stable, its faster, and i love that new solitare game too...but win2k may be stable, but it has no compatability. id have to spend well over 400 dollars to upgrade to 2k and have my stuff still work(according to microsoft), and even then it wouldnt have nearly half the options it does now. win2k is pretty...CRAPPY. id rather have nt 4 over 2k. and yes, whistler will 0wn all OSes...
Posted by askheaves on Oct. 12 2000,21:19
Compatibility:Something funny happens when you try to install WinMe on my old computer (or an old test machine in house at work): you get a message saying that WinME refuses to install on less than a P166. Swear to god, the message box comes up and I don't know how to circumvent it. Win2K runs awesomely on my P166. It is my internet server at home. Hardware compatibility in Win2K is great, while software compatibility isn't. The reason there are software conflicts is usually because of the programmers. I haven't been able to write an app yet that runs on Win95, but not on WinNT. Most of the compatibility issues arise from being uncareful with memory, pointers, and exceptions... or writing a 16bit dos app using realmode memory stuffs. Bad people. Posted by dido on Oct. 12 2000,21:35
quote: I'm sorry but I don't have 6 months to get nt4 working properly. Yes that's right 6 MONTHS!!!! The damn thing needs so many "service packs" (which translates into shit we forgot to put in the original) and the service packs are not compatitble with all hardware and they have to be done in a certain order..blah..blah..blah. NO thanks. While I admit nt runs sweet once it gets running, its a bitch to get going. win2k on the other hand first time no problems...none of this dicking around for 6 months. ------------------ Posted by Sithiee on Oct. 12 2000,22:26
yeah, except 2k doesnt work with my vid card, dvd player, dvd decoder, and such. yeah. win 2k is a great choice for me! DUMBASS!
Posted by askheaves on Oct. 12 2000,22:55
Jesus Christ, you buy your hardware at the same place the Flintstones bought their car?"I'd like a DVD Rock player, please" Posted by Sithiee on Oct. 12 2000,23:55
no, i have an asus vid card. it has geforce + tv options. microsoft's win 2k upgrade readiness shit said it wont work. win 2k isnt exactly super-compatable.
Posted by dido on Oct. 13 2000,00:47
well since you called me a dumbass i suppose i will return the favour. the driver for that vid card was released over two months ago with win2K. don't you ever check the manufacturers websites? or do you just like to bitch and complain that your computer isn't working? if you are having troubles try looking for an updated driver it always helps and try the maufacturer first. oh ya did i forget dumbass?------------------ Posted by aventari on Oct. 13 2000,04:20
okay, anyways I think it's pretty unanimous that ME sucks arse big time.I just can't wait until Microsoft's death grip on the software world weakens. I'm being stifled over here! ------------------ Posted by Hex0r on Oct. 13 2000,04:37
man, yall make me feel like a little bitch, with my AMD K6-2 350 processor, 96 megs o ram, and a total of 19 gigs on 2 MAXTOR drives... and an nVidia tnt 32... i love my video card, got it for cheap on ebay... anyway, i suck, just thought id let yall know, and at the same time say hi, as this is my first posttoo poor to upgrade, my PC was built on student loan money Posted by damien_s_lucifer on Oct. 13 2000,05:50
quote: For most things, Windows 2000 sucks compared to ME... what software do you need that only works for 2000? I have a SB Live and there's a lot more software that WON'T work with 2K than will. Posted by Sithiee on Oct. 13 2000,08:27
note how i said microsoft's upgrade compatability program. i never had any interest in getting 2k, so no i didnt check. thatd be like someone learning how to drive manual transmission just to stick with their automatic. why dont you read what other people write before responding?
Posted by dido on Oct. 13 2000,14:20
I'm not going to get into a pissing contest with you over this. For your information though I did read everyone's posts. And I responded. If you don't have all the information perhaps you shouldn't go shooting your mouth off. Nonetheless, I agree with aventari, I can't wait until there are more OS choices out there too. I would go with Linux but I don't have the time to learn it and Unix is twice as hard. Perhaps someday ------------------ This message has been edited by dido on October 13, 2000 at 09:20 AM Posted by askheaves on Oct. 13 2000,15:38
I'm with you on Lunix, man. I installed a copy of the Mandrake distro on my computer (several times... 25 maybe?), and had nothing but trouble. It took me about 3 weeks to figure out how to change the resolution. I had no internet for quite a while since I couldn't get it to authenticate the connection with USWest. So, after all this time and trouble, I got drunk one night and installed Win2K server back on it. While inebriated, it took me about an hour and a half (mostly loading time) to get back on the internet, up my resolution, etc. I just don't want to deal with Lunix anymore. I curse that friggin penguin.
Posted by DuSTman on Oct. 13 2000,15:59
Lol! ------------------ Posted by DuSTman on Oct. 13 2000,16:09
How many people here have tried Beos?It's supposed to be real easy to use and i've heard lots of good things about it. Only problem is little software availability. Still. Will install the free version on a small partition as a curiosity and see how it goes. ------------------ Posted by Hex0r on Oct. 13 2000,16:25
i heard from a Mac user freind that OS X may be cross platform, i.e. mac os on yer ibm based PC... maybe not X but soon, Mac's annoyinh GUI will be available to people who hate MS' annoying GUI. scary shit
Posted by aventari on Oct. 13 2000,16:29
I wouldn't go _that_ far (the tux must die!), but Linux can be a real bitch and it's just not the best system for a most home PCs right now. windows has application support, a broad user base and ease of use. thats why it dominates. Linux has he best speed, security, and it's open source. Open source will dominate the future for sure OS-X on wintel box0rs looks pretty badass too! ------------------ Posted by DuSTman on Oct. 13 2000,18:11
Hmmn. Installed BEos, booted into it, and despite professing to support USB mice it completely ignores the presence of my logitech optical. Plus a lot of the windows key combos don't work, so i can't explore it properly... Dammit.. I hope i can get that sorted out and have a poke around, but not an encouraging first impression. ------------------ Posted by DuSTman on Oct. 13 2000,18:11
God damn it. I hate it when i post twice by accident. I may as well walk around wearing a billboard saying " I am 4 ll4m4 " Still. At least that would give people something to laugh about that isn't my haircut. This message has been edited by DuSTman on October 13, 2000 at 01:14 PM Posted by askheaves on Oct. 13 2000,18:17
I had no problem with my USB mouse... oddities...The only good app I ever found for Be was Doom... except that my mouse didn't work inside the game. Oh well. Posted by Sithiee on Oct. 14 2000,01:41
DUMBASS! when i say read peoples posts, i meant MY post. where i say that i based it off of what microsoft said. jesus christ you are a dumb motherfucker...
Posted by dido on Oct. 14 2000,02:44
quote: LOL All I managed to do with Linux was change the desktop picture. I was estatic. Then I realised that all I did was change the freaking desktop but I still couldn't use my computer, so I said fuck it and went back to windows. Sometimes I really hate Bill Gates for cornering the damn user-friendly OS market. ------------------ Posted by dido on Oct. 14 2000,02:47
quote: Do you always insult people to make up for your own inadequacies??? Or are you just threaten by a woman who knows about computers?? Perhaps it all stems from your incesant belief in what microsoft tells you...that would fuck anyone up! ------------------ Posted by askheaves on Oct. 14 2000,05:20
quote: I bet you hundreds of Karma points that that picture wasn't rendered on an AMD K6-2 chip (or even a cluster of them). Edit: neutered the reshowing of the pic This message has been edited by askheaves on October 13, 2000 at 12:24 PM Posted by askheaves on Oct. 14 2000,05:28
quote: I tried BeOS 5 on my school laptop when it came out (April?). It was a very nice OS. The UI was pretty, install was a snap, etc. It was very Lunixy, but not real nasty like real Lunix. And, since I didn't want to mess things up too much, no boot sector crap was thrown onto my harddrive. If I wanted into BeOS, I put in a boot floppy and restarted. (If anybody doesn't recognize the Lunix spelling, it's a refference to Jeff K) Posted by Sithiee on Oct. 14 2000,09:22
first off, bitch, i didnt even know you were a woman. second, im calling you a dumbass, because you obviously are, or you would not be making dumb assumptions. assumptions like "sithiee has hardware that is 100\% compliant with win 2k" or "sithiee has a vid card that works with win2k" i didnt even say what vid card i have, so how the fuck would you know if the damn driver was released with win2k?? DUMBASS! i really hope you dont work in tech support, you probably make dumb assumptions all the time....
Posted by dido on Oct. 14 2000,12:47
quote: UMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!! Obviously you were calling yourself a dumbass right? ------------------ Posted by caseman984 on Oct. 14 2000,12:54
Ok, a friend of mine has gone through MANY different os's over the years and this is what he has finally concluded:Win2k is good, but dosnt support enough hardware. WinME blows chunks out the ass. Win2k Adv. Server is the best way to go if you have the RAM (like 256 is best I think) Win98se is, sadly, the best windows platform to date besides win2k adv. server. Just use Linux :P ------------------ Posted by cr0bar on Oct. 14 2000,15:28
As long as we're all self-proclaimed experts, I should note that there's not a whit of reason to run Win2K Advanced Server unless you really ARE running a server of some kind. Otherwise it's just a stupid idea.Win98SE is the best so far, sadly. WinME is basically the same thing, only it works with less hardware, and Win2K Pro would be really awesome if it weren't so god damned quirky. ------------------ Posted by Sithiee on Oct. 14 2000,20:05
yes, so that narrows it to, at least 3 video cards. you still dont know what card i have you dumb ho.
|