Ikonboard » Printable Version of Topic

Forum: The Classroom
Topic: ŭ
started by: Wolfguard

Posted by Wolfguard on Sep. 11 2001,14:51

I think that every man, woman and child in the us should send ŭ cash to George W. with just the words "to be used for the bounty"

George could then show the suitcases of cash and say "Fed-ex me the head of Bin Laden and ill Fed-ex you these suitcases of cash.

------------------
Fucknuggets flamed while you wait.< TeamWolfguard.com >
< Robot Conflict >

Posted by [liquid] meta on Sep. 11 2001,14:54

George the Hunter does not use diplomacy, George the Hunter just go SMASH!

Posted by CatKnight on Sep. 11 2001,16:33

haha

Posted by solid on Sep. 11 2001,21:01

Meh.. as I see it, WG is full of rage that is definately not helping this situation.

This message has been edited by solid on September 12, 2001 at 04:37 PM

Posted by spOon on Sep. 11 2001,21:41

Well they found a 'cell' (I dunno if it's a phone or a Arab group) but they (FBI) said it was connected to Bin Laden.

I think it was him. But still from the things that he has done before, I wouldn't mind to get his head on a platter and use his beard as garnish.

Posted by Dark Knight Bob on Sep. 11 2001,21:58

here u go wolfy this should help ease the pain

------------------
simultaneity is not absolute. So just because you think i'm wrong, from my frame of reference i'm right!

Posted by Rhydant on Sep. 12 2001,00:03

...i love that map.

yeah.... the money/head thing sounds good
in more ways that one
heh.... sorry.

------------------
I'm not living, I'm just killing time.

Posted by whiskey@throttle on Sep. 12 2001,00:09

Even if Bin Laden isn't behind this, he's still the one behind the foriegn embassy bombings and the WTC attack in 93. So...

Posted by StanVanDam on Sep. 12 2001,00:19

I think the first post was useless. Striking the enemy back, who has more to gain? US kills bin Laden, then the next guy who takes over will strike back, only when they do, they kill more than 1. Unless the US.....nevermind....this is all fuct up, we just have to wait to see what happens. Killing the enemy, enemy kills you, cycle continues.

Posted by solid on Sep. 12 2001,03:31

It's so true. Face it, we'll never find a final solution to this thing. It'll just nag us for the rest of our lives.

Posted by Dysorderia on Sep. 12 2001,05:29

And how exactly do you know that Bin Laden is to blame Wolfguard?

------------------
Windows 95 -n- (win-doze): a 32 bit Extension to a 16 bit Graphical Shell of
an 8 bit Operating System originally coded for a 4 bit Processor by a 2 bit
company that can't stand one bit of competition!!

Posted by Vigilante on Sep. 12 2001,05:34

Doesn't matter, Dys. Even if he wasn't directly responsible for this particular atrocity, his head should still be served up on a platter. Same for all his cohorts.

If another party is determined to be responsible for this or any attack, no effort should be spared any longer in their extermination.

Posted by DeadAnztac on Sep. 12 2001,09:04

ŭx, what, 500,000,000 people? That's Ū.5 Billion. That's Ū.5 billion that the Taliban should NEVER have. EVER.

------------------
~Anztac [ I'm just this guy, you know? ]

Posted by Wolfguard on Sep. 12 2001,10:07

quote:
Originally posted by solid:
It's so true. Face it, we'll never find a final solution to this thing.

Thats just it. There is a final solution to this thing but no one has the balls to do it. You release the military like the big dog that it is and you hunt down every known terrorist and kill it. You hunt down every suspected terrorist and bring it to trial. Treat every terrorist attack like and act of war and respond in kind.

They have a word they like to toss around. I think it may be time to dig up and use a christan word that has not been used in a long time.

Crusade.

------------------
Fucknuggets flamed while you wait.< TeamWolfguard.com >
< Robot Conflict >

Posted by demonk on Sep. 12 2001,14:22

Have you ever seen the movie The Seige? Releasing the military on the terrorists won't happen in some far off Middle Eastern country, but right here at home. We would practicly have to become a police state to catch every terrorist.

And just bombing the hell out of the countries that originate these evil bastards will only a) hurt more inocents, thus making them take up arms and hatred against us and b) turn the dead/captured terrorits into myrters(sp?).

There is not simple solution. If you think there is, you just thinking with your rage. I'm angry as hell about all this too and have a very powerful desire to do some serious beat downs. But try to think about the situation afterwards. We might end up making a person or group of persons more angry and vengeful than the current terrorits. Next time, it might be a plane loaded with a nuke hitting builinds in NY, LA, DC, Seattle, etc. Do we really want to end one evil by creating an evil ten times worst?

Let's find who's responsible, and get them, and only them. There was a great quote in The Seige: The army is a broadsword.
Bombings and full out war will not be able to distinquise between inocents and terrorits. That is the only reason I don't want war. If the entire country or the government had done this, then sure, bomb the hell out of the entire country. But this was done by a small group of people that do not represent the culture/religion/people as a whole. So don't punish the people as a whole.

------------------
10 PRINT "HOME"
20 PRINT "SWEET"
30 GOTO 10

Posted by Wolfguard on Sep. 12 2001,14:53

Rage? Im not speaking from rage. Im speaking the same words that i have for years. When a terrorist strikes you take him out and anyone that helped him. Be it a single person, a town, or an entire country. You make an example of them so the rest of the nuggets know what will happen when they try it.

If the people that spawned these animals wont deal with them then we have to.

Yes, all of Islam and the middle east are not behind these animals. They have turned a blind eye to them for way to long. they have the inteligence to know where they are. they have the right to make these nuggets stop. Do they? Have they ever? Do the terroists think about the fact that they are taking inocent lives? Have they ever? Maybe when they know, for a fact, that when they kill our innocents we will not worry much about theirs. Once the rest of the world know that we are going to pull the sword from its scabbard they will start to take care of their own trash.

Yes, the millitary is a Broadsword. on the other hand the movie you all quote is just that, a movie, and it has no real basis in reality. They would not deploy a division to a single city when they have better assets to use.

You know what diplomacy is? its saying nice doggie till you find a big stick. Im thinking we have had enough of saying nice doggie and getting bitten. time to pick up a tree trunk.

If you think about it, the way i started this thread is a lot cleaner than the way i really want to do things.

------------------
Fucknuggets flamed while you wait.< TeamWolfguard.com >
< Robot Conflict >

Posted by TheTaxMan on Sep. 12 2001,15:07

One of the former Secrataries said we "should get on the horn with Afghanistan and tell them to hand over Bin Laden in the next 48 hours or else." Hell yes to that.

I don't even have five dollars *cry*

"I do not suspect the slightest drop of Milk of Human Kindness flowing in his veins."
-Secratary of State Powell on Sadam Hussien's silence just now
To bad life isn't like UT...

This message has been edited by TheTaxMan on September 13, 2001 at 10:09 AM

Posted by solid on Sep. 12 2001,18:14

Well of course the middle eastern countries don't stop the terrorists (anti-american ones anyways). I say that because I think, that obviously, they don't mind the U.S. being attacked.

Posted by demonk on Sep. 12 2001,18:35

You need to make the distinction between the people, and the people in power. In Afghanastan(sp?) for example, the leader(s) in that country are extreme religious fundamentalists. They are not a government "of the people". It is this(these) person(s) who refused to turn over guy when we asked for him a long time ago. Not the people. I say, bomb the hell out of the people giving them aid(i.e., THE LEADERS) and the terrorists. Don't bomb the people who are living under their iron thumbs, unable to prevent the horrible acts that their leaders are doing. All you'll do is show them that the terrorists were right, and that we are evil and we kill inocent people.

I say again:

BOMB THE PEOPLE RESONSIBLE AND PEOPLE HELPING THEM, NOT THE INOCENTS WHO HAVE NO POWER TO PREVENT THESE EVIL ACTS.

That is my only concern. Once we know who did it, unlease the full furry of the US people on them.

Thank you.

------------------
10 PRINT "HOME"
20 PRINT "SWEET"
30 GOTO 10