Mac should have been trying to inform people the same way that AMD is now trying to inform people. MEGAHERTZ IS NOT THE DECIDING FACTOR OF A PROCESSOR'S POWER! Most people are ignorant about computers. So if they see an Intel PIV 1.7 Gigahertz for 赨 and an AMD Tbird 1.4 Gigahertz for 贝, they are going to think that the PIV is faster. Where, in reality, the Tbird kicks it's ass all over the place.This is the reason why AMD is now doing the PR system with their new Athlon XP's. They label them as to what their PIV equivalent is (very conservatively, though). So an Athlon XP 1700+ is really like 1.5 Gigahertz (or something... I'm not sure on the actual speed of the chip).
Oops - back to the Mac.
I'm not a very big fan of them, but they are powerful graphics machines. Their processors do more work per cycle than most PC's, so they have a low MHZ rating, but they can crunch numbers like nobody's business. And if you think is expensive for a Mac, HAH!
Power Mac G4 - ū,499.00
Dual 800MHz PowerPC G4
256K L2 & 2MB L3 per processor
256MB SDRAM memory
80GB Ultra ATA drive
SuperDrive
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX w/TwinView
Gigabit Ethernet
56K internal modem
Imagine two of those Apple 22" LCD displays on the TwinView card.
Another thing about Macs is, when have you ever seen cases that beautiful (I'm talking about the newer Macs - G4, cube)?
Ah! One more thing. Compare apples to apples. If you're talking an HP system (a cheap system - some cheesy components), you should really be comparing to an iMac or something.
This message has been edited by miNus on October 15, 2001 at 06:56 AM