|
Post Number: 1
|
|
Post Number: 2
|
|
Post Number: 3
|
askheaves
Ack!!!
Group: Members
Posts: 1955
Joined: Sep. 2000
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 20 2000,14:34 |
|
|
I want to learn Smalltalk. It looks supersexy I also want to learn C# as well. I have the beta, I'm just too lazy.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 4
|
whtdrgn_2
FNG
Group: Members
Posts: 155
Joined: Dec. 2000
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 20 2000,15:21 |
|
|
Come on now there is no better language then assembler, and it is different for every processor so you can always learn more. Remember that alot of the 4GL languages have there drawbacks. Like very little controll. I prefer C or C++, solely for the control perspective. I have on ocasion done java, and Progress; however, C has never failed me. Microsoft's c# is just another borg-like move for Mr Gates. I think he is hurt because no one wants to code VB anymore.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 5
|
askheaves
Ack!!!
Group: Members
Posts: 1955
Joined: Sep. 2000
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 20 2000,15:44 |
|
|
NOONE WANTS TO CODE VB??? Dear lord. There's something like 4 million (or was it 40 million? doubtfull...) VB programmers in america, as opposed to about 400,000 (or was it 40,000) C++ programmers. In any permutation of those distorted figures above, VB is not going to die soon. I even program in VB when I want to create a quick test app for my COM objects. It's point and click, fill-in-the-blank programming. Easy money when you don't care.I want to get into C# because it's much like C++, Object-Oriented, and basically is a ground-up rip off of Java. Plus, you get one supersexy IDE for all of the languages, and you can comingle the languages with the same application. I agree with somebody's post in another place... we need a supergeek forum. Probably come in handy when we don't want to bore the yokels.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 6
|
|
Post Number: 7
|
|
Post Number: 8
|
|
Post Number: 9
|
DuSTman
70% water in a flexible container.
Group: Members
Posts: 797
Joined: May 2000
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 21 2000,07:03 |
|
|
Yeah, well lisp isn't really very hard to get the hang of. I've got the hang after a couple of hours, but the brackets are just insane. An example : One question asked me to output a list containing the words (left right etc, however many times depending on the integer passed to it. here is the code of my answer:(define march (lambda (steps) (cond ((= steps 1) (list 'left)) ((even? steps) (append (march (- steps 1)) '(right))) (else (append (march (- steps 1)) '(left))) ) ) ) No! Stop the bracketing stupidity! That's only a really simple function but it just looks stupid! Yeah, university taught me java last year and i 0wn at it, seems a really nice language, and i code a bit in it, but i'm transitioning to c++ for more platform-specific action. Back in the day i did a bit of assembly for atari ST. Great language for curiosity, and making things go as fast as possible, but the rate at which you get stuff done in assembler is just abysmal..
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 10
|
|
|
|