Forum: The Classroom Topic: Handgun Recommendations started by: askheaves Posted by askheaves on Dec. 31 2000,23:36
I am the paranoid type, and I am considering buying a handgun... for protection, and for target shooting. More than anything else, I have also always wanted to own one. The problem is that all of the guns I want are in the 軸-逤 range.Any recommendations? I want a .40 cal or 9mm, semi-auto, single action, and it must look cool Posted by hal0 on Dec. 31 2000,23:39
Glock 19< http://www.glock.com/te_g19.htm > all the movie stars use them.. you should too! ------------------ Posted by masher on Jan. 01 2001,08:38
Browning Hi Power.< http://www.browning.com/products/catalog/firearms/hipower/hipower.htm > The SAS use it. It must be good. ------------------ Remember, its all your fault. (added the url) This message has been edited by masher on January 02, 2001 at 04:12 AM Posted by Wolfguard on Jan. 01 2001,10:15
You just cant beat a glockThe SAS use Glocks and HK MP-5S for CQB and that british bullpup rifle for everything else.(cant remember the name at this time) ------------------ Posted by WillyPete on Jan. 01 2001,10:51
Question: You say it's for self defense. Are you going to carry it or just leave it at home. If it's a carry, you need to be totally comfortable with it on your person. You have to evaluate your dress style for various reasons too. Do you wear clothes that would indicate you have a gun and upset or intimidate the wrong people? Would your clothes hamper the use of the weapon? The .40SW is a nice calibre. Glock makes a nice compact carry in this calibre. It's the 23C (for compact). My mate had one and it's nice and comfortable to carry. Easy to maintain. However, if you will only use it for home defense, get a pump action 'riot' shotgun or the 'coachgun'. It's a side by side double 12 bore. It's cut down to minimum legal lenght and is about 跌 last I heard. It's based on the old shotguns used by the guy that rode 'shotgun' on the old western stagecoaches. Put some buckshot through a door with that and you're bound to hit someone. If you get a pistol for home use, remember to get some safety slugs so they don't go through the walls and hit someone innocent. Posted by Wolfguard on Jan. 01 2001,12:44
quote: DUH! I forgot about the old stand by for home defense. Yes, the 12gage is the best for home defense. Hell if you light that thing off in a closed space even if you miss the guy he is not going to stand around and wait for another round. The safety slugs for the pistol are great for another reason. they make a major mess of the guy you hit with them. The ones i have seen where the #12 shot in liquid teflon. They cant go through a wall and get your kid but when you drop one in a bad guy that #12 shot spreads out all over the place. Remember kids, shoot them IN the house. If you shoot them outside drag them into the doorway so it looks like they where going in when you shot them. ------------------ Posted by WillyPete on Jan. 01 2001,13:32
The Browning IS nice. Very comfortable and accurate, pleasure to shoot. However, it's a bit bulky for a carry.I didn't notice you'd also mentioned target shooting. For that you'll want a longer barrel, which makes it harder to carry. If you don't qualify for a carry license in your state though, go for a longer barrel. It makes shooting easier. You may want to consider also buying a second hand .22 like the Ruger. (Looks like the old german Lugers with a long, round, heavy barrel) They last for aeons and are really cheap to shoot a lot. If you really intend to get deep into target shooting, you'll also want to check on the future add-on purchases you'll make, such as scopes, replacement barrels, compensators, competition triggers, etc. Posted by askheaves on Jan. 01 2001,13:52
My main defense use would be in home. I did a night of research looking at gun manufacturers' sites and fell in love with some guns. The Browning High-Power was by far my favorite, but damn expensive. I love the glocks too.The reason I wanted to go with the .40 cal is because it's probably the perfect size for home use. They seem to make walls very thin here. I agree with you all on the special loads for indoors. As for carrying, a little birdie told me that it's extremely easy to get a carry permit in AZ, so I'll probably get one just to have it. I was looking at the Sigs for public use since they seem to have some nice compact versions, so does Colt (the 96G?). And I'm not concerned about barrel length so much for target shooting. I'm more concerned with becoming skillful with a practical gun. I've really only shot handguns a few times in my life. I'm more a shotgun guy myself. Posted by WillyPete on Jan. 01 2001,14:05
You wanted 'cool looks'. Try these.I know a few people that need this one: < http://www.securityarms.com/20001212/galleryfiles/754.htm > Dear Santa.... < http://www.securityarms.com/20001212/galleryfiles/288.htm > Excellent Sporting Pistol:Kimber Elite. < http://www.securityarms.com/20001212/galleryfiles/894.htm > For fans of Aliens: < http://www.securityarms.com/20001212/galleryfiles/108.htm > Wolfguard, that British rifle - SA80. < http://www.securityarms.com/20001212/galleryfiles/108.htm > That Ruger I spoke of: < http://www.securityarms.com/20001212/galleryfiles/rugermk2.htm > My personal Fave: < http://www.securityarms.com/20001212/galleryfiles/558.htm > This message has been edited by WillyPete on January 02, 2001 at 09:06 AM Posted by PersonGuy on Jan. 01 2001,14:28
WillyPete? I know you've written more than 3 posts!???? ------------------ Posted by Wolfguard on Jan. 01 2001,14:32
Ill stick to the M136. The little 6 barell gun next to the vulcan cannon. Hmmm...i could mount the vulcan in the back of my pickup truck on a semi-turret mount and mount the 136 on the roof of the pasenger side... Thanks for the numbers on the brit rifle. i just could not pull them out of my tired brain. My fave will always be the M24 sniper system from the us army. i hits what i aims at up to 1500m. The barret light 50 is great also. Something about being to call a head shot at 2 miles... ------------------ Posted by HOUND on Jan. 01 2001,16:50
pistols are okay for self defense in one respect, if you want to seriously hurt or kill the attacker!!! i personally think that stunguns are a much more efficient way of dealing with people, not only does it have the same effect that a gun does (obviously it scares them!!!) but it doesn't kill them it just as the name suggests stun them or knock them out.check out this site for stunguns, batons, pepper spray, knuckle dusters, knives and other stuff Posted by HOUND on Jan. 01 2001,16:52
( when i said kill them i meant with a powerful pistol and/or if it hit them in the right place ).
Posted by pengu1nn on Jan. 01 2001,18:45
quote: ummmm, i don't think so a gun can kill you have to be right next to them to use the stun gun. plus a loud ass booming noise right behind me is gonna make me run a lot faster than some little jackass with a stun gun (tasers are different) Posted by Sithiee on Jan. 02 2001,00:00
take one of those tazers that shoots the pins, and hook it up to a boat battery or the like. now that would scare the fuck out of me (after a gun of course). who are you gonna be more scared of, a geek with a tazer, or a geek with a tazer attached to a battery bigger than your head?
Posted by askheaves on Jan. 02 2001,00:56
I think I'd be most scared of some geek firing 3 shots into the air and yelling "Get the fuck out of this apartment if you don't want to die!" or maybe explaining the effects of the particular load you happen to have today. "These hollow point bullets are great because I don't have to be aware of my backdrop, but it'll rip a hole in you the size of my fist!"
Posted by Wolfguard on Jan. 02 2001,12:16
stun guns...what a jokeOk im 20 feet away with a gun in my pocket and you are waving a stun gun. Who will win this fight? Ooooo you have a taser...BFD i wear a leather jacket. guess what? Its not going to go through. If your going to fire a warning shot, fire it at your target. I figure the locked door and the fact that the fucknugget had to come through the window is enough warning. ------------------ Posted by Wolfguard on Jan. 02 2001,12:22
now, after my last post this is fun things to do with a stun gun.Place 2 in the driver's seat of your car. One in the seat and one in the seat back. Rewire your car alarm so that when the alarm goes off it does not make any noise but switches a relay that turns on the stun guns in 10 seconds. Add a motion sensor that turns on the stun guns every time it senses motion in the driver seat. When you come out to your car the next morning and find the fucknugget in the car afrade to move, hit the pannic button (triggers alarm) wait for him to get shocked again, drag his ass out of the car and kick the shit out of him. ------------------ Posted by askheaves on Jan. 02 2001,13:13
I like the stungun car alarm When I refer to my warning shots, I think of the layout of my feable apartment where I can put a few shots in the air from another room when I realize that I'm being robbed. Then, I just train the gun on the door to my bedroom and wait. Maybe throw a flashlight into the hall to give some good illumination to that area. If I'm looking at the guy, the only thing he's hearing is BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG CLICK THUD. Posted by Wen on Jan. 02 2001,13:40
=OThis message has been edited by Wen on January 03, 2001 at 08:41 AM Posted by L33T_h4x0r_d00d on Jan. 02 2001,15:00
The old 1911 is a great hand gun. A .45 will stop just about anyone or anything. If thats not enough get a Mossberg 3 gauge. its the same as 3, 12 gauge shells. So if you blast someone with one prepare to mop them up.
Posted by kuru on Jan. 02 2001,15:56
i own a ruger p95dc. at 25 - 30 yards i'm accurate enough to hit a half dollar, and it cost me half of what a comparable glock would. 跌 instead of 軸. it's heavier than a glock, not as much plastic, but i like it. it fits my hands well, which being female, i have smaller hands than most men.my reccomendation though, is to go to a reputable gunshop and spend quite a bit of time there. ask to see a few guns of different types, caliber, and from different manufacturers. figure out which one you're most comfortable holding. another good one is to go to shooting ranges that rent guns, or go with friends that have different types of guns and try them out. you'll be best served by the gun that meets your needs, you're comfortable with, and doesn't break the bank. and the other guys are right, for inside the house, there's still nothing like a 12 gauge. i prefer a pump action loaded with birdshot. if the sound of the action being worked doesn't scare off an intruder, you'll definately turn him into swiss cheese if you shoot him. saftey bullets are a great idea too, since they won't go through a wall and kill a neighbour, but they will liquify the internals of mr. burglar. ------------------ Posted by Wolfguard on Jan. 02 2001,16:09
quote: Nothing quite grabs the ear like the sound of a pump action shotgun. I figured you for a SW semi. They make a nice single stack semi (model 80?). Ruger has alway made a good gun. ------------------ Posted by kuru on Jan. 02 2001,16:40
my rifle is a remington 280 with a 3 x 9 leopould scope on it. i used it to hunt deer for nine years before my university finally scheduled exam week during deer season (those bastards).i love that gun, and i can reliably shoot a 1/2" group at 100 yards with it. i'm a little less accurate free standing, but hell, that's what trees are for. i don't know what i can hit laying down. i love my guns and if those damned liberals ever succeed in destroying the second amendment, i will end up in prison or dead glad to see others on this forum that are willing to talk firearms though. always knew you were a righteous dude, wolf. ------------------ Posted by whiskey@throttle on Jan. 02 2001,18:20
For both stopping power, re-sell value, reliability, accuracy, and pure American craftsmanship....there is only one choice.It is the handgun that has killed more people than any other. It is the only weapon, in the history of the US military, to have not logged a critical failure during combat. It served in WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, and every clandestine operation in between. It is the greatest handgun ever created. Behold...
The Colt 1911 .45. Look hard, and you can get one for about 逤...obviously semi-auto, single action. It's a piece of Americana, and now that Colt's gone, now is the time to buy. If you can't find the real McCoy, their are decent copycats (i,e - ParaOrdinance, Brolin, etc.) Whatever you do, don't get a 9mm...especially if you want it for defense. You'll need at LEAST a .40, in which case I recommend the Smith and Wesson SW99. Truly an unfadeable gun. And if you're still stuck on Glock, get an S&W Sigma. It's the EXACT same gun, only cheaper. In fact, Glock and S&W got in a tremendous legal war over the guns, since they are exactly alike. Posted by L33T_h4x0r_d00d on Jan. 02 2001,18:33
That gun will blow a hole the size of a basketball in mr. burgler. I turned a pumpkin(ripe, not old and mushy.) into a pile of goo.
Posted by kuru on Jan. 03 2001,09:24
do you guys honestly know the difference between single action and double action?'cause it seems to me that some of the handguns i've seen called 'single action' here are actually single/double. fire-able both with or without first cocking the hammer. hell, mine works that way, of course, i don't want to confuse anyone. and btw, whiskey, a 9mm is perfectly good for self-defense if loaded with appropriate ammo for the job. using a .22 for defense would be ass-stupid, but then again most people who over estimate their need for firepower only drool over a name and number. much like guys at bars. personally, i could kill a man much more easily with a 9mm than .40 cal. why? because the 9mm fits my hands better and i can actually /aim/ the son of a bitch. trust me, you plug someone in the heart, lungs, head, liver with a 9mm loaded with starburst teflon hollowpoints, he's not getting up. then again, i'm guessing some of the testosterone filled inhabitants of this forum would suggest absolutely nothing less than a .50 desert eagle, or maybe a thompson center with a 30-30 barrel and a scope. btw, where are you gong to conceal that cannon? This message has been edited by kuru on January 04, 2001 at 04:28 AM Posted by WillyPete on Jan. 03 2001,10:05
Personguy, I had to redo my account cause I changed my email and it automaticcally sends a new password. I never got it.Kuru, I agree with your choice, although the .40 slots between the 9mm and the .45 in terms of velocity and weight, if it doesn't fit in with your lifestyle, you'll tend to store it away rather than have it close enough when you need it. My mum had a .380 ACP Taurus (a beretta action - essentially a .9mm short) We had an armed intruder in the house in So. Africa, he held a knife and a gun to her. She didn't have hers as it's too big for her. A bad choice on behalf of the person that reommended it to my folks. She wasn't harmed, but it points out that any weapon is useless if 1: you don't have it near 2: you aren't prepared to kill if you have one. You HAVE to be prepared to make the choice take a human life if you wish to defend yourself with one. The right ammo is important. I had to put down a dog once. Size of a large Boxer. Used Federal Hydra-shoks. 1 to the head behind the ear and it was instantly dead. Absolutley no fucking around. No pain. ------------------ Posted by Neophyre on Jan. 03 2001,10:37
God it scares me how much even kuru knows about guns.over here in australia guns are fuckin outlawed. Posted by Wolfguard on Jan. 03 2001,12:31
"desert eagle"Most worthles, unreliable piece of shit ever to toss bullets down range. If you give this gun any give straight back (like you want to hit the target again and not the guy behind you) it will not cycle right. The gun sucks! Now if you want a .50 cal pistol Bowen has a fine revolver. If you can hold the damm thing, its a bit big. Remember, guns dont kill people, death is casued by the transference of kenitic energy and hydrostatic shock. ------------------ This message has been edited by Wolfguard on January 04, 2001 at 08:59 AM Posted by hyperponic on Jan. 03 2001,18:26
quote: great stuff, great stuff . believe that's a track off relentless...4 or 5 maybe... Posted by whiskey@throttle on Jan. 03 2001,19:57
I agree, the Desert Eagle does suck major ass - it stovepipes all the time and it has absolutely NO combat value. I mean, what better way to give up your position than with a deafening report from a jamming gun that gives off a muzzle flash the size of your arm? Anyhow, Kuru - yes, I know the difference between single and double...I refer to the "single action 1st, double action thereafter" merely as "single" because its doubtful anyone in this thread is going to bring up nostalgic black power guns... Anyhow, here's my problem with choosing a 9mm over a .45: The benefit to 9mm is in it's piercing factor (cars, doors, light armor, etc.) and it's allowance of a round capacity. Of course, the latter of these two is nullified, at least here in CA, by the crappy law prohibiting anything over a 10 round mag... Basically, the .45 is a slower, heavier bullet with a larger diameter – a mass and force ratio optimized for killing. The .45 is going to give you more resistance over it’s larger surface area, and thus it is more likely to actually stop in it’s target, and subsequently cause hydrostatic shock. All power that goes through a target via a passing projectile is wasted. Hence, the problem with 9mm,: it travels very fast, has less surface area, and weighs far less. As such, it is very likely to completely pass through your attacker. This can be bad in a combat scenario. In details, we are pitting the average 230 grain hollow point .45 with about a 130 grain 9mm. The .45 is moving at about 780-810 fps. Unless you have the CorBons…then you’re at over 1000 fps. You could drop a moose, man. So, overall it’s the .45s superior wound ballistics and ability to create a larger wound cavity that have me convinced it is a better defensive round. Every study ever conducted (from the LFI to the FBI) will agree, in the sense that the .45 has more "stopping power". Oh, and though the recoil is significantly stronger, you can find compact .45s that are actually smaller than your standard 9mm.
Posted by j0eSmith on Jan. 03 2001,23:16
I live in Canada, so its pointless for me to even dream about actully owning a legal handgun. But thats not going to stop me from posting here Theres nothing wrong with using a .22 for self defence, provided you take the time to learn how to aim. You can find quite a few with a laser sight off the front as well. That makes it light weight and fairly intimidating with the laser sight. You have to remember, that even though they make these guns look like they weight 3 ounces in Hollywood, most of them pack a good weight. So its really all personal which type of gun you get. Just make sure it works well for you. ------------------ Posted by askheaves on Jan. 03 2001,23:33
No, there is a problem with using a .22 for self defense. It's a skinny ass bullet, it moves awfully slowly, and you would have to hit somebody in the eye while they are stone sober for them to stop coming after you.Choice: Line up a .22 and fire a pound of lead into them, or fire a .45 round and hit them anywhere on the body... or not even hit them. Hearing a .45 round whiz by you will make you wet your pants and give up presently. A .22 round hurts and makes you react to it in pain. A .45 round spins you in circles and works in ways much quicker than the human reflex system. That second is an incredibly valuable second. I would prefer a large caliber weapon with a lot of leeway against Mr. PCP Robber Boy. The only issue is finding a good balance between stopping power, comfort, and skill. That's why I prefer being around the .40 cal/ 9mm range, although I tend to sway toward the Colt 1911 design occasionally. Posted by fatbitch on Jan. 04 2001,00:34
I, like neo, am in australia, and i like it. some people do have guns yes, but i like being able to walk down the street and know that the chances of anyone i see actually possessing a gun are very very remote.------------------ Metal/Electronic/Ambient etc.. Posted by Sithiee on Jan. 04 2001,01:18
hmm....lasers....you could have some sort of laser network in your house, so that it could track movement and point lots of lasers at te movement, and then its be like 50 laser sights instead of just one....yes...what kind of gun did agent smith use in the matrix? im sure your all gonna say it was pure shit or somethin, but it looked cool.... Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Jan. 04 2001,01:45
quote:
Also with homebreak-ins, why the hell do you think theys gonna be carrying a gun, cos they think you are thats why! you dont think they'll hear you sneak up on them? they'll be expecting it. are you willing to have several lumps of metal violently inserted in your torso at high velocity (don't matter which fuckin' caliber they have! you think you can dodge bullets?) just for the loss of your vcr and the odd bit of expensive stuff? thats what insurance for. here endeth the lesson now go out and shoot each other please so i can sleep more soundly in my bed Posted by j0eSmith on Jan. 04 2001,01:59
quote: ..when I'm done, I won't have to. ------------------ This message has been edited by j0eSmith on January 04, 2001 at 09:01 PM Posted by kuru on Jan. 04 2001,03:08
ok for one thing you still missed my point on the single double action thing. you make it sound as if you MUST cock the hammer to fire the first round, which with my handgun of choice and many others, it's optional.sure, the difference is an approximately 22 lb trigger pull versus a 3 lb trigger pull with the hammer already cocked, but most semi-autos i've fired will do either single or double on the first shot. also, it's moot if you've just pulled the slide, because the slide cocks the hammer anyway, so after chambering a round on a slide action there is no need to cock the hammer. though there is the fact that i tend to keep a round chambered, which means i've gotta de-cock after loading so that i don't go and accidentally shoot myself or someone else. i specifically like the semi autos because with my small hands, i can't always get the thumb reach to quickly cock the hammer, but hell, i have the strength to pull the trigger and fire that first round. also, if you want to kill a man, the ammunition and the location of the shot are generally more important than the caliber of the gun. .45 with target rounds to the calf is not going to have nearly the effect of .38 hollowpoint to the head. which is why PRACTICE PRACTICE PRACTICE, TRAIN TRAIN TRAIN. you are definitely right about one thing though. if you're not prepared to kill, there's no sense having a gun for defense. i have shot everything from .22 to .50 to 410 pistol (yes, they exist... little pieces of shit that they are) to the thompson with the 30-30 barrel on it. personally, for me, i stand my best chance of a kill-shot with a 9mm. and there's also another little law of physics that you're going to need to remember to add to your statement about seeing .45's that are smaller than 9mms. the smaller the gun, the less momentum it has. that means more of the recoil energy gets absorbed by your body. simply put, a super-light, high power gun is going to kick like a sonofabitch. case in point would be my 7lb mountain rifle (it's a 280) versus an .06 that weighs 11 lbs. i shoot 156 to 160 grain when i'm out for deer, and it gives that gun a sweet little kick that caused my dad to bruise his collarbone and slice his eye open on my scope. and honestly, neo, it's not scary how much i know about guns. it's reassuring. to me anyway. i grew up around them. my whole life, there has been a gun collection in my house. if i didn't know what i did, if i hadn't been taught proper respect, who knows. i might've played with those guns and been a dead kuru. second amendment.. the right to protect the other 9. ------------------ Posted by askheaves on Jan. 04 2001,04:16
I understand the difference between a single and double action. I specifically want a single action because I don't want to be able to pull the trigger to fire a round off without pulling the hammer or hitting the slide. I probalby wouldn't keep the thing chambered most times. I don't intend to carry. And, as most are aware, all double action are by definition single action as well. I would like a gun that is single, or has the option of changing out the D/S action.Practice is one thing, but you don't get a lot of practice in high tension situations. As much target practice as you have, odds are you can't put 5 in a dime in that situation. I want to hit somebody anywhere with a high caliber round, not pluck away with a .22. I said before, a .22 works by inflicting pain, which takes a short while for the brain to realize. A .45 works by throwing the body out of alignment and messing with reflexes and muscles. That's much more instantaneous. Plus, it buys you enough time to let off another shot. I like leeway in that situation. As for saving my VCR? If somebody breaks into my apartment, and it's not going to be very big, and they have a gun? They probably planned on killing me as it is. I want a small chance in hell of fighting back if possible. I don't live in a friendly city. If I lived in Ingerland, or Canadia, or the Outback, it'd be a different story. I live in the good ol' US of A, so I get to live with that slight increase in risk. Yay freedom! I wouldn't trade my guns for anything Posted by kuru on Jan. 04 2001,04:28
the point of practice is to make it an action that's not a thought-decision, but to turn it into reflex. and if you don't want to carry, and want a gun for protection inside the house, get a 12 gauge. i wasn't referring to you, either, with the comment about single vs double action. i was talking about the comment that souned a lot like 'you always have to cock the hammer first on a semi-auto' i think i'm starting to get tired, cause i totally just forgot what i was going to say. ------------------ Posted by Observer on Jan. 04 2001,05:18
Neophyre's post reminded me of a Bill Hicks routine where he was talking about the difference in handgun casualties between the US and the UK during the Gulf War. He also mentioned that while the UK has outlawed handguns, they still had a very high crime rate, so he said their crime must go something like this:"Gimme your wallet." "Alright." At least nobody was hurt. He also goes into this bit about deaths from soccer riots and people using a soccer ball as a deadly weapon. I don't know the exact track name or even which CD it's from. I'll check later and post it here. ------------------ Posted by WillyPete on Jan. 04 2001,13:01
Think of it like Martial Arts on steroids. If you wish to use Karate or Judo or whatever you prefer, for self-defense, you have to constantly train and prepare. You have to go to sleep at night visualising. "Right, I'm in a bar, the guy is drunk and wants to fight. He put's his left hand on my right shoulder. What do I do, what are his intentions. Can I resolve the situation, if not, how do I strike so that my first strike disables him, frees me and prepares me for any friends he might have?"Stuff like that, then you plan your best action, train for it and imagine what you'd need to do. It's exactly the same. You have to decide BEFORE you carry a gun, that if used you WILL kill someone as that's what it's ultimately designed to do and you're only meant to use a weapon when you feel your life is endangered. What is the law with regard to my using this firearm? ------------------ Posted by Jongo on Jan. 04 2001,15:50
I'm not going to post any judgemental quotes about how Americans are crazy about guns or anything like that, tempting as it may seem. I am, however, jealous of you guys for having such a large selection of firearms at your disposal (I love anything that's good workmanship)Oh, yeah, question. What does SOCOM stand for? Is it some sort of military program to develop a new handgun (I just sawy on securityarms.com a Colt SOCOM, and H&K are the ones making it, no?) Posted by askheaves on Jan. 04 2001,16:08
I'm not sure about SOCOM. It made an appearance in Metal Gear Sold as the pistol of choice. I think it was something like Special Operations Command, or somthing.Yes, Americans are gun crazy. It's actually possible to find a place here where your bullets won't necessarily hit a person if fired. Posted by whiskey@throttle on Jan. 04 2001,19:17
< US Special Ops Command >. The warning on this page makes for interesting reading. Sithiee - the gun used by the agents is a Desert Eagle .50, the one we had mentioned in earlier posts. There's also a .357, a .44 magnum, a .410 action express, and also a 10" barrel .50. It was originally made by IMI (Israel), but then production went to Magnum Research (US). It's a step up from the crappy Uzi, but it's not much of a combat gun. But it's hard a frickin' nails, and they even make a gold plated titanium one:
If Smith wielded this mofo...I'd side with Cypher. Posted by kuru on Jan. 04 2001,20:29
the laws where i live are actually very reasonable concerning use of deadly force. if someone places you in fear for your own life, or the life of anyone else in your home, it's justifiable to shoot them.what constitutes fear for your life? well, if someone breaks into my house in the middle of the night, i'm going to assume they aren't here to bake cookies. we don't have any 'last locked room' laws, which basically means that it's not necessary to show any proof that you tried to escape the situation before shooting the criminal. a friend of mine who now lives in college station texas tells me that down there, 'lethal defense of property' is legal. not sure how accurate this is. anyone else know? ------------------ Posted by SLATE on Jan. 05 2001,01:52
quote: I would say it safe to assume that it's accurate.. It is Texas, after all.... Posted by ASCIIMan on Jan. 05 2001,03:56
I would have to say, use of deadly force for property protection is DEFINITELY legal here in Texas. The biggest restriction is that you can't shoot someone who's fleeing (in other words, don't shoot them in the back if they don't have your stuff).IIRC, there was a big case a few years back because some idiots were vandalizing a guy's home and continued to do so several nights in a row at the same time. So the guy camped out on his roof and killed one and severly wounded the other. The debate was whether he was guilty killing/wounding, dependant on whether they were running away or not (the guy and the vandals were the only witnesses). Posted by WillyPete on Jan. 06 2001,12:16
Also remember a case where a guy shot the repo man on his property when the repo guy was trying to nick the car. The shooter got away scot free. Evidently Texas law allows you to shoot to defend your property too. That includes your front lawn.As for fear for your life? If there was someone who I knew would probably come back to harm me or those close to me, I'd try to taunt them into saying that they'd kill me. Especially if they have a few mates. In court this should stand as a threat to kill. ------------------ Posted by incubus on Jan. 06 2001,22:56
quote: Ah but it may be a frustrated detnetter trying to boink you ... ------------------ Posted by kuru on Jan. 06 2001,23:00
all the more reason to shoot first.j/k. first i check if it's askheaves. seriously tho, anybody showing up in the middle of the night for sex is either invited, or a threat. *shrug* ------------------ Posted by Wolfguard on Jan. 07 2001,10:13
quote: And no matter how pretty it is, its still a hunk of shit. Do not expect to get a second shot on the target in less than 2 seconds with this thing unless you get about 躔 worth of custom work done to it. ------------------ Posted by DuSTman on Jan. 07 2001,18:00
quote: Be careful. If you're new around here it is pretty much assumed you are a lam0r. It is probably unwise to make comments like this until people know you well enough to take it in good humour. Posted by pengu1nn on Jan. 07 2001,18:46
quote: i don't own a gun. and besides, it's our right to keep and bear arms, we have guns because most of our "criminals" do. i don't know about you but when (if) someone points a gun at me i would like to return the favor This message has been edited by pengu1nn on January 08, 2001 at 01:51 PM Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Jan. 07 2001,19:12
The point you dont seem to realise is that they have a gun cos they know you have one, thats why so many people in the uk are opposed to having a law passed that allows people to legally attack an intruder in their house, cos all it will do is encourage criminals to carry something themselves. I dont really have a major problem with americans owning guns, (you seem to have grown up with it in your culture mabye thats why you so mad about them) its just you think that having a gun makes you safer when it just increases the risk of the burglar to hurt you if he realises you're armed. I'd personally if a burglar broke in and came into my bedroom just say "take what you want man i aint gonna stop ya" or just baracade myself in until he/she went away. After all them having a gun aint gonna make much difference with a bed+wardrobe+chair up against the bedroom door with me taking cover out of the line of fire. Much safer and noone gets killed. and you can save yourself a lot of money just instaed of buying a gun get a sfx cd put it in your hifi turn it up loud and let off a few simulated gunshots (better than nuthin, or mabye just turn on some real loud music that'll probably scare them off before they get anywhere near you, you underestimate how criminals dont want to get caught, 99/100 times it'll be jus some stupid punk kid who dont know better rather than a pyscho whos planning on taking you down with him. Woo i wonder how many people could have been bothered to read all that? Posted by kuru on Jan. 08 2001,01:37
wolfguard: nice post criminals in the united states have always had guns, and will always have them. however, there is actual research which has proven that in areas (like texas) where concealed carry is made legal after a long period of it being illegal, violent crime DROPS. why? because no burglar is going to risk his life for twenty bucks. if they think you might be armed, they go on to someone they know is an easy target. hard to explain to someone who lives in a country where not even cops have guns, but it's the truth. criminals want victims, not survivors. ------------------ Posted by Observer on Jan. 08 2001,01:42
This may have been posted before, but I know not everyone would actually go back to read it. I know that in many parts of the country where they have legalized "concealed carry" permits, certain types of crime have seen a decrease. Think about this for a moment: You are a person who is considering robbing some sort of store. You have a gun to be more persuasive. Now, wouldn't you think twice about it knowing that every person in the bank could possibly be packing?------------------ Posted by j0eSmith on Jan. 08 2001,01:49
Execpt that a concealed carry permit is nigh-impossible to get as a Civillian.Why has no one mentioned the .357 Magnum? Common, its not just any gun that can put a bullet clean through a quarter-inch steel plate. -edit: spelling This message has been edited by j0eSmith on January 08, 2001 at 08:50 PM Posted by askheaves on Jan. 08 2001,03:32
It's not that tough to get a carry permit. My mother's cousin's husband (I know that sounds bad) has a carry permit in Iowa, and he builds his own silencers. One of my senior design partners had a carry permit in Florida, and had a loaded shotgun strapped to the ceiling in his car. Kuru has a carry permit, and I'd be scared as fuck to rob her. Finally, I have been informed that Arizona is an even easier place to get a carry permit. I'll get it just so I have options.
Posted by [_^snot^_] on Jan. 08 2001,05:56
I don't mean to set any stereotypes but...are all americans gun toting nutcases? maybe it's just detnet, i'm not sure. ------------------ Posted by WillyPete on Jan. 08 2001,09:01
Hmmmm, loads to comment on. First, the UK guy. Guns held by law abiding citizens don't cause criminals to buy guns. The risk involved in the crime causes them to buy them. eg: a guy robbing a bank will tend to buy one.As for the .357 magnum, why? The other calibre's mentioned are better for self defense. The weapons required for the .357 have to be much heavier to lower recoil. This makes it harder to carry or conceal such a weapon. Sure it's bigger and stuff, but so is an anti tank weapon. It'll kill him just as well, but it's also unsuitable to carry easily. ------------------ Posted by Wolfguard on Jan. 08 2001,10:00
quote: No, we don's all have guns but we can if we want. ------------------ Posted by Wolfguard on Jan. 08 2001,10:06
quote: Just spend the money and get a 9mm and tungston core rounds. They will go through 1.5 inches of steel. Or just go all the way with the AP rounds and use DPU. Not only will you blast a hole in the plate you will set fire to what is behind it. Its not the gun that can shoot through steel, its the round fired from it. A 357 will not shoot through a steel plate with hollow points. ------------------ Posted by masher on Jan. 08 2001,10:22
quote: If he is in england, and wants a pistol, it would be faster to smuggle one in from somewhere. I think that the UK's gun laws are similar to Australia's in regard to pistols, and its pretty hard to get pistols over here. ------------------ Posted by Observer on Jan. 08 2001,16:50
I guess everyone knew this argument was coming, but gun laws usually only apply to law-abiding citizens. It basically boils down to, "If guns are outlawed, then only outlaws will have guns."------------------ Posted by kuru on Jan. 08 2001,23:50
it's relatively easy to get a carry permit in pennsylvania. it's a 'shall issue' state, which means that in order to DENY someone the right to a ccw (concealed carry warrant), they have to GIVE YOU a reason. also, pennsylvania issues non-resident ccw. which means any united states citizen can apply here. the only restrictions are that you have to be 21 years old, never convicted of a crime for which the punishment was incarceration of more than a year, never committed against your will to a mental hospital, have 2 references, provide a photo, photo identification and a social security card, and pay ร. the permit is good for five years, after which if there's no reason for it to be revoked, it's renewed for ร. for anyone who is interested in the concealed carry laws where they live (sorry, this only applies to the americans) call your county sheriff's office, or try < http://www.packing.org > ------------------ Posted by askheaves on Mar. 11 2001,14:33
Sorry, ya'll for bring back a very old thread, but I wanted to update ya.I bought my new handgun this weekend. I bought a 9mm Beretta 92FS. All black, 15 round capacity clips, and fucking pretty. It has one smooth action, perfect grip, nice recoil, and a lovely decocker. We ran through about 200 shots with it this weekend up in the mountains. My buddy emptied 15+1 shots in about 1.5 seconds with reasonable accuracy. Plus, Kuru is one hell of a shot. Posted by Wolfguard on Mar. 11 2001,14:41
so you were playing with the gun between shots 92fs is a good gun. good mod for it is to get it ported. They cut a slot a the end of the barrel to let some of the gas excape up off the nose of the gun. this totaly kills the muzzle climb from multi shots. ------------------ Posted by Wolfguard on Mar. 12 2001,10:02
went and pulled the papers on mine last night. The operation is called Magna Porting. That is what the paper from the smith says.------------------ |