|
Post Number: 1
|
CatKnight
Jedi Republican
Group: Members
Posts: 3807
Joined: Dec. 2000
|
|
Posted on: Nov. 08 2001,00:49 |
|
|
The red cross recieved around 900 million in donations for aide to the victims of 9/11. however, they have decided that only about 20\% of the money will go towards the victims. the rest will be used for programs the red cross wants to fund. It's classical liberal money wasting. If there is a problem, just throw money at it. Doesn't matter who's money it is (taxpayers, donations etc). Does anyone else see how wrong this is?
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 2
|
kornalldaway
1337 like alan turing
Group: Members
Posts: 297
Joined: Jan. 2001
|
|
Posted on: Nov. 08 2001,00:57 |
|
|
i do and i absolutely agree with CK on this one the money were donated for a perticular purpose, but never got to the people they were really intended for it's a shame
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 3
|
|
Post Number: 4
|
|
Post Number: 5
|
afropik
DetVet
Group: Members
Posts: 155
Joined: Jul. 2001
|
|
Posted on: Nov. 08 2001,02:20 |
|
|
No, but it is kinda fucked up that the Red Cross never really said anything about not all procedes going to WTC funds. I guess when people are throwing gobs of money at you, you keep quiet.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 6
|
veistran
We don't listen to people that don't like us.
Group: Members
Posts: 967
Joined: May 2000
|
|
Posted on: Nov. 08 2001,02:39 |
|
|
I dunno, they're gonna end up shooting the whole charity world in the foot in the long run if you ask me, people are gonne be afraid to donate money because of this.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 7
|
|
Post Number: 8
|
CatKnight
Jedi Republican
Group: Members
Posts: 3807
Joined: Dec. 2000
|
|
Posted on: Nov. 08 2001,03:10 |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by sHuoReNviOLiN: Eh...could they really have used the whole 逤 mil though? It's likely the medical expenses just didn't go anywhere near using up the money...and as for helping the victims financially, that isn't really the Red Cross's purpose...
actually, people donated to the red cross under the pretense that it would go towards relieving victims and medical supplies, etc, not for new research projects and completely unrelated topics. if all of the money was given to the victims, which it was supposed to, then every family who lost a father or mother would recieve somewhere around โ,000, enough to compensate the loss of a full time employee for a year. and solid-the issue isn't what good they could be doing with the money, which is in dispute by itself. the point is that the red cross basically said "everyone in america, give us money, for the sake of the 9/11 victims", then went back and said "hey, we get all this money, we don't have to give ALL of it to the victims do we? i mean, we could give ourselves pay raises instead!"
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 9
|
|
Post Number: 10
|
|
|
|