Best bet is not to cleanse the current, but prepare for the future. Actually eliminating the stupid people from America today is virtually impossible. You're better off declaring a national state of emergency (have several government agencies site severely limited resources, combined with a sophisticated propoganda engine to convince the public) and attemp to instigate a limit on breeding. In secret, breed your own homo superior a la' Gattica (sp?) (using trial and error to generate the best way to genetically sequence a superior human). Ultimately you can slowly but surely integrate your homo superior into the population (now of course genetics isn't enough. You'll have to combine this with a living environment of Samurai-level mind control whereby you get these people insanely bent on perfection and honor yadda yadda -- the ability to breed loyalty is not to be taken lightly). Eventually, darwinism will force the unwanted population to dwindle and eventually die.
Granted this won't benefit you any, since it will take several (best guestimation -- 5?) generations to complete, but ultimately is probably has the best chance of success for the continuing growth and betterment of human society.
of course if you're just trying to kill all the stupid people you'll have to do it nazi style. A massive propaganda engine designed to get the general public to despise the enemy. Target groups one at a time, using control of the press to make them look like terrorists or something (terrorism is probably easier since it would be easy enough, with control of the FBI, to have a false suicide bombing and pin it on a certain group of people. Repeat as neccessary).
Oh and by the way, history hasn't proven that his control won't last for a long time. Romans instigated a severe classist society (granted they didn't quite reach the levels of genocide, but they did maintain an empire of slavery) that lasted a thousand years (or damn near). And history proves that only Hitler's insanity and incredible military incompetance ultimately led to his defeat. His governmental style had nothing whatsoever to do with his empire ultimately being destroyed (what was slightly more relevant was the location of his nuclear research facilities, destroyed by British dambusters, invading Russia too early, not maximizing the oil production of the countries he DID control, failing to decimate British forces as they retreated from France, etc. etc.)
------------------
There may be blood on the tracks, but the trains are on time.
This message has been edited by diusFrenzy on January 17, 2001 at 08:04 PM