Ikonboard » Printable Version of Topic

Forum: The Classroom
Topic: 2000 posts
started by: CatKnight

Posted by CatKnight on Jul. 22 2001,11:06

who do you think will be the first to get 2000 posts? me, personguy, or sithiee?

edit: changed 200 to 2000

This message has been edited by CatKnight on July 23, 2001 at 06:17 AM

Posted by CatKnight on Jul. 22 2001,11:07

i think it will be me

Posted by CatKnight on Jul. 22 2001,11:07

yes i agree with catknight i think it will be catknight

Posted by miNus on Jul. 22 2001,12:05

CK, what are you planning on doing with your nuclear physics degree? Handling radioactive waste? Let's hope not.

Posted by Nikita on Jul. 22 2001,12:26

"D'oh!"

Posted by CatKnight on Jul. 22 2001,12:32

nah i'll either be running the reactor or designing new ones

Posted by TheTaxMan on Jul. 22 2001,12:42

Btw, if it ever comes to vote (it would probably only be a state vote anyway, and does anyone live in Nevada?), vote -down- the radioactive waste site planned for Yucca Mountain Nevada. They want to build it on top of an active volcanic field because the probability is 'low.' It's something like a 1/10,000 chance of happening in the next 10,000 years. Personally, I think builing 10,000 year storage sites is about the dumbest thing in the world, seeing as how in 50 years, we'll probably have a better way to store or get rid of nuclear waste. Oh yes, if I recall correctly, they want to build this thing somewhere in the vicinity of the Las Vegas water table, so if the earth ever shifted a bit, the structure would crack and leak everywhere. Sounds exciting to me...

------------------
Delusions of Grandeur? I am Grand!

Posted by Rhydant on Jul. 22 2001,12:46

earth shifting? in Nevada? they dont have earthquakes out there, man. hell, nevada isnt even CLOSE to a fault line. its on its own big plate with the rest of america/parts of canada. and thats why they bury them there.

besides, whats out there besides las vegas and reno? NOTHING!

------------------
I may be paranoid, but not an Android.

Posted by CatKnight on Jul. 22 2001,13:04

heh taxman let me fill you in on yucca mountain. although i agree it probably won't be used as it is intended for (atleast not fully) the reason is not because of the danger to the ecology, but because we will probably find a use for all the materials which will be stored. or atleast a way of decreasing the radioactivity so it doesn't stay hot as long (e.g. using breeder reactors). however if yucca mountain does become the main site for storing waste, there is no reason to panic. the site is in a type of rock where there is zero moisture (granite i think). it is in the desert no where near the water table or any fault lines. i don't remember whether it is over a volcanic site or not but it is obviously not active. if it was active then it would be smoking half of the time like that one in hawaii. the containers the waste are stored in are so secure that nothing short of an apocalypse could cause them to leak into any water sourse. they are sealed in unbreakable steel/concrete containers surrounded by a reinforced concrete housing within a concrete bunker, surrounded by natural granite.

Posted by Rhydant on Jul. 22 2001,13:42

CatKnight knows too much for his own good. shoot him now.

we should just put a bunch on a rocket and send it towards the sun. it wont bug us out there, now will it?

unless the rocket explodes while trying to leave the earth's atmosphere... then were all screwed. but hey, at least ill have the opportunitie to grow another arm. taht cant be so bad....

------------------
I may be paranoid, but not an Android.

This message has been edited by Rhydant on July 23, 2001 at 08:42 AM

Posted by CatKnight on Jul. 22 2001,13:48

yes now that would be a doozy, wouldn't it

Posted by TheTaxMan on Jul. 22 2001,13:59

You are wrong CK. They want to build it on a volcanic field. Draw your own conclusions if this is good or bad. However, I have actually done survey work and someone I know has written many papers on the subject. The volcanic field has a high probablity to erupt in the next 10,000 years (which is how long the site would continue to be in use, theoretically). And by the way, don't get your information from the DoE. They manipulate the data because they want to build the site.

In addition, they (the DoE), just recently discovered several new volcanoes in the area from an aeromag (Magnetics From a PLane) survey. The refuse to release information on the topic because basically it's just another reason not to build the facility. Also, aeromag surveys don't have resolution for shit, so if they are just now finding these new volcanoes, how many did they miss? Ten? This just increasses the probability of an eruption happening and further gives reason not to build it.

------------------
Delusions of Grandeur? I am Grand!

This message has been edited by TheTaxMan on July 23, 2001 at 09:06 AM

Posted by CatKnight on Jul. 22 2001,14:04

quote:
And by the way, don't get your information from the DoE. They manipulate the data because they want to build the site.

lol i suppose i should take your word over the DoE's then?

Posted by TheTaxMan on Jul. 22 2001,14:08

Actually, I don't know the results you'll get for this will turn out, but try looking up Southwest Research Institute, Geophysics, Yucca Mountain, in google and see what you come up with. Read something by the people that, you know, actually did the research, and not the government organization who just sits in an office.

edit: < http://www.agu.org/sci_soc/eisconner.html > This is written for people who don't have a degree in geophysics (or know something about it) so drink up.

More: < http://www.swri.org/3pubs/ttoday/summer/volhaz.htm >

This one is really long, but bsaically sums up the hazard analysis at the end. < http://www.nrc.gov/NMSS/DWM/ia-rev2.htm >

This message has been edited by TheTaxMan on July 23, 2001 at 09:52 AM

Posted by Spydir on Jul. 22 2001,15:23

I'm to lazy to read this whole thing so I'll get my usual catknight stuff in...

Republicans were the ones pushing for computers in the 70's and then bitching about y2k (shows their "logic", huh?) and ck saying he'll get to 2000 first. When he hits 1990 posts he's last post will be requesting an update to UBB to allow larger post counting, and he'll create a whole new nick and completely ignore "CatKnight" even though it's still good.

There I'm finished.

------------------
Net Syndrome - < http://www.netsyndrome.net/ >
Spydir Web - < http://www.netsyndrome.net/spydirweb/ >

Posted by CatKnight on Jul. 22 2001,15:42

well first of all it was wrong of you to say that the DoE just sit on their asses all day. you aren't helping your argument by showing off your stupidity. secondly:

quote:
Because these wastes remain radioactive and toxic for 10^4–10^5 years, federal regulations require that the consequences of volcanic eruptions be considered if the probability of eruptions is greater than 10^-8 yr^1 (or one chance in 100,000,000 during one year).

i'm not sure why this says that the geological area must be safe for more then 3 orders of magnitude longer then the waste will be toxic. i guess this is do to a vastly excessive and unnecessary precaution. point being, the most toxic waste will only remain highly toxic for around 1000 years and this geology page is saying that there might be an eruption 20 km away within 100 million years.

Posted by CatKnight on Jul. 22 2001,15:46

<---

just for you spydir, and cr0bar too perhaps.

Posted by TheTaxMan on Jul. 22 2001,16:07

Uh oh. That was a long time ago. Maybe his UBB code will start going hey-wire!

------------------
Delusions of Grandeur? I am Grand!

Posted by TheTaxMan on Jul. 22 2001,16:10

Well, what was the probability of risk reduced to when they sent the space shuttle up? It was below that government standard. Yet, one still exploded and killed eight people. The reason i has to be so low, is because if the facility breached and caused toxic waste to leak, the area could be uninhabitable for quite some time. Also, the facility would be there for 10k years. That's how it is designed to be built.

Also, do you have any idea how a volcanic eruption works? 20km is not that far. Lava tends to flow quite some ways, and the the crust of the earth shifts (like an *gasp* earthquake) during the time the volcano is erupting.

This message has been edited by TheTaxMan on July 23, 2001 at 11:12 AM

Posted by CatKnight on Jul. 22 2001,16:24

the risk of dying during space travel is quite high actually. it's just that not very many people do it. i've read about several sattellites who's booster rocket failed and the sattelite crashed and burned just recently...luckily no peeps on board of course. anyway we are talking about orders of magnitudes of a difference in terms of risk factor.

Posted by demonk on Jul. 22 2001,16:25

quote:
Originally posted by CatKnight:
lol i suppose i should take your word over the DoE's then?

I will always take the word of a field survaior(sp?) or technition to the word of upper management any day of the week. If you can't see why, then all I feel is pitty for you and fear for the rest of us.

------------------
Oregonians -
Says they are Independants, registers Democrat, and votes Republican.

This message has been edited by demonk on July 23, 2001 at 11:27 AM

Posted by CatKnight on Jul. 22 2001,16:41

wtf i think you have a huge misconception about what the DoE actually is. they aren't a bunch of beaureucrats sitting around they are mainly military and scientists who work at labs like Los Alamos and Brookhaven. they are the ones who actually design bombs and reactors and such, and they know what they are talking about. they have a lot more expertise then a bunch of liberal hippie democrats from california who think they know what's best for everyone.

Posted by demonk on Jul. 22 2001,18:12

Were in there did I talk about democrats from Calf.? I'm saying that I will always trust the people who gather and analyse mass quantities of data than the upper management people who make the decisions about what information gets presented to the public. And yes, the DoE is full of beuracrats just like every other government agency, so yes, they have to show results to their higher ups. If there isn't any progress or there is a project that failes, it's viewed as a failure of management, not a proof that a concept wasn't possible to begin with. So yes, I will trust the people on the bottom before I trust the people in the middle or on the top. Also, those on the bottom usually have more access to the raw data, unlike the middle and upper management, who usually have the data filtered or watered down. Just because you have a military background or a background in science doesn't mean you can't be a beuracrat. One day CK, I can see you as a middle management beuracrat. That's just the way things are.

------------------
Oregonians -
Says they are Independants, registers Democrat, and votes Republican.

Posted by CatKnight on Jul. 22 2001,19:54

ok i will never be a managment type person or a bureaucrat. furthermore it is a moot point to say you don't like the DoE because they have bureaucrats because all agencies have bureaucrats, and the DoE is comprised of more military and science personel then anything else. i could say i don't believe your geological report because it was created for those bureaucrats in congress to stop them from completeing yucca mountain.

Posted by demonk on Jul. 22 2001,20:05

Or it could be the truth. Never discount data just because it is unpopular, to you or the public. If they have found previously unknown volcanic activity, it needs to be investigated. This project is dealing with timelines of thousands of years, so taking the time and checking every possible problem with the site may take a few more years, but it could make the difference between selecting a "safe and stable" site and selecting the popular but geometrically active site. Wouldn't you rather error on the side of caution than on political lines?

Oh, and no matter how high the percentage of non-bureaucrats, the DoE, or any other agency, will always be controled by the bureaucrats. So I don't care if 99\% of the people at the DoE are scientists or military people. They are the people at the bottom of the information ladder, they are the ones that I will listen to. But that 1\% at the top, the bureaucrats, are the ones who are talking to the public and congress and influencing descisions. They I will inherently distrust, unless they are warning about something, and then I will error on the side of caution. My position is not that every person in a government agency is an evil, self centered power monger. Only a few are. And you CK are not one of those. I will listen to research YOU have conducted, since you are more likely to give the full picture.

------------------
Oregonians -
Says they are Independants, registers Democrat, and votes Republican.

Posted by shifter on Jul. 22 2001,21:02

My personal opinion is that CatKnight is a flaming homosexual, and has a very tiny penis. As a result he sits inside all day on an internet bulletin board and posts messages while he strokes his tiny cock, hoping that his immense post count (the only immense thing he's got) will somehow increase the size of his needle dick.

Sadly, there's no quality in any of his posts...in fact, I feel dumber just for reading them. I love how the newer versions of UBB have that 'ignore' feature by which I can filter out unwanted crap posted by retards like CK.

On a completely unrelated note, is there any chance of a UBB upgrade, cr0bar?

...meanwhile, I'll just check back on this thread in a few days, and bide my time until CatKnight posts something incredibly intelligent sounding, like, "YEAH THEN I COULD USE THE IGNORE BUTTON ON YOU!", or something about how worthless I am for being a newbie and not having a post count like his. One of the two...

Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Jul. 22 2001,21:40

quote:
Originally posted by Rhydant:
CatKnight knows too much for his own good. shoot him now.

well while he's making he nuclear reactors i'll be making my orbital tactical strike sattelites to "nuke" his ass just for you rhydant

and when i've done that i'll go back to street-cleaning

------------------
Is it just me or does WWF look 10 times more entertaining when playing the benny hill music in the background.

Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Jul. 22 2001,21:44

quote:
Originally posted by TheTaxMan:
And by the way, don't get your information from the DoE. They manipulate the data because they want to build the site.

yes trust the papers and stuff instead of the scientists. just like GM food *cough* not a single scientific report to say its bad *cough*

do you think i sneaked my own cause in there subtley enuff?

------------------
Is it just me or does WWF look 10 times more entertaining when playing the benny hill music in the background.

Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Jul. 22 2001,21:50

quote:
Originally posted by TheTaxMan:
Well, what was the probability of risk reduced to when they sent the space shuttle up? It was below that government standard. Yet, one still exploded and killed eight people

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! if you're dumb enuff to want to sit on some 1000 tonnes of rocket fuel hitting 11,000 mps you tend to accept that things go wrong. i'd never go into space cos i know all about it and i sure as fuck don't like leaving my nice safe 100 miles of atmosphere for 5 inches of shuttle hull.

------------------
Is it just me or does WWF look 10 times more entertaining when playing the benny hill music in the background.

Posted by miNus on Jul. 22 2001,22:09

quote:
Originally posted by shifter:
My personal opinion is that CatKnight is a flaming homosexual, and has a very tiny penis.
...
Sadly, there's no quality in any of his posts...in fact, I feel dumber just for reading them.

I'm at a loss for words. Shifter (I feel I have to capitalize your name, you're that important), excellent post man, though I feel that your flaming style needs a little refinement . In order to successfully flame someone without them being able to flame you back, you might want to cut down on the personal attacks a bit. Other than that, you seem to feel the same exact way about CK as I do. All quantity, no quality. Flame on, young one, flame on

-miNus

edit: had to fix a typo that made my post clearly not understandable. Thanks for pointing that out Non

This message has been edited by miNus on July 23, 2001 at 08:25 PM

Posted by CatKnight on Jul. 22 2001,23:50

quote:
My personal opinion is that CatKnight is a flaming homosexual, and has a very tiny penis.

i'm sorry newbie but no one gives a shit about your personal opinion except for idiots like miNus who get a kick out of anyone flaming me in any manor.

quote:
As a result he sits inside all day on an internet bulletin board and posts messages while he strokes his tiny cock, hoping that his immense post count (the only immense thing he's got) will somehow increase the size of his needle dick.

ooh, that hurt. not.

quote:
Sadly, there's no quality in any of his posts...

riiight...try reading the conversation first before you hypocritically flame me off topic.

quote:
in fact, I feel dumber just for reading them.

i'm impressed. i didn't think it was possible for you to get any dumber then you already were.

as for your random comments about me being better then you because of my posts, well, it's true. i've been here a while, people know my personality. you are just some random idiot who jumped on the bandwagon and randomly flamed me. the only difference is that everyone else does it as a joke. you seem to think that you can make yourself look cool by picking on the guy that gets picked on by everyone else. hmm i wonder why...

This message has been edited by CatKnight on July 23, 2001 at 06:59 PM

Posted by TheTaxMan on Jul. 23 2001,00:33

I dunno, I like arguing w/ CK...

------------------
Delusions of Grandeur? I am Grand!

Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Jul. 23 2001,00:41

trying to talk with that guy is like trying to make ghandi eat a double helping at KFC

------------------
Is it just me or does WWF look 10 times more entertaining when playing the benny hill music in the background.

Posted by shifter on Jul. 23 2001,01:03

Haha

I saw a post like that coming a mile away. Couldn't expect much else from someone who writes everything here with a thumb up his ass, so whatever.

I love how seriously CatKnight takes all of this...one of my buddies was looking at his post and laughed so hard that he couldn't think of anything better... I especially liked

"Oohh that hurt. Not."

That's so fuckin fifth grade haha...I'm telling you guys...he's got his thumb up his ass!

CK: I did read your posts! The first fucking 15,000 in this thread alone are by you, trying to improve your own hit count. That's why you're a retard! I guess some retarded people think they're smart or something. (Now say something else really fifth grade, such as, "Yeah, like you!")

This message has been edited by shifter on July 23, 2001 at 08:05 PM

Posted by miNus on Jul. 23 2001,01:17

quote:
Originally posted by shifter:
I especially liked
"Oohh that hurt. Not."

Dammit Shifter, you got to it before I did.

And CK, in that "defense" you posted, you pretty much played into everything shifter said about you. I hope you're trying to make him right. Because if you are not trying to, it means you are dumber than I thought. Which is scary, I didn't think it was possible to have negative intelligence. And by the way, if you actually use punctuation and capitalization, it makes you look oh so much more civilized.

This has been a pubic service announcement made possible by the letters F, A, H, and Q.

-miNus

This message has been edited by miNus on July 23, 2001 at 08:23 PM

Posted by Non on Jul. 23 2001,01:22

quote:

Originally posted by miNus:
...you seem to feel the same exact way about CK as I do. All quantity, no quantity. Flame on...

Shifter where the hell are you coming from? You haven't posted one post of any quality. You have no flaming style, unless imature insults that are obviuosly based on your own insecurites about penis size are a style.

This message has been edited by Non on July 23, 2001 at 08:29 PM

Posted by miNus on Jul. 23 2001,01:24

You seem to have caught my typo. Excellent work detective.

Posted by Non on Jul. 23 2001,01:26

I wasn't trying to point out a typo. I just found it a little funny.

Posted by Sithiee on Jul. 23 2001,01:31

who cares who hits 2000? considering CK's shoudl be adjusted due to double posting (read: posting lots of shit that could go in one post in an attempt to make a lame joke and increase post count), and that i dont care, i think PG shoudl be first.

and shifter, youre a fucking beast, dont ever let a ck drag ya down

------------------

quote:
Originally posted by Dark Knight Bob:
does anyone not notcie that sithee isnt actually talking out of his ass like a lot of people here

Posted by miNus on Jul. 23 2001,01:37

And Sithiee pulls in the lead

Posted by damien_s_lucifer on Jul. 23 2001,01:56

I work for the DOE, I ain't in management, and I must say we DON'T have that much beaurocracy. At least not at the Lawrence Berkeley lab - maybe this will offer up a little more proof. Allow me to introduce The director of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, < Charles V. Shank >, inventor of the femtosecond laser.

Posted by Non on Jul. 23 2001,01:59

Oh yeah the femtosecond laser guy!

Posted by TheTaxMan on Jul. 23 2001,02:23

Shank, shank, shank...
Shank, shank, shank...
Shank your... oh hell.

------------------
Delusions of Grandeur? I am Grand!

Posted by PersonGuy on Jul. 23 2001,02:52

I don't think Cat-man or I can catch up to Sith-man before he hits 2000... but Pickel Therapy Lady just might have a chance if she can keep up her pace!

------------------
"Put the cheese on my bum." -Tom Green
-< PersonGuy >

Posted by Non on Jul. 23 2001,03:09

LOL^ but it's true :/

Posted by Vulu on Jul. 23 2001,03:15

I think CK will reach 2000 posts first. Only because he posts to his own posts at least 3 times before everyone else has even clicked the 'Post Reply' button. I'm not trying to flame you CK - but who really cares who hits 2K posts? I don't. Hooray for all you people who DO care (re: no one); you must have a shit-load of time on your hands if you need to inquire about this.

I do think this is mildly interesting topic (*not) - but yet again, another thread is tainted by the needless flaming and self-posting. OK, I understand you're trying to be funny by posting to yourself, oh wait, hasn't that been done a trillion times (estimate...)

*notice by skillfull use of Grade School jargon! I'm cool now!

EDIT: You people complain about stupid thread and how the forums are 'b0ring.' Well, WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS? "Duh....who do ya think is gonna reach 2000 posts duhhhh...I think it will be me! ha ha ha!" Oh god...

This message has been edited by Vulu on July 23, 2001 at 10:18 PM

Posted by CatKnight on Jul. 23 2001,03:29

ironic how when someone makes a joke about me being a dirty republican i laugh, but when i make a joke about being insane or about how people were bragging about how many posts they have to newbies i get flamed.

Posted by Spydir on Jul. 23 2001,03:54

it's probably because so few people like you here.

------------------
Net Syndrome - < http://www.netsyndrome.net/ >
Spydir Web - < http://www.netsyndrome.net/spydirweb/ >

Posted by shifter on Jul. 23 2001,03:55

Looks like the dumbfuck < finally fucked off >!

Posted by incubus on Jul. 23 2001,09:20

quote:
Originally posted by shifter:
Looks like the dumbfuck < finally fucked off >!

shifter, go shove your dick in a blender. CK rawks.

------------------
-- incubus
As I chase the leaves like the words I never find ...

Posted by Non on Jul. 23 2001,09:38

I thought CK was cool. I have been reading almost all of the threads and didn't notice ppl flaming him (not counting spydir cos i think he was joking) 'til shifter comes along and finds a way into some detnet faction of passive CK haters. Were you guys just letting this build up, waiting for some n00b with nothing to lose to spark it up?
I agree this thread was started in the lamest way possible, but is that an excuse to let some noob play "the big man" with his juvinelle insults?
The way the forums have been going lately most of this stuff is welcome just to get a rise outta ppl but come on...
</rant>

------------------
"Removed from their natural habitat, they can become highly aggressive. They bite, and their favoured method of attack is to hurl themselves at people's heads."
--< Non >

Posted by TheTaxMan on Jul. 23 2001,14:08

You people that take anything on these boards seriously (maybe with the exception of cr0 (maybe)) need to readjust the priorities in your life.

------------------
Delusions of Grandeur? I am Grand!

Posted by CatKnight on Jul. 23 2001,15:20

The problem is that this board used to be serious enough where people were giving each other advice and having interesting conversations. Now it is just polluted with idiots (shifter), ramblers (cowboyneal) and flamers (l33t, spyder, etc).

Posted by Rhydant on Jul. 23 2001,15:29

i agree with CK here, but ive got no where else to go. the IRC channel i go to is slowly dying and the TNL board isnt cool anymore. plus, im still waiting for kuru to post a nekkid pic of herself. one can hope, cant he?

------------------
I may be paranoid, but not an Android.

Posted by Non on Jul. 23 2001,16:16

maybe cr0bar should add some stuff to the forums like an entertainment section just for books and movies and music... etc...
or just change the red bg to those cool dancing hampsters, either way is good.

Posted by Spydir on Jul. 23 2001,16:23

Man, you people are a bunch of pussies. I'm not flaming anyone. It's all in good jest. That's how I actually talk with my friends. We crack on each other, and we all know it's jokes. I think TaxMan (and if it was somone else, put your name in there) said it best: get your shit straight if you take most this stuff seriously.

------------------
Net Syndrome - < http://www.netsyndrome.net/ >
Spydir Web - < http://www.netsyndrome.net/spydirweb/ >

Posted by t|nt|n on Jul. 23 2001,16:26

I think CK is really cool. One of the few people whose posts I actually look forward to reading

P.S. Shifter piss off

Posted by shifter on Jul. 23 2001,20:56

quote:
Originally posted by CatKnight:
Now it is just polluted with idiots (shifter), ramblers (cowboyneal) and flamers (l33t, spyder, etc).

Don't forget idiots who ramble and flame everyone...such as yourself. For example...read this thread from the top!

Posted by incubus on Jul. 23 2001,21:42

quote:
Originally posted by shifter:
Don't forget idiots who ramble and flame everyone...such as yourself. For example...read this thread from the top!

get a fucking life, shitter.

Posted by Sithiee on Jul. 23 2001,21:50

screw you, shifter rocks! shifter, dont take shit from anyone here, were all full of hot air. except cr0, and maybe WG.

------------------

quote:
Originally posted by Dark Knight Bob:
does anyone not notcie that sithee isnt actually talking out of his ass like a lot of people here

Posted by shifter on Jul. 24 2001,00:55

haha no worries, Sithie...incubus didn't even back himself up. He's so out of points that his only comebacks are something along the lines of, "FUX YUO!!1". In other words, I'm not concerned. In fact, I wouldn't even be concerned if he did have a valid point! He's still a retard, and even retards have them every now and again.

Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Jul. 24 2001,01:29

i think sithee can relate to shifter from when he was getting slated for being the guy for having the most posts WAAAY back. its cos its someone getting flamed whose name begins with the same letter as him

no i know none of that made anysense

------------------
Is it just me or does WWF look 10 times more entertaining when playing the benny hill music in the background.

Posted by miNus on Jul. 24 2001,01:29

Oh yeah? Well, !

Posted by Sithiee on Jul. 25 2001,00:51

hey now, incubus may not hate ck like everyone else, but hes still usually a cool guy. usually

------------------

quote:
Originally posted by Dark Knight Bob:
does anyone not notcie that sithee isnt actually talking out of his ass like a lot of people here