|
Post Number: 1
|
|
Post Number: 2
|
askheaves
Ack!!!
Group: Members
Posts: 1955
Joined: Sep. 2000
|
|
Posted on: Sep. 22 2001,07:46 |
|
|
Not to start the debate, but MSSQL server running behind a .NET framework really owns. Takes about 2 lines of code to pull a major dataset from it, that is based on XML, interchangeable between platforms, and is disconnected from any datasource. I mean that literally. If you think you have power now, you've seen nothing until you've seen .NET.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 3
|
|
Post Number: 4
|
|
Post Number: 5
|
damien_s_lucifer
Emperor of Detnet
Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: Jan. 1970
|
|
Posted on: Sep. 22 2001,22:59 |
|
|
if .NET delivers on its promise, it should be damn cool. Especially if I have a choice of vendors, anywhere from open-source to genuine MS software. My computing setups are almost always hybrids - at work, all my users run Win2K as there desktop OS. Almost all my servers run Linux, except for a couple WinNT machines - a PDC, a BDC, and a WINS server. This has shown itself to be a throughly *sweet* setup time and time again.Domain Controllers, whether WinNT or Samba, are machines that admins need to toy with a lot no matter how stable they are. You still need to be able to add and modify user accounts, reset passwords, check the logs, etc. You can do this in Linux, but it's a LOT easier in Windows - which means I can delegate a lot of routine admin-type stuff to the two guys in my department who are pretty good with PCs but don't know Unix and don't have the time to learn it. At the same time, Web servers, backup systems, and dedicated file servers should be black boxes that do their thing without requiring any user intervention. This is what Linux is really good at. So those systems run Linux. Thank God for Samba. The point is, I don't care WHO designs what. I use what I think is the best software for the task, and therefore I need software from one vendor to be interoperable with software from a different vendor. That's why I love Perl - well-written Perl code will execute without requiring any modifications whether you're running Windows, Unix, or Mac OS. That's what I'm hoping open-source .NET will do, too.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 6
|
|
Post Number: 7
|
|
Post Number: 8
|
MattimeoZ80
Purveyor of Untimely Wisdom
Group: Members
Posts: 397
Joined: Nov. 2000
|
|
Posted on: Sep. 23 2001,19:36 |
|
|
i agree, but for most things php works wonderfully. it has a great set of built in mysql functions as well, that work fine for non-crunching functions, such as data retrieval and updating on a per-run basis (forums and such).
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 9
|
|
Post Number: 10
|
MattimeoZ80
Purveyor of Untimely Wisdom
Group: Members
Posts: 397
Joined: Nov. 2000
|
|
Posted on: Sep. 23 2001,21:06 |
|
|
it is incredibly easy to install php and mysql (with apache) on a unix based machine. php is fairly easy to install on winblows, but i've never tried it with IIS, only with the win32 binary of apache for development purposes. i've heard that it's not that hard however, and the readme takes you through all the steps.
|
|
|
|
|
|