Forum: The Classroom Topic: What IT is started by: Resonant Posted by Resonant on Nov. 30 2001,22:54
Dean Kamen, the DEKA inventor, is going to announce what "IT" (nicknamed "Ginger") is on Monday morning, on Good Morning America. Definitely something I'll be watching. No one knows exaclty what it is, but all the top tech investors who have been in on it say it's some sort of great, society-changing invention. May want to check it out.< http://www.ginger-chat.com/ > It must be pretty badass, because the Manager of Credit Suisse First Boston (a big bank) is one of the people who knows what it is, and he claims Kamen will be worth 5x what Gates is in 5 years. Any guesses on this thing? the ginger-chat site has some good info...boggles my mind, though. another thing: 14. There is a spin-off of Deka Research and Development, called Acros, LLC which according to the trademark will produce "motorized, self-propelled, wheeled personal mobility aids, namely wheelchairs, scooters, carts, and chariots." 15. (Acros, LLC) has bought up the url's < www.flywheels.com, > < www.flywheels.org, > flywheelsucks.com, myflywheel.com, [flywheeling.com - ( Thanks majic )] (From now on new domains will be listed in the Domain Timeline section below).
This message has been edited by Resonant on December 01, 2001 at 06:04 PM Posted by Rhydant on Dec. 01 2001,00:53
no shit? finally. its been awhile.i heard it was a one-wheeled skooter-gyro cycle thing. but who knows? Posted by CatKnight on Dec. 01 2001,02:14
maybe it's a flywheel engine
Posted by SLATE on Dec. 01 2001,02:14
I recall hearing something about a wheelchair that could climb stairs and whatnot
Posted by syf on Dec. 01 2001,02:46
The wheelchair is actually something he already invented. They did a big writeup on it for wired. It's a sort of 6-wheeled ATV wheelchair that can truck at 30MPH and stand on two legs. It has really advanced blancing systems.anyways...my guess is close to catknight -- it's not an engine though, he said a while back that the device itself was used for transportation. It's sort of obvious that it's going to be called a flywheel. bearing that in mind, what can it be? "fly" "wheel"...something essential to transportation, and flying. Interesting. Posted by miNus on Dec. 01 2001,04:08
Welcome back syf... I'm curious what IT is. I'm reminded of a song... though the name of the band and the song name escapes me... But it is about "IT"... help? Posted by DeadAnztac on Dec. 01 2001,07:03
The fuck Cat?? I'll get this right so that people understand. The flywheel, on any engine, is a huge piece of metal (or something) that only allows for gains in speed. In other words it's like a rachet, it only allows force in one direction, but not in the other. So it can only speed up. This way it preserves the momentum in a engine that has bursts of power (such as a steam engine) or if the power ratio's change it's used to protect the engine and the transmission from damage. The latter is what flywheels are used for in your standard car. The clutch is between the engine and the flywheel and the Flywheel is on the transmission side (including gear box and all.) When you push in the clutch pedal it makes the actual clutch plates seperate, causing the flywheel and the engine to spin seperately, then when you switch gears the flywheel absorbs the difference in power (in a downshift a higher RPM on the flywheel is transfered into power on the transmission, in an upshift power is transfered into a higher RPM on the transmission) and then when you "Engage" the clutch the engine is at a lowwer RPM (Because you let the gas out) and the flywheel is at the higher or lowwer RPM (because of the shift, but SHOULD still be higher then the engines RPM.) Then when you push in the gas, and give power to the engine it receives no resistance until it gets to above the flywheel's RPM. This way no damage to the engine is sustained from shifting (say running at a high RPM and downshifting where the same RPM require more power). I'm sorry if noone got that, but I sorta got a buzz, and that's the only way I could desribe it. ------------------ This message has been edited by DeadAnztac on December 02, 2001 at 02:37 AM Posted by DeadAnztac on Dec. 01 2001,07:34
Footnote: So in CatKnight's case they took a (apparently) large flywheel, spun it up to a high RPM, and then powered the wheels off the inertia (probably at a really high gear ratio.)------------------ This message has been edited by DeadAnztac on December 02, 2001 at 02:38 AM Posted by ASCIIMan on Dec. 01 2001,08:08
The difference between CatKnight's post and Anztac's post is the difference between physics and engineering.ed - sp This message has been edited by ASCIIMan on December 02, 2001 at 03:08 AM Posted by askheaves on Dec. 01 2001,15:00
quote: That was brilliantly stated. Catknight is right, though. A flywheel is just a method of energy storage by storing it in a motion about a moment. Out of curiosity, is that kinetic energy or potential energy stored in a flywheel? I know it's moving, but it isn't doing any work until it's applied, so I'd call it potential... or both. *head explodes* Posted by jiggyfresh on Dec. 01 2001,15:45
yeah right like my ass is waking up at 7am to watch good morning america..ill catch it on /dot if its anything worth reading about
Posted by Der_Teufel on Dec. 01 2001,16:33
A flywheel stores kinetic energy.
Posted by Wiley on Dec. 01 2001,16:48
All I can say is rember when they thought they had fusion in a glass of tap water? It was going to change the world ..and then the water and the dream was poured down the drain. Flywheels have been around for a while but they have a few flaws as far as I can tell. First off, if you have a wheel spinning at a high rate of speed in your engine and you tilt too far on the wrong axis (like going around a banked turn) your car is going to have to work against the force created by the wheel (like a gyroscope) and really mess with your traction and control. The second issue I see is what will happen to the big heavy wheel spinning at a hight rate of speed in the event of an impact? Very dangerous, no? To see what I mean, get yourself a circular saw and a bunch of freinds to stand around. Then, loosen the screw that holds the spinning blade in place and turn on the power. Stand around for a bit and presto ...somebody is killed by the spinning wheel that goes flying through the air. And it wont stop untill it hits something pretty solid ..we call this Inertia. But hey, I'm all for it if Flywheel Inc goes IPO. Initial buzz about anything is good to drive the stock price up. And they do got some buzz going. I missed out on Inktomi and WeightWatchers IPOs last month and I need to make back some of that Enron money. Posted by Resonant on Dec. 01 2001,17:23
whatever it is...we find out monday morning.
Posted by CatKnight on Dec. 01 2001,17:27
um syf what does flying have to do with a flywheel?oh, you don't know what a flywheel is. a flywheel is a massive wheel with a high angular moment. you can spin it up to a high speed and then mechanically drain that rotational energy to other wheels or gears. I think some delivery/messenger cars in europe use them, but they only give you 15 minutes or so of power. Posted by CatKnight on Dec. 01 2001,18:17
quote: The fuck?
quote: "storing energy" = potential energy. it doesn't matter what you call it, it's still E=1/2*a*I^2 wiley--there is an easy way around that little inertia while turning problem. I think they have the wheel spinning on it's normal axis and on one side of the car. besides we are talkign about courrier vans here, they go like 30 kph through cramped city streets in europe, not down highways in the us. This message has been edited by CatKnight on December 02, 2001 at 02:33 PM Posted by Resonant on Dec. 01 2001,21:05
DRUDGE: 'IT' IS REVEALED: NAMED 'SEGWAY', A SELF-BALANCING PEOPLE MOVER TIME MAG is planning to report on Monday: The Segway is a self-balancing people mover... Developing Hard... The NEW YORK TIMES is set to front Segway in Monday runs... Developed at a cost of more than 贄 million, the vehicle is a complex bundle of hardware and software that mimics the human body's ability to maintain its balance... Posted by DeadAnztac on Dec. 01 2001,22:31
Someone took it upon themselves to make a bipedal system? I can see all the anime comming true now! Bipedal tanks! Mechwarriors! Aghhh! ------------------ Posted by TheManThatWasntThere on Dec. 01 2001,23:02
Heh
Posted by SLATE on Dec. 01 2001,23:56
quote: Great first post Posted by Resonant on Dec. 02 2001,01:01
There is no denying that the Segway, previously code-named "IT" and "Ginger," is an engineering marvel, reports Heilemann, who rode on the machine many times. Developed at a cost of more than 贄 million, Kamenis vehicle is a complex bundle of hardware and software that mimics the human bodyis ability to maintain its balance. Not only does it have no brakes, but also no engine, no throttle, no gearshift, and no steering wheel. And it can carry the average rider for a full day, nonstop, on only five cents' worth of electricity.Kamen explains how the Segway works: "When you walk, youire really in whatis called a controlled fall. You off-balance yourself, putting one foot in front of the other and falling onto them over and over again. In the same way, when you use a Segway, thereis a gyroscope that acts like your inner ear, a computer that acts like your brain, motors that act like your muscles, wheels that act like your feet. Suddenly, you feel like you have on a pair of magic sneakers, and instead of falling forward, you go sailing across the room."
fucking a. Posted by miNus on Dec. 02 2001,01:05
HAHAHAI knew all you hardcore IT fanatics would end up being disappointed... "IT - The moped for the next generation!" edit - reading the article on TIME IT does seem 'neat', though. This message has been edited by miNus on December 02, 2001 at 08:07 PM Posted by ASCIIMan on Dec. 02 2001,01:11
< it >
Posted by [liquid] meta on Dec. 02 2001,01:16
I wonder if they'll make an "IT" like the razor scooters...you know inline wheels & able to do tricks....i mean we CAN do tricks on our own.
This message has been edited by [liquid] meta on December 02, 2001 at 08:18 PM Posted by whiskey@throttle on Dec. 02 2001,03:29
As I've heard, it's not so much the scooter as it is the method of motion/"motor" (a type of Stirling Engine?)
Posted by Rhydant on Dec. 02 2001,04:14
hhehehehhehe. if you cant fall over while riding it, when why is he wearing a helmet?/me fallsover in laughter. aahh.... what horse shit. but i still want one. Posted by DuSTman on Dec. 02 2001,04:22
quote: So how do you get off it then? This message has been edited by DuSTman on December 02, 2001 at 11:23 PM Posted by beuges on Dec. 02 2001,04:52
quote: i'm guessing they'll have some sort of recharge thing like how your car recharges its battery while you're driving. if not, i'll have to pull out the battery of my mp3 player if i get stuck Posted by Resonant on Dec. 02 2001,08:42
quote: Most likely because some gimped advertising agency thought it would look "safe" and "politically correct" for the picture. What a tool. But I still want one too This message has been edited by Resonant on December 03, 2001 at 03:42 AM Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Dec. 02 2001,10:03
haha what a piece of shit he actually expects people to buy that? oh well the micro scooter caught on and that was fucking shite. see this is why hype is exactly that hype no substance.------------------ Posted by SLATE on Dec. 02 2001,10:15
Whats the top speed on that sucker on a level plain?If its faster then 20mph, then that would be cool. Posted by Non on Dec. 02 2001,11:07
You have to stand while you travel?!?... what kind of innovation is that? You need to get two of them brace them about 8 feet apart and sling a hammock between them. Now that is traveling in style.
Posted by L33T_h4x0r_d00d on Dec. 02 2001,11:09
quote: You have to fall off, hence the helmet. ------------------ Posted by chmod on Dec. 02 2001,11:34
quote: I think I heard them say it goes 12 mph... edit: oops, i meant 18 This message has been edited by chmod on December 03, 2001 at 01:03 PM Posted by CatKnight on Dec. 02 2001,12:29
if that thing costs more then a couple hundred bucks then it's worthless. just get a bike.
Posted by Der_Teufel on Dec. 02 2001,13:02
The riced out "IT": Posted by Wolfguard on Dec. 02 2001,13:34
Everyone was expecting BIG things, and we get this.... a Thwackbot with meltybrain standing upright... yawn. ------------------ Posted by veilside on Dec. 02 2001,13:52
quote: ::waiting for ReetStraver's comment:: Posted by Gumm0 on Dec. 02 2001,15:10
quote: Gummo says WTF!!!! heard this barbie scooter is going for 3,000 start, I COULD be misinformed as always.Gummo is fustrated at another 'handicapped' invention, all excited it was going to be a good one, what a let down. Posted by Spydir on Dec. 02 2001,16:47
so basicly... it's a razor, just with 2 wheels side by side, not one infront of the other?"Boys and girls, we're going to learn a new word today. BULLSHIT. B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T. No little Jimmie, that's not hyphanated." Don't try to tell me it's the "science". "you lean forward and it goes, because of SCIENCE!" Yeah, that's called gravity dilnuts. ------------------ Posted by Wiley on Dec. 02 2001,16:56
Do you notice that the pic on the website shows a girl on top of the stairs? WTF? Your telling me that this can get you up the stairs? How far forward do you have to lean to get that to work? And 12mph for ...not really poised to replace the Razor, let alone the automobile.
Posted by Non on Dec. 02 2001,17:41
I just wanna see the guy crash on "Good Morning America".So you go faster by leaning forward? I don't know about you guys but I thought "IT" would be a little cooler... o well. [EDIT] If one put some cinder blocks on it and let it go how far do you think it would make it? This message has been edited by Non on December 03, 2001 at 02:47 AM Posted by chmod on Dec. 02 2001,18:07
Dammit, how does he think this thing is supposed to change society? I was really disappointed.... it doesn't seem to be more than a stupid expensive toy. Nobody's gonna pay three thousand bucks for something like that, we've all been doing fine without it so far.
Posted by Lizzy on Dec. 02 2001,18:12
I can fall on my ass for free at home.
Posted by Non on Dec. 02 2001,18:27
3000$ is what Dean Kamen said. For that price it better have one hell of a sound system, maybe even come with northstar or at least those stalkers in the vest that followed them around on "Good Morning America".If they could put a seat on it, add some doors and a roof for when it is cold or raining, maybe crank up the top speed... At least it might make a cool BattleBot. Posted by ReetStraver on Dec. 02 2001,18:34
quote: Where do I put my nitrous and 5 inch lowering block? Posted by Non on Dec. 02 2001,18:40
I could think of a few places...
Posted by Wiley on Dec. 02 2001,18:49
quote: Your an ass ...but it so damn funny every single time. This message has been edited by Wiley on December 03, 2001 at 03:27 PM Posted by Non on Dec. 02 2001,19:23
I would rather have one of these: Looks like more fun. This message has been edited by Non on December 03, 2001 at 02:27 PM Posted by Resonant on Dec. 02 2001,19:30
quote: No, the science would be the 10 microprocessor, the 100 million dollars worth of research, and the best balancing system ever developed. The fact that you're in a controlled freefall when you fall. It's not a scooter -- sure, it's in the form of one, but there will be plenty of re-applications within a few years' time to include four wheel models and such. Regardless of how you look at it, this thing is liquid brilliance. The fact that it will run for a full day on 5 cents worth of electric charge is incredible -- there's all the power consumption you'll ever need. If you don't want to cough up the cash, then fine, but it's completely the opposite of bullshit. I think you'll be proven wrong sometime withing the next year or so. This message has been edited by Resonant on December 03, 2001 at 02:31 PM Posted by Non on Dec. 02 2001,19:45
quote: hmmm... kinda defeats the purpose a little, eh? Posted by ASCIIMan on Dec. 02 2001,20:23
quote: Hooray for perpetual motion! Posted by miNus on Dec. 02 2001,21:22
I wonder if they could apply this technology to motorcycles, to make an untippable bike or something. Make it so any joe schmoe could do motocross style turns (knees almost touching pavement).THAT would be interesting. Either that or a walking battlesuit so that I could pick up syf0n and chuck him at the moon. Posted by whiskey@throttle on Dec. 02 2001,21:43
quote:
Posted by Resonant on Dec. 02 2001,22:17
quote: no, if each wheel is independent then it would by incredible manueverable, but still make good use of the technology Posted by Wiley on Dec. 02 2001,22:24
You know if you hit a little rock, a curb, or a speedbump the Segway wouldn't have time to correct itself ...then splat ..faceplant.Also, I find it sad that there was hardly any mention of the Segway on most business news sources (Bloomberg, Bridge/Reuters, AP Wire, The Street Report or much else) Posted by Rhydant on Dec. 02 2001,22:26
people, people, people! youre forgetting the point. its not so much the invention, its the technology that powers the invention.and im sure the people over there at DEKA are working on adding things to the Segway like a radio, some kind of umbrella top or something to keep rain out and other features. keep in mind the first model was meant for industrial use. like mailmen and factory workers. Posted by veilside on Dec. 02 2001,22:32
quote:bwahahah Posted by j0eSmith on Dec. 02 2001,22:36
Wow. This thing is incredible. Incredibly gay.Look! I lean forward, and then it goes and doesn't tip because of gyroscopes! at speeds of up to 12 MPH! And it only costs what? -?! My god! Let me go buy one now! Whats that you say? It only needs to charge for six hours a day and can travel distances of up to 15 WHOLE MILES?! No please, take my money! Would you like to punch me in the face to? Because that seems fitting if I'm already buying this piece of shit. What about gyroscopic precussion? (I spelt that wrong, but I'm sure CK knows what I'm talking about) Gyro's drift because of friction between the moving parts. Unless they've invented a frictionless substance that exists at a vide viarity of tempuratures. *shakes head* I want to punch this( whats his name, Bob?) guy square in the face and scream SCIENCE LET ME DO THAT, and proceed to run off in a 'controlled fall'. ------------------ Posted by jiggyfresh on Dec. 03 2001,00:46
watch the video < http://www.segway.com.edgesuite.net/consumer/connect/multimedia.html > its really just for lazy people Posted by miNus on Dec. 03 2001,02:29
Off segway.com:"It leverages aerospace engineering and robust software to track your position. And it does it all without you noticing it." Yeah that's a MAJOR selling point! (anybody want to mirror the movie if you have it?) This message has been edited by miNus on December 03, 2001 at 09:32 PM Posted by whiskey@throttle on Dec. 03 2001,08:28
Kamen: The real invention is the marketing scheme! The real "marvel of science" is that the scheme actually worked! This message has been edited by whiskey@throttle on December 04, 2001 at 03:33 AM Posted by Resonant on Dec. 03 2001,09:42
quote: It does enough calculations per second not to tip over small object....it's got 10 processors. Come on. Of course if you run full speed into a tree or something, you'll fall off. Business media won't mention it until there's some word on how it's doing financially. Since it's not even going to be public for a year yet....All I know is that Credit Suisse think Kamen will be richer than gates in 5 years. We'll see. Posted by Wolfguard on Dec. 03 2001,10:13
I see this thing going the way of the EV warrior. The electric bicycle company that folded.Good quality surplus motors that are great for a battlebot in about a years time. ------------------ Posted by Wiley on Dec. 03 2001,12:27
quote: It doesn't matter how many processors it has, it's top heavy. If one of the wheels hits a little rock or raised pavement it will tip forward too fast to correct. Then ..splat! Basically like tripping over a phone cord or stepping on your shoelace, the difference being that the Segway doesn't have a second leg to throw out and catch the fall. It's basically a one legged man at an ass kicking contest. And I wonder how well it will go downhill? I figure if you are going downhill at top speed and you lean forward, how's the thing going to correct? Will one of you math genius types post that equation? I want to know how much the thing would have to speed up to compensate for a 200lbs guy leaning forward down a 6\% grade with a starting speed of 10mph (of course you have to throw in additional acceleration due to gravity and such). Posted by CatKnight on Dec. 03 2001,13:32
whiskey: hahahahahha
quote: hahahahahaha laf Posted by Nikita on Dec. 03 2001,13:46
oooh that round scooter thing reminded me of this:
Oh man, the horror ...
Posted by askheaves on Dec. 03 2001,17:51
That video is funny because a chick is loading the thing into the back of a ุ,000 SUV that runs a 10mpg, in front of what has to be a million dollar house. Who are they fooling? You can't change the world by building luxury products.I wonder how efficient it is going uphill? I'm pretty sure that half of a journey will be uphill. Still run on .05 worth of energy? Now, when they can balance a 4-passenger vehicle on one wheel and make it drive by everybody inside leaning forward, then I'll be impressed. Posted by Amygdala on Dec. 03 2001,18:53
I heard it cost 3000 bucks or something...I'd rather get a BMW Street Carver.... --amygdala ------------------ Posted by Resonant on Dec. 03 2001,22:41
ASCII: thank you. I meant to say the same thing.It's not like you can "trick it". Of course if you're going to be an ass, you can always find a way around what we're saying, like, "it won't balance me if I drive off a cliff, and that's not good enough!" Posted by Non on Dec. 03 2001,22:45
quote: If it had massive enough wheels it would. But if you were going 12 mph and you hit a 6 inch curb you would fall on your face or at least get a handle in the croch. This message has been edited by Non on December 04, 2001 at 06:02 PM Posted by Resonant on Dec. 03 2001,22:55
Manchester, N.H (SatireWire.com) — After a year-long buildup during which it was known as the mysterious "Ginger" or "IT," the revolutionary, scooter-like "Segway Human Transporter" was unveiled Monday without first being checked for its potential acronym. ...I can't believe this SHT!" said ABC's Diane Sawyer. "It's so fun and stable and quiet. Wow. SHT." "Boy, I hope no one's looking because I really want to take a SHT right now!" joshed good-natured co-host Charles Gibson. At ū,000 each, however, the consumer model may be out of reach of all but the most generous of gift givers. "If it's three grand, there's no way I can give a SHT," said Holly Dumal of Princeton, N.J. "I wish they'd make a cheap SHT." Kamen replied that the company would never give its SHT away, but promised a less expensive version was "definitely on our SHT list." Posted by askheaves on Dec. 04 2001,01:00
Wiley, you're downhill example brought a thought to mind. Am I crazy, or is that thing constantly competing against dynamic instability? ie, the further you push the thing from center, the harder it is to correct exponentially. It's like living on the right half of the s-plane. They're trying to solve a fundamental difficulty of engineering.Then again, they've done it with aircraft. That's the reason for fly-by-wire craft and some of the newer weirder models like the X-29 or whatever, with the swept forward wing. The difference is that aeronautical engineers are using dynamic instability to produce a more agile and maneuverable aircraft. These segway folks can solve their engineering problem by adding a third wheel on the front. Posted by Wiley on Dec. 04 2001,01:01
quote: Oh wow..now I see. So if you are chugging along at 12mph and something gets wedged under a wheel and stops it cold (like a rock or uneven pavement) with your upper body still moving forward at 12mph (this is called i-n-e-r-t-i-a) the super scooter will have corrected it's balance *before* it became a problem? Wow! I didn't know that it was psychic. Posted by ASCIIMan on Dec. 04 2001,02:39
Okay, this is really getting pointless, but look at the wheel diameter: about 12". It's gonna take a pretty big rock to throw this thing completely off balance. I doubt you wouldn't see the rock before you hit it. This thing isn't light either. There's about 80 lbs of aluminum, batteries, motors, etc centered about 3" off the ground with this thing. That will counterbalance at least some of the torque on the wheels after a bump caused by the inertia of the rider. The skateboard metaphor is a little off. First of all, your skateboard doesn't have handles you can hold onto. If it did, it would be a lot easier to control its and your motions after a bump. Secondly, this thing has wheels that are 10 times the size of a normal skateboard and has a heck of a lot more mass concentrated down there (to the point where most of it is centered *below* the wheels), thirdly, I'm guessing your skateboard doesn't have sensors and motors that, if they were not able to correct its motion as it hit a rock, would be able to as soon as the wheels touched the ground again.You're still an idiot. Don't ask "what if" - of course theres going to be situations in which it won't be able to correct in time. That's like asking if a car can crash if it runs into an immovable object. My point is that during normal use it *will* be able to correct itself, and if you're about to run into something that would affect its stability, you would likely know far enough beforehand that you would be able to avoid it. Posted by Observer on Dec. 04 2001,05:14
I thought the round scooter reminded be of the BMW C3. I'd take that over that French-engineered thing.------------------ Posted by ASCIIMan on Dec. 04 2001,05:37
Hey Wiley, you're an idiot. The whole point of it is that it can correct it's balance *before* it becomes a problem. See that wheelchair thingie up there? It uses some of the same technology as Seguay. You can push it as hard as you want while it's in its standing position (on two wheels, like in the picture), or shove it as quickly as you want, and it will keep the occupant stationary. It won't move. Because it can compensate fast enough that balance doesn't become a problem.
Posted by Resonant on Dec. 04 2001,09:35
ASCIIman: 1Wiley: 0 heaves: somewhere in that article it was mentioned that going downhill generated battery power. The time article, I mean... Posted by sureal-killer on Dec. 04 2001,10:14
How many people here are really going to get one of these things?I would rather have a 躔 mountain bike than a scooter. I wouldn't buy one of those things for anything over 跾. ------------------ Posted by whiskey@throttle on Dec. 04 2001,15:05
quote: Anyone else reminded of Preston Tucker?
quote: If you are going 12 mph and hit a 6 inch curb, you're an idiot who deserves to have his face broken. And for the whole "leaning forward/rolling down a hill" deal...I think it's pretty safe to say that you wouldn't need to lean forward if you were at a hill. You could probably stand much more level (or lean back even) in order to control the speed of your descent. BTW, folks, the current price is what the market will bear. Of course this thing is going to have an opening cost of ...think of the marketing hype that was thrust behind this thing for the past year and a half! Besides, some rich bastards out there can afford it...what with the holidays and all, they’ll probably buy these things up like they were black-market Nazi art or discount Beluga caviar. Well, assuming they’re for sale already, that is... Cripes, VHS Cassettes used to cost each. Just wait people...eventually the price of a Segway will become far more consumer friendly. Just as will the Intel Itanium chips, 2002 model cars, etc etc etc Just for the record, however, please note that I will never buy a Segway Human Transporter, no matter how affordable they become. I think one thing people have forgotten to mention is how ridiculously retarded everyone looks while riding one of these fucking eyesores. Like retards of the 22nd century, if I do say so myself. Ride on, Corky. Ride your bastard gyroscopic contraption into the retarded sunset, what with your extra 23rd chromosome and all.
Vamanos, hombres...tonight we cruise the streets of mongoloid city. This message has been edited by whiskey@throttle on December 05, 2001 at 10:14 AM Posted by Resonant on Dec. 04 2001,19:29
HAHAHAHAHA...mogoloid city....oh man, you're the best
Posted by Wiley on Dec. 04 2001,23:39
"This will be to the car what the car was to the horse and buggy.""Imagine them everywhere: in parks and at Disneyland, on battlefields and factory floors, but especially on downtown sidewalks from Seattle to Shanghai. "Cars are great for going long distances," Kamen says, "but it makes no sense at all for people in cities to use a 4,000-lb. piece of metal to haul their 150-lb. asses around town." In the future he envisions, cars will be banished from urban centers to make room for millions of "empowered pedestrians". Suddenly, you feel like you have on a pair of magic sneakers, and instead of falling forward, you go sailing across the room." Unlike cars, they are cheap, clean, efficient, maneuverable. Unlike bicycles, they are designed specifically to be pedestrian friendly. "A bike is too slow and light to mix with trucks in the street but too large and fast to mix with pedestrians on the sidewalk," he argues. "Our machine is compatible with the sidewalk. Turning what would have been a 30-minute walk into a 10-minute ride. Shrink cities to the point where cars "will not only be undesirable, but unnecessary." What ...What is this miricle invention you ask? What is going to change the world as we know it? What is going to end walking forever? I give you the Electric Razor!! Posted by CaptainEO on Dec. 05 2001,02:44
This invention... will turn a nation of fat people... into a nation of even fatter people.
Posted by aventari on Dec. 05 2001,03:19
They just need the Icy Hot Stuntaz to endorse this product or service and it'll sell like a muthafucka.y0 peep my phat new g-ride, I be rollin over you hataz like da playa I am. Bling! Bling! Where be da milk up in dis piece?!
------------------ Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Dec. 05 2001,08:19
its a pile of wank and thats my scientific opinion thankyou very much. resonant can assram his device all he/she wants but fucked if i'm really gonna stand up and proclaim that its the future of transport. woo its a controlled free fall... so basically it just follows the laws of momentum that every other particle in the universe does then. i would think that the way this thing works means that the breaking distance is about 3 times that of whatever an upright thing would be of the same design. ahh tree!!! 10 processors dont fail me now! Processors: Fuck if we try to slow down anymore we'll topple over dont activate the breaks any harder! SMACK in to tree. you now have a lovely crumpled heap of metal worth roughly or whatever this thing costs. ------------------ Posted by chmod on Dec. 05 2001,09:21
quote: HAHAHA it's the icy hot stuntaz!!! Flamer, Ice, and Blade, or something like that, right? edit: oops This message has been edited by chmod on December 06, 2001 at 04:35 AM |